Are Calvinists born ignorant, or do they have to WORK AT IT???
Posted on 06/10/2007 3:02:20 PM PDT by NYer
Cuz I made myself a new rule, I can't talk to those anti kind of people anymore but whatizname wants to know who spewed and it would be himself.
MAGICSTERICAL=spewing.
It is an attempt to degrade and if it was meant as a joke it is not funny unless you're maybe 11 yrs old and it isn't even original.
At bottom, the question is: who do you believe?
For me, the answer is God.
I have cast all of my burdens on the Lord, thrown all caution to His wind. I believe Him and trust Him. My fate is in His hands alone. Therefore, I personally eschew all the doctrines and traditions of men across the board.
At the Great White Throne judgement I pray no one will suffer blame on my account - including apostles, religious leaders, evangelists, teachers, translators and councils.
Much agree with every line.
Thanks thanks.
Are Calvinists born ignorant, or do they have to WORK AT IT???
It is an attempt to degrade and if it was meant as a joke it is not funny unless you're maybe 11 yrs old and it isn't even original.
NOT AT ALL.
Actually, I find this: It is an attempt to degrade to be mind-reading and very poor and thoroughly inaccurate mind-reading, at that.
My original and abiding motive in ORIGINATING--to my awareness I was the first to come up with the term--the word--my motive was and is to highlight--put a spotlight on--EMPHASIZE--the very
HUMAN TENDENCY--VIRTUALLY--HUMAN NATURE--in ANY collection of humans gathered together in a group; given a lofty intellectual, RELIGIOUS title and mandate
. . . the natural human tendency, compulsion, habit for such individuals in such groups IN ALL DENOMINATIONS to become MAGICAL AND HYSTERICAL in their thinking and their pronouncements--also with great pride; great chips on their shoulders and great tendencies to be punitive, hostile and condescending to all who disagree with their learned and sanctimonious pronouncements.
85-95% of my observations of such have been with Proty MAGICSTERICALS. My observations of RC MAGICSTERICALS have been from a distance and a lot fewer. But I find all of the examples I've observed to be essentially similar if not the same on key aspects as noted above. I haven't found a single such group in any denomination to be worth putting much stock in and mostly, wholesale more fitting to put a lot of wariness up about. I have seen far more of them be at least 51% destructive if not overwhelmingly destructive. That is not limited to Proty such groups--though they have been my primary observational examples that I've derived my conclusions from.
and if it was meant as a joke it is not funny unless you're maybe 11 yrs old
Well, you just happen to be factually absolutely wrong on that score. A number of the more mature, good humored, brighter and balanced, charitable folks hereon FREEPMAILED me that it was one of the more amusing things they've ever seen me write. But I do understand that folks with chips on their shoulders and thin skins would be somewhat likely to not find it funny.
and it isn't even original.
News to me. I came up with it out of the blue, having never seen it before, as I was writing a post on FR. Evidently GMTA. LOL.
Now, as to spewing . . . I am well capable of SPEWING as are a number of RC folks.
But I don't think folks really want to see me write such stuff and I am not interested in writing such stuff. But I CAN show you spewing--and it's several orders of magnitude worse than MAGISTERICAL. Perhaps the suggestion to "grow up, get a thicker skin and trash the chip on one's shoulder" would be good advice hereon.
I do NOT consider FR nor America a place where folks have a RIGHT to be UNoffended. I believe we are responsible before God about the offenses we needlessly take up; take to heart and respond to out of a bad faith sort of heart attitude.
Even pointed, satirical, mocking hyperbole has a place--it is in many places in Scripture. But I've not written in such a style hereon for quite some time. I'm well capable of returning by popular RC acclaim, if so desired, however.
I tend to have a bias for a robust sort of aggressive free for all exchange of ideas and even of emotions. I've muted that wholesale--largely because of Mad Dawg being my friend and wanting me to. But I still have strong preferences in those directions.
You know, Quix, I was starting to read and enjoy your posts since you became more congenial.
But with this last post you seem to be back-sliding.
Thanks for your kind words.
But I don’t see me backsliding at all.
I see me saying . . . to folks who SEEM
obsessively . . . affixed to thin skins, jumping to conclusions and chips on their shoulders to . . . grow up a bit.
And, I’m noting that IT IS ENTIRELY POSSIBLE
FOR ME TO RETURN to such a style. But that I don’t think that’s what the whiners would really like.
I see the above post as incredibly gentle and kind. I could have used a verbal 2 X 4 and it was far from that.
I don’t think RC’s or Calvinists or Pentecostals or any other Believer or value orientation do themselves any favors or their orientations any favors when they come across as petty, whining, thin-skinned, brittle with huge chips on their shoulders etc. It may be human . . . but it’s not blessed nor attractive. And usually, nowadays hereon, it’s not warranted.
Disagreeing and saying things with some reasonable forcefulness is not the same as RC bashing or any similar thing. The lack of ability or lack of willingness to make those distinctions is not attractive nor fruitful for collaborative discussion.
It seems to be an RC doctrine of faith or dogma or ritual or some such . . . that whenever a Proty disagrees with any seriousness or forcefulness AT ALL—that the RC respondent MUST, ABSOLUTELY MUST wail, throw dust in the air and fling ashes and blame far and wide about how horrible, unfair, abusive etc. the comment was. When, mostly, it was merely a forceful disagreement and different description or construction on reality.
RC’S ARE MORE FORCEFUL, brittle, demanding, startlingly ALL OR NOTHING descriptive about those who don’t buy into their construction on reality still . . . somewhat routinely. The double standard gets very old and wearying.
In short—quit whining about nothing before someone’s patience runs out and they return to giving something worth whining about.
Quite a number of Proties are NOT going to roll over and play dead just because RC's make some pronouncement about their construction on reality.
We feel just as duty bound before God to speak up for the construction on spiritual and Christian reality which we feel is MORE kosher, fitting, accurate, Scriptural, Christ-like etc.
We will not always wrap every word and phrase in 12 layers of foam and rabbit fur--bending over backwards to try and insure that every nuance has little likelihood in offending thin-skinned RC's with big chips on their shoulders.
NOT going to happen.
Deal with it.
We don't get hyper and foam at the mouth every time some RC poster rants, rails and accuses or throws some baiting thing in our faces any more. We may respond pointedly--even forcefully--but I haven't seen such with rancor in a long time. Maybe I've just missed it. But I think even Dr. E and I have been startlingly and sometimes sadly and overly quite mellow.
Mellow is OK when it's motivated by Love and consideration, kindness, compassion.
But AVOID mistaking it for kowtowing to a view of spiritual and Scriptural reality which we often still find startlingly horrid in this or that way or list of ways. Our mellowness does not imply growing agreement. It implies growing kindness and Christian preferring one another AS UNTO CHRIST because it pleases HIM.
It still appears that several RC's--perhaps a dozen or more even--feel duty bound to wail, whine, puff up their lips and generally throw dust in the air because we don't either agree with them or defer to them in exceedingly submissive, deferent tones. Tough tacos. Not going to happen any more than the reverse is going to happen. Get real.
My use of MAGICSTERICAL is now well known to apply across the board to ANY group of spiritual oversight leaders. ANY--IN ANY GROUP. Taking exclusive offense at the implications of the term for the RC examples of the magicsterical is . . . childish, petty, . . . missing the point wholesale . . . or worse, claiming that RC folks
GET REAL!
GUESS WHAT--RC FOLKS ARE !NOT! IMMUNE TO BEING HUMAN!
Sigh.
Thanks for your opinion and perspective.
I’m sure in many respects and contexts and contingencies that your consistency is quite commendable and advantageous.
It’s quite nice, actually, that you are sooo good at being YOU!
Sincerely,
Whenever you post “MAGICSTERICALS,” you discard most of your reading audience. All that remains after such absurdity is “the choir.”
LOL
You are plenty bright to
KNOW
that the title of this thread
was a screaming red flag baiting title.
The discussion could have been held in an RC caucus.
One has to assume it wasn’t for a reason—a baiting reason.
And, some responses have been slightly to moderately forceful.
And the whining wailing began on cue.
Impressive.
Don’t pretend to you or your family or personal friends that you are convincing anyone here.
You’re ridiculous posts are somewhat less absurd than the admonitions of smock-clad homeless persons toting signs that warn “The End is Nigh.”
Could you expand your list of verboten attacks to attack on groups? People can criticize beliefs all they want, but when they start saying “Catholic are this way,” and “Evangelicals always do such and such,” that’s crossing a line.
I’ll consider it. It has taken a year to get most of the RF posters to stop making it personal. And there are still slip-ups even with the oldtimers. But it would be another step up in improving the dialogue.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.