Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unbelievable! Woman is handcuffed and arrested for a late video rental
Libertarian Party ^ | Feb 12, 2002

Posted on 02/12/2002 8:54:53 AM PST by toenail

WASHINGTON, DC -- A New Hampshire woman who was arrested, handcuffed, and had her car impounded for not returning a late rental video is the latest victim of America's wacky criminal justice system, the Libertarian Party charged today.

"You don't return a video on time and you get treated like Hannibal Lector in Silence of the Lambs, and end up starring in Girls in Prison -- what kind of sense does that make?" asked George Getz, the party's press secretary.

"Yes, it's easy to make jokes, but this is a case study of how, in a society where politicians can't stop writing laws, everyone eventually becomes a criminal -- even if your only 'crime' is forgetting to return a video."

The saga of America's Most Wanted Video Criminal started on Thursday, when Jessie Cohen of Portsmouth, New Hampshire was stopped by police for having a broken tail light on her car.

During the routine license check, police discovered an outstanding warrant for Cohen, dating back to 1997, for allegedly not returning a rented copy of the 1996 movie, Sleepers. She had rented it from an Epsom, New Hampshire video store.

Cohen was charged with misdemeanor unauthorized use of rental property, was handcuffed, had her 1987 Cadillac impounded, and was taken to jail and fingerprinted. She faces a fine of up to $1,200.

Cohen said she had no memory of renting the video, and said she had never received any notice from the store that the video was overdue. The arrest, she said, "seems like a lot of trouble over a tape that probably cost $10."

Actually, the arrest is a microcosm of what's wrong with the American criminal justice system, said Getz.

"This is a classic example of How Good Laws Go Bad," he said. "The law against unauthorized use of rental property was written to protect car rental companies from people who rent a car, but never return it. That's a legitimate law designed to protect companies against costly rental fraud or theft.

"But now, the law has been dumbed down so much that if you forget to return American Pie 2 on time, you need to start plotting your Escape from Alcatraz."

Unfortunately, this isn't the only law that has expanded far beyond its original intent, said Getz.

"Take asset forfeiture laws: Originally designed to target the illegal profits of drug kingpins, they have been expanded to allow the government to seize property in cases of suspected prostitution, illegal gambling, or failure to pay sales taxes. Federal agents can now seize property under 200 different statutes.

"And RICO laws, originally designed to target Mafia crime bosses, are now used against stores that sell allegedly obscene videos, against the tobacco companies, and against investment companies for skirting tax laws."

In each case, said Getz, "Laws are subject to mission creep -- and their enforcement gets creepier and creepier, until you find yourself starring in the World's Most Dangerous Police Videos for forgetting to return a video."

What's the solution? More common sense and fewer laws, said Getz.

"Politicians need to curb the urge to treat every minor problem as an opportunity to write a new law," he said. "Police need to direct their resources against real criminals. And New Hampshire needs to take the 'Bust her!' out of Blockbuster."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: libertarians
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last
In other news, the Libertarian Party national HQ is making progress on its goal to displace the Republican Party as "The Stupid Party."
1 posted on 02/12/2002 8:54:54 AM PST by toenail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *Libertarians
index
2 posted on 02/12/2002 8:56:02 AM PST by toenail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toenail
You think that arrest was a good thing?
3 posted on 02/12/2002 8:57:15 AM PST by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: riley1992
Sad to say but when I was in college I had a warrant out for my arrest for a non returned video. 5 or 6 years later, I applied for a job, got the job, and the manager was nice enough to even tell me about the warrant. Went to the little podunk town, was arrested, fingerprinted, and had to post bond to get out. Three weeks later at the court date, the charge was dropped. Why? The video store had burned down and gone out of business 5 years earlier. What made it worse was that I didn't even rent the video, my roommate at the time did. Still not talking to that slime
5 posted on 02/12/2002 9:02:02 AM PST by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: toenail
Wasn't this already posted once?
6 posted on 02/12/2002 9:04:02 AM PST by biblewonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toenail
I don't believe it. What is the source?
7 posted on 02/12/2002 9:04:12 AM PST by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeEveryman
C'mon Joe....this is just insane.People get slaps on the wrist for a million times worse...this is a video rental.10.00 video rental. Terrorists are making bail and this woman has her life wrecked because of "Sleepers", does this make sense? No.Just another sign of the dumbing down of America.
8 posted on 02/12/2002 9:04:14 AM PST by My Favorite Headache
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
Clearly if the woman did not return the rented property she should face some penalty like paying the full cost of the video plus a reasonable amount of interest. This is at most petty theft and IMHO it should not be a matter for the criminal courts period. It is a dispute between the rentor end the owner of the property. Unless fraud is a part of the charge there is no criminal act by anyone.

Stay well - stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown

9 posted on 02/12/2002 9:04:15 AM PST by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
You think that arrest was a good thing?

It depends on whether the video store made any attempt to get the tape back (other than giving her a police record). By failing to return the video, she effectively stole it.

However, if the video store didn't do anything to contact her, then the law is just plain stupid.

Fact: In Texas, there are people with arrest warrants for overdue library books.

10 posted on 02/12/2002 9:04:37 AM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JoeEveryman
Of course the video store could never make a mistake.

I had a friend who rented a video and returned it. The store called and threatened arrest. My friend told them the video had been returned. She was arrested in the middle of the night and spent the rest of the night in jail. When it finally got to court my friend proved that she had returned the video and SURPRISE, the store found it on their shelf.

It was good for 5k to my friend.

11 posted on 02/12/2002 9:07:08 AM PST by AlligatorEyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: toenail
She rented "Sleepers"?

She had it coming to her.

12 posted on 02/12/2002 9:07:47 AM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
So people should be able to steal the property of others simply because they rented it for one night? Sounds like a pretty left wing position to me.

The next logical position is "video rental companies make billions, what's one stolen video, they are making obscene profits anyways".

13 posted on 02/12/2002 9:07:53 AM PST by GuillermoX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: toenail
During the routine license check, police discovered an outstanding warrant for Cohen, dating back to 1997

As much as the article would like to make you believe the video was 2 days late, we are talking about 5 years here.
And we all know that the video store sent her notices, invalidated her card, and made numerous attempts to collect their rental fee.
After getting no satisfaction, they probably took her to small claims court (much like you would to collect bad checks) which she probably blew off, resulting in a bench warrant.
When she was pulled over, the officer cross-checked her, came up with the bench warrant record, and hauled her in.
It is extremely unlikely the officer has any idea what the root cause of the warrant was.

We all know that's what happened, it even states in the article she was pulled in because of the warrant, not the video. That doesn't make New Hampshire a police state, it just makes this lady an idiot for not paying her overdue rental fee.

Cohen said she had no memory of renting the video, and said she had never received any notice from the store that the video was overdue.

I'm certain.

14 posted on 02/12/2002 9:08:17 AM PST by Cable225
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
If, she was never notified of the late movie, she should have not been arrested. If, there was proof she was notified , preferably more than once, it is stealing. Theft is what she should be charged with.
15 posted on 02/12/2002 9:08:41 AM PST by auggy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: toenail
If there is proof that there was no attempt to contact the woman, then it's a stupid law. If she ignored any notices, then she's not better than a petty thief and deserved what she got. This is no better than shoplifting.
16 posted on 02/12/2002 9:09:07 AM PST by Ptaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
"You think that arrest was a good thing?"

The national LP fritters away their relevance by issuing such vapid press releases.

17 posted on 02/12/2002 9:10:36 AM PST by toenail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal
...and we'll execute them as soon as we find those library stealin' scum! I have been waiting 7 years for that copy of Ole Yeller!
18 posted on 02/12/2002 9:10:50 AM PST by brazos.357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GuillermoX
So people should be able to steal the property of others simply because they rented it for one night? Sounds like a pretty left wing position to me.

Please be so kind as to point out where I said that. Thanks so much in advance.

19 posted on 02/12/2002 9:10:52 AM PST by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: toenail
So you posted this not to discuss the article, but simply to bash Libertarians. Bravo. You may have just garnered the stupid post of the day award.
20 posted on 02/12/2002 9:12:09 AM PST by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson