Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Apparent "Good" in Natural Man
Monergism.Com ^ | J.W. Hendryx

Posted on 12/26/2010 7:51:12 AM PST by Gamecock

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: Guyin4Os; Gamecock
The problem with this hard-line Calvinism is that it does not account for man's decision-making ability

True, and if you couple this with double predestination, then it's like saying God is a roboticist --He makes us, His robots, programmed to do good or evil. We robots are hence already pre-programmed to do good or evil and do not "choose" to do anything as per Calvin. Then, linking this to the hard-line zero free-will, that means that God/the roboticist directs the robots' actions down to the lowest detail.

Then, as per Calvin's philosophy, the roboticist, at the end of the robot's lifespan tells the pre-programmed "evil" robot: "Ha, ha, you did the evil that I pre-programmed you to do and you were directed by my actions as you had no free will. However, you were evil, so now you're going to be tormented in hell for eternity".
41 posted on 12/27/2010 3:44:13 AM PST by Cronos (Kto jestem? Nie wiem! Ale moj Bog wie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ripliancum; Gamecock
Mosiah 3:19

For the natural man is an enemy to God, and has been from the fall of Adam, and will be, forever and ever, unless he yields to the enticings of the Holy Spirit, and putteth off the natural man and becometh a saint through the atonement of Christ the Lord, and becometh as a child, submissive, meek, humble, patient, full of love, willing to submit to all things which the Lord seeth fit to inflict upon him, even as a child doth submit to his father.
Interesting -- so does Mormonism share the same Calvinist belief in the Total Depravity of mankind?
42 posted on 12/27/2010 3:45:55 AM PST by Cronos (Kto jestem? Nie wiem! Ale moj Bog wie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock; Mr Rogers
1. Mr. R never claimed that Gen 4 was the Gospels.
6The LORD said to Cain, “Why are you angry, and why has your face fallen? 7 If you do well, will you not be accepted? And if you do not do well, sin is crouching at the door. Its desire is for you, but you must rule over it.” - Gen 4
2. Why do you reject Revelations by saying "It is not an evangelistic verse"
43 posted on 12/27/2010 3:49:10 AM PST by Cronos (Kto jestem? Nie wiem! Ale moj Bog wie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Interesting — so does Mormonism share the same Calvinist belief in the Total Depravity of mankind?
______________________________________________________________________

No. It's not the same thing. Correct me if I'm wrong, but Calvinism professes predestination, total depravity and unconditional election.
Mormonism professes free agency, no original sin, and children who are alive in Christ and unspotted from the world until they reach the age of accountability.

I would recommend reading Moroni 8. Here's a snip.

8 Listen to the words of Christ, your Redeemer, your Lord and your God. Behold, I came into the world not to call the righteous but sinners to repentance; the whole need no physician, but they that are sick; wherefore, little children are whole, for they are not capable of committing sin; wherefore the curse of Adam is taken from them in me, that it hath no power over them; and the law of circumcision is done away in me.

9 And after this manner did the Holy Ghost manifest the word of God unto me; wherefore, my beloved son, I know that it is solemn mockery before God, that ye should baptize little children.

10 Behold I say unto you that this thing shall ye teach—repentance and baptism unto those who are accountable and capable of committing sin; yea, teach parents that they must repent and be baptized, and humble themselves as their little children, and they shall all be saved with their little children.

11 And their little children need no repentance, neither baptism. Behold, baptism is unto repentance to the fulfilling the commandments unto the remission of sins.

12 But little children are alive in Christ, even from the foundation of the world;...

http://lds.org/scriptures/bofm/moro/8?lang=eng

44 posted on 12/27/2010 7:53:53 AM PST by Ripliancum ("For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given" Merry Christmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
The PCA is now freeling choosing to ordain women deacons

Freeling? Do you mean freely? Actually they are, as far as I know, studying the issue.

I would however, submit to you that the ordination of women as Deacons is far less serious than ordaining homosexuals like the Catholic Church does, and certainly less damaging than the criminal conspiracy of moving child molesting priest from one parish to another unsuspecting one...

and also free will debates on Federal Vision

Which has, BTW, been declared a heresy.

45 posted on 12/27/2010 9:34:07 AM PST by Gamecock (The resurrection of Jesus Christ is both historically credible and existentially satisfying. T.K.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Ripliancum
Thank you. But your excerpt from Mosiah said For the natural man is an enemy to God, and has been from the fall of Adam, which must mean Original Sin, correct? and and will be, forever and ever, would mean Total Depravity, correct?
46 posted on 12/27/2010 12:05:46 PM PST by Cronos (Kto jestem? Nie wiem! Ale moj Bog wie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
No, I meant freeling :-P

Sorry, was busy trying to get SciFi channel to re-start the Farscape series and got lost in that language!

The Church doesn't ordain a person who says he's a homo and has always checked that those with such tendencies do not join -- this was lax in the 50s but the checks are far more rigourous now since JPII

But, seriously -- if you do not believe in free will, how do you freely choose to have Women Deacons in the PCA? Isn't that against St. Paul?
47 posted on 12/27/2010 12:09:33 PM PST by Cronos (Kto jestem? Nie wiem! Ale moj Bog wie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Leftism is Mentally Deranged
We have free will. Some people freely choose evil and others freely choose good.

Man is free to choose as he will the question is can he will what he can not do?

48 posted on 12/27/2010 12:26:44 PM PST by RnMomof7 (Gal 4:16 asks "Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

Did Christ die for

1. All the sins of all men.
2. All the sins of some men, or
3. Some of the sins of all men.


49 posted on 12/27/2010 12:51:49 PM PST by RnMomof7 (Gal 4:16 asks "Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

I think we have a very different idea of what original sin means.

As a Mormon, I believe that because of the Fall of Adam and Eve, all people live in a fallen condition, separated from God and subject to physical death. However, we are not condemned by what many call the “original sin.” In other words, we are not accountable for Adam’s transgression in the Garden of Eden.

Our articles of faith address this head on.
“We believe that men will be punished for their own sins, and not for Adam’s transgression” (Articles of Faith 1:2).

As to “Total Depravity”, no. The atonement of Christ as an eternal necessity, eternally balancing justice and mercy. This in contrast to the sectarian view of the catastrophic fall and total depravity of man, sometimes juxtaposed with the sectarian doctrine of Ultimate Reconciliation.

Hope that makes sense.


50 posted on 12/27/2010 2:28:48 PM PST by Ripliancum ("For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given" Merry Christmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

BTW, James 4:4 says pretty much the same thing as the Mosiah reference, about the natural man being an enemy of God.

“Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God.”

http://lds.org/scriptures/nt/james/4?lang=eng

Hope that helps.


51 posted on 12/27/2010 7:21:52 PM PST by Ripliancum ("For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given" Merry Christmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

I can’t answer that question. I am not in a PCA that “ordains” women deacons.

In fact, I am not in the PCA.


52 posted on 12/28/2010 6:07:52 AM PST by Gamecock (The resurrection of Jesus Christ is both historically credible and existentially satisfying. T.K.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

***Sorry, was busy trying to get SciFi channel***

I miss Mystery Science Theater 3000. Wifey hates that I found it on NetFlix and can watch it instantly.


53 posted on 12/28/2010 6:10:09 AM PST by Gamecock (The resurrection of Jesus Christ is both historically credible and existentially satisfying. T.K.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Pity they don’t make any new episodes though...


54 posted on 12/28/2010 6:43:02 AM PST by Cronos (Kto jestem? Nie wiem! Ale moj Bog wie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson