Posted on 09/16/2010 12:16:18 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
That's racist, and besides, the price is up to a six pack and a carton.
“By rights, Jews should back Sarah.”
#####
Absolutely.
But don’t count on it.
Most of God’s “stiff-necked people” are secular progressives first and foremost, and “jews” largely for social and career reasons.
It took me a long time to figure that out.
She’ll drill, Drill, DRILL!
And, people will LOVE it!
(She puts the “men” in this country to shame.)
This is why the attacks on O’Donnell in Delaware by the GOP establishment is disingenuous. Because anyone who’s a veteran of the political wars should know that there are very few people who are truly “unelectable”.
This is the left's big mistake: Tina Fey is unelectable. But Sarah Palin is not Tina Fey.
The same types of people said Reagan was “unelectable”. They feared another “Goldwater massacre”. Then, when he won, they latched onto him like starved leeches.
The slithering spineless squishes then spent his entire presidency trying to undermine his policies and pull him to the “center”. They leaked stories about him and his “intransigence” and then implied (or said outright), he was “out of touch”, sleeping, and/or too dim to “get it.”
They thought they knew better than him how to do things and were frustrated when he wouldn’t take their enlightened advice. ...and those were a majority of his RINO workers.
In fact, he was a brilliant, intellectual powerhouse who knew what he believed and wasn’t about to be shaken by their elitist and condescending tripe.
In ‘64 we could nominate, but not win.
In ‘80 we could win, but not govern.
Next time, we nominate Palin, we win, and we govern.
after reading the post about Moogly loosing it, I’d say she’d be refreshing.....
Palin is the only one with fire in the belly to take on the communist left.
I truly appreciate and admire the tea party women who have acted more fearless and with more balls than all the patsies and pansies in the gop combined.
I really like the Palin/West ticket
In late 1978 a Harris poll showed Reagan trailing Carter by 17 points, 55-38.
In 1979 U.S. News published comments by the Carter WH lamenting that Reagan seemed to be slipping because they thought he was the most beatable:
"White House political strategists have concluded—regretfully—that Ronald Reagan is fading and will have little chance of winning the Republican presidential nomination in 1980. Why the regrets? Because Carter's aides are convinced that the conservative, 68-year-old former California governor is an easy target. (April 2, 1979)"
Jonathan Chait - A self-described liberal hawk
He drew considerable attention with his "Case for Bush Hatred", in which he defended his dislike not only of Bush's policies but also his personality and mannerisms
Still Crazy After All These Years
Bush's tax cut didn't work, won't work.
Commentary | December 17, 2004|JONATHAN CHAIT
On the subject of a comparison of Andrew Breitbart to Dan Rather, Jonathan Chait of The New Republic writes:
Breitbart makes a malicious error, very similar to a previous malicious error he committed, and lashes out at his critics rather than confess his mistake. CBS makes a sloppy but innocent mistake and fires the responsible parties.
Actually wonder if they are less corruptible...?
ping
Thank you for the excellent reply.
What I’ve found funny are the GOP’ers who have been discounting this (obvious) intention of Gov. Palin.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.