Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

University indoctrination and conservative stupidity
email | Craig J. Cantoni

Posted on 09/23/2003 12:19:57 PM PDT by hsmomx3

While conservatives smugly and mistakenly believe that they are winning the ideological war because they control talk-radio, the presidency and Congress, their kids are being indoctrinated in leftist thinking in a new and more insidious way on college campus, where 90 percent of professors vote Democratic, according to surveys.

Everyone has his own definition of stupidity. My definition is this: Stupidity is paying tens of thousands of dollars to have your kid receive an illiberal education instead of a classical liberal education and to see your offspring enter adulthood thinking like Ted Kennedy and Hillary Clinton.

The new method of indoctrination was described in the September 21, 2003, edition of The Arizona Republic. Of course, the Republic portrayed the method as a positive change and not as indoctrination, probably because journalists have the same left-leaning worldview as professors. True to form, the Republic did not include any opposing views.

Like all effective indoctrination, the new method seems innocuous on the surface. It entails offering "integrated learning" programs that tie together what is learned in separate courses in separate academic disciplines. For example, an integrated learning program might teach the interrelationships between economics, history and literature.

Arizona State University has three such programs. One is Multicultural America.

No, I'm not making this up. And, no, the university is not offering it as a parody of the politically-correct, anti-intellectual, multicultural claptrap that has been taught on universities.

These people cannot help themselves. It's some form of mental illness.

The other two programs are War, Culture and Memory; and Human Disease and Society.

In the War, Culture and Memory program, according to the Republic, "students are studying how nations at war often dehumanize the enemy through propaganda, art and literature."

Wow, how profound!

The Republic went on to say that the program shows how Americans characterized the Japanese in W.W.II as "apelike, inhuman, brutal creatures." It also shows how the Japanese did the same thing. In other words, the program implies that there was a moral equivalency between America and Japan.

No doubt, the program does not include the following facts from the disciplines of history, political science and economics:

History: The program does not include the facts about the brutality of the Bataan Death March; the torture of American prisoners by the Japanese, including ghastly medical experiments in which organs were removed until the prisoners died; and the Rape of Nanking, where the Japanese raped women, cut fetuses from the wombs of living women, and threw babies in the air and then speared them with bayonets on the way down.

Political Science: The program does not include the common ideological thread between the autocratic regimes of Imperial Japan, the Soviet Union and the Third Reich -- namely, that each had a culture and tradition of putting the state before the individual, similar to how modern-day American liberals (really illiberals) want to put the state before the individual.

Economics: The program does not include the fact that that individual freedom cannot exist without economic freedom, which is anathema to professors, who favor collectivism and disdain capitalism, free markets and the profit motive.

How do I know that the program does not include the foregoing facts? Because I have guest-lectured to senior business classes at Arizona State University. Even business students have a bias against capitalism and are ignorant of the moral, philosophical and historical foundations of capitalism and our constitutional republic.

It is axiomatic that if leftist claptrap is being taught in individual course in individual disciplines by leftist professors, then a program that shows the interrelationships between the individual courses and disciplines will also be leftist claptrap if it is taught by leftist professors.

Of course, you will never see a program on college campus that shows the interrelationships between leftist claptrap and leftist claptrap. Conservative parents are too smug and stupid to demand such a course.

__________

Mr. Cantoni is an author, columnist and founder of Honest Americans Against Legal Theft (HAALT). He can be reached at ccan2@aol.com.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: academia; azrepublic; college; education; highereducation; tenuredradicals

1 posted on 09/23/2003 12:19:58 PM PDT by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
Repeatedly calling Conservatives smug and stupid is an odd way to get Conservatives to consider your ideas.
2 posted on 09/23/2003 12:25:08 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (France delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
I teach a class called "Technology and the Culture of War," which uses Victor D. Hanson's "Carnage and Culture" as one of the textbooks, and basically the theme is "Why the West Kicks Butt," with a subtheme of "Why the U.S. is the Baddest Butt-kicker of All."
3 posted on 09/23/2003 12:28:24 PM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
My definition is this: Stupidity is paying tens of thousands of dollars to have your kid receive an illiberal education instead of a classical liberal education and to see your offspring enter adulthood thinking like Ted Kennedy and Hillary Clinton.

My definition is this: Stupidity is not inoculating your children in advance. I put up with a lot in college, such as a course in leftist (anti-war) indoctrination disguised as English II, for example. But if anything, seeing the enemy close-up and in-your-face confirmed my conservative attitudes.

4 posted on 09/23/2003 12:49:04 PM PDT by Eala (If "Peace is Patriotic," then "Appeasement is Patriotic" too? How about "Surrender Is Patriotic"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
Nah. College students these days are getting priceless exposure to how manipulative and irritating Liberals are. I doubt any but the most gullible leave college impressed with Liberalism, let alone convinced.
5 posted on 09/23/2003 12:52:56 PM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
INTREP
6 posted on 09/23/2003 1:33:27 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grut
You're zero for two, Grut. When faced with an overwhelming sea of dissenting opinion, most accept some degree of it just to get by. If you don't accept it, you do learn to not speak your views in class, or to draw parallels in your papers, because you do want to graduate. You sure can't count on your professors behaving honorably! Why would they? They left threw out ethics a long time ago. The reality of the education system, from middle school to college is that it is a left-wing indoctrination camp, pure and simple. Even those who survive it are scarred from it.
7 posted on 09/23/2003 1:37:59 PM PDT by =Intervention= ( When you vote your own principles, there's always a winner -- YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LS
Reading the chapter on Cannae right now.
8 posted on 09/23/2003 1:39:10 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (this space intentionally blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Grut
My freind, who is a 56 year old Vietnam vet, has gone back to school for a graduate degree. One of his courses is titled "the significance of time" or some such. As part of his first assignment his class was given Martin Luther King's letter from the Birmingham jail to read and comment on in a non-interpretive manner. The letter contains phrases like "time doesn't heal all wounds" (refering to slavery, of course) and that "time is the ally of stagnation" (refering to the black ministers of the day who condemned MLK for causing trouble and breaking the law). My freind is finding the course very interesting and was upset that I thought it reeked of propoganda and leftist indoctrination of students. I guess I'm just an old suspicious right winger.
9 posted on 09/23/2003 1:45:22 PM PDT by harrym
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
"Integrated Learning", huh? I wonder if they'll teach a class on how a liberal arts degree integrates into the real world and earns the holder something better than minimum wage? Didn't think so.
10 posted on 09/23/2003 4:06:58 PM PDT by randog (Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS
Where do I sign up?!
11 posted on 09/23/2003 4:08:00 PM PDT by randog (Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson