Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SARS Much More Deadly Than First Estimated
New Scientist ^ | 4-25-2003 | Debora MacKenzie

Posted on 04/25/2003 3:08:17 PM PDT by blam

SARS much more deadly than first estimated

13:43 25 April 03

NewScientist.com news service

Analysis of the latest statistics on the global SARS epidemic reveals that at least 10 per cent of people who contract the new virus will die of the disease.

The low death rates of about four per cent cited until now by the World Health Organization and others are the result of a statistical difficulty, well known to epidemiologists, that hampers the early analysis of new disease outbreaks. This difficulty is the reason for the apparent rise in death rate - not a change in the SARS virus.

A fatality rate of over 10 per cent puts SARS on a par with some other RNA viruses. Yellow fever and Japanese encephalitis, spread by tropical mosquitoes, between them kill more than 10,000 people a year, even though both have vaccines. Lassa fever kills about 70,000 a year in West Africa, but people mainly catch it from a local mouse.

Because these infections need animal vectors that only exist regionally, none has ever gone global. But the SARS vector - humans - is everywhere.

Draconian measures

The emergence of the true deadliness of SARS comes as further draconian measures are implemented by health authorities around the world.

The latest is the quarantining of 4000 people and the complete isolation of two hospitals in Beijing. China, where the virus emerged, has about half the world's known SARS cases, which have now risen to total 274 deaths and over 4800 infections.

The standard figure used to gauge the deadliness of any disease is the "case fatality rate" (CFR). This is the number of deaths divided by the number of cases of the disease.

Early in the SARS epidemic, the CFR was about four per cent. But the CFR calculated from statistics released on Thursday and Friday for Hong Kong, Canada and Singapore are now 7.6, 10.7 and 9.9 per cent respectively. These three places are the worst hit after the Chinese mainland.

The global CFR has risen steadily since the start of the epidemic but this is to be expected, say epidemiologists contacted by New Scientist. Early in an epidemic, a significant proportion of the total number of cases have neither recovered nor died. Some will eventually die and so move from the denominator to the numerator of the CFR, raising its value. The CFR moves towards the true value as time passes, unless the number of new cases explodes.

Better estimate

With many cases still unresolved, a better current estimate of the deadliness of SARS may be the number of deaths as a proportion of resolved cases. Those numbers for Hong Kong, Canada and Singapore are 15.8, 18.3 and 13.7 per cent. But these too could be misleading if, for example, it takes longer to recover from a disease than to die from it.

In China, this death rate is only 8.8 per cent. But statistics there are widely mistrusted, after Chinese authorities withheld nearly all information until recently. The Chinese statistics may also include cases of pneumonia due to bacterial infections, a widespread problem there, and which are cured with antibiotics.

One way to resolve the uncertainty over the death rate, say epidemiologists, would be to take a "cohort" of cases that start at the same time, and follow them until all have resolved. Several groups, including Roy Anderson and colleagues at Imperial College in London, plan to publish detailed epidemiological analyses shortly.

Uncertainty may dog the exact calculation, but it now seems clear that in the absence of a cure or a vaccine, SARS could eventually kill millions. The best hope is a vaccine. At a high-level meeting last week in Washington DC, every major vaccine company reported that it had begun a research programme.

Debora MacKenzie


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: deadlier; estimated; fatalityrate; first; rate; royanderson; sars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last
To: tubebender
Has everyone that has SARS been hospitalized or only the very sick. Is it possible that there are many who suffered through it at home ?

The converse is also a possibility, i.e., cases with the symptoms of SARS *but* caused by other viral agents ...

21 posted on 04/25/2003 4:03:39 PM PDT by _Jim (Guangdong doctor linked to SARS: http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030320/09/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: blam
Well, how the heck is the rest of the world going to blame this in the U.S. in general, and George Bush in particular?
22 posted on 04/25/2003 4:07:57 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope
... a statistical difficulty, well known to epidemiologists,...

This difficulty was known to the professionals though.

23 posted on 04/25/2003 4:14:05 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope
than SARS has killed in billions of years.

SARS hasn't been around for "Billions of years" as far as we know. Maybe only a few years, maybe less than one. Give SARS time, it might turn out to be nothing at all, or the 21st century equivalent of the Black Death, or at least the Spanish Flu. We shall see I guess.

24 posted on 04/25/2003 4:14:28 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Thanks for the link to the blog. What I bring back from it is the following:

"All public transportation vehecales and public places must be disinfected everyday. Planes, trains, long distance buses, cargos, metro, buses, taxies and all other kind of publich transportation viacles and stations, ports, dorms in building sites, schools, Internet cafes, bars, Karaoks, theaters, shopping malls, and other public places must be disinfected everyday and stick the disinfection mark with the date of the disinfection. Failure to keep compliant with the requires will be shutdown immediately."

25 posted on 04/25/2003 4:17:55 PM PDT by PayrollOffice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: blam
Listen to this
26 posted on 04/25/2003 4:18:48 PM PDT by TexasRepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Fortunately, it would be a relatively peaceful way to die in the US. A ventilator and enough drugs to snow you out of this life.
27 posted on 04/25/2003 4:18:56 PM PDT by Glenn (Look on the sunny side of death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodieD
Remember there are lies, damn lies and statistics. There are stats on anything you can truly trust. As for SARS there just isn't enough data currently. The Philipines death rate is 50%, of course 2 people got it and 1 died. Give it another month, by that point all the current cases will have run their course and we'll know whether or not this is an epidemic (my vote is not) and there should be enough useful data to make something up with.
28 posted on 04/25/2003 4:22:50 PM PDT by discostu (A cow don't make ham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blam
at least 10 per cent of people who contract the new virus will die of the disease

And the WHO said that we had better just learn to live with it!

29 posted on 04/25/2003 4:26:55 PM PDT by my_pointy_head_is_sharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasRepublic
I do not know if I should laugh or not?
30 posted on 04/25/2003 4:27:36 PM PDT by CathyRyan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: blam
In the first place, a 4% death rate for a highly contagious disease is quite high. A death rate of 10 or 15% is extremely high.

In the second place, we will never get reliable statistics out of China. The leadership probably doesn't have them, and if they do, they will never reveal them.

A British doctor today said that Sars may not be highly contagious or fast spreading. We'd better hope so, because it's the first good news we've heard since Sars appeared on the radar scope.

News reports have said that older people have a higher mortality rate, as you would expect. But plenty of young healthy victims have died, too, so no one can expect to be free from danger, IMHO.
31 posted on 04/25/2003 4:58:50 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodieD
Ditto! The reports suggest we should worry but for some reason I just don't care about SARS and I'm not afraid of it. The disease Du jour indeed!
32 posted on 04/25/2003 5:00:24 PM PDT by TalBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
The converse is also a possibility, i.e., cases with the symptoms of SARS *but* caused by other viral agents ...

I have been trying to put that thought out of my mind for a couple of weeks now. I was kind of hoping it was a foolish thought.

33 posted on 04/25/2003 5:02:53 PM PDT by Nov3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: blam
Lassa fever kills about 70,000 a year in West Africa, but people mainly catch it from a local mouse.

Well, catch that mouse then!

34 posted on 04/25/2003 5:04:26 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
They do catch them. It's the eating them that causes the problem
35 posted on 04/25/2003 5:11:12 PM PDT by CathyRyan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: CathyRyan
It's a terribly lethal disease and those who catch it should be forcibly quarantined until it is over!

Let's not fool around here; we have an opportunity to prevent a melt-down of modern civiization.

36 posted on 04/25/2003 6:08:03 PM PDT by Dec31,1999 (Thank You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: blam
Thanks for posting these articles.
37 posted on 04/25/2003 6:12:04 PM PDT by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Bump
38 posted on 04/25/2003 6:13:03 PM PDT by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Quote "My suspicion is that older people are more likely to die of SARS,"

Well of course :) That is always the case with any disease.

Healthy young people have died here in Toronto...as well as everywhere else that is dealing with this disease. Of course NOBODY has died in the USA ;) If you believe the Government...cough cough
39 posted on 04/25/2003 6:13:57 PM PDT by Lucas1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lucas1
Gives a whole new meaning to the concept of free trade, i.e., SARS-laden products.

From your Commie "friends."

40 posted on 04/25/2003 6:18:35 PM PDT by Dec31,1999 (Thank You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson