Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was the Shroud’s First-Century Origin Really Debunked?
Inside the Vatican ^ | Jim Bertrand

Posted on 07/08/2021 3:45:21 PM PDT by annalex

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: ready2brd

How do we know the carbon we are measuring was accumulated by the organism, vs. being present from the time matter came into being?


21 posted on 07/08/2021 6:46:13 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (No audit. No peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Exactly. It is unimportant trivia. Read the Gospels. Follow the Gospels. Repent. Pray. Have faith.


22 posted on 07/08/2021 6:58:13 PM PDT by BipolarBob (I'm drinking tonight until I'm someone elses problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

The fabric is linen, which comes from flax plants. C-14 dating would essentially be dating when the flax plants were harvested (that is, killed). That’s when they would have stopped absorbing C-14 containing CO2 from the air.


23 posted on 07/08/2021 7:06:47 PM PDT by Campion (What part of "shall not be infringed" don't they understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
The cross is everything

Amen

24 posted on 07/08/2021 7:13:59 PM PDT by SisterK (Maranatha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob

It might be Jesus’, people have issues with the samples and the dating.

It might not be Jesus’,

The end result is it has nothing to do with my faith in Jesus.


25 posted on 07/08/2021 7:14:03 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SisterK

And Paul said it best.


26 posted on 07/08/2021 7:14:35 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: newfreep
Today’s technology still cannot duplicate the 3D image that was “burned” into the shroud at the instantaneous moment of Christ’s resurrection.

ping

27 posted on 07/08/2021 7:18:47 PM PDT by alrea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

The carbon dating was done on a portion of the shroud that had been charred in a, I think, 14th century fire.


28 posted on 07/08/2021 7:28:32 PM PDT by arthurus (covfefe i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pez149
The shroud shows the holes in the . The picture of Jesus with short curly hair was done a couple of centuries later than Jesus walked. The condition of the hair in the shroud is ambiguous. Who said he tweezed his whiskers? I see nothing like that in the Gospels or in Acts. The shroud is a wide strip of linen.
29 posted on 07/08/2021 7:32:21 PM PDT by arthurus (covfefe ii)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Captain Walker; BigEdLB
He may have survived the Crucifixion, and continued his message outside of Judea. France and Kashmir.

The Romans would have never allowed Him to be taken down from the cross if He were not dead. Furthermore, the Jews would have never buried Him if He were not dead.

The Romans were master executioners. When they crucified someone they ensured they were dead before they were removed from the cross. Those who were found still breathing after so many agonizing hours and sometimes days had their legs broken prior to being taken down so they could no longer lift themselves up to breathe (see John 19:31-34). It was a cruel and horrendous method. The Bible says that they did not break Jesus' legs because He was already dead. A spear thrust into His side resulted in water and blood pouring out - a sign that they had ruptured His pericardial sack and He was confirmed dead.

Also, Jesus told His disciples many times that He would die and then be raised from the dead after three days. I've heard the skeptic opinions about Jesus possibly not dying but reviving once he was placed into the cool, dark tomb. They don't realize that He endured terrible torture before He was nailed to the cross and lost a lot of blood . Those who removed Him and washed Him prior to placing Him in the tomb also would not have wrapped Him in burial cloths had He still been breathing. I've read that burial practices involved a weighty amount of spices and linen cloths. Not at all conducive to recovering from severe bleeding, beatings, flesh-tearing whipping, a crown of thorns dug into His head, suspension from a tall crossbeam using ropes and large iron nails driven into both the wrist and foot joints. Like I said - an unbelievably cruel way of killing people.

30 posted on 07/08/2021 8:45:35 PM PDT by boatbums (Lord, make my life a testimony to the value of knowing you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: newfreep
"Today’s technology still cannot duplicate the 3D image that was “burned” into the shroud at the instantaneous moment of Christ’s resurrection."

I have forgotten where I read about how they translated the image from the shroud into a picture. They treated the image like an electronic flat file and printed it into an 3d image. The final image was a stereotypical thin Jewish guy. If he went into a store, no one would notice him.

Which begs the question: If someone was faking it 500+ years ago, who would have thought to do it in a manner that would require a computer to reassemble it.

31 posted on 07/08/2021 10:01:04 PM PDT by fini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB

The most important thing is His Resurrection; it’s irrefutable evidence that He is God.


32 posted on 07/09/2021 2:44:20 AM PDT by Captain Walker ("The side that has Truth gets Humor as a bonus.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pez149; Alamo-Girl; albee; alrea; Ambrosia; AnalogReigns; AnAmericanMother; Angelas; AniGrrl; ...
"First off Jesus did not have long hair."
The Bible does not describe the length of Jesus’ hair, nor anything about his description or appearance. Several Judaic sects of the period, such as the Essenes, wore their hair long, especially those of the priestly tribe. The tradition is that John the Baptist was an Essene and Jesus took on his cousin John’s traditions after his Baptism. There is a Biblical OT tradition that a man’s strength came from not cutting his hair, I.e. the story of Samson and Delilah with her cutting Samson’s hair supposedly to weaken his strength. Hasidic Jews to this day retain long forelocks in honor of that Jewish tradition.

“2nd Jesus had his facial hair plunked.”
That was only one of the tortures and indignities inflicted on Jesus. The Beard plucking does not need to be that the entire beard was plucked out but that patches were pulled for pain and the humiliation effect to a Jewish man to have the effect desired. . . nor did they have the time to do a thorough job of beard plucking. It was a casual thing the soldiers would do while taunting him.

"3rd the nails were driven into the wrist."
What is seen on the Shroud wrist wounds is actually anatomically and forensically correct. Multiple studies using actual human bodies have demonstrated that nailing a Crucifixion victim through the center of the palm as most Christian art depicts Jesus’ nailing NG would fail as there is nothing there to prevent the flesh of the palm between the bones from tearing under the weight and flexing of the movement over even a short period of time and the victim falling from the cross. However, at the base of the palm, still on the hand, is an easily located indentation, about ¾" to 1" toward the wrist from the center of the palm, where a nail can be driven that opens a space in the bones of the wrist (the Space of Destót). The wrist bones move enough to allow the nail to pass through without breaking any, but the median nerve is either severed or damage, causing the thumb to contract into the palmar area, not to mention severe nerve pain. The naturally derived exit wound is exactly where it is shown on the back of the wrist. These wrist bones easily can hold a struggling human victim without giving way, while the soft tissues between the carpal bones of the palm cannot. Any experienced Crucifixion executioner would know exactly where to nail a Crucifixion victim.

"4th Jesus was bound in strips of linen and his face was covered by a napkin(separate cloth)"
Actually, these are only mentioned in one of the Gospels, and the "strips" are a very late translation of the original Greek of that Gospel, using an obscure reference of the word "Othonia" used which was only found when the word was used as bandages in war stories. There were three more common uses of the same Greek word in Ancient Greek literature that would have served better. Translators misused Othonia as "bandages" and "strips of linen" because they were doing their English translations at the very same time as many Egyptian mummies were being brought to Europe wrapped in yards and yards of strips of linen. They assumed Jews buried their dead in similar grave clothes. They did not.
The Jews actually had a written tradition of how their dead were to be buried recorded in the Mishnah, and that tradition first of all required the body be interred before sundown of the day of death. The body is to be ritually washed, anointed, limbs tied to prevent flopping akimbo at wrists and ankles, knees, and the jaw tied shut (this was the face cloth "about" the face, under the chin, around the face and tied over the crown of the head), eyes closed with weights (potsherds or coins) on the eyelids. A shroud used to cover the body if it could be afforded, and aromatic herbs packed around the body. There is literally no time to wrap a body in yards of linen strips when the body had to be interred by sundown.
A 1st Century Jewish Cemetery in Jerusalem was unearthed in the mid-1980s and excavated where numerous skeletons were discovered. None were found entangled with remnants of linen strips, but two were covered with the remains of large linen shrouds. The archaeological, written, Greek original, and Jewish Mishnah record is clear… Jews did not wrap their dead in strips of linen as old English biblical translators erroneously claimed. The only strips used may have been used as binding to hold the limbs from flopping.

"These are mentioned in the Bible."
Another thing mentioned in the Gospels in the original Greek is that Joseph of Arimathea bought a fine Linen "Syndon"… which translates as a large cloth, a sheet, a shroud, or a sail… I.e. a really big piece of cloth. It does not say he bought yards and yards of linen strips.

SHROUD OF TURIN PING!

33 posted on 07/09/2021 2:52:14 AM PDT by Swordmaker (My pistol self-identifies as an iPad, so you must accept it in gun-free zones, you hoplophobe bigot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Thank you.


34 posted on 07/09/2021 5:25:14 AM PDT by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: boatbums

and large iron nails driven into both the wrist and foot joints.


Stepping aside from the question of his not being dead for the moment: Would he be *walking* after that? Much less in a manner that it wouldn’t call attention to his crippledness?


35 posted on 07/09/2021 6:34:15 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB

Um, the Word of God says Jesus died on that cross and was buried. He did not swoon and the Roman soldier mistake a swoon for dead when he pierced the side and punctured the pericardium to relese water and blood. Your unbelief is directing your false reasoning.


36 posted on 07/09/2021 7:06:37 AM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Amen ... the True message is that ‘God with us’ died to pay my sin debt so God has put His Spirit in my before-dead spirit and I am now in His family.


37 posted on 07/09/2021 7:12:23 AM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Pez149
How can you be sure of the length of Christ hair?

Rather than nailed, which not have been a secure way to fix some one to a Roman crucifix Christ would most likely have been tied at the wrists.

38 posted on 07/09/2021 7:30:36 AM PDT by jmacusa (America. Founded by geniuses . Now governed by idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: annalex

i’ve tried soaking and pre-soaking but i still cannot get out these supernatural stains.

i’ll give you $50 for that shroud..RIP..it’s to prove a point. we’ll wash this half of the shroud in detergent alone, and this half in detergent plus blorox . to prove blorox is best at taking out those supernatural impressions.


39 posted on 07/09/2021 7:59:03 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

I knew about the wrists, but not about the cloth/strips info. Great stuff!

The Shroud was left as a gift for us.


40 posted on 07/09/2021 8:45:40 AM PDT by Melian (Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens. ~ Gimli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson