Posted on 02/28/2008 6:25:40 AM PST by Manfred the Wonder Dawg
ROMAN CATHOLICISM: A DIFFERENT GOSPEL
In their lust for unity the Emergent Church and post-evangelical Protestants are right now embracing the Roman Catholic Church as another Christian denomination. But the issue is simple: If, as taught the Church of Rome, no one can enter the Kingdom of God without the new birth in baptism then we are now in hopeless contradiction with the Gospel contained in Holy Scripture.
But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. (Galatians 1:8)
Speaking The Truth In Love
Let me make this as clear as I possibly can for the Roman Catholics who may read this work in Christ from Apprising Ministries. I personally am former member of the Church of Rome and care very deeply about those, such as the majority of my own family line, who are trapped in this apostate man-made system of religion known as Roman Catholicism. I also fully realize that what I say may sound unloving and possibly even harsh. However, there is just nothing that I can do about that. By not telling the Truth we arent doing anyone a service.
(Excerpt) Read more at apprising.org ...
Have you also noticed that you've not been included in all their "high fives" for posting Scripture? No thank-you's for that beautiful Scripture for you. Curious, isn't it? Do you suppose it's because it disproves the opinions/interpretations they're desperately grasping on to?
You solved that much of the problem. So where is the one prayer to Jesus Christ.
Another fact you may not know. The daily prayers said by the priest are also biblical quotes to God the Father.
So, do you see why I say that the Catholic Church is the Church of God the Father?
Our main prayer, the Mass, is all to God the Father, except for the one prayer that is directly to Jesus Christ.
Know you learned something today and will now accuse the Catholic Church of not honoring God the Father, because we do!
Hilarious.
On the one hand, you guys say that we walk around on tenterhooks all day lest we "lose" our salvation, and we can never really be sure if we're going to heaven.
On the other hand, you accuse us of making infant baptism a "stamped ticket into heaven". What, you mean like OSAS Baptists view answering an altar call? That kind of "stamped ticket into heaven"?
So which is it, Dr. E? Do I have a "stamped ticket into heaven," or do I have to worry about my salvation, or do I somehow have to do both at the same time?
And what of your esteemed Reformed colleague, the late (I believe) Dr. Boettner, who wrote in his ridiculous book words to the effect that my survivors will be tormented practically weekly by priests trying to extort Mass stipends to dig my soul out of purgatory?
This despite the "signed ticket into heaven" that you claim I think I have!
It's always a source of great amusement to me when one crowd of people condemns us for being too cold, and another crowd condemns us for being too hot. What is even funnier is when the same crowd condemns us for being both too cold and too hot at the same time!
That lying is gonna get you in trouble, Reg.
I don't claim to know how many years he was there or where he stayed while he was there. For all I know it was Motel 6. If the early church fathers ... who followed closely behind the original 12 ... said he was there, who are we to argue? Just because it's not in the bible are we to deny it?
Of course. An oversight on my part that has already been discussed. Thanks for your keen eye.
Thanks for the ping.
Alamo-Girl,
This post, in particular, gave me cause to rejoice in the salvation of our Lord. Oh how great is His mercy and how great is the love the Father has lavished upon us - that we should be called the sons (and daughters) of God! Therefore, the world does not know us, because it did not know Him. (1 John 3:1)
Indeed - nor do Muslims claim to be the ONE TRUE CHRISTIAN CHURCH.
I am on Taiwan time and totally out of the loop regarding timely responses :-)
Nicely said St. Francis.
You and the other RCC watchdogs won’t like it, but this site has a pretty detailed review of early history that shows another perspective of how the Lord of Heaven preserved His church (that body of believers, not a central group gathered under a man). http://www.searchgodsword.org/his/ad/hop/
So you have been taught by the RCC. That does not make it so.
I’m sorry if your pointy head leads you to think so. Rebuking false teaching is not “bashing”. I care not to even bash Muslims - but Islam. I bash false teaching in the Southern Baptist Convention - but not the Southern Baptists. RCC doctrine is largely apostate. I am far from alone in having this perspective - based on what Scripture and history reveals.
Just because its on a website, does not make it true. While the Web is great for finding and researching, it also allows for inaccurate data to pass itself as fact.
Jesus chose to teach men thru other men. It is they who made his words and deeds knwn to other men; so far as we know, he never wrote a word of the New Testament. His whole ministry was a preparation of these men for their mission. These men in their turn taught other men and this process continues to the present day.
What his favorite website also claims is that the Gnostic, Manichean Albigensians were Protestants. Not sure that is a claim Manfred actually wants to make, but his vaunted source does.
It also claims St. Ireneaus of Lyon as a Protestant missionary, news to St. Ireneaus.
Reading it, one recognizes not history, but polemic.
You still havent addressed my question about the need for demonstrable continuity of authority and doctrine and how it relates to proving or disproving the premise of this article
My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me: - John 10:27
But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him.
But God hath revealed [them] unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God. For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God. Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God. Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know [them], because they are spiritually discerned.
But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man. For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? But we have the mind of Christ. - I Corinthians 2:6-16
Thank you so much for sharing your insights, dear brother in Christ!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.