Posted on 08/30/2009 9:34:08 AM PDT by Colofornian
70 years ago today in Utah History --- Heber J. Grant writes Twentieth Century Fox "I hope we shall not appear to you to be over anxious ... but we are tremendously concerned..."
But nearly a year later the Mormon church president declared "This is one of the greatest days of my life." His involvement in helping with the film "Brigham Young" influenced the making of the movie and subsequently the public perception of the LDS Church.
Early movies depicting Mormons were not flattering. In 1910 the first anti-Mormon film, 'Victim of the Mormons' was "publicly condemned by Apostle David O. McKay" and Utah's LDS Governor William Spry led a successful effort to prevent the film from further airings. [1].
The negative portrayal of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints continued with the films "The Mountain Meadow Massacre" (1912), "The Mormon" (1912), "Deadwood Dick Spoils Brigham Young" (1915), Cecil B. DeMille's "A Mormon Maid" (1917), and "The Rainbow Trail" (1918).
In 1921 Apostle and Senator Reed Smoot received a letter "from [the] president of Fox Films, agreeing to stop exhibiting [the] movie 'Riders of the Purple Sage'" after church condemnation of the film. Later "the studio re-edited 'Riders,' which Apostle Smoot reviews and approved." [2]
Over thirty movies portrayed the church in a less than flattering light. But in the 1930s, restrictions were imposed on the portrayal of polygamy on the screen. This gave the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints church a break from negative portrayals in the movies. [3]
In the late 1930s, former Mormon Vardis Fisher's prize winning novel about the early history of the church -- "Children of God" came to the attention of film maker Darryl F. Zanuck. Zanuck had recently purchased 20th Century Fox and had made a series of biographical films about important Americans. Fisher's book helped inspire him to make a movie about Brigham Young. [4]
President Grant was concerned how the church would be portrayed and offered church resources while the film was extensively researched. Vincent Price, who played the part of Joseph Smith, recalled Grant "felt that the picture might have been about Joseph Smith instead of Brigham but of course realized that the great appeal to the public (and of course to the producers) was the difficult trek and the miracle of the gulls." Price continued "I greatly enjoyed the part of Joseph Smith, I read a great deal about him and with the help of the late Heber Grant kept on finding more material on the subject."
Grant was the 7th president and prophet of the Latter-day Saint church, son of Brigham Young's counselor, and adopted son of Joseph Smith.
Writing to the movie's associate producer, Grant expressed concern. "I hope we shall not appear to you to be over anxious, and we have no disposition to be oversensitive, but we are tremendously concerned that this picture shall be a true picture, and, while we are not, any of us, playwrights, or dramatists, or Movie technicians, we can appreciate the war which must constantly go on in one preparing a picture, between the highly dramatic and the sober fact." [5].
The movie's storyline and content continued to be adjusted. In the end it told the story of the founding of Mormonism, the death of Joseph Smith, Brigham Young leading Mormons west, and ended with the miracle of the seagulls.
After a private viewing aired for Heber J. Grant, J. Reuben Clark and David O' McKay before the film's general release, president Grant declared "I endorse it with all my heart and have no suggestions. This is one of the greatest days of my life. I can't say any more than 'God Bless You'" [6].
Utah declared the film's opening day (August 23rd, 1940) "Brigham Young Day" and hosted a parade in downtown Salt Lake City with nearly 100,000 spectators. The film was so popular in Salt Lake that it set a record for the number of theaters opening a single film. It was estimated the population of Salt Lake doubled for the debut because of out of town visitors. [7]
But not everyone was happy with the movie. The church-owned Deseret News pointed out that "the Brigham Young of the picture lacks the faith and knowledge the real Brigham had, who never doubted his leadership nor its divine direction. It therefore to the Church members comes as a shock," but "Church members will readily overlook the infelicities that appear and that they only are likely to see." [8]
The Salt Lake Tribune noted there was only a brief reference to polygamy and that "there is nothing calculated to reopen old wounds, nothing likely to revive rancor." [9]
While some church members were upset with the movie's portrayal of Brigham Young as a self-doubting leader, others praised the movie, feeling the historical inaccuracies and a doubtful Brigham Young were minor issues, particularly when compared to the long string of negative publicity the church had received though film. [10]
At the semi-annual conference of the church in October, President Grant observed "I have heard some little criticism of it, but we cannot expect the people who do not know that Brigham Young was in very deed the representative of God upon this earth who do not know of his wonderful character, to tell the story as we would tell it."
He continued "It is a very marvelous and wonderful thing, considering how people generally have treated us and what they thought of us. Of course, there are many things that are not strictly correct, and that is announced in the picture itself. It is of course a picture and we could not hope that they would make a picture at their expense, running into a couple of million dollars, to be just as we would like it." [11]
The film helped modify the perception of the Mormon church's public image. James D'arc, who provided commentary on the DVD release of "Brigham Young" noted "Brigham Young, to them, was seen in this screen portrait as a courageous and human leader who, while beset by natural self doubt, rose successfully to each challenge of circumstance." The image of Brigham Young in the movies changed "from perverted religious fanatic to virile striving pioneer."
[1] Quinn, D. Michael, The Mormon Hierarchy: Extensions of Power, Appendix 5, Selected Chronology of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1848-1996
[2] ibid.
[3] D'arc, James V. , "The Saints on Celluloid: The Making of the Movie Brigham Young," Sunstone 1:4 (Fall 1976), p. 11-28
[4] ibid
[5] Heber J. Grant in letter to Kenneth Macgowan, 30 August 1939 as quoted in D'arc
[6] "High L.D.S. Officials Preview Brigham Young," Salt Lake Tribune, 14 August 1940, p. 8, as quoted in D'arc
[7] D'arc
[8] Editorial, Deseret News, 24 Aug 1940, p. 4, as quoted in D'arc
[9] Editorial, Salt Lake Tribune, 23 Aug 1940, p. 10, as quoted in D'arc
[10] D'arc
[11] Heber J. Grant, One Hundred and Eleventh Semi-Annual Conference of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, p. 96, as quoted in D'arc
(Sometimes that's what realistic historical portrayals wind up doing -- telling the truth minus the expensive public relations attempt to present most things in a "flattering light")
From the article: The film helped modify the perception of the Mormon church's public image.
Of course it did. Here we have a film about Brigham Young. Polygamy was barely mentioned. His 27 wives were glossed over, as if they didn't matter. Same with his 57 kids -- about half of whom were born to girls in their teens and women in their 20s. In a dozen of Young's marriages, the age differences were:
41-20; 42-18; 42-15; 43-20; 43-19; 44-16; 45-20; 45-16; 45-19; 61-24; 63-22; 66 or 67 - 23 or 24.
A 45 yo marrying a 15 yo & a pair of 16 yo? Sounds to me like the perfect thing even 1940 Hollywood might be interested in. (But no, that got censored out as the Mormon church ensured the film in the prep stages was as the article said "adjusted")
From the article: ...feeling the historical inaccuracies and a doubtful Brigham Young were minor issues...
Listen, if Hollywood had actually gotten into very many "historical accuracies," it would have dealt with:
#1 Brigham Young as territorial governor during the first 9/11 domestic act of terrorism in our nation -- when 120 innocent children, women and men were executed at close range by Mormons their remaining children aged 7 & under kidnapped by Mormon families in Southern Utah, -- all under the watchful eye of Young who acted as both "prophet" and "Guv" of the people. (Ya gotta know this event didn't just happen in a day; the Fancher party was under siege for several days before seeing no alternative but to surrender their weapons and being forced by Mormons to go on their death march)
#2 How about Brigham's "interesting" teaching of blood atonement, which led to some avenging angels & Danites ensuring men were punished for their own sins by "helping them" shed their own blood? (That, too, sounds like Hollywood intrigue; but, no, that, too was skipped over)
#3 What about Brigham's quarter-of-a-century teaching that the first man, Adam, is our god? Surely this "tidbit" highlighted -- if only briefly on the big screen -- could have added more "historical reality" to who Young was.
But, of course, Mormons want a "prophet-hero" they can name a school after and send their kids to.
A movie on Brigham Young and Joe Smith? Cool! I love comedies, or is this categorized strictly under outlandish fiction?
I think also in the minds of many ldsers today, just can't seem to see the guy as he really was.
Attack the Mormons. Leave the Muslims alone. We can’t even have a cartoon about Muslims.
When did that happen?
If there ever was a Hollywood produced anti-Muslim film, do you think people would attend?
Ok, gotcha. And yes I think they would.
Of course there will be an accurate rendering of the Muntain Meadows massacre where Brigham oung ordered the murders of 120 unarmed men women and children and babes in arms who were under a flag of truce, and kiddnapped several children 7 and under and held them captive in starvation, want and squallor for two years before the US Army made them give them back...
And brigham young stolle the wagons, horses and cattle, and other belongings and money of his victims and never returned any of it...Even the bloody clothes on the bodies of his victims was stripped from their dead bodies..
Then Brigham Young left the bodies of his victims out on the prairee for two years and animals ate their flesh and scattered the bones...until the US Army, (again) buried their bones etc..and placed a memorial over the huge common grave..
after which Brigham young ordered the memorial pulled down, and the grave destroyed and desecrated...
***A movie on Brigham Young and Joe Smith? Cool! I love comedies, or is this categorized strictly under outlandish fiction?****
I saw this piece of dreck many years ago on tv. Read about the death of Joseph Smith, then watch the movie.
Smith died in a shootout with the mob killing three of them. Then tried to break jail by jumping out of the unbarred window and was caught in the back by the rifle fire from the mob.
Vincent Price looks at the mob, breaking down the door, like an innocent lamb and is then shot and falls backward out the window. No return fire, no Masonic cries for help.
I read a few years back that this particular movie failed at the box office, even in Utah.
***Even the bloody clothes on the bodies of his victims was stripped from their dead bodies..***
I read a history by a Mountain Man (I wish I could remember his name) who was a scout for the US Army when they retrieved the children from the Mormons.
He said only firm discipline by the officers prevented the soldiers from lynching every Mormon they could find. the Cedar City Stake house still stank like a slaughter house two years after the massacre because that is wher the bloody unwashed clothing was stored.
The Mountain man later converted to Mormonism but had to flee Salt Lake for his life when he was seen talking with a non-mormon woman about the errors of Mormonism.
Personally, I think the mormons should make a movie about the TRUTH, only. (As if that would ever happen).
Here are some groovy fictional concepts from a fake-prophet to help build a truthful storyline:
ALL QUOTED FROM HERE
Ping
Well, I'll be you learn something everyday. Honestly, ROTFLMAO
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.