Skip to comments.
Rush’s Defenders Ignore His Venom by Joe Conason (Mega Barf Alert)
The New York Observer ^
| 12/2/2002
| Joe Conason
Posted on 11/28/2002 2:11:06 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: Paleo Conservative
Hard times for the clinton gang when they have to claim NBC is "conservative". Does this lapdog expect anyone except the most deluded loony leftie to believe this crap? The best part is has-been (never-was?) conason's jealousy of Rush.
To: Freedom4US
It's amazing how loud the liberals WHINE when they don't control ALL media and there is a single outlet for those who don't agree with them. Get over it! you don't own all of us!
To: Paleo Conservative
Joe Conason? I don't even have to look at this to know it reads like used toilet paper.
To: Psycho_Bunny
Does anyone know why Rush hasn't updated his web site.....it's still yesteday's stuff.
To: Paleo Conservative
People woke up to what a drag a big socialist government is. Rush and right wing radio simply benefit from having a product that is needed and thus in demand.
Democrats are till trying to figure out how to deceive voters or bribe them into voting for the party that pulls the US leftward. Thankfully, they ain't doing a great job anymore.
Truth and freedom is the "vast right wing conspiracy."
25
posted on
11/28/2002 7:02:45 PM PST
by
alrea
To: Paleo Conservative
Readers of online media criticism at Spinsanity.com, FAIR.org and DailyHowler.com could learn, however, that Mr. Limbaugh has literally demonized Mr. Daschle for years. "How many different versions of Satan, the devil, have you seen in your life?" he asked his listeners in July 2001. "Is Tom Daschle simply another way to portray a devil?" So Clintonesque. Bring in four totally obscure websites as your 'scientific' sources.
What's got Conasson's brief's all twisted in a wad is the fact that Rush told the truth that the liberal media shoulda but didn't mention. Rush NAILED Dashole. Besides, I am a 15 hour a week listener. I don't remember Rush spending that much time on Dashole.
Once you peg a guy, is there really any reason to belabor the point?
"Is Tom Daschle simply another way to portray a devil?" says Rush.
YES.
Dashole has got a soft voice and he wants more than anything to make you THINK he really, really cares. But, he has proved himself to be a hypocrite par excellence. He's kinda like that old Elvis song, "You walk like an angel, You're the devil in disguise."
26
posted on
11/28/2002 7:12:46 PM PST
by
Slyfox
To: Slyfox
bump
To: Paleo Conservative
Joe Conason is one of the most venomous of the Clinton Koolaid drinking journalists.Don't insult journalism like that. Conason is the guy who wrote the book Hunting of the President where he "proved" Hitlery's right-wing conspiracy. He's a hit man for the Left, it's a shame any magazine gives him page space.
To: Paleo Conservative
hmmm... i, for one, believe that (myth) the lamestream media are not only liberal, but super-liberal... that they support their (admitted by polls) liberal leanings by writing and editing pieces (knowingly or unknowingly) that foist those beliefs on their readers. sorry, joe... you may not understand reality, but most of us now do. i find it most delicious that you and d'asshole and algore and the rest of the lamestreamers now find it necessary to even give lipservice to statements that you idiots are leftists. not too long ago, you found it unnecessary to even acknowledge those of us who voiced that as reality. sorry to crash unexpectedly into your world, but it appears that you are finally going to have to deal with it... denial, after all, is the first step... but you now are on your way... keep walking...
29
posted on
11/28/2002 10:23:33 PM PST
by
AFPhys
To: Paleo Conservative
..."Because of what Mr. Limbaugh has actually said about Mr. Daschleand because a serious physical threat has already occurred at least once as a direct result of irresponsible broadcasts by Mr. Limbaugh and others."...
Lemmie get this sh*t straight, is this idiot implying that El Rushbo was DIRECTLY responsible for Daschles being the recipiant of that dangerous anthrax letter???
This is ridiculous and even more outrageous than Daschles previous rantings!
30
posted on
11/29/2002 12:31:01 AM PST
by
Terridan
To: Paleo Conservative
Because of what Mr. Limbaugh has actually said about Mr. Daschleand because a serious physical threat has already occurred at least once as a direct result of irresponsible broadcasts by Mr. Limbaugh and others."...Call out the boys in the white coats this guys lost his fricken marbles
Comment #32 Removed by Moderator
Comment #33 Removed by Moderator
To: Paleo Conservative
Hank Buchanan, a brother of Pat and Bay, decided to visit Mr. Shearers Washington home. He broke into the garage, slashed the tires of two cars and threatened three other people with a handgun before fleeing. Hank Buchanan was apprehended and sent to a mental institution. The Buchanan Family should sue Mr. Conason for Slander. How on earth could he make up this garbage?
Comment #35 Removed by Moderator
To: Paleo Conservative
thanks for including the author's name in the title so I can just flush this down the toilet where it and he belongs
To: Behind Liberal Lines
They behaved as if Mr. Limbaugh is a paragon of respectability whose listeners would never, ever threaten anyone...not exactly. Didn't the unabomber have Rush's book in his cabin?
37
posted on
11/29/2002 4:54:12 AM PST
by
RWG
To: RWG
They behaved as if Mr. Limbaugh is a paragon of respectability whose listeners would never, ever threaten anyone...not exactly. Didn't the unabomber have Rush's book in his cabin? Given the unabomber was a liberal environmentalist, probably not.
As I recall, the unabomber's manifesto sounded quite a bit like Gore's "An Earth in the Balance."
To: Paleo Conservative
The legend of the liberal media is finally dead. When the mightiest voices of the mainstream gang up on Tom Daschle with Rush Limbaugh, who can believe in that old myth in the liberal media any more?
With slight modification, Joe may be onto something. With all their unpatriotic obstruction foolishness in time of war, Baghdad Bonior and ilk etc., the tide may have shifted. Perhaps the liberal media is in decline.
To: smarticus
Actually, I figure the reason the networks supported NAFTA is because thier boy Clinton supported it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson