Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rachel's Tomb to be "annexed" within Jerusalem security ring
Israel Insider ^ | 9/12/2002 | Israel Insider

Posted on 09/12/2002 10:08:44 AM PDT by Israel Insider

The security cabinet approved on Wednesday Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's proposal to incorporate Rachel's Tomb, located outside of Bethlehem, within a security ring being built around Jerusalem. Access to the holy site was guaranteed by Israeli-Palestinian agreements but the violence of the past two years has made it difficult for worshippers to visit. Critics said the cabinet decision "annexed" the territory into Jerusalem city limits.

The cabinet-approved plan calls for a new access road to the tomb to be built by the IDF and the Jerusalem Municipality. The army's roadblock and crossing point from Bethlehem into Jerusalem would be moved 200 meters to the south. The cabinet decision was reached as part of the deliberations regarding the construction of a defensive barrier around Jerusalem to prevent infiltration of Palestinian terrorists into the city.

Click here for full article


TOPICS: Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: annex; israel; jerusalem; rachelstomb; religionofpieces; unesco

1 posted on 09/12/2002 10:08:45 AM PDT by Israel Insider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Israel Insider
The next step should be to "annex the West Bank and the Gaza Strip...
2 posted on 09/12/2002 10:11:14 AM PDT by cardinal4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Israel Insider
Is this the only tomb to a Hebrew matriarch in dispute? I seem to remember, maybe last year, that there was conflict over a tomb of an important Hebrew woman---the Arabs painted the roof blue, or something. Is this Rachel's tomb, or does Sarah also have one?
3 posted on 09/12/2002 10:11:38 AM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Israel Insider
Well Rachael's tomb should be in Israel.She was a Jewess not a Palestinian.Now if we can just get them to re-annex the Temple Mount.BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!
4 posted on 09/12/2002 10:12:34 AM PDT by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
Think the tomb you are referring to was Joseph's tomb which Palestinian mobs tried to destroy.
5 posted on 09/12/2002 10:13:48 AM PDT by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lexington minuteman 1775
Thanks. Was I right that they tried to paint it blue? Blue is the color to ward off the "Evil Eye" of the jin. That's why the women of Afghanistan wore blue burquas. Men aren't as evil as women, so they didn't have to wear blue.
6 posted on 09/12/2002 10:18:05 AM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Israel Insider
From the same article: Wednesday's cabinet decision came in sharp contrast with the fate of Joseph's Tomb in Nablus, which was destroyed by the Palestinians and transformed into a mosque following the IDF's relinquishing of control there.

Methinks the decision by the Israeli government to protect this ancient site from the Palestinian Taliban is a good one.

(I use "Palestinian Taliban" very deliberately to remind you that the Afghanistan Taliban did to those huge, ancient stone Buddhist statues back in March, 2001.) http://www.newslookmag.com/fullcoverage/taliban_destruction.htm

7 posted on 09/12/2002 10:19:45 AM PDT by Ipberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
It was blue, but the Islamonazis finished trashing it they painted the dome green.

Before

After

Desecration of Joseph's Tomb

8 posted on 09/12/2002 10:35:51 AM PDT by Alouette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Israel Insider
They should annex the whole West Bank.
9 posted on 09/12/2002 10:54:52 AM PDT by absinthe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
Don't recall the "Blue color" incident.But to the Jews. The blue signifies the Torah.I think more than painting the Israelites were concerned bout them desecrating a holy sight.
The bones of Joseph had been brought back from Egypt on the Exodus so I am sure they are very revered.
10 posted on 09/12/2002 10:55:20 AM PDT by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
More examples of tolerance from The Religion of Peace.
11 posted on 09/12/2002 11:48:19 AM PDT by Corporate Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
animals
12 posted on 09/12/2002 11:53:49 AM PDT by johnb838
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Corporate Law
Should we list more examples of religious tolerance?

My favorite example is their destruction of the 60 ft. stone statues of Buddha carved into the Afghan mountainside, saying they were nothing more than rocks.

But, of COURSE we should give them control of every Christian and Jewish Holy Site in the region. THEY can be trusted to be good stewards of the lands, heritages, treasures, interests, and religious beliefs that are concerned.

13 posted on 09/12/2002 12:05:11 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lexington minuteman 1775
It is anachronistic to call Rachel a Jewess--there were no Jews until later. She wasn't a descendant of Abraham, but rather the great-granddaughter of Abraham's brother (see Genesis 11.26-32, 24.15, 28.5, 29.16). Rachel was the mother of Joseph and Benjamin; the Jews seem to be mainly descended from the tribe of Judah (but to have absorbed remnants of the other tribes--St. Paul, of the tribe of Benjamin, sometimes includes himself in "the Jews"). Judah was one of the sons of Rachel's sister Leah.
14 posted on 09/12/2002 2:00:51 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LostTribe
It is anachronistic to call Rachel a Jewess--there were no Jews until later.

Bump to Lost Tribe.

15 posted on 09/12/2002 7:46:44 PM PDT by PaulKersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: PaulKersey
It is anachronistic to call Rachel a Jewess--there were no Jews until later.

>Bump to Lost Tribe.

Thanks.  It's good to see there are others who have the basics straight.

16 posted on 09/13/2002 8:31:12 AM PDT by LostTribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson