Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shroud of Turin on display again
CBC news ^ | April 10, 2010

Posted on 04/10/2010 12:37:32 PM PDT by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Interesting Times

Thanks for the ping. I wonder if they are going to take any samples this time.


21 posted on 04/10/2010 6:49:35 PM PDT by zot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Thanks for the ping!


22 posted on 04/10/2010 8:16:19 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: zot
Thanks for the ping. I wonder if they are going to take any samples this time.

I haven't heard that any scientific examination is scheduled

23 posted on 04/11/2010 2:30:33 AM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE isAAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
Thanks for the ping.

I was able recently to catch a part of the History Channel's "Face of Jesus" show.
It was very impressive, and I especially noted how they addressed the major concern I've expressed here -- in my eyes, the Shroud Image does not "look Jewish" enough.

Well, their "real face of Jesus" certainly DID look "Jewish enough" to me.
And they explained in great detail how they, so to speak, reverse engineered from the image that we SEE to the face which produced it.

So, point is, the face we see on the Shroud is not itself the "face of Jesus," but rather was produced by another face which looks very much like I would have expected.

They were also careful to point out that the Shroud can never be "proved" authentic scientifically, and that the Church does NOT require belief in the Shroud as an article of faith.
The most science can do is suggest stronger or weaker probabilities.
The Church merely points to the evidence which exists and says, "you decide."

If the cloth is definitively dated 1st Century, well, that would make the probabilities much stronger, imho.

24 posted on 04/11/2010 10:04:24 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Thanks. I wish they would take samples, from the original cloth.


25 posted on 04/11/2010 11:04:04 AM PDT by zot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind
How many times have I seen statements like this in which the writer doesn't bother to mention why the carbon 14 testing was bogus? There's always the underlying implication that the "rejectors" are just religious fanatics who ignore science.

When anyone sees any disinformation, religious, political or other out there please log in and reply. Be careful of your facts but let the truth be known. Do not let lies stand. Even if someone else has already posted the truth do it again in your own words. Don't be afraid of the commie trolls, they count on it. The post is mightier than the sword.

26 posted on 04/11/2010 8:32:19 PM PDT by Bellflower (If you are left DO NOT take the mark of the beast and be damned forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson