Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Book Review: Discovering a Lost Heritage: The Catholic Origins of America
catholicism.org ^ | August 28th, 2009 | Eleonore Villarrubia

Posted on 09/02/2009 1:49:58 PM PDT by GonzoII

- Catholicism.org - http://catholicism.org -

Book Review: Discovering a Lost Heritage: The Catholic Origins of America

Posted By Eleonore Villarrubia On August 28, 2009 @ 2:24 pm In Articles, Book Reviews, Catholic America, History | 2 Comments

So, you think you know your American history? Well, this little gem of a book, a Catholic history of our country, will probably leave you quivering, both with shock at your lack of knowledge of some of the “true facts” of our past and with indignation that this information is not taught in American schools and is absent from standard textbooks. Why, you ask, did this happen? According to the author: “Much of American history is, and has been for two centuries, taught from a Protestant-English viewpoint. To be more exact, U.S. history has been primarily taught from a WASP (White Anglo-Saxon Protestant) perspective, and this has more often than not been anti-Catholic, or at the least, silent on the foundation of America as being originally Catholic.”

Let’s try a question from early New World history: Who were the first Europeans in New England? Standard answer: Pilgrims, escaping religious persecution in England, landed in Massachusetts in 1620.

That is not the correct answer. As early as the fifth century, a monk, whose name is unknown, and his companions, left evidence of their visit to the area of New Hampshire on a petroglyph. The message praising “Christ the Lord” is written in ancient Celtic. Natives told the early French explorers of this tradition among their people.

In the late sixth century we know that Saint Brendan, an Irish monk, and his companions, landed on the shores of America near what is now New Salem, New Hampshire. There they planted the Cross of Christ and explored the eastern coastline of North America. Saint Brendan himself recorded the events and descriptions of his explorations in his Saga.

Along about the year 1000, Catholic Norsemen from Scandinavia explored the coastline of the northern part of the east coast from Greenland, down to Nova Scotia and New England. Viking Leif Ericson, who was converted to the Catholic Faith by King Saint Olaf, took missionary monks with him on the voyage. Coastal Indians spoke to them of white, bearded men who wore robes and carried beads and crosses in procession. Was this the stuff of legend or were they speaking of their own times? While that question cannot be answered, surely the story had some basis in fact.

Almost one hundred years before Columbus’ voyage, a Scottish-Norse prince, Henry of St. Clair (or Sinclair) from the Orkney Islands off the northern coast of England, set off on an expedition to America and landed in present-day Nova Scotia. Being a good Catholic ruler, Henry also brought along missionaries who evangelized the gentle Micmac Indians while teaching them many practical skills as well. Evidence exists that the St. Clair party sailed farther south and established a settlement at the site that is today Newport, Rhode Island. One can see in this very American city the remains of a stone tower that once adjoined a church. This tower is not typical of early American architecture, being modeled after a church tower in Scotland, which in turn was modeled after the tower of the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem; they are the world’s only structures built in this manner. (A photograph of the tower adorns the cover of this book.) More proof of St. Clair’s visit to New England is a petroglyph found on a large rock near Newport. There one can see a large and detailed carving of the coat of arms of the Sinclair family. Although Henry founded several settlements, leaving a missionary at each, he was killed in a family dispute back home in the Orkneys; as a result, deprived of needed supplies, the settlements fell apart and the settlers vanished. The Spanish explorer Verrazano saw the tower in 1524 and encountered Indians he believed to be of mixed race, possibly descendants of the Scottish settlers of St. Clair’s expedition.

Finally, by the 1570’s, France had begun to send explorers and missionary priests to the New England area, where a Cross and French flag were planted near the Kennebec River in Maine and the land was claimed for Christ and France. What we now call New England was earlier known as Norumbega.

All these events happened before the Pilgrims!

Examples of historical distortion (or simply omission) abound in this fact-packed book. Here is another shocker: Did you know that whites were not the only slave owners in nineteenth century America? In 1830, the national census counted nearly 3800 black slave owners who, among themselves, held nearly 12,800 slaves. These were not even all in the South. In New York City that same year, eight free men of color owned seventeen slaves. In addition, there were many whites who were slaves, mostly despised poor Irish and Scottish Catholic immigrants who had no choice but to sell themselves into indentured servitude for life — which amounts to slavery — because of their destitute condition.

Any Catholic living in New England should be able to relate the history of anti-Catholicism that was traditional here. Samuel Adams wanted to establish laws specifically directed against Catholics in every state of the nation. John Jay, prior to becoming Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, did his best as governor of New York to deny Catholics rights of citizenship in his state. Too, in our own state of New Hampshire there was a clause on the books excluding Catholics from holding office as late as 1876. Not one of the proudest of the liberal traditions, is it? And the violent anti-Catholic activities of the Know-Nothing movement is (pardon the pun) well-known!

Of particular interest to this reviewer was the chapter on Texas. Our author explained how the Freemasonic government of the United States eventually annexed the territory, which had already been established as a Republic independent from Mexico and, as had been hoped by Texans, independent of the United States too. Manifest Destiny took care of that, as it did the entire southwest, wresting one third of what would be the United States from Mexico by means of President Polk’s Mexican-American war. The destruction of the Catholic/Spanish culture of the peaceful Indians of Florida is also a sad chapter in American history. Worse than that, in terms of the scale of the injustice, was the forced relocation of all Indian tribes east of the Mississippi to western reservations as outlined first by President Monroe in his 1825 report to the Senate on a “plan of colonization or removal” of said tribes. After the Civil War President Grant pushed a law that prohibited Catholic priests from ministering to Catholic Indians on the reservations; Protestant ministers were sent instead. Our Masonic political rulers were also eager to help their brothers south of the border to cut ties with the Catholic motherland. This is the main reason for the support that the United States supplied to the revolutionary movements in Latin American countries in their successful breaks from European colonizers. Although the Monroe “Doctrine,” as it came to be called, was not enforceable at the time it was proclaimed, it set the stage for a new sphere of influence in the western hemisphere where any colony that sought independence from European powers would have the backing of the United States.

A handy section at the end of the book called “U.S. History Mythbusters” is by itself worth the price of the book. It includes thirty-five common myths regarding our history, which are taken for granted as true by nearly all Americans, and their precise refutations.

This is such an essential little volume — only 195 pages in length — so packed with information that one has to ignore the few misspellings and typos within it. Adam Miller has done a wonderful service by providing us with such a well-researched, fact-filled production.


Article printed from Catholicism.org: http://catholicism.org

URL to article: http://catholicism.org/book-review-discovering-a-lost-heritage-the-catholic-origins-of-america.html

Copyright © 2009 Catholicism.org. All rights reserved.


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; General Discusssion; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: barryfell; bookreview; catholic; godsgravesglyphs; history
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
 Who is like unto God?........ Lk:10:18:
 And he said to them: I saw Satan like lightning falling from heaven.
1 posted on 09/02/2009 1:49:59 PM PDT by GonzoII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Sounds like a very interesting read. Thanks for posting.


2 posted on 09/02/2009 1:55:52 PM PDT by al_c (http://www.blowoutcongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
In the late sixth century we know that Saint Brendan, an Irish monk, and his companions, landed on the shores of America near what is now New Salem, New Hampshire?????

I hope the book is better than the reviewers knowledge of New Hampshire geography.

3 posted on 09/02/2009 1:58:59 PM PDT by ALPAPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Sounds interesting.

But what role did Catholics play in forming the institutions of this country? What, for example, did 6th century monks have to do with it?

I’m sorry, but this sounds a lot like Afro-centric history does to me. Interesting facts, but irrelevant to the mainstream of events.


4 posted on 09/02/2009 2:05:30 PM PDT by chesley ("Hate" -- You wouldn't understand; it's a leftist thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Go St Augustine!

Our town and parish were founded by Spain in 1565, and we’re still going strong...


5 posted on 09/02/2009 2:19:02 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chesley

Do some research on Charles Carroll and see whether our nation would have survived its own birth without him...


6 posted on 09/02/2009 2:19:29 PM PDT by pgyanke (You have no "rights" that require an involuntary burden on another person. Period. - MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chesley

Actually, the thinking of Jefferson and most of the other men of the Enlightment were very much shaped by the Catholic theory of natural law (which is essentially the basis of our Constitution and our country).

Jefferson and other people in the English speaking world were also very impressed by the writings of the 17th century Spanish Jesuit, Suarez, who was the first to come up with the idea of the “consent of the governed” as being a prerequisite for governance. He also developed the Christian theory justifying the overthrow of a despotic government.


7 posted on 09/02/2009 2:21:44 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

I don’t know much about him but he is in just about every family tree I have. He has many, many descendants or people who claim to be.


8 posted on 09/02/2009 2:33:40 PM PDT by MamaB (If you see someone without a smile, give them yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Save


9 posted on 09/02/2009 2:52:41 PM PDT by Rumplemeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

“All these events happened before the Pilgrims!”

I was going to say that very specifically, the perspective is NEW ENGLAND Protestant.

Indeed, the impression that “pilgrims” were the 1st English settlement in NA is bogus.

The 1st being the mysterious Roanoke, NC and the 2nd - 1st permanent - being JAMESTOWN, VA. Note these were both “south” - indeed, pilgrims were aiming for VA.

But people continue to think of “Plymouth”, “Salem”, etc, when it comes to “1st American...”

Which trickles into the whole “Thanksgiving” thing. Never mind other items of culture, and you’ll find New England has ultimately dominated as far as telling the story.


10 posted on 09/02/2009 2:58:24 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chesley

Well, not mentioned is that the entire colony of MD was founded by Catholics for the purpose of providing Catholic refuge - along with “tolerance” for all, which England was not doing.

Indeed, a secret truth is that Maryland was NOT named for “Henrietta Maria” (bah! Why the 2nd name of a queen?) but for the Virgin Mary.

Oh, do the Democrats here go into shock when they hear that!


11 posted on 09/02/2009 3:00:53 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MamaB

Make sure you have the correct Charles. He had to specify himself as “Charles Carroll OF CARROLLTON” to distinguish himself from his contemporary cousin, who replaced him in Congress.

He was the last surviving member of the Signers (he did not vote on it, having just been sent the very day it was signed by Hancock), and he laid the stone of the B&O Railroad in 1828.


12 posted on 09/02/2009 4:13:03 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke
Do you mean his loyalty to George Washington during the Conway Cabal, and his working with Benjamin Franklin and Washington to bring France in as an ally while France was saying why help the Rebels and then have two Protestant powers against them and while the other ministers were trying to keep France out becausae it was a sovereign nation. Or how about at the end of the war when Charles Carroll of Carrollton, the only Catholic to sign the Declaration of Independence was also the only leader (after the war) that had money to lend. I guess those things helped us.
13 posted on 09/02/2009 7:09:59 PM PDT by Seniram US (Quote of the Day: Smile You're An American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; 31R1O; ...

· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Looks lame, but hey, there's a PreColumbian navigation of the Atlantic angle, so ping.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

·Dogpile · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google ·
· The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


14 posted on 09/02/2009 8:24:48 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chesley; pgyanke; livius; the OlLine Rebel
"But what role did Catholics play in forming the institutions of this country? "


Daniel Carroll a Signer of the Articles of the Confederation/ U.S.
Constitution and U.S. Representative in the First Federal
Congress (1789-179)


Charles Carroll a Signer of the Declaration of Independence and a
Senator in the First U.S. Federal Congress (1789-1791)


Thomas Fitzsimons a Signer of the U.S. Constitution and U.S.
Representative in the First Federal Congress (1789-1791)

15 posted on 09/02/2009 10:35:01 PM PDT by GonzoII ("That they may be one...Father")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: al_c

You’re welcome.


16 posted on 09/03/2009 12:13:16 AM PDT by GonzoII ("That they may be one...Father")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Yes, but how does that compare to, say, the number of Anglicans and other Protestants.

The founders of America were overwhelmingly British Protestants, at least nominally.

this is not to disparage the contributions that others made, but still. The Spanish Catholics, the Mexican CAtholics, the Viking Catholics, and the Irish Catholics, etc., while they may have been here, even first, did not play a significant role in the founding of this country, whatever they may have done since.


17 posted on 09/03/2009 5:49:51 AM PDT by chesley ("Hate" -- You wouldn't understand; it's a leftist thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: chesley
"Yes, but how does that compare to, say, the number of Anglicans and other Protestants."

I didn't intend to get into numbers just facts.

Of course Protestants out-numbered Catholics at the beginning of our Nation, but nonetheless, Catholics did contribute to its founding.

18 posted on 09/03/2009 6:57:51 AM PDT by GonzoII ("That they may be one...Father")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
"out-numbered"

= outnumbered

19 posted on 09/03/2009 6:59:52 AM PDT by GonzoII ("That they may be one...Father")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: chesley
"The founders of America were overwhelmingly British Protestants, at least nominally."
20 posted on 09/03/2009 7:02:10 AM PDT by GonzoII ("That they may be one...Father")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson