Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saint Malachy, Prophecies about 112 popes until the end of the world, the last five Popes
WorkofGod.org ^ | n/a | WorkofGod

Posted on 10/14/2007 8:25:58 PM PDT by Salvation

Saint Malachy 
Prophecies about 112 popes until the end of the world.

Note: The Church does not lean on private revelation for doctrinal matters, but it does not oppose to the faithful obtaining benefit from them so long as they don't go against our faith.  

This analysis focuses on the last five Popes in the context of the prophecies of Saint Malachy.

+ + +  

Saint Malachy was born in Amagh Ireland in 1094, he lived a religious life as a monk, then he was ordained priest and finally Bishop. He was canonized in 1199 by Pope Clement III. His biography was compiled by Saint Bernard, a contemporaneous saint.

He made a pilgrimage to Rome and during the end of the year 1139 and the beginning of 1140 had a series of visions about 112 Popes from Celestine III, elected Pontiff in 1130 until the last Pope who is described in his list as Peter Romanus.

After the last Roman Pontiff, Saint Malachy predicts the end of the world.

The Benedictine historian Arnold Wion was the first person to mention these prophecies in his book Lignum Vitae, published in 1559.

These prophecies are short, but they have demonstrated to be very accurate, even though in the time of their publication they caused much controversy as some claimed that they were falsified.

The book of prophecies of Saint Malachy was published originally in 1969 by Colin Smythe Ltd. in England, with the title "Prophecies of St. Malachy and St. Columbkille."

Tan Books published the book in the United States in 1973 with the title "Prophecies of Saint Malachy" its author is Peter Bander.

The foreword reads like this:

In publishing THE PROPHECIES OF SAINT MALACHY, Colin Smythe Limited have produced an instructive and entertaining book.

There is great deal of instant information in Peter Bander's nutshell biographical accounts of the popes who occupied the Roman See since the year 1143 to our present time - and indeed of the antipopes as well. The remarkable way in which the visions St Malachy is alleged to have had, are shown to apply to the succesive individual popes is most amusing. Is it not the case to repeat: "Se non e vero, e ben trovato"? (If it is not true, it is well rhymed)

Whatever one may think of the genuineness of the prophecies attributed to Saint Malachy, here is a fascinating study which provides the curious reader with much profit and pleasure.

Archbishop H.E. Cardinale
Apostolic Nuncio to Belgium and Luxemburg, until recently Apostolic Delegate to Great Britain.

It is curious to think that whenever there is a Conclave, the Cardinals read these prophecies of the saint, and even though they are not ecclesiastic authority they give an idea of what has happen and of what is to occur.

Prophecies of Saint Malachy

This study is an analysis based on private revelation and observations of what is taking place now. It is not to be taken as an official position of the Church. It is good to remind us of the words of the Lord: "stay awake."

The last five popes are mentioned with the following titles: 
Flos Florum
De medietate Lunae
De Labore Solis
Gloria Olivae
Petrus Romanus


Flos Florum - Flower of flowers

Saint Malachy Prophecies, Popes, end of the worldPope Paul VI 
Pontiff from 1963 to 1978. 

Giovanni Battista Montini. In his coat of arms there are three "fleurs de lis"

With great success he concluded Vatican Council II, he made rigorous reforms to the Roman Curia, he traveled the five continents and was called peregrine pope .  In 1965 he was well received and accepted at his address to the UN. Author of the encyclicals
opulorum progressio (1967), Humanae vitae July 24, 1968. He died in August 6, 1978, feast of the Transfiguration.

De medietate Lunae - Of the half moon

Saint Malachy Prophecies,Popes, end of the worldPapa Juan Pablo I ' Abino Luciani
Pontiff for 33 days.

He was born on 17 of October 1912 in Forno di Canale, called now Canale de Agordo, he was baptized the same day by his midwife, for fear of his death, he was later baptized by a priest.

After a life dedicated to the Church as a priest, he was elected Pope during the second day of the Conclave in August 26, 1978. He died of cardiac attack in September 28 1978, thirty three days after the beginning of his papacy.

"De la media luna" Of the half moon is a very accurate description regarding his beginning and also his short pontificate. Even his name Abino Luciani means white light, it has been mentioned that the most important events of his life took place in dates of half moon.


De Labore Solis -
From the toil of the sun - or - Of the eclipse of the sun.

Pope  John Paul II 
Pontiff from 1978 to 2005

This description fits John Paul II perfectly, since he emerged as a especial light for the Catholic Church, promoting the faith from all angles. The works of John Paul II were truly the work of God, the labor of the sun.

The second meaning of "De labore solis" is a solar eclipse, in which the sun seems to struggle in order to give its light. Perhaps the fact that John Paul II, was a very Marian Pope who had a special devotion to the Virgin Mary, the woman clothed with the sun that appears in the Apocalypse, suggests that the sun (Our Lord) has been temporarily eclipsed by the moon (Our Lady). 

John Paul II was a great humanist and peacemaker, a traveler Pope, proclaimer of the gospel in more than 130 countries throughout the world, author of many apostolic letters, encyclicals and books. Canonizer of more saints in his pontificate than any other Pope in all history. During his last years as Pope he concluded his pontificate proclaiming the Holy Trinity, the Virgin Mary and the Eucharist.

Year 1997. God the Son
Year 1998. God the Holy Spirit

Year 1999. God the Father
Year 2000 
24 December 1999 - 6 January 2001Great Jubilee. 

Year 2002-2003. Year of the Holy Rosary, institution of the Luminous mysteries.16 October 2002 - 31 October 2003
Year 2005. The Holy Eucharist.
17 October 2004 - 29 October 2005

Gloria Olivae - The Glory of the olive

Benedict XVI 
Joseph Ratzinger
Starts Pontificate in April 2005

He chose his name in honor of Saint Benedict, author of the very strict rule of the Benedictines.

His motto is "Co-worker of the Truth."

He has been known even before becoming Pope as a conservative man, ready to defend the Catholic principles that represent the truth of the teachings of Christ.

Our new Pontiff is covered under the sign of the olive according to the prophecies of St. Malachy

The branches of the olive were symbols of peace and victory for Noah after the flood. Throughout history, we know that olive branches have made crowns for kings and athletes as symbols of power and glory. The olive tree thrives in silent areas, such as the garden of olives where Jesus suffered his agony before being arrested by the soldiers.

Olive oil has anointed kings, saints, popes and in a especial way all Christians.

The leaves and the oil of the olive tree have medicinal properties, derived from the oleic acid which is an anti cancer component. The good kitchen cannot exist without olive oil. The best paints have olive oil base, to give them luster and to increase their durability.

The olive is a symbol of peace, abundance, glory and purification.

The Church has been through a period of light, and now is the the time to celebrate and pick up the fruits of the previous pontificate of John Paul. It is quite possible that they will bring many conversions and an increase in the faith especially from the young people.

With the purifying properties of the olive, our new Pontiff comes to challenge error.  He presents himself exposing the truth of our faith with a special courage, he is prepared to heal the cancer of heresy, the infection of apostasy and to promote the health of our Catholic faith.

According to the prophecies of Saint Malachy, Pope Benedict XVI is the Pope before the last one, named "Gloria Olivae" which means the glory of the olive, it is to be a time of glory and rejoicing for the true Church.   

Due to the straightforwardness of our new Pontiff, great opposition is expected, but the Spirit of God is with him and we are in good hands.

Petrus Romanus - Peter Roman

The apostle Peter was the first Pope of the Church, elected directly by our Lord Jesus Christ:

You are Peter, the rock. On this rock I will build my Church and the gates of hell will not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the Kingdom, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in Heaven, whatever you loose on earth will be loose in Heaven. (Matthew 16:18-19)

Peter, the same as Christ, drank of the same chalice of suffering when he died as a martyr.

The body of Christ, the Church represents our Lord Jesus Christ.

The last two pontiffs will have to face the fury of the enemy who will make a violent persecution to Christianity. Faithful as Peter, the last Pontiff will take care of his flock in the midst of the attacks of the enemy. 

2 Thessalonians 3-4 speaks of the apostasy of the last times before the second coming of Christ, when evil will be defying everything that is sacred. The man of iniquity, or the anti-Christ will take his seat in the temple of God. 

This does not necessarily means the embodiment of the devil but if could mean the evil that is being accepted broadly when human beings who are temples of the spirit of God are being desecrated by their own wickedness. 

Just as the Lord lived, taught us, gave us spiritual food and saved us by his death on the cross, the Church being the mystical body of Christ has a similar task. Therefore the church is to be persecuted, insulted and finally crucified, in preparation for the coming of the Lord.

But just as the Lord rose after his death, the Church will also be resurrected for the Glory of God.

No one knows the day nor the hour, but the Lord tells us to be ready.

The prophecies of Saint Malachy end like this:

In the persecution of the Holy Roman Church, there will reign Peter the Roman, who will feed his flock among many tribulations after which the seven hilled city will be destroyed and the dreadful Judge will judge the people.



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History; Moral Issues
KEYWORDS: catholic; catholiclist; popes; prophecy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 401-413 next last
To: Campion

I don’t think that Rome does today, either. It did in the days that John wrote the Revelation.

Neither does or did Jerusalem or Cincinnati.

In any apparent sense, none of those cities currently rule over the kings of the earth.

Rome is the only candidate from John’s era. And it is a certainty, and because of that, it must be considered a candidate.

One important question for me is this: what was the dominant religion of Rome at the time John wrote Revelation?

It certainly was NOT Christianity.

We’ve heard of the pantheon of Roman gods, but was there a dominant expression of that religion? a dominant worship?


81 posted on 10/15/2007 11:47:35 AM PDT by xzins (If you will just agree to murder your children, we can win the presidency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Campion

See #79.

There is no temple there, so a Jew cannot see it that way about Jerusalem.


82 posted on 10/15/2007 11:50:09 AM PDT by xzins (If you will just agree to murder your children, we can win the presidency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Personally, it doesn't bother me if, during an intellectual debate, disparaging, historical quotes are brought up about the Church. If it's part of a conversation, fine, let's debate it. But using it as pure invective is offensive. I don't go around posting that the church of Calvinism is worthless and hellbound. I find that the loudest Protestant critics of the Catholic faith spend all their energy trying to prove the Church wrong and none of it on proving themselves right.

Typically - typically - it's ex-Catholics who need to feel more secure in their decision to leave the Church by returning in the night to burn it down.

83 posted on 10/15/2007 11:51:59 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: topcat54
Is this some sort of PC revisionism that we're witnessing on the forum?

I would never have guessed this could happen on FR.


This forum was here to allow conservatives to talk about our faith, not stir up the 30 years war. I still hold that sometimes this forum is counterproductive to our common cause to educate and enlighten America in political discourse.

As far as Protestantism as a heresy, Catholics refer to that some times. I think a lot of things are heresies and abominations. Birth control, genocide, willful murder, homosexual sex, pedophilia, euthanasia, abortion and drug abuse are all things that should be odious to Christians. Some of you use birth control, some of you engage in sex without marriage. I even fall short. I can point fingers too.

My Brother is a full fledged Baptist Minister and Pastor. We have arguments all the time. We both know that we are trying to serve Christ. I argue that I serve Christ by remaining in Catholicism, working out my salvation as Paul described. He thinks the freedom of the Baptist confession gives him the tools to follow Christ.

He reads John 6 one way and I read it differently. We both read 1 Cor. 12:11 the same way. We don't scream at each other over the Thanksgiving Turkey and spend time hurling plates at each other. I love my brother and he loves me. We mutually agree that the other is in error.

Of course, I am right. :-)
84 posted on 10/15/2007 11:58:50 AM PDT by Dominick ("Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought." - JP II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: xzins
There is no temple there, so a Jew cannot see it that way about Jerusalem.

There may well have been at the time John wrote Revelation. (Yes, I know the arguments about the dating. I find the arguments for the late dating of Rev unpersuasive. In fact, I find arguments for the late dating of most of the NT unpersuasive.)

85 posted on 10/15/2007 12:07:34 PM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Dominick
He reads John 6 one way and I read it differently. We both read 1 Cor. 12:11 the same way. We don't scream at each other over the Thanksgiving Turkey and spend time hurling plates at each other. I love my brother and he loves me. We mutually agree that the other is in error.

That's the blessing of being in the Religion Forum rather than having dinner together. :-)

It like pope and protestant hurtling all those anathemas at one another from a distance.

Also, keep in mind that the status of individuals in any communion before God is a matter between them and God. Just because the system they are involved with is apostate, that does not necessarily mean they are themselves lost for eternity.

86 posted on 10/15/2007 12:12:43 PM PDT by topcat54 ("Friends don't let friends listen to dispensationalists.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: xzins
We’ve heard of the pantheon of Roman gods, but was there a dominant expression of that religion? a dominant worship?

YMMV, but it would seem to me that the dominant expression was the worship of the emperor. Their refusal to offer even so much as a pinch of incense in worship of the emperor was what got the early Christians in trouble with the state.

The modern equivalent would seem to be the Totalitarian State, as exemplified by fascists, national socialists, and the various international communists.

87 posted on 10/15/2007 12:13:27 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Glenmerle
This is extememly hateful.

Are you a member of the Thought Police?

You've just said -- in a cute sidways way -- that Protestants follow a false religion.

Now you're putting words into my mouth. There are elements of truth in all Christian denominations - some more than others. However, the fullness of truth resides in Catholicism, if only because Protestant denominations don't believe in the sacraments as a source of grace.

But let's look at it logically. If God is One, how can His body ever be more than one? Do you proclaim Buddhism and Islam to be on a par with Christianity? If you tell someone you think Christianity is superior to those religions, why are you so "hateful"? Aren't all religions equal? Aren't the Branch Davidians practicing by the same Truth as you?

Philosophically, why have any religious affiliation whatsoever unless you think it's the right one? What kind of faith do you have if you're not sure? What kind of benevolent God would build a Church filled with uncertainty of where He really is? God does not sow confusion. That's the work of the devil. There was one, Apostolic, Catholic Christian Church until the Reformation. 1500 years. Enter confusion.

There is One Truth. It's Jesus Christ. And He built His Church upon Peter so that we would not be abandoned to No other denomination has a rightful claim to this mandate but those which enjoy Apostolic succession.

Feel free to disagree. I promise I won't call you a hater if you think I'm wrong. I don't think God loves me any less than you. I don't think He wants me in heaven any more than He does you. But there is a Way, and that Way was built on Peter.

88 posted on 10/15/2007 12:18:57 PM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
I even remember a few decades ago a prediction that California was supposed to fall into the ocean

Where there's life there's hope.

Cordially,

89 posted on 10/15/2007 12:20:50 PM PDT by Diamond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
However, the fullness of truth resides in Catholicism, if only because Protestant denominations don't believe in the sacraments as a source of grace.

Like I said, hatred. Just said with a touch of sugar. Have you read the entire thread? I'm not part of the "thought police." I didn't ask to have two posts removed. When they were removed, however, I did think it fair to ask to have post 44 removed. I see it remains. And I see how the game on this forum is played.

90 posted on 10/15/2007 12:25:30 PM PDT by Glenmerle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
No other denomination has a rightful claim to this mandate but those which enjoy Apostolic succession.

Oops, almost forgot this choice bit. How kind. But you didn't use that word, so who cares?

91 posted on 10/15/2007 12:28:00 PM PDT by Glenmerle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: xzins; Campion
I don’t think that Rome does today, either. It did in the days that John wrote the Revelation. ... Rome is the only candidate from John’s era.

Rome of John's day could not have been the "harlot" since, as a pagan nation, it was never in a covenant relationship with Jehovah God. Only Israel (Jerusalem) qualified for the designation "great harlot" in the 1st century. Old Jerusalem was the "harlot" who happened to be involved with spiritual fornication with pagan Rome against the Christian church. It was the apostate Jews by the hands of "lawless men" (Rome) who crucified the Messiah (Acts 2:23).

The Reformers saw the spiritual entity we call the Roman Catholic Church as fallen in much the same way as ancient Israel. Rome was in covenant relationship at one time, but had abdicated their position and gone after foreign gods through a gradual process of assimilation of false practices.

92 posted on 10/15/2007 12:35:12 PM PDT by topcat54 ("Friends don't let friends listen to dispensationalists.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Glenmerle; Rutles4Ever; topcat54
I did think it fair to ask to have post 44 removed. I see it remains.

And Post 43, to which 44 was a response, also remains.

Not so hypocritical after all.

Courtesy pings.

93 posted on 10/15/2007 12:37:18 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: xzins
You are correct. It must be interpreted correctly.

However, one of the possibilities — and the best one because of the 7 hills explanation — remains Rome.

I, however, don’t think that any actively proclaiming believers in Jesus Christ will be the Mystery Babylon religious system based in that city that has 7 hills.

It will be a mock-up of the Bride of Christ that will go along with the False Messiah and His False God and their False Herald. (Satan, Beast, False Prophet)

Could be. Along these lines, though, I think it will be not necessarily "Christian" per se, but something that seems to bear the promises of Christianity - peace, eternal life, abundant blessing, and a benevolent supreme being.

Consider: the secular world is steeped in these pursuits -

1. peace (tolerance, relativism);
2. eternal life (health at any cost; embryonic research, cloning, genetic manipulation and screening);
3. abundant blessing (materialism, comfort, gluttony, sexual freedom);
4. a benevolent supreme being ("me").

The way I see it, Christianity in its entirety will be rejected. The Catholic Church - by far the biggest target -will, by its teachings, be seen as the enemy of eternal life, the enemy of abundant blessing, then enemy of the peace, the enemy of the supreme being. Christians will have to choose either the secular idea of salvation, or the Church's.

All of this dovetails into the number of the beast - "666".

1. "6" being the number of man (created on the 6th day)
2. "7" being the number of perfection - or "God".
3. "6" iterated three times at once emphasizes something of intensely human (thus, flawed) characteristic striving after "7" (God, perfection).
4. Therefore, the Mystery Babylon is that which mimics the qualities of the Gospel by all appearances, but is woefully, intensely short of perfection.

IMHO, secularism is that which is the Beast, that which is Mystery Babylon, and that which will crucify the Church. It is the all-powerful city on the seven hills...

94 posted on 10/15/2007 12:49:52 PM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
And Post 43, to which 44 was a response, also remains.

Did you ask to have it removed?

95 posted on 10/15/2007 12:57:16 PM PDT by Glenmerle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Glenmerle
Like I said, hatred. Just said with a touch of sugar. Have you read the entire thread? I'm not part of the "thought police." I didn't ask to have two posts removed. When they were removed, however, I did think it fair to ask to have post 44 removed. I see it remains. And I see how the game on this forum is played.

Potato, po-tah-to. Loosely assigning values like "hate" to someone's expressed opinion is a tool of the far left. It's the argument of last resort because, like calling my Church a whore, it's designed to evoke an emotional reaction and doesn't convey any useful information.

96 posted on 10/15/2007 12:57:46 PM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
Loosely assigning values like "hate" to someone's expressed opinion is a tool of the far left.

As I asked you before, did you read the whole thread? Including the moderator's reasoning for tossing out two posts? We've been informed that "stirring up hate" isn't allowed; hence my ironic use of the word "hatred."

Go back, for goodness' sake, and read from the beginning. Find out who had the posts pulled and why. Find out what the moderator said about "hate mongering." Don't talk to me about tools of the far left. Flipping hypocrisy.

97 posted on 10/15/2007 1:03:23 PM PDT by Glenmerle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Glenmerle
My post number 47 is my only reference (public or private) to actually having something removed. I did not ask to have anything removed.

Please note the substance of my observation: #43 ascribes blasphemy to "Rome", #44 ascribes heresy to "protestantism".

To object to #44, while ignoring #43 strikes me as very odd.

98 posted on 10/15/2007 1:09:45 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Glenmerle
Find out who had the posts pulled and why.

It was a inexact term better applied to loose women.

I think keeping track of who called whom a heretic is a waste of the Internet’s electromagnetic flux.

99 posted on 10/15/2007 1:16:11 PM PDT by Dominick ("Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought." - JP II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
To object to #44, while ignoring #43 strikes me as very odd.

My whole point.

100 posted on 10/15/2007 1:19:03 PM PDT by Glenmerle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 401-413 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson