Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Darwinist thinking on the origin of religion (the Temple of Darwin wants to explain your religion)
Science Literature ^ | November 9, 2009 | David Tyler, Ph.D.

Posted on 11/10/2009 2:53:21 PM PST by GodGunsGuts

This topic forces us to assess the relationship between science and spirituality: is the invisible spiritual realm generated from the material or should it be considered as having a separate existence? Is religion a phenomenon that can ultimately be explained by science in naturalistic ways, or does religion represent a dimension of reality that cannot be directly probed by the methodologies of science? In an essay in Science, Elizabeth Culotta writes: ...

(Excerpt) Read more at arn.org ...


TOPICS: Catholic; Charismatic Christian; Current Events; Evangelical Christian; Mainline Protestant; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics; Religion & Science
KEYWORDS: antiscienceevos; belongsinreligion; catholic; corruption; creation; evolution; evoreligionexposed; godsgravesglyphs; intelligentdesign; moralabsolutes; notasciencetopic; propellerbeanie; religion; science; spammer; templeofdarwin

1 posted on 11/10/2009 2:53:22 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

The minute I see religion, new religion, etc. I see another pocket picker who wants to control my life, my money and my well being ...


2 posted on 11/10/2009 2:58:33 PM PST by fujimoh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
"The materialist who debunks everyone else’s ideas as the subrational products of their brain chemistry or environment cannot avoid being debunked himself. If he is honest, says C.S. Lewis, the materialist will have to admit that his own ideas are merely the “epiphe-nomenon which accompanies chemical or electrical events in a cortex which is itself the by-product of a blind evolutionary process.” If all thoughts are merely the products of non-rational causes, this includes the materialist’s own thoughts. In other words, there is no reason according to materialism for materialism itself to be regarded as true.
3 posted on 11/10/2009 3:03:33 PM PST by HerrBlucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom; DaveLoneRanger; editor-surveyor; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; MrB; GourmetDan; Fichori; ...

Ping!


4 posted on 11/10/2009 3:04:31 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fujimoh
The minute I see religion, new religion, etc. I see another pocket picker who wants to control my life, my money and my well being ...

Sounds like the government to me

5 posted on 11/10/2009 3:04:35 PM PST by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher

And yet, this obvious point rarely seems to occur to the materialist.


6 posted on 11/10/2009 3:08:00 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher

That was a mouthful!


7 posted on 11/10/2009 3:26:45 PM PST by rae4palin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Thanks for the ping!


8 posted on 11/10/2009 7:49:27 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher; GodGunsGuts
Perfect, and the pretensious idea that naturalism is somehow the default, sterile, apolitical, non-ideological, non-liberal position is ridiculously quite laughable.
9 posted on 11/10/2009 8:27:27 PM PST by tpanther (Science was, is and will forever be a small subset of God's creation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

Haven’t see you for a little while, tpanther. Good to see you back. Hope all is well with you and yours :o)


10 posted on 11/10/2009 8:31:07 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Why are you in the Religion forum?


11 posted on 11/10/2009 8:57:02 PM PST by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

Iconcur with you.


12 posted on 11/10/2009 9:05:08 PM PST by LocDoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Religions evolve just as living and non-living entities evolve.

A good reference for that is in Will Durant’s “The Story of Civilizaation,” volume 1.


13 posted on 11/11/2009 9:03:07 AM PST by OldNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher
there is no reason according to materialism for materialism itself to be regarded as true.

Gotta love ol' C.S.!

I've heard this used when someone claims all truth is relative. That there is no absolute truth. What can their response be when you ask, "Is what you are saying a true statement?" uhhhh.....

14 posted on 11/11/2009 8:40:19 PM PST by boatbums (Pro-woman, pro-child, pro-life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts; metmom

“Haven’t see you for a little while, tpanther. Good to see you back. Hope all is well with you and yours :o) “

Thanks, less free time these days...more on-call, etc. etc. etc.

Keep up the good work!


15 posted on 11/12/2009 11:31:02 AM PST by tpanther (Science was, is and will forever be a small subset of God's creation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson