Photo Report of Hindu Ritual at Fatima: Pictures of a Desecration

Catholic Family News Special Report ^ | John Vennari

[Polycarp IV]

Catholic Family News Special Report

Pictures of a Desecration

Photo Report of Hindu Ritual at Fatima

by John Vennari

(article appears below photos)

May 5: Portugal's SIC television announces its
coverage of an "uncommon ecumenical experience".
There will be a Hindu ritual at the Fatima Shrine.
 

Morning prayers in the Radha Krishna temple in Lisbon
 

"All the invocations of the pagans are hateful
to God because all their gods are devils"
- Saint Francis Xavier
 

 A young Hindu woman explains the importance
of their various gods
 

About 60 Hindus travel by bus to Fatima
 

Arrival at the Fatima Shrine
 

The Hindus bring a gift of flowers. For them, Our Lady
of Fatima is a manifestation of one of their gods.
 

SIC broacasting says, "This is a unique event in the
history of the Sanctuary and of devotion itself...
 

...the Hindu priest, the Shastri recites at the (Catholic)
altar the Shanti Pa, the prayer for peace."
 

The Hindu ritual — a ceremony to false gods — desecrates
the Fatima Shrine, making it necessary for the chapel
to be re-consecrated.
 

The "Hindu family of Porgutal" worshipping at the
shrine after the Hindu ceremony.
 

Shrine Rector Guerra speaks approvingly about
the Hindu worship at Fatima
 

Crossing the esplanade to meet the Bishop
and the Shrine Rector
 

Received by the Bishop of Fatima. SIC explains, "the
Hindu pilgrims are received as if they were an embassy,
an unheard of gesture...
 

...which can be understood as an invitation for other visits"
This means that the pagan desecration of Fatima
is likely to happen again.
 

The Bishop of Fatima says,
"We do not want to be fundamentalists"
 

Shrine Rector Guerra receives from the Hindus
a shawl covered with verses of the Baghwad Gita,
a "sacred book" of Hinduism whose basic message
is, all of life is an illusion.
 

The Bishop of Fatima also receives a shawl
laden with verses of pagan mythology.
 

Acknoweldgement to SIC Televisino for video footage from which these photos were extracted.

 

 

Catholic Family News has obtained a video copy of the SIC television broadcast of the Hindu ritual performed at Fatima. As reported last month, the sacrilege took place on May 5 with the blessing of Fatima Shrine Rector Guerra, and the Bishop of Leiria-Fatima, D. Sarafim de Sousa Ferreira e Silva.

SIC, a national television station in Portugal, reported on the Hindu ritual at Fatima the same day it took place. The announcer called it an “ncommon ecumenical experience.”

The broadcast shows morning prayer at the Radha Krishna temple in Lisbon. “Light and water, energy and nature, mark the rhythm of the Arati, the morning prayer,” the announcer says. “Hinduism is the oldest of the great religions. It is characterized by multiple deities, worshiped through a triple dimension of life and sacredness: the creator god, the preserver god, and the god who has the power to destroy.”

Thus the Hindus spent the morning worshiping their false gods, which are nothing more than demons. Saint Francis Xavier, the apostle to India, said of Hinduism: “All the invocations of the pagans are hateful to God because all their gods are devils.”[1]

A young Hindu woman appears on screen with statues of gods in the background. She explains, “This is god Shiva and his wife Parvati. In the center we can see god Rama, to our right his wife Sita and to our left, his brother and companion Lakshmama. Now we can see Krishna Bhagwan and his consort Radha. The deities are always accompanied by their respective consorts or wives. As a rule, when we address the deities or want to ask for their graces, we address the feminine deity, who is very important to us.”

About 60 Hindus, said the broadcast, “leave Lisbon with the chandam, the sign on their foreheads which shows the wish for good fortune in a noble task. And this is the day dedicated to the greatest of all female deities. She is called the Most Holy Mother, the goddess Devi, the deity of Nature who many Portuguese Hindus also find in Fatima.”

Another young Hindu lady explains, “As a Hindu, who believes the whole world, or rather all human beings, are members of a global family, it would be natural for me to see any manifestation of God, including Our Lady of Fatima, as a manifestation of the same God.”

Here, this young lady speaks as a true Hindu, since Hinduism regards the various false gods they worship as manifestations of “God”. Thus, they are not honoring Our Lady as the Mother of Our Lord Jesus Christ, but worshiping Her as a manifestation of their pagan god.

The newscast then shows the Hindus bringing flowers to the statue of Our Lady inside the Capelinha, the little chapel built over the spot where Our Lady of Fatima appeared. The Hindu priest stands at the Catholic altar and recites a Hindu prayer. Meanwhile, the SIC announcer says, “This is a unique moment in the history of the Sanctuary and of devotion itself. The Hindu priest, the Shastri, recites at the altar the Shanti Pa, the prayer for peace.”

Pope Pius XI, in a liturgical prayer consecrating the human race to the Sacred Heart of Jesus, prayed for the conversion of all who are not members of the Mystical Body. He invoked Our Lord, “be Thou King of all those who are involved with the darkness of idolatry”. [2] This idolatry is now practiced at the Fatima Shrine, desecrating the sacred site, making it necessary for the chapel to be re-consecrated.

In another clip, the Hindu priest explains that he finds a “divine energy” at Fatima. “It is an energy that permeates the whole place,” he says. “ It has the power to be present here, around us. Whenever I come here, I feel this vibration ...”

SIC then explains that the display of this group of Hindus at Fatima “is not well-accepted by all Catholics”. The camera then shifts to Fatima Shrine Rector Guerra who defends Hindu worship at the Catholic Shrine.

“It is obvious” says Rector Guerra, “that these civilizations and religions are quite different. But I think that there is a common background to all religions. There is a common background that, how can I put it, is born from the common humanity we all possess. And it is very important that we recognize this common background, because, due to the clashes of the differences, we sometimes forget our equality. These meetings give us that occasion.”

The Hindus are then welcomed by the Bishop of Leiria-Fatima in a room containing a large model of the modernistic Fatima Shrine now under construction. “This time,” says the broadcast, “the Hindu pilgrims are received as if they were an embassy; an unheard of gesture which can be understood as an invitation for other visits.” This means that the pagan desecration of the Fatima Shrine is likely to happen again and again.

The Bishop of Leiria- Fatima then says, “We don’t want to be fundamentalist, we don’t want that, but we want to be honest, sincere and want to communicate by osmosis the fruitfulness of our rituals, so that we may produce fruits. I am pleased to meet them.”

At this point, the Hindu priest places on the shoulders of the Bishop of Leiria- Fatima and Shrine Rector Guerra a shawl covered with verse of the Bhagwad Gita, one of Hinduism’s sacred books.

The report ends with a close-up of a guest book that includes the signatures of Pope John Paul II, Mother Teresa, and a Hindu high priest. It goes on to say that Hindus intend to keep Fatima “on the road map of places where they claim they can find vibrations of holiness...”

Catholic Family News has reported on the interfaith orientation at Fatima since it was launched at the interreligious Congress held at Fatima in October 2003.[4] We warned repeatedly that this type of desecration was inevitable if Catholics did not resist the new ecumenical program.

Predictably, the enablers of the “New Fatima” such as Father Robert J. Fox ridiculed our efforts and tried to dissuade Catholics from taking us seriously. Father Fox, on an April 25 EWTN broadcast, claimed that the reports about the interfaith activity at Fatima were nothing but "fabrications,” that he knows Shrine Rector Guerra personally, and that Rector Guerra would never allow such interfaith activities to take place. Less than two weeks after this EWTN broadcast, the Fatima Shrine was desecrated by pagan worship, with the blessing of Rector Guerra and the Bishop of Leiria- Fatima.

Pope Leo XIII, along with his predecessors taught “we are bound absolutely to worship God in the way which He has shown to be His will".[3] Hinduism worships false gods who are demons. It is sacrilegious for Rector Guerra and the Bishop of Fatima to permit these rituals in a Catholic sanctuary.

Pope Pius XI called it “ignominious” to place the true religion of Jesus Christ “on the same level with false religions”.[5] Pope Leo XIII likewise taught “it is contrary to reason that error and truth should have equal rights.”[6]  Thus the “equality” that Msgr. Guerra speaks of, and his notion of various religions coming from a “com mon background,” defies Catholic truth.

Rector Guerra and the Bishop of Leiria-Fatima are also guilty of grave scandal. Their actions tell these poor Hindus, who are in bondage to a heathen religion, that they are pleasing to God as they are. This is contrary to the manifest will of Christ, Who said, “No one comes to the Father but through Me.” “He who believes and is baptized will be saved, He who does not believe will be condemned.” Hindus reject Jesus Christ. They have no interest in baptism or in the truths revealed by God. Rector Guerra and the Bishop of Lierra of Fatima counsel and encourage this apostasy. By their bad example, they scandalize not only the Hindus, but others who observe their actions.

“Scandal” says Saint Thomas Aquinas, “is a word or act which gives occasion to the spiritual ruin of one’s neighbor.” Saint Leo calls the authors of scandal murderers who kill not the body but the soul. Saint Bernard says that, in speaking of sinners in general, the Scriptures hold out hope of amendment and pardon, but the Scriptures speak of those who give scandal, as persons separated from God, of whose salvation there is very little hope.[7]

Perhaps this is why we see a spiritual blindness in these men. They persist in their apostasy despite the outrage from concerned Catholics. Nonetheless, we must pray for them.

And what of the Hindus themselves? The Shastri comes to Fatima because he feels there a “divine energy,” “vibrations of holiness”. Members of all religions worship the same god and are part of the “global family”.

This is the language of paganism, not of our received Catholic tradition. "Holy vibrations” is what Hindus call Shakti, and they go to various places to seek it. They will rush to be in the presence of the Dalai Lama or Pope John Paul II or Ghandi because this gives them Darshan, the good fortune that comes from being in the sight of a holy man. Each and every one of their terms is rooted in heathen superstition, not in the truths revealed by Christ.

In short, the Hindus did not go to the Fatima Shrine to be Catholicized. Rather, they Hinduized the Fatima Shrine, folding their pagan myths and superstitions into one of Catholicism’s most sacred sites.

This is not honoring the Mother of God, but a blasphemy against Her, since there is nothing honorable in placing Our Lady on the same level as one more goddess in their pantheon of demonic deities. “What concord hath Christ with Belial?”, says Saint Paul, “or what part hath the faithful with the unbeliever?” (2 Cor. 6:15)

At the end of the visit, the Hindus presented Msgr. Guerra and the Bishop of Fatima with a shawl covered with verse of the Bhagwad Gita. This book contains a story which illustrates a central tenet of Hinduism.

Arjuna, a warrior, is on the eve of a great battle. He dreads the next day, because he knows he will have to kill his friends, relatives, teachers. Arjuna's charioteer, who turns out to be the god Krishna in disguise, tells Arjuna not to fear the coming battle because none of it is real. No one is going to die. All of it, and all of life, is illusion.

Arjuna then thrusts himself into the bloody conflict believing it to be his Dharma, his given path, to hack his friends and relatives to pieces. It is all illusion anyway. No one really dies. This is Hinduism in a nutshell. You are god, everything else is illusion.[8]

Catholics who behold the Fatima Shrine Rector and the Bishop of Fatima draped in shawls laden with verses from a pagan mythology, certainly would wish that the Hindu desecration of Fatima was an illusion, that none of it was real.

But no, it really happened. And Catholics must register their outrage to Rome and to Fatima, as they offer prayers of reparation for Catholic leaders who hand over the chapel of Our Lady of Fatima to a religion whose god is the devil.

Notes:

1. Saint Francis Xavier, James Brodrick, S.J., (New York: Wicklow Press, 1952), p. 135.

2. Consecration of the Human Race to the Sacred Heart of Jesus, Pope Pius XI, published along with the Encyclical Quas Primas, “On the Kingship of Christ”, 1925.

3. Imortale Dei, 1885.

4. See J. Vennari: “Fatima to Become an Interfaith Shrine? An Account from One Who Was There", (CFN, December, 2003), "More News on the Fatima Interfaith Program",  (CFN, Jan., 2004), "Shrine Rector Confirms New Interfaith Orientation at Fatima", (CFN, Feb., 2004), Hindu Ritual Performed at Fatima Shrine, (CFN, May, 2004).

5. Quas Primas, 1925.

6. Libertas, 1888.

7. Quotes taken from Sermons of Saint Alphonsus Liguori, “On Scandal,” (Rockford: Tan Books, reprinted 1982), pp. 168-181.

8. For more, see “The Dharma of Deception”, Edwin Faust, Catholic Family News, November, 1998.

 

Reprinted from the July, 2004 edition of
Catholic Family News
MPO Box 743 * Niagara Falls, NY 14302
905-871-6292 *  cfnjv@localnet.com

CFN is published once a month (12 times per year)  • Subscription: $28.00 a year.
Request sample copy

   Home  •  Audio Cassettes • CFN Index



 

[Coleus]

And Catholics must register their outrage to Rome and to Fatima,>>

Any e mail addresses? I remeber seeing e mail addresses for the Pope and Cardinal Ratzinger on the FR.

I can't understand Hindus, they are vegetarians because they claim it's against their religion to kill any living creature and yet, many will then go out and vote (they do by me) for "Democrats" pro-abortion politicians. It just doesn't make any sense.

And why do so many Catholics take up Yoga and pray/chant to om?  Aren't hey inviting evil into their souls?

[St.Chuck]

Those who permit these desecrations do not have the Catholic faith-

What do you mean by desecrations?

[St.Chuck]

The issue is what are they doing praying to false gods at our altars in violation of the first commandment?

Maybe God, who loves irony, is using the Hindu's to point out that the Shrine of Fatima isn't exactly in keeping with the 1st commandment either. This talk of false gods and demi-gods, at Fatima. Interesting.

[Polycarp IV]

Here you go:

Main Entry: des·e·cra·tion
Pronunciation: "de-si-'krA-sh&n
Function: noun
: an act or instance of desecrating : the state of being desecrated

One entry found for desecrate.

Main Entry: des·e·crate
Pronunciation: 'de-si-"krAt
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): -crat·ed; -crat·ing
Etymology: de- + -secrate (as in consecrate)
1 : to violate the sanctity of : PROFANE
2 : to treat disrespectfully, irreverently, or outrageously <the kind of shore development ... that has desecrated so many waterfronts -- John Fischer>
- des·e·crat·er or des·e·cra·tor /-"krA-t&r/ noun

Main Entry: ¹pro·fane
Pronunciation: prO-'fAn, pr&-
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): pro·faned; pro·fan·ing
Etymology: Middle English prophanen, from Latin profanare, from profanus
1 : to treat (something sacred) with abuse, irreverence, or contempt : DESECRATE
2 : to debase by a wrong, unworthy, or vulgar use
- pro·fan·er noun

[St.Chuck]

One of the most venerated shrines in the Universal Church was desecrated.

What do you mean by desecrated?

[Polycarp IV]

See post 144. I realize its a multi-syllabic word, but its not too difficult to understand if you read its definition and associated words' definitions I posted. What the other posters mean should be fairly clear to you after you read the word's definition.

Glad to be of help.

[B-Chan]

Our local health club offers a course in Yoga, which my pious Catholic wife takes. She assures me that the class is intended for purposes of physical fitness only, and involves no chanting or other Hindu religious content. As long as this is the case, I see no reason to condemn the physical discpline of Yoga.

[sinkspur]

Yoga is, essentially, stretching, for long periods of time.

Bodybuilders do yoga to build their muscles and strengthen ligaments.

[ultima ratio]

If you think the shrine at Fatima offends against the first commandment, you've been fully protestantized by your own admission. The Novus Ordo has done its work.

[St.Chuck]

Glad to be of help.

Thanks. Given what the dictionary's definition is and what the article describes as to what occurred, I am still interested in how the other posters are using it.

[ultima ratio]

"What do you mean by desecrations?"

To treat something sacred with contempt--as the Bishop of Fatima and his Vatican superiors have done. Fatima is reverenced as a shrine for Catholics everywhere. It is where the Mother of Jesus appeared and performed a great wonder. This is not superstition. It happened and was witnessed by 70,000 people, some of them atheists, many of them journalists who recorded their experience.

[St.Chuck]

If you think the shrine at Fatima offends against the first commandment, you've been fully protestantized by your own admission. The Novus Ordo has done its work.

What do you mean by fully protestantized?

[Polycarp IV]

Don't be coy, we both know the sense in which the other posters are using it: to violate the sanctity of : PROFANE; to treat disrespectfully, irreverently, or outrageously; to treat (something sacred) with abuse, irreverence, or contempt : DESECRATE.

So your question is not how they are using it. You are simply trying to refute their claim that it is, in fact, desecration. Why play semantics? Say what you mean, and mean what you say. You are saying they are being silly for referring to this event as desecration.

[St.Chuck]

To treat something sacred with contempt

That's what I would think a desecration is. But the Hindu's, according to our intrepid Mr. Vennari, displayed the utmost respect, putting face paint on to make the journey and removing their shoes (see picture) as little jeremiah suggested would be a sign of reverence. They did not desecrate anything because they did not treat anything as not sacred.

[Cvengr]

I see all monotheists - sincere ones - as brothers and sisters,...

That's precisely what most Satanists assert,...they only worship one god and want no other. Then again, those who have faith alone in Jesus Christ alone have already been reborn in the spirit. Such charades of substituting monotheism with faith through Jesus Christ don't fool the active party who provides the life of the relationship.

[pro Athanasius]

Sorry,
You are a little off on the number. I have got more and I also lost a few like the women of old. I thought you said that 'why do you think everyone is interested in reading your posts'? Well the fact is I don’t really. I know people don’t like to read more than a “sound bite” but as my motto is “Catholicism is more than just a politically correct sound bite.” It is a lot to “chew” and after our Lord Jesus said to the Pharasees unless you eat (in Greek as you know being a deacon means to chew down) my body and drink my blood you will not have life within you.” And they walked away. How can this man give us his flesh to eat? Jn (6-54) Then Jesus said to them: Amen, amen, I say unto you: except you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you shall not have life in you. 54 (6-55) He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath everlasting life: and I will raise him up in the last day.

John 6:60-71 60 (6-61) Many therefore of his disciples, hearing it, said: This saying is hard; and who can hear it? 61 (6-62) But Jesus, knowing in himself that his disciples murmured at this, said to them: Doth this scandalize you? 62 (6-63)

Deacon isn’t it sad that these clerics are so scandalized by our Lord that they would do such a thing? As Father Dupuis S.J. said, "The religion of the future will be a general converging of religions in a universal Christ that will satisfy all", http://traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/g06htPortugalNewsDocs.htm This site quotes exactly the original Portugal’s Weekend Newspaper in English of Nov 11, 2003 which I have.

Did Christ satisfy everyone when he walked the face of the earth? Did Jesus please the Jewish and Roman authorities? Did he believe in “religious convergence”? No he said that they would worship him in spirit and in truth. He said he came to fulfill the Law of the prophets not Baal. Is he pleasing them the Pharasees of today who present a false Christ for public “ecumenical/diabolical” consumption? I can’t change my posts too much but I’ll try because it does take time to do the research. I have to present the truth. If I fail in this I hope that you will pray for me and try to set me back on the straight and narrow path like my kids do. Children are wonderful you know- they are honest and tell me just what they think of Mom. People should have more of them- be fruitful and multiply. But children have to be disciplined if you don’t they’ll run roughshod like your two male dogs. The West is dying out and getting old without enough young people to replace them. We need more children not more dogs. God bless you.

[Cvengr]

"They did not desecrate anything because they did not treat anything as not sacred."

Except of course their thinking. If they failed to exhibit faith alone in Christ alone, then they desecrated the only temple that really matters, namely the body of a believer which is designed to be indwelled by the Holy Spirit providing a temple for the Shekinah Glory of the Son of God.

[St.Chuck]

Except of course their thinking.

I see your point.

[pro Athanasius]

Go to this site and you will see the bottom addresses towards the bottom of the "Golden Calf Dancers part four" and e-mail for the cleric who runs the Fatima Shrine

http://dailycatholic.org/issue/04Apr/apr17mas.htm

Here are the following names and addresses : Francis Cardinal Arinze
Prefect, Congregation for Divine Worship and
Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger Sacraments
Prefect, Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Piazza Pio XII, 10
Piazza del S. Uffzio, 11 00193 Vatican City
00193 Vatican City
Your Eminence:
Your Eminence:

Dario Cardinal Castrillon Hoyos Archbishop Gabriel Montalvo
Prefect, Congregation for the Clergy Apostolic Nuncio
Piazza Pio XII, 3 3339 Massachusetts Ave, NW
00193 Vatican City Washington DC 20008-3687
U.S.A
Your Eminence
Your Excellency:



For Msgr. Luciano Guerra rector of the Fatima Shrine’s Email address in on
or click on reitoria@sanctuario-fatima.pt

You can translate your Email to him automatically here!
http://dictionary.reference.com/translate/text.html

[ultima ratio]

It is not the Hindus who are showing contempt in this case, it is the Bishop and his cohorts--and those in Rome who allow this. The first commandment says, "Thou shalt not have strange gods before me." The commandment means what it says. The men who encouraged this are heretics, violating an essential dogma of faith. This would include the Pope, if he allowed this knowingly, so we are getting into very dangerous and possibly traumatizing territory for millions of Catholics. But JPII has been showing his hand for years--nobody ever noticed much before. This time it's apparent--he is not orthodox and never was.