Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/31/2002 3:49:59 PM PDT by davidosborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: /\XABN584; 10mm; 3D-JOY; 75thOVI; 5Madman; <1/1,000,000th%; 11B3; 1Peter2:16; ...
Passing it on..
2 posted on 07/31/2002 3:51:24 PM PDT by davidosborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davidosborne
The woman's case was that her children were being abused by the natural father, but the truth was that the ACLU, the National Lawyers' Guild and the reast of the trial lawyer establishment needed a test case and they've had it in for Justice Moore for years because he fought them many times and won.
3 posted on 07/31/2002 3:53:25 PM PDT by Commander8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davidosborne
What a refreshingly clear and concise judgment. Hats off to the best man in Alabama!
4 posted on 07/31/2002 4:03:16 PM PDT by Sangamon Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davidosborne
You know what the best part of that judgment is? The UNANIMOUS part!
7 posted on 07/31/2002 4:07:02 PM PDT by Sangamon Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Alabama Court decision [PDF File Link...]
9 posted on 07/31/2002 4:15:00 PM PDT by davidosborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davidosborne
Judge Morre should have been with me today. I'm not judging, mind you, just recounting an observation. I was picking up a few thing at the Ft. Belvoir Commissary this morning when something just struck me as odd. Two females. One, an army major in uniform, and the other in civilian clothes. My mind quickly discounted the possibility of sisters, two people from the same office, or just ordinary room mates. I thought at the time, if that's not a domestic partner thing going on, I'll eat my hat. As Seinfeld would say, "Not that there is anything wrong with that."

It should go without saying that, of course, I could have been wrong.

10 posted on 07/31/2002 4:17:46 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davidosborne
Man, "politically correct" this guy ain't!
12 posted on 07/31/2002 4:30:31 PM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davidosborne
Ah, to have a Supreme Court filled with such realism, clear-thinking, and courage to defy politically correct lies.

Liberals would leave the country in droves, and we'd throw rotten vegetables at them as they left. Unless, of course, they happened to be peta members, in which case we'd throw cheeseburgers at them.
13 posted on 07/31/2002 4:54:53 PM PDT by watchin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davidosborne
amen amen amen.
60 posted on 07/31/2002 6:58:48 PM PDT by goodieD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davidosborne; EdReform
* PERVERSION PING *

65 posted on 07/31/2002 7:36:26 PM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davidosborne
WoW!

They (the court) should expect a large, loud number of people standing outside the courthouse screaming at the top of their voices, and calling them bigots and homophobes very soon.

They will be mostly dressed in pink chiffon.
66 posted on 07/31/2002 7:40:00 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davidosborne
Why the repost of a six month old article. Did something change the decision? Was it overturned or something?
73 posted on 08/01/2002 3:48:27 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *SASU; JMJ333; Tourist Guy; EODGUY; abandon; Khepera; Dakmar; RichInOC; RebelDawg; Fiddlstix; ...
Woo Hoo!
77 posted on 08/01/2002 5:28:06 AM PDT by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davidosborne; Khepera
but the courts of this State have consistently held that exposing a child to such behavior has a destructive and seriously detrimental effect on the children.

Shocked! I am absolutely shocked that a judge would use case precedent to make a determination on whether something is legal or not. Doesn't he know that the American judicial system is based on judges re-interpreting laws as cases come before their benches and not on any effort to determine what the law's authors meant or how courts have interpreted those laws previously? In my opinion .... What? ... Case precedent is a cornerstone of US jurisprudence?

Nevermind!

Shalom.

86 posted on 08/01/2002 6:58:11 AM PDT by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davidosborne
Wow, the judge let fly. God bless him, bump for Alabama.
203 posted on 08/01/2002 1:49:29 PM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson