Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canon Law and Non-Infant Baptism
Canon Law Made Easy ^ | January 9, 2014 | Cathy Caridi, J.C.L.

Posted on 01/09/2014 11:27:51 AM PST by Weiss White

Q: My neighbors are Catholics who didn’t practice the faith for years, but now they are returning to the Church. Their children were never baptized, so they went to the parish priest to arrange for their baptism. But he refused, because he said the children are too old! He claims the children are mature enough to decide for themselves if they want to be Catholic or not…. The whole thing sounds bizarre. The parents truly want to raise their children as Catholics. Is it possible the priest doubts their sincerity? What can they do? –Rachel

A: It’s impossible to be absolutely sure what is happening to Rachel’s neighbors without knowing all the details, but we can nevertheless piece together the likely reason for the priest’s refusal to baptize their children at the parents’ request.

(Excerpt) Read more at canonlawmadeeasy.com ...


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Religion & Culture; Theology
KEYWORDS: bandwidththief; baptism; bloggymcblogger; blogpimp; blogselfpromo; blogspam; canonlaw; catholic; checkoutmyblog; comeseemyblog; didjareadmyblog; ihaveablog; iminteresting; listentome; lookatme; payattentiontome; pimpmyblog; rcia; readme; readmyblog; readmyramblings; trollingforhits
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
This post and all other posts on the same blog are copyrighted. That's why I only post an excerpt
1 posted on 01/09/2014 11:27:51 AM PST by Weiss White
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Weiss White

I doubt seriously that anyone would write that this situation ‘sounds bizarre’. This seems to me to be like ask the mullah or dear ann landers. Why not just ask a general question about children and baptism rather than putting words in a nonexistent person’s mouth?


2 posted on 01/09/2014 11:46:44 AM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Weiss White seems to respond immediately to articles written by
Cathy Caridi, J.C.L. which leads me to believe they are both the same person.


3 posted on 01/09/2014 11:53:57 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true .. I have no proof .. but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Weiss White

The way i understand it is that infant Baptism is only a christening and not a baptism in the Church.

A person must decide for them selves if they want to be a part of the Church.

Jesus was Christened as an infant, but close to thirty years old before he was baptized, aside from Jesus many young people do not know what they really believe even at that age, and some much older.


4 posted on 01/09/2014 12:08:03 PM PST by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf; Jim Robinson

I believe you are correct that they are one and the same. And Weiss White is very adamant about the articles being copyrighted and not permitted to post the entire article.

Does not JimRob require bloggers to post their entire article?


5 posted on 01/09/2014 12:18:05 PM PST by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

If they’re posting from their own blogs, there is no need to excerpt. If they’re posting from someone else’s copyrighted blog, there’s no choice.


6 posted on 01/09/2014 12:26:14 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Weiss White

How old are the kids?
3-4-5 priest should go with parents wishes
13-14-15 let kids make up thir own mind


7 posted on 01/09/2014 12:27:05 PM PST by brooklyn dave ( Dante DiBlasio's Afro for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf

“Jesus was Christened as an infant”

Where is that in the Bible or tradition? I’m not accusing you of anything, just never heard anything about that.

He was certainly circumcised per Jewish Law as an infant. Is that what you mean?


8 posted on 01/09/2014 12:30:15 PM PST by TheThirdRuffian (RINOS like Romney, McCain, Christie are sure losers. No more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf
Jesus was Christened as an infant

Um, no.

9 posted on 01/09/2014 12:31:29 PM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf
"Jesus was Christened as an infant"

I know Catholics get angty at me because I question them a lot, but ... Where did you get THAT ?

10 posted on 01/09/2014 12:41:37 PM PST by knarf (I say things that are true .. I have no proof .. but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knarf; ravenwolf

I doubt that ravenwolf is a Catholic. If so, he/she is a poorly informed one.


11 posted on 01/09/2014 12:44:30 PM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf

I think you mean, Jesus was taken to the temple for the sacrifice, naming and circumcision.
That ceremony is at 8 days.


12 posted on 01/09/2014 12:53:27 PM PST by svcw (Not 'hope and change' but 'dopes in chains')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Weiss White

Short answer: If they’re old enough that they could make First Communion if they were baptized already, they’re old enough to make their own decision to be baptized, and go through (I know this is going to sound strange, but go with it) RCIA adapted for kids.

I know this because I’m an adult catechumen right now and my parish has a separate RCIA class going for the kids.


13 posted on 01/09/2014 1:04:50 PM PST by RichInOC (2013-14 Tiber Swim Team)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First; knarf; Weiss White
I believe you are correct that they are one and the same. And Weiss White is very adamant about the articles being copyrighted and not permitted to post the entire article.

I believe you're correct on the first part. And I know you're correct on the second part, making the first part (if true) disingenuous.

14 posted on 01/09/2014 1:16:15 PM PST by Alex Murphy ("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Weiss White

Not bizarre. Infant baptism is for infants. Adults must ask for baptism on their own. The official church reply makes sense.


15 posted on 01/09/2014 1:30:50 PM PST by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
"I believe you're correct on the first part. And I know you're correct on the second part, making the first part (if true) disingenuous"

By faith, I believe you just made sense

16 posted on 01/09/2014 1:32:06 PM PST by knarf (I say things that are true .. I have no proof .. but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

I wonder how many kids raised by Catholics are actually allowed to make that decision for themselves?


17 posted on 01/09/2014 1:47:08 PM PST by happilymarriedmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: happilymarriedmom

Or how many baptize their children, but later leave the faith entirely?


18 posted on 01/09/2014 1:55:10 PM PST by darkangel82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: svcw
Jesus was not taken to the temple for circumcision.

In the traditional church calendar, the Nativity is celebrated on Dec. 25, the Circumcision 8 days later on Jan. 1, and the Presentation in the Temple (or the Purification of the Virgin Mary) on Feb. 2, the 40th day after the Nativity.

19 posted on 01/09/2014 2:00:46 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

Mary and Joseph were observant Jews, Jesus would have been circumcised when he was eight days old, Joseph would have named Him, and there would have been a sacrifice.
I have know idea what your dates are referring to, the family would have acted in accordance to the Law.


20 posted on 01/09/2014 2:39:05 PM PST by svcw (Not 'hope and change' but 'dopes in chains')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson