1 posted on
03/26/2002 1:58:38 AM PST by
kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
ping
2 posted on
03/26/2002 1:59:47 AM PST by
kattracks
To: kattracks
to create a variety of new programs that would, among other things, discourage smoking I thought that was what the tobacco settlement was for, among other things.
3 posted on
03/26/2002 2:43:39 AM PST by
chainsaw
To: kattracks
Booz, Butts,.....Targeted for Tax Hikes... It is about time California tax Homosexuality! The revenues will be astronomical! Brilliant!
5 posted on
03/26/2002 2:53:44 AM PST by
SkyPilot
To: kattracks
I know it would never happen, but my fantasy would have these three industries simply stop selling their products in California altogether (or at least threaten to do so) in retaliation. No law against it and it would effectively undermine these stupid laws. A good way of telling the socialists out there to go get stuffed.
To: kattracks
These folks have simply ruined what used to be the best state in the country.
8 posted on
03/26/2002 4:40:01 AM PST by
Dog Gone
To: kattracks
"to create a variety of new programs that would, among other things, discourage smoking and child obesity." And gubmint grows larger than ever.
We need spaying and neutering laws for gubmints.
10 posted on
03/26/2002 4:46:53 AM PST by
Inge_CAV
To: kattracks
Paul Knepprath, a lobbyist for the American Lung Association, which is spearheading support for the bill.I would like to see a law which states that all people working for or at the American Lung Association should do it Pro Bono. All money raised should be used only for pulmonary research
11 posted on
03/26/2002 5:00:21 AM PST by
scouse
To: kattracks
There will be, before I die, state mandated physical fitness programs.
Just like Nazi Germany and Communist China.
To: kattracks
Sen. Gloria Romero is working to institute an "alcohol retailer fee" which consumers would pay each time they bought a drink in the state. The amount of the fee has yet to be determined.Why Gloria, it should clearly be one hundred zillion skadillion eleventy trillion dollars for one shot of alcohol.
In richest liberal tradition.
To: kattracks
For some reason, a song keeps copming to mind...
"If you get too cold I'll tax your heat, if you take a walk I'll tax the streets..."
The Stevie Ray Vaughan cover version, that is.
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
19 posted on
03/26/2002 5:20:44 AM PST by
wku man
To: kattracks
"To place the majority of the tax burden on one group of people is fundamentally unfair,"Are they JUST NOW figuring this out?
To: kattracks
For the "never surrender" croud, I have a list
1) learn to brew your own beer and your own wine
2) you can make your own pop using dry ice for the CO2
3) buy tobacco from the indians and "roll your own"
You can buy a "bag of beer". All the ingredients come in a bag and all you do is add hot water. If you are really ambitious, you can buy the ingredients separate and brew it from scratch. Wine is simple to make compared to beer. I have made rootbeer in the past using dry ice to provide the carbonation. Now days, you can buy cigarette paper *with the filter attached*, so you can roll your own filter cigarettes. There is almost always a way around the "rules".
To: kattracks
Lordy, a "BUTT-TAX"? I'd better lose some weight, pronto...
To: kattracks
just like NewYork, when all else fails go after these products and call it "the SIN tax"
To: kattracks
Pretty soon some one is going to start smuggling in Coke from Arizona. No not cocaine, bottles of Coca Cola. :)
25 posted on
03/26/2002 6:00:00 AM PST by
anymouse
To: kattracks
I just emailed Sen Ortiz, and gave her my opinion on this soda pop tax, and the senators on the revenue and tax comittee in the senate of Calif.
senator.scott@sen.ca.gov, pres of com.
Senator.Poochigian@sen.ca.gov , vp of com.
Senator.Ortiz@sen.ca.gov , author of the bill
To: kattracks
Sen Deborah Ortiz, looks like she has been chugging a few soda pops herself...
email the Senator
To: kattracks
Tobacco, liquor and soda pop are the target of a Democratic-controlled California Legislature that is seeking higher taxes on those products, not to fix a $17.5 billion state budget deficit, but to create a variety of new programs that would, among other things, discourage smoking and child obesity. This is ridiculous! Kool-aid has more sugar and calories than soda! Why not exempt diet Coke and diet Pepsi?
You know, these so-called "sin taxes" make me sick. The taxes are raised to fund programs, but if the end result is achieved ... for example, everyone quits smoking ... there will be no money to fund the programs. Do you think the programs will disappear? NO!!!! They will just get money from everyone else to keep going.
This is pathetic. I really don't like Democrats.
32 posted on
03/26/2002 10:24:37 AM PST by
Gophack
To: kattracks
Another element of the fall out from Gov. Davis squandering our budget surplus. Will they tax diet sodas also?
Does anyone in California really call it pop?
To: kattracks
I still beleive that we should tax adult establishments (strip clubs, adult book stores, etc). How about a porn tax?
36 posted on
03/27/2002 6:15:46 AM PST by
Clemenza
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson