That writer is Dr Laura Schlessinger sp? and she gets a lot of her understanding of current social and psychological realities from the callers in to her radio show.
That is a very accurate reflection of at least a certain sizeable percentage of our nation sociologically, psychologically.
I'm glad you have several to cite on the other side. But please avoid underestimating the problem.
> That writer is Dr Laura Schlessinger sp? and she gets a lot of her understanding of current social and psychological realities from the callers in to her radio show.
Radio talk-back should also be avoided, just like singles-bars and supermarkets. No real men are going to pick over the scabs on their souls over the airwaves on radio talk-back. It just isn't done. Only pathetic no-hopers and losers will ever contribute to the discussion. That won't work!
> I'm glad you have several to cite on the other side. But please avoid underestimating the problem.
I don't see a problem. Like I said, Social Darwinianism is taking its toll. If Dr Laura needs a date or something, all she need do is stop being a wallflower and -- oh I dunno -- join the volunteer fire brigade or the RSPCA or the local Surf Lifesaving club. Help out at a soup kitchen or join the army. Or something. But nattering on talk-back radio about the (perceived) inadequacies of (some) modern males? Crikey! Can't think of a more depressing thing to do.
Counter-productive, in fact. Life's too short.
To the contrary, I see DieHard as putting his finger right on it.