Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Former Rep. Tim Roemer, D-IN, mentioned in the article, is the son-in-law of former Sen. J. Bennett Johnston, D-LA.
1 posted on 07/14/2003 3:16:35 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: All
We're On A Mission From God
Help us make our 3rd quarter fundraising goal in record time!

2 posted on 07/14/2003 3:18:41 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
Oh, Saddam wasn't dangerous ...

(I'm so sick of this garbage)
3 posted on 07/14/2003 3:19:53 PM PDT by JmyBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
Now we have Freepers who spout DUmmyland LW drivel.

Great.
4 posted on 07/14/2003 3:22:34 PM PDT by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
I dunno, was Bush under oath?
5 posted on 07/14/2003 3:25:17 PM PDT by chance33_98 (http://home.frognet.net/~thowell/haunt/ ---->our ghosty page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
Though this writer has yet to publish any significant research regarding Bush's activities on and immediately following 9/11
Now there's an understatement...
6 posted on 07/14/2003 3:25:45 PM PDT by William McKinley (The Democrat Party Appeals To The Midol Challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
tell chuck this:

Gore repeats that Saddam MUST GO - June 2000
Following Gore's meeting with the Iraqi opposition groups, the two sides released a joint statement reiterating the U.S. commitment to removing Saddam Husseyn from power and arguing that Saddam's removal "is the key to the positive transformation of Iraq's relationship to the international community." ---- "U.S. Vice President Al Gore told Iraqi opposition leaders that Saddam Husseyn "must be removed from power,"

The Democrats' Case Against Saddam Hussein (Dems nailed, yet again)
Senator Kerry: "Mr. President, we have every reason to believe that Saddam Hussein will continue to do everything in his power to further develop weapons of mass destruction and the ability to deliver those weapons, and that he will use those weapons without concern or pangs of conscience if ever and whenever his own calculations persuade him it is in his interests to do so. . . . I have spoken before this chamber on several occasions to state my belief that the United States must take every feasible step to lead the world to remove this unacceptable threat.

Headline Rundown and links on Iraq - Things the democrats have conviently forgot...
SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: However, as you all know from the recent crisis that we had, that we are sensing more and more that Saddam Hussein only wants sanctions lifted and does not want to comply with what is absolutely essential, that is, that he not reacquire or redevelop his ability to have weapons of mass destruction, or threaten his neighbors, or threaten our forces in the region. And therefore, we have added to our policy, and are now at containment plus regime change.

Saddam Abused His Last Chance, Clinton -clear and present danger to safety of people everywhere 1998
Clinton: "Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons," Clinton said. The Iraqi dictator has used these weapons against his neighbors and his own people, he said, and "left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will use these terrible weapons again."

What the democrats want you to forget
Clinton: Clinton detailed Hussein's lies and evasions since the end of the Gulf War. Under the agreement ending the war, Hussein had 15 days to report about his nuclear, chemical and biological arsenal. "Iraq has repeatedly made false declarations about the weapons that it had left in its possession after the Gulf War," Clinton said.
U.N. inspectors have found proof time and again that Iraq lied about its nuclear program, Clinton said. The Iraqis simply amended their declaration to incorporate the discoveries.
"[Iraq] has submitted six different biological warfare declarations, each of which has been rejected by [the U.N. Special Commission]," he said.

Iraq is a Regional Threat, capable of as much as 200 tons of VX nerve agent (1999 Clinton report)


7 posted on 07/14/2003 3:26:08 PM PDT by chance33_98 (http://home.frognet.net/~thowell/haunt/ ---->our ghosty page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
Chuck Baldwin forgot Saddam sent his weapons list 12 years ago to the U.N. and signed off on it. I guess Chuck has no
political agenda?????

Christian ministers should not misrepresent the truth.

Ops4 God BLess America!

9 posted on 07/14/2003 3:27:18 PM PDT by OPS4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
Where's the (BARF ALERT)??

The original author is pretty stupid. Clinton wasn't impeached for lying, he was impeached for committing perjury. There is a difference.

11 posted on 07/14/2003 3:29:46 PM PDT by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
"Also, President Bush vehemently denied receiving advanced warnings concerning an impending attack by militant Muslims using airliners as weapons. We now know he did."

I would like to see the source for this comment. Chuck? Anyone?


12 posted on 07/14/2003 3:30:54 PM PDT by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
After learning of the falsehoods and outright lies upon which the war against Iraq was waged, former British Prime Minister John Major said, "It is essential that the word of government and the intelligence services is readily accepted by Parliament and the public." In other words, it is essential that government leaders tell the truth!

I'm still waiting to here what these "falsehoods and outright lies" are.

And an error in one small piece of intelligence doesn't qualify...since anyone over 12 years old knows that intelligence is often a judgement call on far from conclusive evidence...and the statement in question was made long after the Congress had ALREADY voted to support military action anyway.

To claim that they were somehow deceived is cleary false.

The only dishonesty I see is from those now making these baseless accusations against Bush and Blair.

13 posted on 07/14/2003 3:31:42 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
upCHUCK Alert!
14 posted on 07/14/2003 3:32:47 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (Liberals - Their neural synapses are corroded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.

Clicking on this sure was an experience. Like reaching into a bag of popcorn and coming up with a big, kicking cockroach. Chuck Baldwin, eh? I'll try to remember that name.


15 posted on 07/14/2003 3:34:47 PM PDT by Nick Danger (The liberals are slaughtering themselves at the gates of the newsroom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
Equating anything about the present WH to how it was under i42 immediately and automatically makes this piece a piece of garbage!
16 posted on 07/14/2003 3:35:09 PM PDT by Ed_in_NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
There were two posts the other night on FR from former Navy intel officers, and they said that if the public knew half of what went on in the world that posed a threat to this nation, none of us would ever sleep at night.

I'm all in favor of opening the flood gates of intelligence and letting the sheeple know how dangerously close they come every day to being a grease spot on the pavement.

17 posted on 07/14/2003 3:36:31 PM PDT by My2Cents ("Well....there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
Most definitely not. One, Bush doesn't lie. He's a politican, and will make a political presentation which can be interpreted one way or the other -- but he is committed to the truth.

And I think that he owned a Baseball Team should be a great source of comfort to us all as to where his final, to-the-wall-loyalties will lay. Baseball is as deeply American as the Constitution and Declaration in its knowns and in its mysteries.

18 posted on 07/14/2003 3:36:48 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
After learning of the falsehoods and outright lies upon which the war against Iraq was waged

Is he talkin g about the 1998 resolution that Clinton received to stop Saddam Hussein?

Why are democrats suddenly so concerned about the truth?

22 posted on 07/14/2003 3:46:51 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (theclintonsarescumtheclintonsarescumtheclintonsarescum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
Former President Bill Clinton was rightly impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives for lying under oath. Of course, his crimes were not limited to that. However, if lying is reason enough to impeach...

Note how the criterion slips neatly from "lying under oath" to simply "lying" in the course of a sentence? Nice try, Chuckie.

24 posted on 07/14/2003 3:55:13 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
Since you only post things that are negative about Republicans, no matter how dumb they are, I'd like to know which party you support.
26 posted on 07/14/2003 4:00:36 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
Who is this idiot?
And why is this crap posted on FR?

What possible purpose does a delusionary rant serve?

33 posted on 07/14/2003 5:09:02 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Californians are as dumm as a sack of rocks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
Chuck Baldwin can be impeached? What's the procedure? How do we start?
34 posted on 07/14/2003 5:10:57 PM PDT by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson