Posted on 06/05/2003 9:35:04 PM PDT by nickcarraway
UNFPA still deviously covering for China's brutal, enforced, one-child policy
FRONT ROYAL, Virginia, June 5, 2003 (pop.org/LifeSiteNews.com) - In its June 4 Weekly Briefing, the Population Research Institute warns that UNFPA supporters are attempting to gut the 1985 U.S. law which forbids U.S. funds from going to any organization or country that participates in a program of forced abortion or sterilization.
Recent PRI investigations in China have revealed that the gruesome forced abortion policy is still being enforced in the Communist country.
PRI reports, "One former Chinese official, now residing in the U.S., said that at provincial hospitals, pre-born babies are often delivered alive then killed. The policy is "for the nurse to take the baby as soon as the baby came out, alive or dead, and place her hand over the baby's mouth. [t]hen. place the baby into a garbage can filled with water, to drown the baby."
Also, says PRI's Steve Mosher, "According to another Chinese doctor, China's health bureaucracy regularly "slaughters infants" while carrying out the one-child policy.
According to this witness, the babies of one-child policy victims are also delivered alive, then "taken back from the Gynecology and Obstetrics Hospital. When the infant is born, the nurse will take it away right away, and won't let its mother see it and know if it's living or dead."
More is revealed about callous harvesting of organs on demand from born babies who are immediately killed when organs or cells for experimentation purpose are requested.
PRI and its local Chinese witnesses insist that, despite the usual government denials, these atrocities are "part and parcel of national policy. All hospitals and abortion facilities in China are subject to what one witness termed 'the same national program involving coercive abortion and involuntary sterilization today without change.'"
UNFPA claims that its "model family planning counties" are free of such abuses, says Mosher, but the evidence is that the UN organization is once again engaging in information manipulation in order to protect its star population control nation. A Senior Chinise health official told PRI that the Coercive regulation are enforced throughout the nation which would indicate that UNFPA is not telling the truth, as it rarely does anyway.
The population watchdog organization concludes, "The U.S. should not fund groups that are working hand-in-glove with China's population control machine. This is why the effort to gut Kemp-Kasten should be turned back".
If anyone wants on or off my ProLife Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
Population control/abortion enthusiasts on the House International Relations Committee last month succeeded in including language in the Committee Report that would render Kemp-Kasten toothless.
The new language states that UNFPA will be funded if the "President certifies to the Congress that the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) does not directly support or participate in coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization" [italics added]. It goes on to reveal its true purpose by providing a hefty $50 million for the UNFPA for 2004 and 2005 in the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, 2004-2005 (H.R.1950).
No one argues that UNFPA employees in China are doing forced abortions and sterilizations themselves, only that they collaborate with a regime that does, thus facilitating these human rights abuses. This is sufficient, under the current law, for the President of the United States to deny them funding.
Call the bastards
Liberal spin: In its June 4 Weekly Briefing, the Population Research Institute warns that UNFPA supporters right wing elements are attempting to gut the 1985 U.S. law which forbids U.S. funds from going to any organization or country that participates in a program of forced abortion or sterilization. that upholds the reproductive freedom of women everywhere.
PRI reports, "One former Chinese official, now residing in the U.S., said that at provincial hospitals, pre-born babies are often delivered alive then killed. partial birth abortion is practiced regularly
More is revealed about callous harvesting of organs on demand from born babies who are immediately killed when organs or cells for experimentation purpose are requested. when one considers the usual arguments put forth by pro-abortion types, in that such research is needed to 'advance medicine'.
UNFPA Planned Parenthood claims that its "model family planning counties" are free of such abuses, says Mosher Gandy, but the evidence is that the UNhuman rights organization is once again engaging in information manipulation yet another battle in order to protect its star population people from reproductive control. nation.
I'm with Mosher................I decided to rewrite this article in such a way as the usual suspects would present it.
My mistake. Spin in the wrong direction.............
.......spin all the same.
...this paragraph might become under NOW types:
According to witnesses, the babies of one-child policy victims socially responsible parents are also delivered alive, then"taken back from the Gynecology and Obstretics Hospital. When the infant is born, the nurse will take it away right away, and won't let its mother see it and know if it is living or dead ensure that it is placed in proper custody of the authorities
.............they'll make the most cherished words sound filthy.
• "In order to stabilize world population, it is necessary to eliminate 350,000 people a day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it's just as bad not to say it." - Oceanographer Jaques Cousteau Published in the Courier, a publication of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
NEW WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION CHIEF INVOLVED IN [abortifacient]POPULATION CONTROL VACCINE SCANDAL
The UN Wants Population Control in Ethiopia, CEDAW Passed, Appointed 3 Pro-Abortion Judges to the International Court
Population Research Institute, Get the TRUTH Here About Population Control!!
Focus on Population Control
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.