Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Freep this poll over Right-to-carry. We're getting our @$$'$ kicked!!
St. Louis Post-Dispatch ^ | March 5, 2003

Posted on 03/05/2003 7:49:55 PM PST by Missouri

Question of the day:

The concealed weapon debate is back in Missouri. Who do you think should be able to carry them? No one Anyone with the proper training and no criminal background Anyone with the proper training, regardless of background Everyone over 21, regardless of training or background

(Excerpt) Read more at stltoday.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; US: Illinois; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: 2ndadmendment; banglist; concealandcarry; crime; freep; guncontrol; liberalbias; missouri; postdispatch; righttocarry; stlouis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: Amerigomag
VOTE, VOTE, VOTE
21 posted on 03/05/2003 8:09:04 PM PST by shootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Missouri
We're getting our @$$'$ kicked!!

Not now we're not. :-) I agree those are really lame questions. I put my vote down for the extreme libertarian view even though I don't fully agree with it.

22 posted on 03/05/2003 8:09:22 PM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tatze
>>But the "no one" total is below 45% now.<<


All we can ask for is to bring the "no one" down as far as possible before they pull the plug on the poll. It was up to 75% when I first noticed it.
23 posted on 03/05/2003 8:09:30 PM PST by Missouri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Missouri
anyone just see that huge change???
24 posted on 03/05/2003 8:11:07 PM PST by Noslrac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Missouri
Someone seriously rigged that poll. The "no one" choice suddenly went from 35% to 58% in about 30 seconds. I guess the lefty editors didn't like the results.
25 posted on 03/05/2003 8:12:29 PM PST by GnL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Noslrac
Yes. "no one" jumped up 20 points.
26 posted on 03/05/2003 8:12:59 PM PST by Tatze (Give Pizza Chants!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Noslrac
Its fluctuating 10% back and forth with each refresh...
27 posted on 03/05/2003 8:13:13 PM PST by Noslrac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Missouri
bump
28 posted on 03/05/2003 8:13:21 PM PST by shootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
>>We're getting our @$$'$ kicked!!<<


I'll admit I was in a state of panic when I first posted this thread.
This leftist newspaper layed on the propaganda on real thick back in 1999 when the vote went against us in a close vote with probable voter fraud in St. Louis City.



29 posted on 03/05/2003 8:14:33 PM PST by Missouri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Missouri
Neither do I, but I voted anyway.
30 posted on 03/05/2003 8:15:09 PM PST by Taxman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noslrac
anyone just see that huge change???

Yup. A DU counterattack.

Always happens.

31 posted on 03/05/2003 8:15:53 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Missouri
Hey!
They're onto us!
I just hit it and the No Ones are ahead 50%-35%!
32 posted on 03/05/2003 8:16:39 PM PST by MIgramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
http://www.komu.com/html/epoll.html here's another. looks a little better.
33 posted on 03/05/2003 8:18:36 PM PST by Noslrac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Missouri
I can't believe a southern state is even debating this. You guys need to propose a law saying that just St Louis should allow noone to carry/own weapons.

See who whines then :-)
34 posted on 03/05/2003 8:20:35 PM PST by VeniVidiVici
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici
Even if it passes both house and senate, one term bob holden (who seems to be in yet another scandal) has said he won't sign it.
35 posted on 03/05/2003 8:22:30 PM PST by Noslrac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: Missouri
Looking better now.
37 posted on 03/05/2003 8:24:30 PM PST by thepitts (We The People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Missouri
Well the good guys are winning, but (from the poll):

"Surveys are unscientific and for entertainment only."

Bingo!

38 posted on 03/05/2003 8:25:18 PM PST by Doomonyou (Don't panic...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Missouri
I don't like the way the options are layed out.

Classic, dishonest, divide-and-conquer poll design: one negative choice and three positive choices.

Exactly the same way Clinton got elected; too many conservatives voted for Perot -- effectively splitting the conservative vote.

39 posted on 03/05/2003 8:26:07 PM PST by TXnMA ((No Longer!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA
bump
40 posted on 03/05/2003 8:44:01 PM PST by shootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson