Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael D. Evans: Where are WMDs? Hidden in Syria
Worldnetdaily ^ | 06-23-03

Posted on 06/23/2003 7:30:47 PM PDT by Brian S

Where are WMDs? Hidden in Syria


Posted: June 23, 2003
5:00 p.m. Eastern

It is widely believed by the U.S. and Israeli intelligence communities that the evidence Saddam Hussein deployed weapons of mass destruction is hidden in Syria, among Damascus' own substantial arsenal of unconventional weapons.

On April 13, 2003, President George W. Bush said Syria possesses Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and warned the Assad regime to cooperate with the U.S.-led war against the regime of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. The U.S. demanded that Syria give up its stash of Iraqi WMDs and fugitive WMD scientists. Officials said the flight of Iraqi biological and nuclear components and scientists to Syria could turn that country into the next WMD threat to the United States and its allies in the Middle East and Europe.

The Bush administration has been examining a range of sanctions with which to pressure Damascus to surrender Iraqi WMDs and scientists.

"We will examine possible measures of a diplomatic, economic or other nature as we move forward," U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell said on April 14. "We are in touch with Syrian authorities and will make them aware of our concerns and we'll see how things unfold as we move forward." Powell did not elaborate regarding sanctions, but the U.S. already embargoes military sales to Syria.

U.S. officials said the extent of the Iraqi-Syrian WMD connection was revealed by Jaffar Jaffar, regarded as the father of Iraq's nuclear program, after he fled to Syria and then to an unidentified Arab country where he surrendered to U.S. authorities.

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld confirmed this on April 14, when he said Syria had conducted a series of chemical-weapons tests. Later, his aides explained the tests sought to exploit the transfer of Iraqi expertise on the weaponization of WMD agents that would enable Syria to develop a second- or third-generation chemical-warfare capability. "I would say that we have seen chemical-weapons tests in Syria over the past 12, 15 months," Rumsfeld said.

Syrian President Bashar Assad has denied knowledge of Iraqi WMDs hidden in his country – not that he could dare to reveal any without dooming himself by becoming the first Arab leader to surrender Islamic weapons of mass destruction to the United States.

On April 24, 2003, The New York Times reported that a captured Iraqi scientist who worked in Iraq's chemical weapons program for more than a decade had led U.S. investigators to material that proved to be the building blocks of WMDs. The scientist also said Iraq had secretly sent unconventional weapons and technology to Syria, starting in the mid-1990s. A U.S. military team said the scientist was credible.

The paper also reported that the scientist told investigators that Saddam's government had destroyed some stockpiles of WMDs as early as the mid-1990s, but had transferred others to Syria and had shifted efforts to developing WMDs that are undetectable by international inspectors.

Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon disclosed in a television interview in December 2002 that Syria is hiding Saddam's WMDs.

"What we believe, and I say that we have not yet confirmed it conclusively, is that weapons he wants to hide – chemical and biological weapons – have indeed been sent to Syria," Sharon said. "Saddam Hussein wanted to hide his weapons, and I think that the Americans know that."

Later, a senior Israeli intelligence official said Sharon had played down evidence of Syrian complicity in concealing Iraq's WMD capability, said to have included mobile biological facilities as well as chemical munitions.

The official said the U.S. had already examined evidence provided by Israel. "We have solid evidence," the official said. "This is not a hunch or speculation."

On March 31, 2003, a senior Israel Defense Forces intelligence officer told the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee that Iraqi chemical and biological weapons are probably hidden in Syria.

"It is possible Iraq transferred missiles and weapons of mass destruction into Syria," Intelligence Research Department head Brig. Gen. Yossi Kuperwasser told the committee, Israel Radio reported. He said this would explain why U.S.-led forces scouring suspect sites in western Iraq had found nothing so far.

According to the Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Syria has the largest and most advanced chemical-warfare capability in the Middle East, including chemical warheads for Scud ballistic missiles and cruise missiles, chemical gravity bombs for delivery by aircraft, and chemical warheads for artillery shells. It has an estimated CW stockpile in the hundreds of tons, including Sarin, VX, and mustard gas.

It appears – for now – that Syria is keeping its own WMDs and any it is sheltering for Iraq under close control and is not about to transfer some to Hezbollah in Lebanon. While it is in Syria's interest to keep Israel on the defensive by encouraging Hezbollah radicalism, it is not in its interest to invite massive Israeli retaliation for a WMD attack. According to Dr. Boaz Ganor, head of the Herzliya-based International Policy Institute for Counter-terrorism, it is not Hezbollah's ideology of working toward Israel's destruction that will dictate its next move:

"In my opinion, Hezbollah's ideology, or its intentions, are not relevant. There is one key player – Syria. What will determine the level of security in the North is not the ideology of Hezbollah and not even the desire of the Lebanese government, but rather the interests of Syria."

Besides Hezbollah, Ganor notes that Syria cultivates other terrorist groups that are committed to Israel's destruction, such as Hamas and Islamic Jihad.

"But in the present constellation, when world focus is on Syria, it would not be rational for Damascus to transfer WMDs to these groups and invite a massive U.S. response," he said. "Under the present U.S. administration, such action by Syria would be considered a casus belli." He did not discount the possibility of U.S. military intervention under such circumstances.

We know that, in addition to building massive underground bunkers in Baghdad, Saddam also prepared escape routes from Iraq for himself, his family and his top officials. From the number of high Iraqi officials – including weapons scientists – who have turned up in Damascus, it is not unreasonable to assume that this escape route was functioning before and during the Iraq war. It is the same well-traveled route used in the other direction by Palestinian would-be suicide bombers to reach Iraq from Lebanon, where Hezbollah helped to organize their "solidarity missions." If Syria harbored Saddam's personnel, why not his WMDs? If Saddam could hide his air force from the U.S. with his erstwhile enemy Iran during the first Gulf War, why not hide WMDs with friendly Syria this time?

While the Bush administration pursues the implementation of the road map in hopes of resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and works to rebuild a post-Saddam Iraq, it must not lose focus on the looming danger represented by Syria.

One hopes Assad will continue to act rationally in Syria's self-interest. The question is whether Syria's terrorist proxies will let him do so in an atmosphere of growing Islamist volatility – surrounding a potential Armageddon-size store of weapons of mass destruction.


Michael D. Evans is the author of the best seller "Beyond Iraq: The Next Move."


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: syria; wmd

1 posted on 06/23/2003 7:30:47 PM PDT by Brian S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brian S
Where are WMDs? Hidden in Syria

This sounds like the most logical conclusion possible. Although I wouldn't rule out Saddam destroying, or hiding in Iraq some of his WMD.

When PresBush called the Syrian's out for having their own WMD, he was telling the world to keep a close eye on these bastards. Same with North Korea. Both countries have no credibility. Highly dangerous.

2 posted on 06/23/2003 7:51:12 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
We heard a lot about all those underground bunkers and subways before the war but I have heard almost nothing about them since. Did we find them? Have we explored them? An underground railroad, literally, into Syria would seem a distinct possibility. Any knowledge of that?
3 posted on 06/23/2003 7:57:23 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot
From what I know, there are almost 1,000 known sites in Iraq that could contain WMD. The allied forces have examined less then 400 sites, so far. I'm sure the underground bunkers and subway tunnels are part of the examination process. I haven't heard anything about a railroad directly to Syria. That would be a long long long railroad and a huge construction project. We shall see.
4 posted on 06/23/2003 8:04:01 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Thud
FYI
5 posted on 06/23/2003 8:17:00 PM PDT by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
Nah, they were returned to France, where they had been manufactured in the first place. Now the frogs have to find replacement buyers before we knock those off too.
6 posted on 06/23/2003 8:29:00 PM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
Excellent article. Thanks. I've added it to the master WMD list.

These paragraphs are so far-reaching that they're breathtaking. They explain both a process for hiding WMDs and a potential explanation for Gulf War Syndrome if one reads between the lines. New classes of WMDs or research on the long-term effects of low-level known WMDs. Awesome.

On April 24, 2003, The New York Times reported that a captured Iraqi scientist who worked in Iraq's chemical weapons program for more than a decade had led U.S. investigators to material that proved to be the building blocks of WMDs. The scientist also said Iraq had secretly sent unconventional weapons and technology to Syria, starting in the mid-1990s. A U.S. military team said the scientist was credible.

The paper also reported that the scientist told investigators that Saddam's government had destroyed some stockpiles of WMDs as early as the mid-1990s, but had transferred others to Syria and had shifted efforts to developing WMDs that are undetectable by international inspectors.

All You ever wanted to know about WMDs

Terrorist devices, chemical weapons found in Iraq

Suspicious Iraqi Drums - UPDATE

Suspected bioweapons labs found

Searching for Weapons of Mass Destruction, Larry Elder

Iraq's Weapons and the Road to War

Iraqi Scientist Links Weapons to 'Dual Use' Facilities, White House Says

IRAQ: U.S. Analysts Link Iraq Labs to Germ Arms

Illicit Arms Kept Till Eve of War, an Iraqi Scientist Is Said to Assert

Herald Sun: Soldiers find Iraqi chemical 'dump'

***Germany's leading role in arming Iraq

*Germany intercepts (30 tonnes) chemicals (may be used to make nerve gas) for N Korea

New DOD team to hunt for intel as well as weapons

***Chemical Weapons Programs

Capture of chemical expert could help U.S. weapons hunt in Iraq (Emad Husayn Abdulla al-Ani)

Belgium Finds Nerve Gas Ingredient in Letters

Banned missile programme found in Iraq

Administration to Announce 'Rollback' Strategy for WMD

Suspicious Iraqi Drums Preliminary Testing Suggests Chemical Agents; More Testing Needed

2 trailers deemed biological arms labs

***Table 2: Characteristics of Chemical Warfare Agents: Commercial Uses of Chemicals or Precursor Chemicals

***CENTAF IRAQ'S CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS PROGRAM

WARNING: Gathering WMD storm a crock. See what Clinton told nation in 1998...

THE ROAD ENDS FOR WMD ON WHEELS

Coalition forces enter possible WMD site

Initial tests suggest WMD "cocktail" found in Iraq (**Of special note--post #58, by Archy)

U.S. finds new evidence of Iraqi WMD (NBC training school, antidotes)

Chem-weapons lab believed discovered

BRITS' CHILLING CHEM-NUKE FIND

CAPTURED FOES FOUND WITH CHEM-WAR GEAR

EUPHRATES 'POISONED'

MSNBC - Cyanide & Mustard Agents Found in Euphrates River

Is the Activity at Al Qaim Related to Nuclear Efforts?

U.S. probing nuclear facility (Al Tuwaitha Follow Up)

Team Inspects suspected plutonium site (update by the journalist who broke original story, NEW info)

Underground Nuclear Facility Found in Iraq

Marines hold Iraqi nuclear site built by French

U.S. Marines Guard Secret Iraqi City with Very Hot Nuclear Radiation Levels

IRAQ: WMD source 'was senior Iraqi officer'

If Bush, Powell & Rumsfeld "Lied" on WMD, So Did the UN, EU & Clinton (RUSH LIMBAUGH)

Rumsfeld Denies 'False Pretext' for Iraq War

Who screwed up?

An absence of evidence proves nothing

Powell Defends Information He Used to Justify Iraq War

Iraq Resumes WMD Activities, New York Times Reports [Carnegie - Jan. 22, 2001]

Iraq Rebuilt Weapons Factories, Officials Say

U.S. says more radioactive material than expected found at Iraqi nuclear site

Fate of Al-Tuwaitha nuclear material unclear

Iraq Failing to Disarm: Nuclear Weapons

***October 1998:Senate Democrats Signed Letter Urging Clinton To Attack Saddam Over WMDs

U.S. Discovers Weapons of Mass Destruction Lab.(see para 8; scrubbed caustics)

Weapons of Mass Destruction ( or Distorsion or Deception? You decide...)

Iraq's bioweapons program: detailed info on mobile labs from pre-war intel.

As conspiracies go, this is a doozy

Michael D. Evans: Where are WMDs? Hidden in Syria

7 posted on 06/23/2003 8:38:50 PM PDT by HatSteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HatSteel
Half your links are two or three months old and those stories are dead or discredited? The fact remains - no WMDs have been found. Your list is not exactley useful.
8 posted on 06/23/2003 8:58:02 PM PDT by Burkeman1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Burkeman1
We've been in Iraq for 2 or 3 months. Of course they're 2 or 3 months old (some of them). It's called tracking the flow of info. "Discredited" is the wrong word. It implies that the soldiers who found the different potential systems had somehow misrepresented them. They hadn't. They had simply "presented" them.

The mobile anthrax labs are still called mobile anthrax labs. The missiles and bombs found that were designed for use with WMDs are still considered special weapons for use with WMDs. The atropine and the chem suits were found in warehouse quantities.

The only think lacking is a container filled with anthrax, vx, sarin, mustard, etc.

Do you realize that these WMDs DID exist in Iraq? Do you realize that our troops CANNOT leave Iraq until the WMDs are accounted for? We cannot be party to arming any new Iraqi government through complacency in finding the former regime's WMDs.

9 posted on 06/24/2003 5:04:27 AM PDT by HatSteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HatSteel
It doesn't imply anything about the soldiers. Their job is not to determine anything about what is discovered. There is a large question about the mobile antrhax labs. That is not an established fact by far. And every army has protective gear for chemical or bio warfare. We have found nothing so far. They were given away or destoyed shortly before the war. We will never find them. I would wager a heck of lot of the WMD's are in AL Queada or Hamas hands right now and out of Iraq to be used against us or Israel in the future. Yep- a real successful operation.
10 posted on 06/24/2003 7:07:55 PM PDT by Burkeman1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Burkeman1
That is not an established fact by far

That is a far cry from being "discredited."

Chem suits are needed by nations who possess chem/bio ready missiles and bombs....both of which were found in Iraq.

Destruction is only one possibility. There are others.

1. Just-in-time production.
2. Missile side mixing.
3. New classes of WMDs via new research.
4. Hidden.
5. Destroyed.
6. Moved to another country.
7. Deployed in oceanic vessels.
8. Others?

11 posted on 06/24/2003 7:36:06 PM PDT by HatSteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HatSteel
Or nations that could be attacked by nations possessing them. I am sure the Suadi military has chem/bio suits and shots. I am sure Kuwait does as well. I am sure even a nation like Australia has them. Don't get me wrong- Sadaam had them but suits and gear to protect from attack are not evidence of anything. I don't get your first "just in time" point. I don't get missle side mixing. I don't get "new WMDS". I get hidden. I get dstroyed. I get moved to another country. I get destroyed. I don't think ships is an option or we would have heard about it by now.
12 posted on 06/24/2003 7:52:13 PM PDT by Burkeman1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Burkeman1
There was a blurb in one news item about WMDs possibly being at sea. I'd have to look to find it.

Read the asterisked items in the above links list to understand just-in-time production and missile side mixing.

It's basically a process of assembling all of the legal chemicals needed to create the illegal chemical weapons.

You place them in known areas, have a method of producing the chemicals "on call" or "just-in-time" in dual use chemical facilities. (Perhaps you recall the tylenol scare of a decade or so ago....some folks were killed by someone intentionally contaminating Tylenol on store shelves. During that investigation it became public knowledge that the plants that make Tylenol also make cyanide (or some other poison?) and that it's a minor technological adjustment when they convert from one production run to another.) Fertilizer plants, chemical plants, and medicine plants can have the dual use of producing "chemical weapons" on a "just in time" basis.

Weapon-side or missile side mixing is a similar process only you have mobile chem labs that mix the legal chemicals into the recipe for the chemical weapons while alongside the weapons themselves.

13 posted on 06/24/2003 8:10:24 PM PDT by HatSteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HatSteel
Thanks for the info. I will check it out when I have time. But forget the ship thing. It is ancient. It was back in April while the war was going on. It was speculation. I would suspect that we would have tracked those ships down and checked it out by now.
14 posted on 06/24/2003 8:23:40 PM PDT by Burkeman1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson