Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RIDGE ADMITS HE IS COLOR-BLIND
Borowitz Report

Posted on 09/04/2003 5:28:15 PM PDT by dts32041

Threat Level Remains at Gray

Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge admitted today that he is "completely color-blind," but assured the American people that his condition in no way impairs his ability to fulfill his duties as steward of the nation's security.

"Color-blind or not, here at the Department of Homeland Security, it is business as usual," Mr. Ridge said. "The threat level remains at gray."

For Secretary Ridge, the admission that he is color-blind brought with it a tremendous sense of relief, he said.

"In the past, every time I picked up a pointer to indicate the latest threat level on that darned chart, I was always scared to death I would mess up somehow," Mr. Ridge said. "I can't tell you how good it feels to let each and every one of you know that I can't tell one threat level from another."

While Mr. Ridge acknowledged that he found the color-coded threat-alert chart "confusing," he added, "I'm sure I find it no more confusing than anyone else in the country does."

Even as he admitted his own color-blindness, Mr. Ridge announced a bold new initiative that would urge high-fashion designers to color-coordinate their fall collections with the current threat level, yellow.

"I hope they will be showing a lot of yellow this fall," Mr. Ridge said. "Here at the Department of Homeland Security, yellow is the new black."

Carson Kressley, fashion guru of Bravo's hit series "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy," bemoaned Mr. Ridge's fashion alert, saying that "Yellow makes me look like a stick of I-Can't-Believe-It's-Not-Butter," but added, "I'll do anything that beefy dreamboat tells me to."


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: ridge; threatlevel

1 posted on 09/04/2003 5:28:16 PM PDT by dts32041
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
Ping
2 posted on 09/04/2003 5:40:49 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife ("Life isn't fair. It's fairer than death, is all.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
Oh, for Pete's sake, this is easily solved. We stop naming the threat levels after colors - dumb idea anyhow, who could coordinate? - and start naming them after something practical, like body secretions. You know, "Threat Level Phlegm" could be where you're only spitting, and "Threat Level Urine" the more serious level where you're peeing your pants. The highest level could be the equivalent of today's "Threat Level Brown..."
3 posted on 09/04/2003 5:44:39 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
The Onion?
4 posted on 09/04/2003 5:44:52 PM PDT by Mushinronshasan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mushinronshasan
http://www.borowitzreport.com/
5 posted on 09/04/2003 5:53:33 PM PDT by Thumper1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Thumper1960
I'm so color blind that my doctor asks me what I do at intersections with lights. I tell him that I do what everybody else does. He asks what I do if no one is there? I say if nobody is there, then it doesn't matter.
6 posted on 09/04/2003 6:10:33 PM PDT by umgud (gov't has more money than it needs, but never as much as it wants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
We stop naming the threat levels after colors

Roger that ... how about "one finger" ... "two fingers" ... "three fingers" ...

We'll leave it to the imagination WHICH LEVEL and WHICH FINGER we'll use for the *highest* level ...

7 posted on 09/04/2003 6:41:15 PM PDT by _Jim (Resources for Understanding the Blackout of 2003 - www.pserc.wisc.edu/Resources.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: _Jim
Roger that ... how about "one finger" ... "two fingers" ... "three fingers" ...

Or we could use our toes, like in "this little piggie." Is the little piggie having roast beef, or will it go "wee, wee, wee," all the way home?

9 posted on 09/04/2003 6:47:00 PM PDT by RedWhiteBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
We should have threat levels named after villians.

Like when the muslims are just blustering, we're at Threat Level Bluto.

If they start get their hands on some airplanes, we move to Threat Level Witchiepoo.

If they get ahold of some WMDs, we move up to Threat Level Blackula.

10 posted on 09/04/2003 6:52:21 PM PDT by dead (Perdicaris alive or Raisuli dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
Funny. Thanks for the laugh.
11 posted on 09/04/2003 6:55:06 PM PDT by Ruth A.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
That may be too confusing. How about 'pucker' factor?

We could have levels 1-5, 5 being the highest pucker factor.
12 posted on 09/04/2003 6:58:11 PM PDT by Snowy (My golden retriever can lick your honor student)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Snowy
Except for rare cases where people have complete color loss more color blind people are difficient in seeing certain colors or hues.

http://www.uic.edu/com/eye/education/eyefacts/ColorBlindness.htm

What are the types of inherited color vision defects?

There are three groups of inherited color vision defects: monochromacy, dichromacy and anomalous trichromacy. The last two groups are subdivided into red-green and blue-yellow types of defects. Inherited red-green color vision defects are more common in males (1 to 8 percent depending on race) than in females (about 0.4 percent). Inherited blue-yellow defects are rare in either sex.

Monochromacy—Rod monochromats, or complete achromats, are truly "color blind" since they cannot distinguish any hues (e.g., blue, green, yellow and red). They see only different degrees of lightness. For them, the world appears to be shades of gray, black and white. They also have poor visual acuity, aversion to bright light and nystagmus (an involuntary, rapid movement of the eyes).

To have rod monochromacy, someone must inherit a gene for the disorder from both parents. This condition occurs in approximately 1 in 30,000 of the population.

Dichromacy is a less severe form of color defect than monochromacy. Dichromats can tell some hues apart. Dichromacy is divided into three types: protanopia, deuteranopia and tritanopia.

Protanopia and deuteranopia are red-green defects. Persons with red-green defects have difficulty distinguishing between reds, greens and yellows but can discriminate between blues and yellows. Protanopes often can name red and green correctly because green looks lighter to them than red.

Males have red-green defects if they inherit a defective gene from their mother. Affected males pass the defective gene to all of their daughters but none of their sons. Females who inherit only one defective gene are carriers of that gene. Females who inherit the gene for red-green defect from both parents are affected.

Hereditary tritanopia is a blue-yellow defect. Persons with blue-yellow defects cannot see the difference between blues and yellows but can distinguish between reds and greens. Tritanopia is somewhat rare (affecting between 1 and 15,000 and 1 in 50,000) and occurs equally in both sexes. Triatnopes usually have fewer problems in performing everyday tasks than do those with red-green dichromacy.

Anomalous Trichromacy—The ability of anomalous trichromats to distinguish between hues is better than dichromats but still not normal. Red-green anomalous trichromacy is subdivided into protanomaly and deuteranomaly. Both types are inherited in the same way as for red-green dichromacy. The severity can range from mild to extreme. Some persons with the mildest forms may not even realize their color vision is abnormal.

A third type of anomalous trichromacy is tritanomaly. This condition is more often acquired than inherited.

13 posted on 09/04/2003 7:24:28 PM PDT by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
AdAstra admits he is too.
14 posted on 09/04/2003 7:26:16 PM PDT by AdA$tra (Hypocricy is the Vaseline of social intercourse....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snowy
How about 'pucker' factor?

My vote goes to the 'pucker factor' system!

15 posted on 09/04/2003 8:21:07 PM PDT by _Jim (Resources for Understanding the Blackout of 2003 - www.pserc.wisc.edu/Resources.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
We could have a sphincter icon - sort of like a diaphragm of a camera. It would tell the threat level by how closed it was.
16 posted on 09/04/2003 8:37:51 PM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: marsh2
Color Blind AND hard of hearing.
17 posted on 09/04/2003 9:51:18 PM PDT by merry10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
Headline I'd like to see:

In big blow for affirmative action in Govt, Tom Ridge announces he is color blind


18 posted on 09/04/2003 10:57:28 PM PDT by WOSG (Lower Taxes means economic growth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: merry10
He had his eardrums damaged in Vietnam.
19 posted on 09/05/2003 4:27:39 AM PDT by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson