Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Laci's things in tug of war
The Modesto Bee ^ | May 31, 2003 | Garth Stapely and John Cote'

Posted on 05/31/2003 8:41:50 AM PDT by runningbear

Laci's things in tug of war


Laci Peterson's brother Brent Rocha loads a rocking chair from her Modesto home into the back of a truck Friday morning.

Laci's things in tug of war

By GARTH STAPLEY and JOHN COTÉ

BEE STAFF WRITERS

Published: May 31, 2003, 07:16:10 AM PDT

Laci Peterson's family and friends removed truckloads of items from the slain Modesto woman's house on Friday, touching off controversy between her family and that of her husband.

Police responded to the Covena Avenue home at about 10 a.m. after a security company reported that the alarm had been triggered, Capt. Greg Savelli said.

Officers determined that Laci Peterson's family and friends were removing items that belonged to Laci, said Savelli, who added that officers documented what was taken.

"We're treating this as a civil dispute over property," he said. "It was clear to the Police Department that this was not a burglary.

Peterson's husband, Scott, 30, has been charged with double murder and faces the death penalty in the killings of his 27-year-old wife and their unborn son, Conner.

Savelli said the fallout from Friday's property removal "was best handled between the families and their attorneys."

Adam Stewart, an attorney for Laci Peterson's family, said the family had been in contact with Scott Peterson's defense team, who had agreed to allow Laci's mother, Sharon Rocha, to go through the house on Tuesday. She was to be accompanied by representatives of the defense team, and all items taken were to be photographed and videotaped.

Scott Peterson's parents and lawyers expressed outrage that the Rochas did not follow the agreement.

Jackie Peterson said the people who went into the home Friday had "absolutely no permission to be in that house. I have a lot of empathy for Sharon, but she does not have a right to go in our house and take what she wants."

Rocha did not appear to be among the packers. Calls placed to the Rocha home were not accepted.

Seven vehicles loaded

Among the items loaded into seven vehicles were a crib, a rocking chair and a box with Graco printed on the outside. Graco makes such products as strollers, highchairs and car seats.

Laci Peterson's family announced Wednesday that it had hired attorneys to help recover items from the house. A list included her wedding dress, jewelry and Conner's crib.

Jackie Peterson told The Bee that the security company notified her by telephone in San Diego County that the house alarm had been tripped.

The property removal appeared to take Scott Peterson's defense team by surprise.

Matthew Dalton, an attorney with lead defense attorney Mark Geragos' law firm, drove to the house and asked reporters if someone had reported a burglary.

Dalton went to Stewart's Modesto law office Friday morning and dropped off some items requested by the Rocha family, Stewart said.

Monday, the defense team moved other items, including what appeared to be gifts, to the Modesto office of defense co-counsel Kirk McAllister, for transfer to Laci Peterson's family. But the items had not been picked up by Friday morning, McAllister said.

Stewart said in front of the home that it would be "ridiculous" to suggest that the Rochas broke into the home.

"I apologize for it coming down to this," he said. "This is not the way we operate. This is for Laci, for Conner and Laci's family. It is not for the media or Mr. Scott Peterson's defense in any way, shape or form. It's depressing that it's come down to this."

Stanislaus County Chief Deputy District Attorney John Goold said prosecutors had no legal authority over the house.

"It's not a crime scene," Goold said. " This is a civil problem between the Rochas and the Petersons."

The house title is in Laci and Scott Petersons' names, county records show. In such a joint tenancy, when one titleholder dies, the title goes to the other.

------------------------------------------------------------

Incident brings Peterson case close to home
Victim's family moves items from house, raising the issue of ownership.

Incident brings Peterson case close to home
Victim's family moves items from house, raising the issue of ownership.

By Garth Stapley and John Coté
The Modesto Bee

(Published Saturday, May 31, 2003, 4:47 AM)

MODESTO -- Laci Peterson's family and friends removed truckloads of items from the slain Modesto woman's house Friday, touching off controversy between her family and that of her husband.

Police officers were dispatched after a security company notified them that the alarm at the Covena Avenue home had been triggered, Capt. Greg Savelli said.

Officers determined that members of the Rocha family and friends of Laci Peterson were removing items that belonged to the slain woman and documented what was taken, Savelli said.

"We're treating this as a civil dispute over property," he said. "It was clear to the police department that this was not a burglary. It was a dispute over property and was best handled between the families and their attorneys."

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Judge cites Peterson right to fair trial in denying report access

Judge cites Peterson right to fair trial in denying report access

By JOHN COTÉ
BEE STAFF WRITER

Published: May 31, 2003, 07:16:56 AM PDT

A Stanislaus County judge on Friday ordered that arrest and search warrants remain sealed in the case against Scott Peterson, who is accused of murdering his pregnant wife and unborn son.

Superior Court Judge Al Giro-lami's ruling also ordered the autopsy reports for Laci and Conner to stay sealed.

Thursday, District Attorney James Brazelton reversed his position and asked to have the autopsy reports made public, and the matter is set for hearing June 6.

Brazelton's about-face came after part of the fetus's autopsy report was leaked to the media. Prosecutors said that portion was clearly "skewed in favor of the defense."

Defense attorneys, coroner's officials, police and prosecutors have denied leaking the information.

Friday, in his ruling on all the documents, Girolami said releasing them "might irreparably harm the continued investigation into this criminal matter."

"Despite the fact that the complaint has been issued and a suspect has been arrested, the investigation and search for both incriminating and exonerating evidence in this matter continues," Girolami wrote.

Prosecutors and defense attorneys argued that releasing the documents could impede Peterson's right to a fair trial and damage an ongoing investigation.

Girolami agreed, saying in his ruling that releasing the documents "might result in the evidence being destroyed and witnesses being reluctant to step forward."

A group of newspapers, including The Bee, are seeking to have the documents unsealed.

Right to view reports argued

Charity Kenyon, an attorney representing the newspapers, argued that the public's right to view court documents was fundamental in an open legal system.

Other means exist for ensuring

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Judge orders Laci Peterson autopsy report sealed

Judge orders Laci Peterson autopsy report sealed

The Modesto Bee

The Associated Press

Published: May 31, 2003, 06:49:17 AM PDT

MODESTO, Calif. (AP) - A judge ruled Friday that an autopsy report on the deaths of Laci Peterson and her unborn son should remain sealed along with other search warrant and arrest records.

Superior Court Judge Al Girolami said releasing the information could hamper the murder investigation and prejudice public opinion before a trial begins.

Girolami is scheduled to hear more arguments June 6 from prosecutors preparing a murder case against Peterson's husband, Scott Peterson. Prosecutors on Thursday asked that the autopsy reports be released to the public. They argued that media leaks of the reports are biased toward the defense.

Girolami also ordered that leaks of sealed information stop and indicated he would consider a gag order to stop the prosecution and defense teams from talking to the media.

Scott Peterson, 30, is accused of killing his wife and unborn son, whom the couple had planned to name Conner, last December in their home. Laci, 27, was eight months pregnant at the time. The bodies washed ashore in San Francisco Bay last month.

Contra Costa County authorities concluded their autopsy report earlier this month, but did not disclose the cause of death.

Several media outlets have released details of the coroner's report, and a spokeswoman for Laci Peterson's family members said Thursday they were "devastated" at hearing autopsy reports without warning on television.

The leaked reports indicated the unborn son had plastic tape wrapped around his neck and a significant cut across the shoulders.

Meanwhile, friends of Laci Peterson removed several personal articles Friday from the single-story Modesto home where she and Scott Peterson lived.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

MOM'S MOVING MOMENT

MOM'S MOVING MOMENT

By HOWARD BREUER and MARSHA KRANES

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 31, 2003 -- Laci Peterson's mother - shattered by the graphic details leaked from the 25-page autopsy of her unborn grandson - yesterday began removing her slain daughter's belongings from the home she had shared with her accused murderer husband, Scott.

Sharon Rocha, accompanied by several friends and relatives, was seen at the Modesto, Calif., house removing the rocking chair Laci had bought to use when she nursed her infant son, as well as unopened Christmas gifts, clothing, chairs, lamps and artwork.

In doing so, she ignored the advice of her lawyer, Al Clark, that she wait until he, Scott Peterson's lawyers and court officials work out the procedures to be followed when she entered the house.

Modesto police arrived while Rocha was there, and she and her entourage left a short time later after packing seven cars full of Laci's belongings.

Hours later, lawyers representing Laci's family and Scott Peterson started haggling over whether removing the items was legal.

Scott Peterson's mother, Jackie, expressed outrage that the items had been removed since Laci's family had "absolutely no permission to be in that house."

Scott Peterson has pleaded not guilty to killing his wife and their unborn son.

Laci's family said Wednesday that they had hired lawyers to help them retrieve a baby crib and jewelry from the home.

Meanwhile, Clark told Fox News his client's anger over the grisly revelations leaked from her daughter's and grandson's sealed autopsy reports drove her to go get her daughter's possessions.

A family spokeswoman said Rocha was "devastated" by the reports describing how the near full-term fetus of her grandson Conner had plastic tape wrapped around the neck and a large cut across the chest when he was found in the shallow waters of San Francisco Bay last month.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Excerpt) Read more at modbee.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: avoidingchildsupport; baby; babyunborn; conner; deathpenaltytime; dontubelievemyalibi; getarope; ibefishing; laci; lacipeterson; smallbaby; smallchild; sonkiller; unborn; wifekiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740741-760761-780 ... 881-894 next last
To: itsahoot
That is most of what I say, don't have money to make the payments, it isn't a long time before foreclosure takes place.... Yep, I know the steps..>Not that has happened to me, happened to others I know/knew..... Thanks...
741 posted on 06/01/2003 3:33:04 PM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 698 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
What with Lawyers and mortgage payments, mommy and daddy Peterson just might go broke.!! They WANT this house to sell to help with legal costs. No doubt in my mind anyway. I think that's one reason they will make the payments for awhile anyway. We'll have to see what a Court Probate does. They just may NOT get as much as they think. It's also very possible that Snott will not collect Life Insurance.
742 posted on 06/01/2003 3:45:28 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 741 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
Who is asking the Govt to support them due to a disability? The Petersons'?

I still stand by my opinion that is shaped by what I hear on the news since that is my source. For what ever that is worth it is still mine to have.

743 posted on 06/01/2003 3:55:41 PM PDT by oceanperch (Who needs Hollywood Productions when you have Fox Reality TV?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 740 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
BTW Rocha's own Attn. said three hours ago on Fox that Sharon was not telling the truth. That is where my opinion came from.
744 posted on 06/01/2003 3:58:57 PM PDT by oceanperch (Who needs Hollywood Productions when you have Fox Reality TV?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 740 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
can you imagine those payments on top of the Peterson's other financial obligations? That house payment on Covena must be near 1400 a month? And not to say, any vehicle payments, plus that impound truck payments.... Unless Scott can declare BK... His and Laci's credit is going down the tubes unless as you say, the parents are paying to keep up with it all... Wealth!
745 posted on 06/01/2003 4:01:58 PM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 742 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
I thought they had Ins. to continue to pay the mortgage. Isn't that covered on their homeowners policy?
746 posted on 06/01/2003 4:05:28 PM PDT by oceanperch (Who needs Hollywood Productions when you have Fox Reality TV?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 745 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
whoops, I just noticed the time, I gotta go get something done around here and do some cooking. LOL BBL
747 posted on 06/01/2003 4:10:06 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 745 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
This jewelry issue is the most interesting little item. First of all, Scott and Laci weren't married very long and doing the combine or alter or whatever to Laci's wedding ring and the grandmothers is a little early in their life together. What's missing is: Laci MUST have discussed this with her mother or best friend. It is one of those things you "tell" to someone else. It's not a "secret" thing. It's a feeling thing that involves others.

Good point. My dad had my mom's diamond solitare reset for their 30th anniversary. Laci and Scott were married for approximately 5 yrs. I'm sure that Laci would have mentioned this being done, especially since the extra stones would involve "family" jewelry.

Now all we need is the "time" when the rings went to the jeweler and and to know why Scott didn't pick them up in the months to follow. I think the jeweler may play an important part in this case.

It's not logical for both rings to be used for a reset, imo. You'd still want your wedding band separate from the solitare, wouldn't you? If Laci was experiencing water retention from pregnancy, that would explain why she wasn't wearing them. Maybe Scott didn't take the stuff to the jeweler's. Why would he take every bit of jewelry to the store to have it all made into one ring? Well I don't want to say who's name popped up as needing the cash, because that's just pure speculation ;-)

I think the jeweler will be a witness for the prosecution, and that's why we won't hear anything about this until the information is available to the public. Three choices: Scott did plan on having a ring remade for Laci, he intended to have the ring made for someone else, or the stuff was going to be hocked.

748 posted on 06/01/2003 4:18:01 PM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (America...love it or leave it. Canada is due north-Mexico is directly south...start walking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 719 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
I think we should all STOP this stupid conversation because NONE of us know the nitty gritty details. However, it's clear to me that Snott Peterson is a very greedy person and after viewing the actions of his mother and father, I can see why.

Any decent person would have offered to let the Rochas come and get these things, without them having to resort to raiding the house.

749 posted on 06/01/2003 4:21:43 PM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (America...love it or leave it. Canada is due north-Mexico is directly south...start walking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 720 | View Replies]

To: TheSpottedOwl
I agree and with an open heart.

The Petersons maybe in denial over the son but if they truly loved Laci as their own they should have gave the Rochas' their blessing on retreiving personal items as soon as possible.

All the smoke and mirrors MG is putting out is not going to work if the client and his parents show a side of greed and cold heartedness. Not exactly a sympathy factor. It will add to the doubt SP has casted with his actions from day one.
750 posted on 06/01/2003 4:29:34 PM PDT by oceanperch (Who needs Hollywood Productions when you have Fox Reality TV?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 749 | View Replies]

To: oceanperch
Who is asking the Govt to support them due to a disability? The Petersons'?

They are thousands who suffer from depression at the taxpayers expense. My point was that I'm glad the Rochas are not part of that. And we can differ on this point, okay?

751 posted on 06/01/2003 4:31:24 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 743 | View Replies]

Comment #752 Removed by Moderator

To: oceanperch
BTW Rocha's own Attn. said three hours ago on Fox that Sharon was not telling the truth.

About what? What did he say?

753 posted on 06/01/2003 4:35:11 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 744 | View Replies]

To: oceanperch
The Petersons maybe in denial over the son but if they truly loved Laci as their own they should have gave the Rochas' their blessing on retreiving personal items as soon as possible.

I'm trying to think back to the beginning of all this, when the Petersons said something to that effect. I can see why they would be upset that their son is considered the prime suspect, but they way they've gone about EVERYTHING including not shutting the hell up after the bodies were found, makes me wonder if they cared for Laci and the baby at all.

754 posted on 06/01/2003 4:36:18 PM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (America...love it or leave it. Canada is due north-Mexico is directly south...start walking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 750 | View Replies]

Comment #755 Removed by Moderator

To: RGSpincich
I don't disagree. Depression in most cases is treatable and many carry on without losing everything to end up on SSI Disability.

I thought you maybe referring to the Petersons Jackie being on o2 that they are on SSI disability. Which I feel if she can show up for her son and care for his needs she can show up to a job or work out of her home.

When one is on SSI disability I usually think of adults that I know whose retired parents have given up rights to care for them. These are adults who are like my son completely disabled. Or terminal patients who have not one dime left to there name.

As for depression and other mental disorders I have no idea what the deal is on SSI disablity payments.

I know quite a few paraplegics that work in society and would never consider govt. payment. Maybe a loan for school or grants but I do not know if that is private or public.

A dear freind of ours has learning disabilities and is blind in one eye and after a lot of trying is finally starting Nursing school in Jan.

756 posted on 06/01/2003 4:47:56 PM PDT by oceanperch (Who needs Hollywood Productions when you have Fox Reality TV?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 751 | View Replies]

To: TheSpottedOwl
I had my opinion that they were not the kindest hearted in laws too.

What firmed it up for me was Jackie saying "our house". That was a big slip in the wrong direction.

If they want to help set Scaughty free they should be approaching things waaay more compassionate.

I was thinking of the NE from May that had pics of the inside of the home and now it comes out that Jackie is the contact when the burglar alarm goes off.

How come it did not go off or if it did Jackie P did not call MPD when NE supposedly hopped the fence and got in to take pice. Could she have known they were coming and taken payment for allowing them access? If so it will show up on someones income tax I would think if the some was large enough.
757 posted on 06/01/2003 4:57:09 PM PDT by oceanperch (Who needs Hollywood Productions when you have Fox Reality TV?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 754 | View Replies]

To: oceanperch
I wouldn't think that applies in this case... (but if someone else knows, please advise..)
758 posted on 06/01/2003 5:02:11 PM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 746 | View Replies]

To: oceanperch; runningbear
Isn't that covered on their homeowners policy?

Don't think that is covered by homeowners insurance. My lender sells mortgage life insurance. It's pretty expensive, we opt for term life insurance from the same company that has the homeowner's policy to cover the amount of mortgage and some change. Much cheaper. I will say that no payoff on Laci's home has been recorded at this point.

Homeowners policy may end up making a payout to Laci's heirs if they win a wrongful death suit against SP. Didn't OJ's homeowner's policy have to payoff to the Browns and Goldmans?

759 posted on 06/01/2003 5:13:33 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 746 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
Too far back for me to recall...Only that I remember that rather hefty judgement the Browns won, that they took pretty much everything of value OJ had.... including that trophy.... They even tried for his NFL retirement salary? couldn't tap into that..

I just think that they have to pay for it, until the criminal process is thru, and pending civil actions... I just hope the Rocha's sue the heck out of the Petersons... ;o)

760 posted on 06/01/2003 5:20:47 PM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 759 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740741-760761-780 ... 881-894 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson