Posted on 04/22/2003 2:10:07 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob
Congressman Billybob Sez:
This here's the 346th Report ta the Folks Back Home from the (More er Less) Honorable Billybob, cyberCongressman from Western Carolina.
Proliferation izza word fer the day. Not proliferation ov weapons, but proliferation ov freedom n self-government.
Since yer Congresscritter don us'ally use big words lack that, I'll turn this over ta ma able assistant, J. Armor, Esq..
"Who's Next?"
Let's begin this lecture with a blast from the past, a few bars from Tom Lehrer's classic about nuclear proliferation:
"First we got the bomb, and that was good,
‘Cuz we love peace and motherhood.
Then Russia got the bomb, and that's okay.
The balance of power's maintained that way.
Then China got the bomb, but have no fears.
They can't wipe us out for at least five years."
It is a sobering thought that Lehrer wrote these words over thirty years ago. The point here is that not just ultimate bad things -- nuclear weapons – can proliferate. Ultimate good things – freedom and self-government – also can proliferate. That is the long-term meaning of the events now occurring in Iraq.
Although there will be more fighting, the war is over. There remain only certain "pockets of resistance" to deal with. Let's address those.
Hollywood
There are many people who could serve as poster children for arrogant foolishness in Hollywood. I choose Susan Sarandon, because she made some excellent movies, including Bull Durham, and because she has been spouting brass-plated geopolitical nonsense. I took time to venture over to a competing rally in Washington, and heard her state views she obviously believes, but which have no relationship with reality.
Most people agree that Bull Durham is one of the finest sports movies ever made. Some rate it as the best ever, as do I. So it was no surprise that the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown long ago scheduled a special screening of this film on its fifteenth anniversary and invited the stars to take part.
It was also no surprise that the Hall of Fame recently cancelled the invitations to Ms. Sarandon and her bad-mouthed POSSLQ, Tim Robbins, in light of their recent comments and the reactions to them. (POSSLQ is a US Census category, "persons of opposite sex sharing living quarters.")
This week at the Press Club in Washington Mr. Robbins condemned the backlash against him and Ms. Sarandon as violating their "freedom of speech." Peter Jennings of ABC conducted a pity party for Mr. Robbins on air, on the same issue. Both fail to understand that freedom of speech is a double-edged sword. It does not mean, "I have freedom of speech. You have freedom to shut up."
The little people who go bowling on Thursday, take the family to Shoney's on Friday and spend a few squirreled dollars for a movie on Saturday, also have their freedom of speech. The reporters don't gather in flocks when these people speak, yet they speak with their wallets. Susan Sarandon, who depends on their dollars, is a either a brass-plated fool if she thinks she can ignore their voices with impunity, or a hard-wired hypocrite if she thinks they have no right to speak in their own way, in response to what she says.
Sarandon, and many other denizens of Hollywood, need to be toppled from their self-constructed pedestals, their heads severed (figuratively, of course), and dragged through the streets where the little people can smack them with their sandals.
Columbia University (and many others)
Nicholas De Genova is an anthropology professor at Columbia University. He was one of twenty speakers at a "teach in" there last week, sponsored by the Columbia Anti-War Coalition. While a few of the presentations were scholarly, most took the viewpoint that "George W. Bush, not Saddam Hussein, poses the greatest threat to world peace and security." Many ranking professors at that institution took part in this anti-Bush, pro-Hussein rally. The most obnoxious comment of the day was made by Professor De Genova.
To the cheers of the assembled students, he said that he wished for "a million Mogadishus" against the American troops in Iraq. (That was a reference to the 18 Americans killed in Somalia, portrayed in the movie Black Hawk Down.) So the professor was wishing for 18 million American deaths. In that particular battle, the kill ratio was 100 to 1. So the professor was also wishing for 1.8 billion citizens of the Earth to be killed. But then, logical consistency is not the long suit of the "anti-war" protestors.
Others in other circumstances have made similar comments. Ellen Ratner, a Fox News contributor and a regular on National Public Radio, said about a month ago on the Neil Cavuto Show that she hoped that "Bush will mess up the war," meaning that enough Americans would be killed so that "Bush will not be reelected." If one sits through a couple dozen "anti-war" screeds, as I have done, it quickly becomes clear the real purpose is not to oppose the war, but to oppose President Bush and those who agree with him. But I digress.
Should the University keep on staff in the Geology Department a professor who believes and professes to his students that the world is flat? Should it keep in the Chemistry Department a professor who believes in alchemy? Should it retain in the Mathematics Department a professor who teaches that two plus two equals five?
This is not a matter of either freedom of speech or academic freedom. Professor De Genova (and many others like him) are teaching stupidity to another generation of college students. In any university, the purpose is to preserve and increase the stock of human knowledge. Such professors are, therefore, enemies of the institutions where they "teach."
This week, after the Iraqi prison for children had been opened, weapons had been found in schools, hospitals, and mosques, two thousand sites of potential WMDs had been found with mountains of documents, and the Iraqis had (mostly) welcomed the troops – after all this, the Faculty Senate of UCLA voted 180-7 to condemn the Iraq War. Getting it wrong before the war was an error, but an understandable one. Getting it wrong now is geopolitical idiocy. It is not the role of any university to preserve and spread stupidity – especially while using money from the grateful taxpayers to carry out that task.
Professor De Genova and thousands of others, in hundreds of college towns, need to be pushed off their perches, and their heads (metaphorically) dragged through the streets while students beat on them with spiral-bound notebooks.
CBS News
Dan Rather's interview with Saddam Hussein a month ago reminded me of Larry King interviewing a well-endowed starlet. It was all smiles and softball questions. Rather's interview was arranged by the good offices of Ramsey Clark, prime mover of the "anti-war" movement and a staunch ally of the world's few remaining Stalinist dictators.
Rather has now gone to Iraq to continue his biased reporting from the front, now that it is no longer a front. His reporting remains of a piece with the Hussein interview in which the "news" man bowed and scraped to the dictator like he was a rock star, and the dictator played the "news" man like a cheap violin.
The American people, in line with their views, have reacted to Mr. Rather in a very predictable fashion. CBS News has lost 15% of their viewers during this war, the largest loss of any major network, and a richly deserved one.
Even Uncle Walter Cronkite has been revealed as a public fraud, decades after he left the air as the "most trusted" American. This week he said, "I am a pacifist. I guess I always was." He never mentioned that obviously relevant fact when he was on the air.
We are in a new era. Millions of Americans who don't buy and read books can watch raw information on 24-hour news channels. They can reach on their own the same conclusions that Bernard Goldberg did in his book, Bias. Millions of Americans have discovered what only hundreds of thousands knew before, that CBS News is a deeply bigoted organization.
Dan Rather, and many others, need to be bumped off their dwindling media hillocks – just a nudge will do it -- and their heads dragged (electronically) through the streets while viewers beat on them with their remote controls.
"Experts" on the Future of Iraq
The subject du jour is the rebuilding of Iraq. The airways are cluttered with assorted experts saying that Iraq cannot be reconstructed as free democracy. They say it will take too much time, too many troops, too much money, and probably won't succeed in any event. But no more than twice in twenty hours of such blather have I heard the word "Japan" mentioned.
Anyone can find the history of the American rebuilding of Japan with a few mouse clicks on the Internet. In just two years, General Douglas MacArthur led the reconstruction of Japan from a military dictatorship of 1,500 years standing, into a modern, democratic, free market nation. At the most, MacArthur had 200,000 troops in Japan. Comparing populations, Iraq will therefore require about 60,000 troops in place. That is only slightly more than the American troops now stationed in Germany. And in Germany they are neither needed nor properly appreciated.
In short, a few dozen "experts" on the future of Iraq also need to have their heads dragged through the streets, figuratively speaking.
The Congress of the United States
This is just too easy, like shooting fish in a barrel. Just imagine the heads of Senator Tom Daschle and Representative Sheila Jackson Lee being dragged through the streets, in tandem so as to be politically correct.
Post Script for Leaders and Press in Muslim Nations
Until this week, you believed it was divine will that Saddam Hussein remain in control of Iraq. In the land of Nebuchadnezzar, the moving finger has writ. Either your theology or your politics require massive reexamination. Allah has spoken.
- 30 -
Since that was the central image of the column, I had the choice of savaging my own column, or not having it run. I chose the latter. However, I think Freepers will appreciate this, so here it is.
Also, a change in the future. UPI wants me to switch to straight columns written in my own name (rather than Ol' Billybob). So, in the future, Billybob is retired where UPI is concerned, but he will remain a feature of my own website. (I kinda like the ol' coot, n thank y'all does, also.)
It's too bad that UPI went PC, the more-or-less honorable Billy Bob is a hoot!
You betchya!!!
LOL!
Things are happening:
Senior Bush aides meet to weigh sidelining France for Iraq war stance
Bush Doctrine Unfolds :
| To find all articles tagged or indexed using Bush Doctrine Unfold , click below: | ||||
| click here >>> | Bush Doctrine Unfold | <<< click here | ||
| (To view all FR Bump Lists, click here) | ||||
So, I will not even declare for that office unless I have raised at least $600,000 from sources not seeking to purchase my vote and my soul. And, if I do not declare, I will return all donations to the donors. Either I do it right with a legitimate chance of success, or I stay out. Doing it halfway is worse than not doing it at all.
Billybob / John
I do wish you had pointed out that "freedom of speech" means "freedom from government constraint", not freedom from being shunned by your countrymen when you say something stupid.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.