Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Families clash over belongings in Peterson home
Modesto Bee ^ | May 30, 2003 | BEE STAFF REPORTS

Posted on 05/31/2003 12:45:21 AM PDT by joyce11111

MORE NEWS

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Families clash over belongings in Peterson home

By BEE STAFF REPORTS

Modesto Bee

May 30, 2003

MODESTO, Calif. - Scott Peterson's family had planned to voluntarily turn over only some of the items that his wife's family wanted from the couple's home.

Laci Peterson's family and friends acted first, though, and took what they wanted Friday from the Covena Avenue house - over the Peterson family's objections.

Jackie Peterson, Scott's mother, expressed dismay: "Yesterday we see a coroner's report about a baby, and today we're talking about salt-and-pepper shakers," she said by telephone from her home in San Diego County.

In discussing the Rochas' request for property from the home, Peterson said some of the items, like Laci's journals, could not be turned over.

"Scott didn't even know she had journals," Peterson said. "If she did, police have them."

Peterson said her son has a request, too: He wants his wife's wedding ring, another diamond ring that he bought her, and a few diamonds given to Laci by her grandmother. Peterson said the rings and gems had been taken to a jeweler, for crafting into one ring.

"We want those," Peterson said. She said the Rochas picked them up from the jeweler.

The Rochas had submitted a 22-point list of items sought from the house. Peterson said Laci's mother, Sharon Rocha, later revised it to 16 points. The Rochas still wanted the crib intended for Conner, the boy with whom Laci was pregnant at the time of her disappearance. And they wanted the rocking chair from the baby's room, too.

Crib and rocking chair went out the door Friday. Earlier this week, family attorneys said the Rochas needed to "sit in Conner's room in the rocking chair Laci had purchased to rock him in, and just to have the opportunity to feel her presence."

Peterson said she and her family bought almost everything in the baby's room, including crib, rocking chair and ottoman, clothes, toys and a baby book - all given as gifts at a baby shower. And Scott wanted to keep the baby's things, his mother said.

She said Sharon Rocha was welcome to take back the crib bedding that she had purchased.

Peterson said her son previously agreed to give some property to Laci's brother and half sister: for Brent Rocha, flower vase wall sconces that he had given to Laci as a gift; and for Amy Rocha, wicker furniture and lamps given to Laci by the women's paternal grandmother.

Other items, she said, Scott and Laci acquired as a couple - such as two white chairs and an end table. "They are not Sharon's," Peterson said.

Nor did her son want to turn over kitchenware - a food processor, a mixer and cookbooks - "that Scott will need to keep house," his mother said.

Scott already had decided to turn over the salt-and-pepper shaker set, in snail motif.

The Rochas also had asked for "Laci's fine china and stemware." Peterson noted how the listing omitted Scott's name.

She described the china and stemware as wedding gifts to the couple, entitling Scott to keep them. She added that she and her husband bought most of the china, filling out the set after the wedding.

There are no photos of Laci to turn over, Peterson said. She said police took every one that included Laci, leaving four photos in the house. She said police also took most of Laci's clothing. "But she (Sharon Rocha) can have all of it."

The Rochas also had asked for Peterson's wedding dress. Scott's mother revealed that the dress was taken in a mid-January burglary at the house, during a weekend when Scott was in Los Angeles for a one-day search effort for his wife.

A few days later, police said they had identified a suspect but did not report an arrest. They gave no name but described the suspect as someone known by the Petersons, and said the suspect was one of many people with access to the home.

Jackie Peterson said her son got the wedding dress back, then had it cleaned and boxed. She was adamant about a glass memento box. She said she gave the glass box to her son and daughter-in-law, for display of photos and seashells from their honeymoon in Tahiti.

"That's a no way," Peterson said about giving the box to the Rochas.

It was not know where the box is today.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Distributed by Scripps-McClatchy Western Service, http://www.shns.com.)


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: avoidingchildsupport; baby; babyunborn; conner; deathpenaltytime; dontubelievemyalibi; getarope; ibefishing; laci; lacipeterson; smallbaby; smallchild; sonkiller; unborn; wifekiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: Velveeta
Over here ping.
41 posted on 05/31/2003 8:14:58 AM PDT by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
thank you!
42 posted on 05/31/2003 8:17:02 AM PDT by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mass55th
RE Laci's wedding gown. Jackie said it was stolen (the woman walking the dog?), but "Scot got it back". Then it was sent to the cleaners and boxed, so presumably that is how Laci's mother was able to get it back.

When Jackie called in to Greta's show earlier, however, she told Greta that there was not "one thing of Laci's" in the house. Yet the Rochas found truckloads of Laci's things there. From my BS meter, I read Jackie's statement to mean that everything was Scott's, not Laci's.

43 posted on 05/31/2003 8:19:31 AM PDT by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mass55th
RE Laci's wedding gown. Jackie said it was stolen (the woman walking the dog?), but "Scot got it back". Then it was sent to the cleaners and boxed, so presumably that is how Laci's mother was able to get it back.

When Jackie called in to Greta's show earlier, however, she told Greta that there was not "one thing of Laci's" in the house. Yet the Rochas found truckloads of Laci's things there. From my BS meter, I read Jackie's statement to mean that everything was Scott's, not Laci's.

44 posted on 05/31/2003 8:20:25 AM PDT by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: All
Sorry for the burp....more coffee needed, I guess.
45 posted on 05/31/2003 8:21:43 AM PDT by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: FreePaul
I don't think that is true. I would think if my daughter and her unborn son were murdered I would want anything personal around me to remind me of them. In my grief, after losing my child and grandchild, I wonder if I would act the same. I don't think it is greed, but grief.

Everything I know about thi scase is heartbreaking.

46 posted on 05/31/2003 8:21:46 AM PDT by Diva Betsy Ross ((were it not for the brave, there would be no land of the free -))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
My thinking is that if those rings and diamonds given to Laci by her grandmother were actually taken to a jeweler to be put in a new setting, that it was Scaughty's idea to do so. This way, the rings/diamonds would be out of the way and in safe keeping for him to retrieve once he got rid of Laci. Then, once the hullaballoo was over, he'd get the stuff back and hock it. I think he is as delusional as his mother, and thought that he'd never get caught. Studies show that most criminals take chances and commit crimes because they don't think they'll be caught. It has to do with arrogance and as we all know, Scaughty is full of that.
47 posted on 05/31/2003 8:22:08 AM PDT by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: joyce11111
...a food processor, a mixer and cookbooks - "that Scott will need to keep house..."

LOL. Right.

48 posted on 05/31/2003 8:25:38 AM PDT by Petronski (I"m not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom
It's just all so sad.

One of my most cherished possessions is the engagement ring my father gave my mother. Before that, his mother wore it.
I don't wear it on my finger, I wear it on a chain around my neck. I find myself touching it a lot, and I remember it on my mother's hand.
I would love it just as much if it came from a Cracker Jack box, because my mother chose me to be the daughter to inherit it. That means a lot to me.

The Petersons have stolen Laci's chance to have the things she loved go to the people she loved.
49 posted on 05/31/2003 8:29:56 AM PDT by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom
" Jackie said it was stolen (the woman walking the dog?), but "Scot got it back".

Well, I believe it was stolen like I believe Scaughty saying he's not guilty. It wouldn't surprise me if Scaughty sold the gown and then bought it back when Sharon expressed a desire to have it. Or he had removed it from the house and stored it somewhere, then claimed it was stolen. I'm sure he had plans of selling it at a later date if it hadn't already been sold. I'm wondering what other stuff was allegedly stolen from the house. It would be interesting to know and find out if any of this stuff could be tracked down and linked to Scaughty selling it.

50 posted on 05/31/2003 8:31:32 AM PDT by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
If Scott (through his mother) starts saying "she took them off to wash dishes", I think I'll scream. She had a DISHWASHER!!

She had a maid too.

51 posted on 05/31/2003 8:34:52 AM PDT by WellsFargo94
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: mass55th
HMMM! Now that's an interesting idea--I sure hadn't thought of that! IF that's what happened, I'd say THAT is some good proof of premeditation!!

Yes, so often I see where Scott did something really stupid--like calling Amber--and I think "Is he crazy? Does he WANT to get caught/convicted?" But the thing is, I'm making the mistake of not thinking as he is: in his mind, he's not going to get caught. He thinks he can get away with it--as you said.
52 posted on 05/31/2003 8:41:06 AM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
They could be very important if she wrote of her relationship with her husband.
53 posted on 05/31/2003 8:41:53 AM PDT by joybelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tiamat; FreePaul
Amazing how some people will "go for the gold" in a tragedy.

In typical cases I would agree. But in this case with their pregnant daughter being murdered, and Scott's incredible deceit and incesent lies turning their world beyond upside down again, I think the Rocha's are justified. They tried to do it the polite way, then the legal way, and they are just sick of being victimized by Scott, his family, and now his lawyers. I don't blame them a darn bit.

If anyone is going for the gold I would say it's Scott and his family. They weren't going to give Laci's jewelry (from her grandmother) back to the Rocha's and I would bet that their plans for it were to make some needed cash not to fondly reminisce the wife that Scott murdered.

54 posted on 05/31/2003 8:45:07 AM PDT by WellsFargo94
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: WellsFargo94
Sure did! I think that the fact that Laci's wedding ring is not at the bottom of the ocean is a very telling point. I just don't know quite what it tells, yet. I hope to find out.
55 posted on 05/31/2003 8:45:23 AM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: FreePaul
Scott tried to sell the house, sold her car, no telling what might have happened to her things as they had people going in and out of the house. He showed himself to be completely uncaring about her.
56 posted on 05/31/2003 8:45:37 AM PDT by joybelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: joyce11111
good morning.. was playing catch up and started to read your ping.. by then I started one... lol.. soo much news, on this.. and Jackie is one mean SOB...
57 posted on 05/31/2003 8:46:48 AM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
...a food processor, a mixer and cookbooks - "that Scott will need to keep house..."

Hope they left the mop, we know how Scaught loves to clean up.

58 posted on 05/31/2003 8:49:49 AM PDT by pbear8 ( sed libera nos a malo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: libbylu
Jackie Peterson is a witch and a liar like her son. Did anyone catch her lie about who called the police on Sharon Rocha ?
59 posted on 05/31/2003 8:50:15 AM PDT by OREALLY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
swollen fingers or no swollen fingers...can someone post the picture of Laci in her red pantsuit (that looked as though was taken at Christmas time)? Maybe that will show us if she had them on or not?
60 posted on 05/31/2003 8:50:33 AM PDT by WellsFargo94
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson