Skip to comments.
The Amish come to Israel, ask Jews for forgiveness
Israel Today ^
Posted on 12/01/2010 2:24:01 PM PST by Amerisrael
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 181-194 next last
To: mas cerveza por favor
There is nothing at all in the article indicating that the Amish have embraced dispensationalism.
To: Westbrook
Well did not the apostle Paul say that the gentles are “grafted” unto being part of God’s people, as in Romans Chapter 10?
62
posted on
12/02/2010 6:42:42 AM PST
by
Biggirl
(GO UCONN!!!!:)=^..^=)
To: mas cerveza por favor; GiovannaNicoletta
63
posted on
12/02/2010 6:53:00 AM PST
by
Quix
(Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
To: Biggirl
> Well did not the apostle Paul say that the gentles
> are grafted unto being part of Gods people, as in
> Romans Chapter 10?
Yes, but not as one of the Tribes of Israel mentioned in Revelation 12.
As Christians we are a branch grafted onto the tree that sprouted the original branches of the Tribes of Israel. We are not one of those branches.
See Job 14:7-9 for a blessing.
64
posted on
12/02/2010 7:13:03 AM PST
by
Westbrook
(Having children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
To: Amerisrael
65
posted on
12/02/2010 7:33:01 AM PST
by
agrace
To: Quix
We have repeatedly documented that that assertion is thoroughly false. Darby was a Johnny Come Lately to the Biblical truths about Israel, the END TIMES and dispensations. Please provide documentation of anyone who interpreted the Bible as dispensationalist prior to John Darby.
To: John Leland 1789
There is nothing at all in the article indicating that the Amish have embraced dispensationalism. The article uses the pejorative term "replacement theology" to describe traditional Christian beliefs. Anti-Semitism and NAZI sympathies are represented as the consequence of traditional Christianity. That is dispensationalist.
To: bareford101
the country stands as an example of how God is patient and faithful to a very unfaithful people.....kind of like us. So God is patient with all sorts of disobedient nations. How exactly is the present situation with secular Israel different?
68
posted on
12/02/2010 7:54:08 AM PST
by
topcat54
("Dispensationalism -- like crack for the eschatologically naive.")
To: mas cerveza por favor; GiovannaNicoletta
I did.
We’ve done so on FR many, many times.
Still REPLACEMENTARIANS
seem to prefer to peddle falsehoods about that as they do about Scriptural truths.
69
posted on
12/02/2010 8:01:05 AM PST
by
Quix
(Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
To: mas cerveza por favor
Hopefully they did not also join John Hagee in rejecting Jesus' coming as Christ and Messiah. Better than embracing your slander against Hagee. His actual point, which he had to make more clear in the second printing of the book in question since some people seem incapable of handling a bit of hyperbole, was that Yeshua's intent in the First Coming was not to be the Annointed (Mashiach, Christos) King, but to bear Israel's sins as a sacrifice.
Which is true.
May I suggest that you actually read the quote in context before getting incensed about it next time.
Shalom.
70
posted on
12/02/2010 8:01:51 AM PST
by
Buggman
(returnofbenjamin.wordpress.com - Baruch haBa b'Shem ADONAI!)
To: mas cerveza por favor
The term "replacement theology" is a false, pejorative insult against traditional Christianity. The fact that your particular replacementist heresy is as old as gnosticism does not make it any less false.
71
posted on
12/02/2010 8:10:22 AM PST
by
Buggman
(returnofbenjamin.wordpress.com - Baruch haBa b'Shem ADONAI!)
To: mas cerveza por favor
Let's see: Calling a theology "replacement" because it claims that the Church has replaced national Israel vs. calling a theology a heresy because you happen to disagree with it . . .
I say, is that a beam in your eye?
72
posted on
12/02/2010 8:13:51 AM PST
by
Buggman
(returnofbenjamin.wordpress.com - Baruch haBa b'Shem ADONAI!)
To: Westbrook
We’re the evangelical arm of Judaism - we bring heathens and pagans to knowledge of the Hebrew God via Christ.
73
posted on
12/02/2010 8:18:24 AM PST
by
GOPJ
('Power abdicates only under the stress of counter-power." Martin Buber /a Tea-nami's coming..)
To: SunkenCiv
Were the evangelical arm of Judaism - we bring heathens and pagans to knowledge of the Hebrew God via Christ.
Thanks for the ping.
74
posted on
12/02/2010 8:19:45 AM PST
by
GOPJ
('Power abdicates only under the stress of counter-power." Martin Buber /a Tea-nami's coming..)
To: GOPJ
LOL I like that description.
Shalom.
75
posted on
12/02/2010 8:21:20 AM PST
by
Buggman
(returnofbenjamin.wordpress.com - Baruch haBa b'Shem ADONAI!)
To: Buggman
The fact that your particular replacementist heresy is as old as gnosticism does not make it any less false. Who did the original Hebrew Christians "replace"? Were they not simply remaining faithful to God by accepting their prophesied Messiah at the time of their visitation? Obviously, the term "replacement theology" would have sounded ridiculous to them, as it does to any honest person today.
To: Buggman
Now now.
If . . . Rabid clique types could not distort Scripture, reality and history
all out of whack to fit their twisted notions,
they might not have a reason to get up in the morning!
/s
77
posted on
12/02/2010 8:28:24 AM PST
by
Quix
(Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
To: Buggman
The fact that your particular replacementist heresy is as old as gnosticism does not make it any less false.
INDEED TO THE MAX.
78
posted on
12/02/2010 8:29:59 AM PST
by
Quix
(Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
To: Buggman
Better than embracing your slander against Hagee. His actual point, [...] was that Yeshua's intent in the First Coming was not to be the Annointed (Mashiach, Christos) King, but to bear Israel's sins as a sacrifice. Thank you for making one of my points. Hagee preaches that Jesus did not yet come as Christ. Logically then, Hagee and his followers should not continue to call themselves Christians. Agreed?
To: Quix; GiovannaNicoletta
Please provide documentation of anyone who interpreted the Bible as dispensationalist prior to John Darby.
I did. Weve done so on FR many, many times. I doubt that because in the 1800 years of glorious Christian civilization prior to Darby, there were no dispensationalists. He and CI Scofield were 19th Century revivalist hucksters peddling religious novelty. Tim LaHaye and John Hagee continue the lucrative $cam.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 181-194 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson