Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pakistan not in favour of Iraq regime change
Dawn News ^ | 02/26/03 | Livis Dad

Posted on 02/25/2003 10:32:01 PM PST by livis_dad

KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 25: President Pervez Musharraf said on Tuesday that Pakistan was not in favour of regime change "anywhere", because this would destabilize the entire region.

"I would not like to get involved in conjectures," he said when a Saudi journalist wanted to know whether Pakistan was afraid of any consequences for itself if there was a regime change in Iraq.

Addressing a crowded press conference, the president said he did not think there would be regime change in other states also.

Asked whether Pakistan as a member of the current Security Council would support the second resolution on the Iraqi situation, the president said his government was for peace, and what mattered was that "both sides" should make efforts to avoid war. All weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) must be eliminated, and Iraq must fully comply with Security Council Resolution 1441.The Blix report was due next month, and it was important to see if there was any violation of Resolution 1441.

Asked about the consequences of an American attack on Iraq, the president said it would be "premature for me to comment, but let us give peace a chance. We must go by the ground realities," and wait for the UN inspectors' report to see if there was any violation of the Resolution 1441.

The president said the people of Iraq should not in any case be made to suffer more. "They have already suffered enough, and they should not be the centre of gravity." The issue was the WMDs and Iraq's compliance of the relevant UN resolution.

To a question about Pyongyang's nuclear programme, the president said he was more concerned with the aspersions being cast on his country.

Pakistan, he said, "has not and will not help North Korea (in its nuclear programme). North Korea is doing it on its own. Pakistan will not contribute to proliferation, because we are not in the proliferation business."


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Free Republic; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1441; iraq; pakistan; unitednation; usa; war

1 posted on 02/25/2003 10:32:01 PM PST by livis_dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: livis_dad
It sounds like they go in the 'no' column. Too bad.
2 posted on 02/25/2003 10:34:33 PM PST by paul51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aaron0617
It sounds like they go in the 'no' column. Too bad.

But we need Pakistan. We're not going to get the 9 votes without them. Chile and Cameroon are still deciding.

3 posted on 02/25/2003 10:44:04 PM PST by Aaron0617
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: livis_dad
President Pervez Musharraf said on Tuesday that Pakistan was not in favour of regime change "anywhere", because this would destabilize the entire region.

And that's opposed to the stablizing force of their hostilities, to include nuclear sabre rattling, with India..
5 posted on 02/25/2003 10:51:07 PM PST by stylin19a (it's cold because it's too hot...- Global Warming-ists explanation for cold wave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: livis_dad
"President Pervez Musharraf said on Tuesday that Pakistan was not in favour of regime change "anywhere", because this would destabilize the entire region."

Whoa! Does this legitimate Israel?

7 posted on 02/25/2003 11:01:05 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (Peace is Good, Freedom is Better!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NolanVoid
We should keep the money and let them vote no. I'm waiting to see what Mexico does. Pay back time for all of them will come soon enough.
8 posted on 02/25/2003 11:07:14 PM PST by paul51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NolanVoid
I'm sure if the bags of $$$ are large enough, we can win them as an 'ally'...

They learned the Turk's strategy well.

9 posted on 02/25/2003 11:21:55 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: livis_dad
It is way past time to take over/destroy Pak's nukes, and leave.Thre is no percentage for the US in Pakistan.
10 posted on 02/26/2003 6:30:33 AM PST by madrastex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
Of course! If the the administration is dumb enough to wage a futile crusde to create "a democratic Iraq" it is dumb enough to pay bribes till the cows come home.
11 posted on 02/26/2003 6:38:17 AM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NolanVoid
I'm sure if the bags of $$$ are large enough, we can win them as an 'ally'...

Isn't that the truth? All this talk about "diplomacy" is hooey. It's blackmail and extortion. To think we have to go begging to countries like Cameroon and Pakistan in order to provide for our and the world's security interests. It's pathetic. The UN is a travesty and the sooner we get out of it the better.

If nothing else comes out of this, it should be obvious to all that the UN is just an empty debating society and a vehicle for blackmail and extortion. There is nothing honorable about it.

12 posted on 02/26/2003 6:42:13 AM PST by Wphile (I'M SO SICK OF THE IRAQ DEBATE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: paul51
I agree, lets see the true colors of these so called 'friends'.
13 posted on 02/26/2003 8:14:18 AM PST by Aaron_A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson