Skip to comments.
Postal workers refuse to deliver Bible recordings because the CDs are ‘offensive’ (UK)
The Daily Mail (UK) ^
| 9/9/11
| Staff
Posted on 09/10/2011 2:22:05 PM PDT by ruralvoter
Postal workers refused to deliver CDs of Bible readings after deciding they were offensive material.
Several churches had paid for discs with recordings of St Marks Gospel to be produced to celebrate the 400th anniversary of the King James Bible.
They were due to be delivered to all households on the Channel Island of Jersey, but church leaders were stunned when they were told postal workers would not handle the 45,000 CDs.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Current Events; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: bible; censorship; formerlygreatbritain; freespeech; islam; kjv; kjvbible; oncegreatbritain; uk; ungland
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: ruralvoter
2
posted on
09/10/2011 2:25:24 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
To: ruralvoter
Good work my fellow postal workers, soon your souls shall be mine, forever and ever will be your reward.
3
posted on
09/10/2011 2:25:24 PM PDT
by
Scythian
To: ruralvoter
The UK continues to slide into the toilet. I’ll bet they wouldn’t dare to refuse to deliver 45,000 CDs of the Koran. They’d probably agree to deliver them crawling on their hands and knees. Cowards.
4
posted on
09/10/2011 2:25:41 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Only two things come out of the DemocRAT Party. Fears and Smears.)
To: FlingWingFlyer
I wonder what the minority breakdown of the Royal Mail is?
5
posted on
09/10/2011 2:28:58 PM PDT
by
wally_bert
(It's sheer elegance in its simplicity! - The Middleman)
To: ruralvoter
This is the same country that stood up to Herman Goering’s Luftwaffe? Seriously?
6
posted on
09/10/2011 2:29:50 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(I'll raise $2million for Gov. Sarah Palin. What'll you do?)
To: ruralvoter
'This decision was made on the basis of our terms and conditions which states that we have the right to refuse to distribute something that falls under the category of 'promotional material which could cause offence' Yet, 99.9% of all other mail is deemed not to be offensive?
He should be fired for such a decision.
7
posted on
09/10/2011 2:30:00 PM PDT
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
This is the same country that stood up to Herman Goerings Luftwaffe?That was a select few... ; )
8
posted on
09/10/2011 2:31:02 PM PDT
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: ruralvoter
But I’ll bet “Playboy”, “Hustler”, and “Penthouse” make it through without any problems.
9
posted on
09/10/2011 2:31:33 PM PDT
by
SoJoCo
To: ruralvoter
Who is the individual that made this ridiculous ruling?
10
posted on
09/10/2011 2:31:52 PM PDT
by
G Larry
(I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his character)
To: ruralvoter
These Postal “workers” sound like they are just a bunch of whining, lazy bass turds to me. If they don’t want to do their job, they need to find a new job.
11
posted on
09/10/2011 2:34:51 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Only two things come out of the DemocRAT Party. Fears and Smears.)
To: G Larry
So long, UK.
‘twas good to know ya.
12
posted on
09/10/2011 2:34:59 PM PDT
by
Eric in the Ozarks
(I want a Triple A president for our Triple A country)
To: FlingWingFlyer
But notice the voting on the anti-Christian type comments is overwhelmingly negative. There is hope yet.
13
posted on
09/10/2011 2:35:26 PM PDT
by
steve86
(Acerbic by nature, not nurture (Could be worst in 40 years))
To: GeronL
Someone get the lights ... the sidewalks are already rolled up.
At the risk of being banned, I think it might be time to adopt a variation of "Remember The Alamo".
Something on the idea of ... I dunno ... Remember Hiroshima.
14
posted on
09/10/2011 2:35:33 PM PDT
by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
To: ruralvoter
One point I’m confused about in the story. Did the church pay postage on the deliveries or was the Post Office delivering them for free? The story seems ambiguous on the point.
15
posted on
09/10/2011 2:36:28 PM PDT
by
DManA
To: ruralvoter
Oh, okay - England. Figures. Maybe they should have mingled some Koran CD’s in with them.
16
posted on
09/10/2011 2:36:39 PM PDT
by
SkyDancer
(I Am The Person Whom I've Been Waiting For.)
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: ruralvoter
GB has a state religion - Church of England. The Bible is still the sacred text for the Church I presume. So one department of the government is so offended by another department of government they refuse to cooperate with them? What a silly country.
18
posted on
09/10/2011 2:39:51 PM PDT
by
DManA
To: ruralvoter
If I refuse to do my job I get fired.
Fire their asses and hire some people who want to work.
19
posted on
09/10/2011 2:40:32 PM PDT
by
Pontiac
(The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
>This is the same country that stood up to Herman Goerings Luftwaffe? <
These were the same clowns who allowed their cities to be burned to the ground by illegals and criminals during the riots and you still ask that question?
20
posted on
09/10/2011 2:40:46 PM PDT
by
max americana
(FUBO NATION 2012 FK BARAK)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson