Prosecutors want autopsy results unsealed

Prosecutors have reversed their position and are now asking a judge to unseal autopsy reports for Laci Peterson and her unborn son after details allegedly from one report were leaked to the media Thursday.

“The information being leaked has clearly been skewed in favor of the defense,” prosecution documents filed in court Thursday say. “The People cannot see why the autopsy documents should not be released.”

Defense attorney Mark Geragos strongly denied the leak came from his team. "I don’t know who they got the document from and I certainly didn’t want the document public," Geragos said.

The prosecutors’ shift on the autopsy reports came after NBC News reported they had obtained “a portion of the coroner’s report on the autopsy on the fetus.”

The document says the fetus was found with 1 1/2 loops of plastic tape around its neck and had a significant cut on its torso that had been inflicted after death, MSNBC reported on its Web site.

The information could be used to bolster a defense theory that Laci and her unborn child were slain in a ritualistic killing, possibly by Satanic cult members.

Stanislaus County Judge Al Girolami had ordered the autopsy reports tentatively sealed on May 15 at the request of prosecution and defense attorneys. He was scheduled to make a final decision on the sealing by today.

A statement released Thursday from the district attorney’s office says prosecutors “cannot verify the accuracy of any media statements concerning the contents of the autopsy reports without violating the court’s order.”

Senior Deputy District Attorney Dave Harris had argued in favor of sealing the documents at a Tuesday hearing, saying it was necessary to protect Scott Peterson’s right to a fair trial.

Charity Kenyon, an attorney representing a coalition of newspaper organizations, including The Bee, said during the hearing that the public’s right to view court documents was a fundamental component of a transparent legal system.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peterson D.A. wants autopsies released
Prosecutor appeals to judge after reports leaked

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A frustrated Stanislaus County district attorney did an about-face Thursday and asked a judge to release autopsy reports on Laci Peterson and her unborn son, saying that leaks about the condition of the baby's body were "skewed in favor of the defense."

District Attorney Jim Brazelton stopped just short of accusing defense attorneys for Scott Peterson -- who have hinted that a satanic gang was responsible for killing Laci Peterson and the couple's unborn baby -- of leaking selected details from the autopsy. But in asking a judge to lift a seal on the document, Brazelton said prosecutors hadn't released the document, even to Modesto police or to Laci Peterson's family.

Brazelton filed court papers to make the autopsy public hours after the cable news outlet MSNBC reported that the unborn baby had been found with a loop and a half of plastic tape around his neck and that there was a "significant cut" on his torso inflicted after death.

"The information being leaked has clearly been skewed in favor of the defense," Brazelton, who originally had asked for the autopsies to be sealed, said in his motion Thursday. "By releasing the autopsy reports, the court will allow the media to see what the actual facts are, and then accurate information may be reported."

Mark Geragos, who is defending Scott Peterson on capital murder charges that he killed his wife and their unborn son, did not return phone calls to his office Thursday, but told the Associated Press that he would not comment on the reports.

Girolami "more than telegraphed that he does not want us commenting on the case" during a closed meeting in his chambers Tuesday, Geragos told the AP.

The Contra Costa County Sheriff's Department, whose coroner conducted the autopsies, would not confirm or deny the information in the leaked report.

The bodies of Laci Peterson, 27, and her unborn son, whom the couple had planned to name Conner, were found in mid-April after washing ashore along the Richmond shoreline.

May 30— Laci Peterson's head and parts of her limbs were missing and plastic tape was wrapped around the neck of her child, according to the full autopsy and coroner's photographs exclusively seen by ABCNEWS.

According to the autopsy, the skin of the child was not decomposed at all, though the right side of his body was mutilated, and the placenta and umbilical cord were not found with the body.

The autopsy said that the cause of Laci Peterson's death was undetermined, and there was no evidence of man-made wounds, despite the fact that her head and all or part of her limbs were missing.

Peterson's body was so badly decomposed it barely looked like a body after it was found in San Francisco Bay last month. However, the autopsy report showed her cervix was intact.

Experts are divided over whether the new revelations about the condition of Laci Peterson's body and that of her child will help prosecutors or Scott Peterson's defense.

On Thursday, sources close to the investigation told ABCNEWS the sealed autopsy report indicated a piece of nylon tape was looped around the child's neck when it washed ashore last month, and that there was a laceration or tear on the tiny body.

There also was tape on Laci Peterson's lower torso, outside her clothing, when her body was found April 14, a day after her baby's remains were recovered, the sources said.

Forensic pathologist Dr. Michael Baden told Good Morning America that the limbs and head were probably removed before Laci was put in the water.

The grisly new details could fuel speculation as to whether the baby ever lived outside the womb, which defense attorneys could use to undermine the prosecution's case against Scott Peterson, Laci's husband and the father of the child they had planned to name Conner.

The prosecutors handling the case said Thursday that since the autopsy was starting to be leaked to the media, the whole report should be released.

"The information being leaked has clearly been skewed in favor of the defense," Deputy Stanislaus County, Calif., District Attorney David Harris wrote in a statement released late Thursday. "By releasing the autopsy reports the court will allow the media to see what the actual facts are and then accurate information may be reported to mitigate recent adverse publicity."

While the defense and prosecution dispute what the latest revelations might mean, experts also appear divided.

When asked what the tape on the bodies might mean to the case, Robert Pugsley, a law professor at the Southwestern University School of Law in Los Angeles, told ABCNEWS Radio: "This 8-month-old fetus was the direct intended victim, as well as the mother, of the homicidal activities of the murderer.

"This is a clear indication that the state is perfectly justified — indeed, I think, obliged — to pursue the double-homicide case which they've already laid," he said.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MODESTO, California (CNN) -- On the heels of gruesome information leaked from the autopsy report on Laci Peterson's unborn child, the prosecutor in the case filed a motion Thursday seeking to unseal the reports on both the mother and child so that the media can report "accurate information."

Stanislaus County District Attorney James Brazelton said the people of California have the right to correct inaccurate information, suggesting the media reports on the autopsy are not.

"By releasing the autopsy reports, the court will allow the media to see what the actual facts are and then accurate information may be reported to mitigate recent adverse publicity," his motion read.

Brazelton earlier Thursday released a statement, saying he "cannot verify the accuracy of any media statements concerning the contents of the autopsy reports without violating the court's order."

"It continues to be the view of the district attorney that the evidence in this case should be presented in court through testimony of witnesses and not selectively leaked to the news media by unknown persons whom the press will not identify," he said.

Scott Peterson, 30, is awaiting trial on two counts of murder for the deaths of his wife Laci, 27, and their unborn son, who was to be named Connor. Prosecutors have said they will seek the death penalty if he is convicted. Peterson insists he is innocent.

Just two days ago, Superior Court Judge Al Girolami heard arguments on whether to keep the autopsy results sealed, with prosecutors and the defense arguing that unsealing them could jeopardize Peterson's chance for a fair trial. News organizations countered by saying the results are a matter of public record and should be released. Girolami did not rule on the matter at that time.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 30, 2003 -- Laci Peterson's unborn child had plastic tape wrapped around his neck and a large cut across his shoulders when he was found in the shallow waters of San Francisco Bay.

The shocking revelation opens the possibility that the 81/2-month fetus had been born and then strangled, a forensic expert told The Post.

According to sources close to the probe, the boy, who was to be named Conner, was found with 11/2 loops of plastic tape around his neck, with an inch gap in between the tape and the skin - making the tape resemble a noose.

Noted forensics expert Dr. Henry Lee said that would be "with strangulation." Lee, who is not connected with the case, said it was possible the child had been born and then strangled - but cautioned that more details needed to be revealed before he could say conclusively.

The latest blockbuster details were first reported by MSNBC and later confirmed by The Associated Press.

The revelations could bolster the defense's contention that members of a Modesto satanic cult - not Scott Peterson, Laci's husband - killed his wife and unborn child, Lee said.

"This opens up a lot of interesting questions," said the doctor, who provided DNA expertise for the O.J. Simpson double-murder case.

The new headline-grabbing murder mystery has intensified since Laci's headless body washed ashore in San Francisco Bay on April 14. The fetus was retrieved a day earlier.

Sources involved in the case told Fox News that investigators were not ruling out that the plastic tape could have been floating debris that managed to wrap itself around the baby's neck.

Top forensic pathologist Dr. Michael Baden doubts the fetus was actually born, but was still intact in the womb when Laci died. If the baby had been separated, Baden said, the tiny body would have deteriorated faster than Laci's.

Reacting to yesterday's stunning autopsy details, District Attorney James Brazelton lashed out at the media, saying that because of the leaks, his office had filed a motion to unseal the full 25-page autopsy report.

"The information leaked has clearly been skewed in favor of the defense," the motion stated.

Peterson, 30, who has pleaded not guilty, is in jail pending his trial on charges of double murder. Mark Geragos, Peterson's defense lawyer, has asserted that a mystery brown van was seen around the Petersons' neighborhood sometime around his 27-year-old wife's disappearance.

The defense also contends it knows at least four or five people who were actually involved in the "satanic" killing.

A preliminary hearing has been set for July 16, when prosecutors will have to show they have sufficient evidence to try Peterson on murder charges. If he is convicted, he could face death by lethal injection.

A spokesman for the Contra Costa County coroner's office left a recording saying officials would not comment.

I just got back from the vet last night. My little 10 month old Chihuahua Fidel's baby teeth never fell out. So he has two sets of teeth on the upper jaw and two sets on the lower.

Egads.. So the answer is braces? For a dog?

I have a half Chihuahua half minn-pin. (looks like a little, 6 lb doberman, she's really cute)

The vet told me that they have weak teeth, so dry food and (little) rawhide chew sticks are good for them.

Those chew sticks took care of the teething problem completely. (and saved who knows how much in otherwise chewed up shoes) So you might give those a shot first.

PS: Strangely enough, she also likes them to releive stress.

She get's really wound up and she seems to like to work it off with a good chew stick. It's like the doggie equal of a beer after dinner or something..

Egads.. So the answer is braces? For a dog?

Your chi-min pin sounds darling.

Actually the bottom line of #829 mentions that the surgery is to extract all of the baby teeth which are running right next to the adult teeth. But the canines are askew since there was not enough room for two sets of teeth. In order to straighten then, since they are pointed sideways, is to do the braces a few weeks after the operation.

Fidel loves long beef tendons which are rolled into a pinwheel ... they are called "Paddywacks" (they also have Nicknacks). He chews on them all day while I am at work to keep him busy ... and yes, calm. :-D

Interesting post! Yes, I see what you're getting at about tenancy by the entireties, which as you said, would have about the same effect as the JTWROS. Both are dissolved on the death of one joint owner; real estate people would certainly want that death certificate b/f attempting anything. But the dissolution would occur by the death itself, I think.

I never thought of tenancy by the entireties as existing in community property states, it being a common law concept, I thought. But I guess what's important is that this house of theirs passes to Scott on Laci's death.

I was surprised to find out that in some community property states, the community property passes to the spouse; in others, it doesn't--the deceased's heirs other than the spouse are considered. Don't know where California falls on this.

I think you're right in that most of their property would be community property, but clearly stuff Laci inherited from, or was given by, the grandmother, would not be community. Especially if that gift by grandma was made b/f Laci's marriage. Scott better keep his meat-hooks off those Tiffany lamps, the way I see it!

There doesn't appear to have been a will. I do think there is still an estate, however. I think someone can apply to be the administrator (or whatever they call it in California when you become the representative of an intestate estate.) The question of "who's got first dibs" aside, it would be extremely impractical for Scott to be made the representative of Laci's estate, given that he is in jail. I don't think an estate representative can usually delegate his powers to another person--even by power of attorney.

I still think that the Rochas might well have some inheritance rights here. One other thing, which you pointed out, is that they have another trick up their sleeve: the civil suit against Scott, which would serve to tie up at least the real estate, until the Rochas' rights were given due consideration.

As you implied, there is very little, if any, legal justification for the Rochas' having just gone in and gotten stuff. Still, I think they considered all the possible consequences, and decided they wanted to take their chance on those consequences, rather than take their chance that the Petersons wouldn't alienate property to which they (even Scott) did not have a right.

I still applaud them; sometimes having possession of something, PRACTICALLY speaking, can be the trump card. I think we are about to see an unprecedented amount of litigation take place for a relatively small amount of property!

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.