Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Major Baptist seminary rejects practice of speaking in tongues
Kansas City Star ^ | Oct. 17, 2006 | Brett Hoffman

Posted on 10/19/2006 5:44:54 PM PDT by split

FORT WORTH, Texas - After a Baptist pastor said in a chapel service at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary that he sometimes speaks in tongues when he prays, seminary trustees adopted a resolution Tuesday that states the institution will not tolerate the promotion of the practice of speaking in tongues.

The resolution: "Southwestern will not knowingly endorse in any way, advertise, or commend the conclusions of the contemporary charismatic movement including private prayer language. Neither will Southwestern knowingly employ professors or administrators who promote such practices."

Speaking in tongues is described in the Bible as a spiritual gift from God that empowers humans to speak in other languages. But many contemporary theologians teach that the practice was distinctly for first-century Christians. However, in the past century, Pentecostal and charismatic Christians have contended that speaking in tongues should be practiced in today's churches.

Patterson said he has consistently maintained a different view.

"I have opposed (speaking in tongues) for all of these years because I think it's an erroneous interpretation of the Bible," he said. "Southern Baptists traditionally have stood against what we feel like are the excesses of the charismatic movement. All we're doing is restating where we've always been."

Baptists are "the most intense advocates of religious liberty," Patterson said, defending the right of other Christians to believe in speaking in tongues. "But don't wear a Yankee uniform when you play for the Mets."

"We interpret the Scriptures in such a way that we do not see room for a private prayer language and we're saying we will not waver on that," Redmond said.

(Excerpt) Read more at kansascity.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: baptists; nopopesomanypopes; popehashismerits; religiousfreedom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-224 next last
To: aimhigh

Then how is it, brothers? When you come together, each one of you has a psalm, has a teaching, has a tongue, has a revelation, has an interpretation. Let all things be for building up. If one speaks in a language, let it be by two, or at the most three, and in succession. And let one interpret. But if there is no interpreter, let him be silent in a church; and let him speak to himself and to God. And if there are two or three prophets, let them speak, and let the others judge. If a revelation is revealed to another sitting by, let the first be silent. For you may all prophesy one by one, so that all may learn and all may be comforted. And the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets. For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints. Let your women be silent in the churches; for it is not permitted to them to speak, but to be in subjection, as the Law also says. And if they desire to learn anything, let them ask their husbands at home; for it is a shame for a woman to speak in a church. Or did the Word of God go out from you? Or did it reach only to you? If anyone thinks to be a prophet, or a spiritual one, let him recognize the things I write to you, that they are a commandment of the Lord.
(1Co 14:26-37)


61 posted on 10/20/2006 4:14:23 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Quix
I don't have to pretend anything. GOD HIMSELF HAS GIVEN ME MANY supernatural insights and bits of information while I was praying in tongues. Such have been priceless in counseling and have saved my life at least 3 times.

That's wonderful, and I congratulate you sincerely for being the recipient of this miraculous blessing from God, Who surely is preserving you for some good work in His name. What foreign language were you speaking in when these insights came to you?

62 posted on 10/20/2006 5:49:21 AM PDT by Fairview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
I think the SBs (full disclosure, I am one) have taken the correct position on this. Both as to the theological truth of the matter, and the fact that if you feel differently, there are other churches that would welcome you.

Southern Baptists! Love 'em or leave 'em. (That was a joke).
63 posted on 10/20/2006 5:58:36 AM PDT by chesley (Republicans don't serve to win...But America does not deserve the Dhimmicrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hambone02
I've attended a couple of charismatic services. One even called themselves Baptist (but not Southern Baptist). Some woman would get up and speak and the Preachers (yes, two of them with cross chatter) would interpret. Generally it was that the Lord wanted the congregation of dig deep.

The Lord told them that they would get $1000 during this service, and by golly they did. Of course, they had to pass the bucket (yes, a Kentucky Fried Chicken, this was before KFC, bucket) around about 10 times before they did.

They did healings. Headaches and depressions disappeared. It was a miracle. The girl who had invited my fiance and I went down. She was blind in one eye. She was still blind in one eye when she returned to her seat, but she felt a LOT better.

The piano played the entire time. The pianist was very, very good.

The other wasn't actually a charismatic service. I was serving as a summer missionary in Ohio (for the Southern Baptists, though). We went to an interdenominational service, a crusade of some sort in Columbus.

It wasn't actually charismatic. The speaker didn't indulge at all. But a number of the audience evidently did. During the whole service we could hear a little buzz of, well, babbling. it rose and fell in volume. Very weird it was. But it was never acknowledged in any way from the podium, and so did not disturb me at least. Although it took me a while to determine what it was.
64 posted on 10/20/2006 6:10:26 AM PDT by chesley (Republicans don't serve to win...But America does not deserve the Dhimmicrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: caseinpoint

It is when missionaries of the gospel find it relatively easy to learn the obscure languages of the people to whom they are called to preach.

Precisely. As I was reading your post, I was thinking about Wycliffe Bible Translators, certainly not an example of instantaneous speaking in tongues, but in reality, that's what they do.

65 posted on 10/20/2006 6:12:12 AM PDT by norge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

Move up a bit in the same chapter:

26How is it then, brethren? when ye come together, every one of you hath a psalm, hath a doctrine, hath a tongue, hath a revelation, hath an interpretation. Let all things be done unto edifying.

27If any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it be by two, or at the most by three, and that by course; and let one interpret.

28But if there be no interpreter, let him keep silence in the church; and let him speak to himself, and to God.


66 posted on 10/20/2006 6:18:32 AM PDT by Ingtar (Prensa dos para el inglés)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: split
I think the Bible has something to say on this:

But if any man be ignorant, let him be ignorant. Wherefore, brethren, covet to prophesy, and forbid not to speak with tongues. Let all things be done decently and in order. (1 Corinthians 14:38-40 KJV)

67 posted on 10/20/2006 6:19:26 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: durasell; Onelifetogive; phoenix0468; P-Marlowe; xzins
Whether it is an actual language or not is pretty much a moot point -- it's not nice to make jokes about someone's belief system. And, I did apologize.

Don't be so hard on yourself durasell. I'm a member of an AOG church. In the AOG the practice/promotion of tongues varies from congregation to congregation. In my congregation I can think of maybe a half dozen times when it has been displayed in a service over the last 8 years that I've been there.

That said, I thought your post was hysterical. And most of the folks at my church would as well.

There's certainly enough evidence that this whole issue has been taken to extremes that are not from God.

As one of my pastor's likes to say. "We're Pentecostals. Just not the scary, crazy kind."

68 posted on 10/20/2006 6:30:03 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (http://wardsmythe.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

Go to post #25


69 posted on 10/20/2006 6:30:34 AM PDT by DarthVader (Conservatives aren't always right , but Liberals are almost always wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: chesley

"I think the SBs (full disclosure, I am one) have taken the correct position on this. Both as to the theological truth of the matter, and the fact that if you feel differently, there are other churches that would welcome you.
"

The problem, as I see it, is that they have taken a position at all and have excluded other positions. This is the very source of the splintering of the Christian church through the decades and centuries.

Almost every time people break away from an established church and form a new sect of Christianity, it is over some small difference of opinion as to doctrine.

It is this that has lead to the diminishing of Christianity as a unifying force in society. It is this that has lead to one Christian calling another a non-Christian, based on miniscule differences of belief. It's simply ridiculous.

You are a Southern Baptist, which is a definition that's really hard to define, since the SBC doesn't dictate much of anything to its loose coalition of member churches.

Go to your local Assembly of God church for three consecutive Sundays. You'll be amazed at the difference between your church and theirs. Someone coming from outside of Christianity would be justified in thinking that they were two different religions.

Then, visit an Eastern Orthodox church of any variety. The differences are even more marked.

Christianity is dissolving into a collection of belief systems that are more different than similar. I have read posts from people on Free Republic countless times telling Christians of other denominations than theirs that they are not really Christians. How divisive. How ridiculous.


70 posted on 10/20/2006 6:32:51 AM PDT by MineralMan (Non-evangelical Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

I replied before reading the entire thread. I've yet to see a case where in a church there was an interpreter nearby that could translate. Oh, I've seen cases where they say there is an interpreter. But even here abbabbabaloo can easily mean many different things in the same session. I am not saying it is not real for some, bu the vast majority seems to be aimed more at self-aggrandizement than in truly praising God.


71 posted on 10/20/2006 6:36:24 AM PDT by Ingtar (Prensa dos para el inglés)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands; durasell; Onelifetogive; phoenix0468; Quix; xzins
That said, I thought your post was hysterical.

I thought it was funny too.

72 posted on 10/20/2006 6:37:22 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

"I've yet to see a case where in a church there was an interpreter nearby that could translate."

I have on numerous occasions.


73 posted on 10/20/2006 6:38:48 AM PDT by DarthVader (Conservatives aren't always right , but Liberals are almost always wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: BibChr

When my sons were little by their constant fooling around they made me speak in tongues, along with rocking back and forth with my hands on my hips like Stevie Wonder.


74 posted on 10/20/2006 6:43:48 AM PDT by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands

It shouldn't vary. Denominational position is that, contrary to 1 Corinthians 12:13, the baptism in the Holy Spirit is subsequent to conversion, and, contrary to 1 Corinthians 12:29, its sign is speaking in tongues.


75 posted on 10/20/2006 6:50:35 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: BibChr

The denominational position does not vary. But the intensity of the practice does vary between congregations. Some are more open and public. Some emphasize it more as prayer language.


76 posted on 10/20/2006 6:54:10 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (http://wardsmythe.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader
I have on numerous occasions.

I was raised in a Baptist church that had solid teaching but you couldn't clap in the morning service. Growing up I didn't have a problem with it because that was all I knew. But, while checking out worship in a church other than the church I was raised in, a few times I heard tongues and they were interpreted.

There was a lot of emotion in that church. And there was this really cute girl, too, but I digress. Anyway, during a time of praise I experienced something I had never previously experienced. It seemed as though something was trying to come up through the floor, through my feet and fill my body. It was an incredible feeling. But I was scripter, and scripter was a stuffed shirt.

The next think I knew, boom, Greg Lebarron, a guy with whom I went to high school and who was standing next to me started speaking in tongues. I opened my eyes and he was glowing, or so it appeared. After he stopped somebody else interpreted.

I saw something similar a few times. While I'm not much of one for the more spectacular gifts, I can't deny what I experienced. It seems God has given me other gifts than the gift of tongues.

77 posted on 10/20/2006 6:54:10 AM PDT by scripter ("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: scripter; DarthVader; Corin Stormhands
The first time I heard speaking in tounges, I was freaked out. But I believe it is a genuine phenomenon. I was once in a small prayer group before an outreach program and some of the participants were praying in tounges. During that prayer session I was surprised to find that I received a Divine healing of a physical malady.

After that incident I was no longer the big skeptic about the continuation of the spiritual gifts. There is nothing scriptural to suggest that any of the spiritual gifts were taken away after the first century. That which is perfect is not yet come.

78 posted on 10/20/2006 7:09:46 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

"During that prayer session I was surprised to find that I received a Divine healing of a physical malady."

Totally cool! What was it? I've been healed too of serious things. God's power is amazing and he has shown me a man educated in the hard sciences that His power is reality.


79 posted on 10/20/2006 7:12:35 AM PDT by DarthVader (Conservatives aren't always right , but Liberals are almost always wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
This is the very source of the splintering of the Christian church through the decades and centuries.

You seem to think that there is something wrong with that. I don't. The ONE essential is belief in Christ as your personal Saviour. Everything else is secondary. But, all the different doctrines can't be right. Why associate yourself with error, as you see it, for the sake of unity? To me, that smacks of the liberal's "inclusiveness".

80 posted on 10/20/2006 7:18:39 AM PDT by chesley (Republicans don't serve to win...But America does not deserve the Dhimmicrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-224 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson