Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What if Hitler Had Invaded the United States in World War Two?
Ave Maria

Posted on 06/16/2003 6:15:57 PM PDT by AveMaria

This is a nightmare scenario targetted towards all of you World War Two history buffs.

About a week ago, a statue of Eisenhower was unveiled at the Capitol in DC, honoring President Eisenhower in his army uniform. In a speech commemorating that occassion, Bob Dole asked the audience to consider what would have happened if Ike had failed in his crusade. Is there a possibility that Hitler would have managed to take advantage of political, regional, and ethnic divisions in America in the 1940s, and defeated good old USA?

It certainly would not have been possible for Hitler to stage a successful naval invasion across the Atlantic to take the Eastern Seaboard, irrespective of whether or not America succeded in Europe. He simply did not have a Navy that was large enough for that task.

I considered various ways in which the Germans would have defeated America, assuming that they had succeeded in their mission to conquer the Soviet Union:

1. They might have attempted to conquer Alaska, based on their ability to control Siberia and the arctic regions of Russia. From there, they would have rolled over poorly defended Canada, from which they would have launched a massive invasion from the sparsely populated North-Western US.

2. Using the historic grievances that Mexico has, especially over territorial loss in the 1848 war, Hitler could have encouraged the Mexicans to stage a massive military invasion from the South (something similar to what their illegals are already doing). Given that many South Americans had pro-axis fascist feelings during the war, Brazil and Argentina could have send their own armies as well, to support the Mexicans. And, considering that Latin America continued to trade with Germany in the war years, Germany would have been able to move massive armaments and troops to South America, support an invasion from Mexico. As a reward, Mexico would have been rewarded with the return of California, New Mexico and Arizona. The rest of South America would have had a chance to be freed from American regional dominance that has existed since the Monroe Doctrine.

3. Hitler could have reached out to the anti-FDR right-wing, the likes of Charles Lindberg, Henry Ford, Rev. Charles Coughlin, and their many followers who were influential in the America First Movement. He could have used the resentment that Irish-Americans and German-Americans had for Anglo elites who wanted to save Britain, a nation that many in both groups disliked (I am Irish myself, and I am aware about how many Irishmen resented going to help Britain. The Republic of Ireland made a conscious decision to stay neutral in the war to the very end).

4. Germany could have offered the South a second chance. If the South militarily supported the defeat of the Yankees, they could get back the Confederate States of America. The CSA would have been a fully independent right-wing nation that was allied to Germany, like Franco's Spain. They would have been allowed to preserve their system of segregation, a system that Germans approved of.

5. In the 1940s, Eugenics was highly favored by both liberal and conservative elites in New England. American race scientists like H. Goddard, Carl Bingham, Madison Grant, and Lothrop Stoddard were standard readings in the school system in Nazi Germany. A shared interest in race issues would have brought the Nazis and the New England Eugenicists together.

A combination of all those forces would have overwhelmed the FDR administration.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Germany; Government; Philosophy; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: eisenhower; germany; hitler; worldwar2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 301-310 next last
To: jlogajan
Yes, but according to Monty Pythion, we had developed the ultimate joke, which would make people die laughing! (Quick, anyone remember the joke...) (Hint, it's about Hitler's dog...)
181 posted on 06/16/2003 8:32:30 PM PDT by plusone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus
It always surprised me that the Japanese did not invade Hawaii and the West Coast.

If US Naval intelligence had not cracked the Japanese naval codes, we might have lost the battle of Midway and control of Midway Island. In that case, there probably would have been an attempt to invade Hawaii. The destruction of four Japanese aircraft carriers (three of them witin five minutes) prevented additional naval offensives agains the US.

182 posted on 06/16/2003 8:33:50 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: AveMaria
Well, the fact is, if Hitler had any military sense whatsoever, in that he used decent tactics and didn't get involved in a two front war immediately, Germany could have defeated the United States. Germany probably would have even won against both the U.S. and Soviet Union if Hitler wasn't such a military moron. Germany might not have necessarily won, but they sure as hell wouldn't lose, either, until the nuclear bomb came out.
183 posted on 06/16/2003 8:33:56 PM PDT by Norse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NovemberCharlie
You'd probably like the alternative history woven by Harry Turtledove starting with How Few Remain (Second war between the states) and winding through the defeat of the Confederacy, England\Canada, France and Japan by the US and Germany in the Great War series.

Forstchens "Lost Regiment" Series is a romp too, more in the sci-fi alternative arena though.

If you're interested in gaming a couple of scenarios, if you kick major butt as the Germans in Panzer General II in the Blitzkrieg Campaign you eventually end up invading England and then on to the US landing at Saratoga and a final engagement with the defenders of Oak Ridge. Two situations unfold, an early and a late. Its WAY harder to beat England and the US with Pzkfw III's and IV's in an earlier run than later with Tiger II's, Panther G's, Jets, and self propelled howitzers, though the Americans have the P-80 and the computer fights American forces like we're possesed :)

184 posted on 06/16/2003 8:34:19 PM PDT by Axenolith (<This space for rent>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AveMaria
Apropos of Eisenhower, according to a recent book, "The Secret Empire" by Taubman Ike was a real hero after the war too. It's a fascinating and well-researched book about how we developed the U-2 and surveillance satellites, without which we would have been sunk during the Cold War.

We knew next to nothing about the Russian space or atomic programs and it was Ike, as prez, who pushed these crucial programs forward. He was a great prez, better than most people think. Certainly much better than Klintoon and several other presidents.

185 posted on 06/16/2003 8:37:35 PM PDT by Paulus Invictus (RATS are scum with poor memories)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xrp
Keep in mind the limited power of rockets in WW2 compared to the size/weight of nuclear bombs. When were ICBMs introduced? Late 1950s or early 1960s, right? Hitler would have been 15 years away from an intercontinental delivery system. Plus, wasn't there a documentary on the History Channel recently about the German atomic project not really getting anywhere?

This is true, however to view this scenario in it's fullest you have to determine if the Russians had been defeated, the British Isles invaded and nothing to stop Hitler and his scientist from rapid development of more 'wonder' weapons.
IF you take into account the huge amount of resources availe and the lack of any substaintial opposition he could have developed the weapon(s) needed for just 1 launch at the North American continent. He would have to have many...one a month? One every 6 months?

186 posted on 06/16/2003 8:39:12 PM PDT by Pistolshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Axenolith
I believe Yamamoto's statement was that there would be "a rifle behind every blade of grass".

Who would fear that now? Or even think it was true?

187 posted on 06/16/2003 8:39:19 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1
Forgive me, but you are WRONG on # 1. A German victory in the East would have been FAR more costly than Hitler could ever have imagined pre-June 1941, BUT - it was possible.

In fact, I believe that one of his generals proposed a plan for conquering the Middle East, and coming up on Russia from that direction as well as through Europe. Hitler wasn't interested in the Middle East, however.

Even given Operation Barbarossa, had Hitler not foolishly delayed the onset of the War by over a month in order to conquer and punish the Yugoslavs (Serbs, really), who had rejected an alliance with him, he STILL could have won the war by concentrating all of his forces on one devastating thrust to Moscow. Had Moscow been taken early, as could have happened if the three invasion groups had been unified, Russia would have CRUMBLED.

Stalin might well have gone down in Moscow (remember that he refused to leave it in Dec '41). Even if he had escaped, ALL of the communications - rail, road, telegraph, etc. in the Soviet Union ran through Moscow. Take out Moscow and Russia would have been separated into islands of resistance that could then have been reduced and isolated until their collapse. The psychological blow of Moscow's loss to the Russian will to fight can also not be underestimated.

For those of us from the formerly communist lands, there has always been some question whether we would have been better off under a Hitlerite despotism, or - as happened - under the oriental communist tyranny partly visited on us because of the West's betrayal of Central/Eastern Europe at Yalta.

Al

188 posted on 06/16/2003 8:44:42 PM PDT by Al Simmons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Regulator
Actually, yes. The only down side is that all of us patriotic types would be spending a lot of time defending against all of the 5th columnists who would come boiling out of the woodwork.

I don't think we'd go down at this time, if we did, we'd sure take a lot of them with us ;)

189 posted on 06/16/2003 8:45:53 PM PDT by Axenolith (<This space for rent>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
I'm a WW2 buff and I don't see any feasible way that Hitler could have defeated the United States.

With better spies Germany could have developed the atomic bomb and avoided losing. I agree he could not have won though.

190 posted on 06/16/2003 8:48:01 PM PDT by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
I just don't think there is any realistic scenario in which Hitler could have successfully invaded, or otherwise defeated, the United States.

How about if instead of invading the Soviet Union he became military allies with Stalin? He started out that way with Poland.

191 posted on 06/16/2003 8:49:20 PM PDT by CharacterCounts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
the braintrust at Los Alamos was overwhelmingly comprised of European refugees, mostly Jewish.

You probably think that Hollywood and the media are controlled by jews too.

192 posted on 06/16/2003 9:00:55 PM PDT by clockwork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: xrp
Post 171 clarifies this...I hadn't heard about that. Still, the paraphrase I referred to was Stalin, I'm pretty, no almost entirely sure.
193 posted on 06/16/2003 9:10:01 PM PDT by mitchbert (Facts are Stubborn Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: AveMaria
Bump for later reading.
194 posted on 06/16/2003 9:19:37 PM PDT by The South Texan (The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCCNN NYLA TIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AveMaria
"Germany could have offered the South a second chance."

For anyone venturing upon our shores with malice the South is the Killing Ground...our Killing Ground...

195 posted on 06/16/2003 9:22:19 PM PDT by TexanToTheCore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
"I'm a WW2 buff and I don't see any feasible way that Hitler could have defeated the United States."

I basically agree with you but consider a Mexico-Germany alliance combined with the placement of hundreds of V2 rockets circa, say, 1946. Hitler might not have beat us but he could have forced us to cease hostilities and possibly forced the election of a pacifist. With all our major cities threatened who knows?

This is incidentally the same concern we all have about terrorists and WMDs. If they can make good on threats to destroy one major city at a time (like Lex Luthor in Superman) would we fight or just give up? Would we die in defense of our nation or accept life as slaves?

196 posted on 06/16/2003 9:48:33 PM PDT by tom h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
Oh and by the way in the 1940's one did not 'roll down' Alaska. The Alcan Highway was not built until the 1950's-the late 1950's if I remember correctly.

You are incorrect. The Alcan Highway,now called the Alaska Highway,was built in a five month period in 1942. The US Army Corps of Engineers, using Army Engineers, and civilian contractors, built it to supply the Russian Lend-Lease program, which staged through Fairbanks.

After the war, in 1946, it was opened to the public. Improvement work continues to this day.

When we first came over the road, in 1958, the road was virtually all dust or mud. Today, though the miles can still be monotonous, it is a two lane paved road. There are towns with all services along it's length. The onlty glimpses of the past are construction zones and a short stretch along Kluane Lake. Even there the road is paved, though it is very narrow and winds along between the lake and the Mountains.

197 posted on 06/16/2003 10:52:00 PM PDT by snowtigger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Al Simmons
I still dont think Germany would have won. With 1) Land, 2) Urals, 3) Population, Germany stood no chance. With 150,000,000 people vs 60,000,000 Germans, It just wouldn't have happened. Stalin was shrewd and would have evacuated everything and everyone to the Urals until his multi-million manpower armies could be assembled. Remember, Zhukov had 2 Million siberian troops for the winter offensive in 1941 and for the "umpteenth" time, General Winter and the bravado of Russian/Soviet soldiers defending the "rodina" saved Russia.

We are saying the same thing, just differently.

Germany MIGHT have won if Hitler stayed out of the Generals way, but with Hitler in control, Russia would never fall.

198 posted on 06/16/2003 11:05:40 PM PDT by DCBryan1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1
I agree. Hitler was a "military genius" so long as he listened to his officers and then adopted their plans as if they were his own (such as the invasion of France through the Ardennes).

Once Hitler started micromanaging the war, Germany was doomed.

Although, being of Slavic heritage, a part of me still regrets that Stalin died a natural death. He deserved worse, and our collaboration with him in WW II was realpolitik at its absolute worst. Like Castor oil, you know its good for you but it sure leaves a HORRID taste in your mouth.

Its a pity that Germany and Russia could not BOTH lose WW II.

P.S. My favorite (ironic) Hitler quote: "Starting a war is like stepping into a dark room."
199 posted on 06/17/2003 12:17:51 AM PDT by Al Simmons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
"You are all forgetting that there were para-military units right here in the mid-west called bundts (sp?) made up of the children and grandchildren of German immigrents."

IIRC correctly, the leader of the German-American Bund made some remark that the organization had 500,000 members, to which an American Congressman replied that we had "500,001 lamposts."

I've always liked that way of thinking.
200 posted on 06/17/2003 12:37:46 AM PDT by PLMerite ("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 301-310 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson