Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

REFORMATION SUNDAY (Reformed Caucus)
Reformation Theology ^ | Oct 2005 | John Samson

Posted on 10/29/2006 4:41:14 AM PST by Gamecock

REFORMATION SUNDAY by Pastor John Samson

The last Sunday in October is traditionally known as “Reformation Sunday,” in Protestant Churches, drawing from the date of October 31, 1517 when Martin Luther nailed his “95 Theses” to the door of the Wittenberg Church in Germany, sparking the Protestant Reformation.
Martin Luther in Germany heralded the Biblical doctrine of justification through faith alone; salvation is by God’s grace alone, received through faith in Christ alone. Good works play no part in a person’s salvation (Rom. 3:21 - 4:5; 5:1; Gal. 2:16; Eph. 2:8, 9; Phil. 3:9) but are merely the by-product, or fruit, of a relationship with God, established by God’s grace alone.

Following on from Luther, God raised up a Frenchman by the name of John Calvin to lead the growing Protestant movement. Both Martin Luther and John Calvin opposed the errors of the Roman Catholic Church concerning salvation, directing people to the truth of the Bible. Though definitely in agreement with the doctrine of justification by faith alone; John Calvin (based in Geneva, Switzerland) through both his preaching and his writings, systematically applied the message of the Bible to every aspect of life. Calvin's Institutes became the handbook of all the Reformers. Like Luther before him, Calvin believed in the Sovereignty of God, (in the doctrine of election and predestination, all that Calvin said was first said by Luther) and wanted society (as well as the church) to view the world through the lens of the Bible. He wanted the laws of the land to be conformed to and founded on biblical principles.

A broader view of history would reveal that the Reformation itself began long before Luther, when men like John Wycliffe (1329-1384) and John Hus (1373-1415) stood for the truth of God. Hus paid the ultimate price, a martyr’s death, for doing so.

Wycliffe, with the help of his followers, called the Lollards, and many other scribes, produced dozens of English language manuscript copies of the scriptures. They were translated out of the Latin Vulgate, which was the only source text available at the time. He died a natural death. In 1415, the Council of Constance ordered his remains exhumed and burned. The order was not carried out until 1428, 44 years after his death.

William Tyndale c.1494—1536 also had a monumental role in translating the Bible for the English speaking world, and shared the same fate as Hus by being burnt at the stake.

These men were not only concerned with what the Scriptures taught, but that the common people had access to read the Bible in their own language. It would be a fair appraisal to see these men's efforts (under God) as foundational to the sweeping changes throughout Europe that Luther and Calvin would bring. Wycliffe, Hus and Tyndale built the bonfire, so to speak, and Luther simply lit the match and held it to the wood! The result - most of Europe was set ablaze with the biblical doctrines of grace.

The Reformers had 5 main slogans, all using the word "SOLA," which is the Latin word for "ALONE." It was this word "ALONE" that designated the true biblical Gospel and set it apart from all other pretenders. Urging a return to the Scriptures as the source of all truth, the cry of these Reformers was not simply FAITH!, GRACE!, CHRIST!, THE SCRIPTURE!, or THE GLORY OF GOD! (All embracing a false Gospel could do that.) But the cry was "FAITH ALONE!, GRACE ALONE!, CHRIST ALONE!, SCRIPTURE ALONE!, THE GLORY OF GOD ALONE!" With Scripture alone as the sure foundation, the Reformers affirmed that justification is by grace alone, received through faith alone because of Christ alone — for the glory of God alone.

It is easy to see the need for the same correctives in our own day. These essential truths of the Bible are often blurred, ignored or even denied in the pulpits of our land. Yet, now is not the time to be feint of heart or to dilute or adjust the Gospel message under the pressure of the cultural relativism all around us. To be a friend of the world is to be an enemy of God. With the Reformers, let us “contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all handed down to the saints.” (Jude: 3) May each of our churches enjoy a Gospel centered, God exalting Reformation Sunday!



TOPICS: Evangelical Christian; History; Mainline Protestant; Theology
KEYWORDS: 5solas; calvin; luther; reformation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: adiaireton8; Campion
Challenges are allowed on any "open" thread on the Religion Forum. Open threads are like town squares.

Challenges are not allowed on "closed" threads - which are treated like a closed door church meeting. Devotionals and prayer threads are closed. And any confession is welcome to designate a thread as a "caucus" in which case it will be closed - providing the thread is not being used to demean any other confession.

Do not make any further challenges on this caucus thread.

21 posted on 10/30/2006 9:27:33 PM PST by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator
Devotionals and prayer threads are closed.

Would you be so kind as to please point out what makes this thread a devotional or prayer thread? I see nothing devotional nor do I see prayers being asked for or prayed.

any confession is welcome to designate a thread as a "caucus" in which case it will be closed - providing the thread is not being used to demean any other confession.

Does the following quote from the article not demean another confession? Both Martin Luther and John Calvin opposed the errors of the Roman Catholic Church concerning salvation,It appears to be flame-bait IMHO.

Why is it that the poster of post five was allowed to question where the "five solas" are in the Bible, but Catholics may not ask the same legitimate question?

Thank you in advnce for your answers.

22 posted on 10/31/2006 5:00:32 AM PST by pipeorganman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: pipeorganman
This is a caucus, not a devotional or a prayer thread. But because it was declared a caucus, it is closed.

To be a caucus, neither the article nor the replies are to be used as a staging ground to take pot shots at another doctrine.

The quote from the article is a belief of this doctrine ("Reformed") The quote does not rise to the level of a "pot shot" any more than a statement on an LDS caucus that it replaces all prior dispensations would rise to the level of a "pot shot". Both are fundamental to their doctrines.

Likewise, should a Catholic caucus declare the Catholic Church is the only true church or the body of Christ, that also would not rise to the level of a "pot shot."

And yes, members or other interested parties are welcome to discuss the article on a caucus. But if the caucus considers it out-of-line for a closed door church meeting, then it is and I will step in.

It is roughly the equivalent of someone walking into a church meeting. If it is ok with them, it's ok with me. If it is disturbing the assembly, I will stop it.

Posters should mount challenges against other doctrines on the "open" threads. There, all correspondents must suffer the adverse testimony and respond, respectfully.

Another point: caucus threads are usually ignored by members of other confessions and thus there are relatively few reply posts. Open threads, on the other hand, attract a lot of attention and often build into thousands of posts with several concurrent sidebars.

If you wish to defend your beliefs or challenge another's belief, use the open threads for a platform. But remember, open threads are a like a town square and the challenges can and often do, cause offense. So it pays to have a thick skin and good knowledge of the issues to engage on an open thread.

23 posted on 10/31/2006 7:53:21 AM PST by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: alpha-8-25-02

I do not consider your source to be all inclusive.


24 posted on 10/31/2006 4:59:59 PM PST by cheme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Read yours!


25 posted on 10/31/2006 5:01:25 PM PST by cheme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cheme

I WILL HELP IN ANY WAY I CAN.

A SPECIFIC QUESTION WOULD HELP.

I ASKED IF YOU WHERE CATHOLIC?

"I do not consider your source to be all inclusive."

INCLUSIVE OF WHAT?


26 posted on 10/31/2006 5:12:25 PM PST by alpha-8-25-02 ("SAVED BY GRACE AND GRACE ALONE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: alpha-8-25-02

The source Wikipedia is not reliable and the historical works have other versions and explanations than what was presented.
http://www.catholicapologetics.net/bartholomews_day.htm


27 posted on 10/31/2006 7:26:52 PM PST by cheme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: alpha-8-25-02

Basicly, inlclusive of the history of what happened in the referenced autrocity.


28 posted on 10/31/2006 7:32:23 PM PST by cheme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator; Ottofire
I made no "challenge". I asked a question.

The response is to have the questioner silenced by management. I'd say that says more than any post I have ever made on any topic, anywhere.

29 posted on 10/31/2006 7:43:57 PM PST by Campion ("I am so tired of you, liberal church in America" -- Mother Angelica, 1993)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: cheme

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=DKUS,DKUS:2006-31,DKUS:en&q=St%2e+Bartholomew%27s+Day+Massacre+

GODSPEED!


30 posted on 10/31/2006 9:39:37 PM PST by alpha-8-25-02 ("SAVED BY GRACE AND GRACE ALONE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: alpha-8-25-02
Yes, I did that as well. However, it seems the online reference material has been flooded with one side of this historical event, much like online polls are artificially skewed. This is the second time this week that someone has used this as a way to disavow Catholicism. Naturally, I wanted to see what is in the public domain on this and where the information is coming from.
31 posted on 11/01/2006 6:21:35 AM PST by cheme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson