Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gays and generals / Top brass torpedo 'don't ask, don't tell'
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ^ | Tuesday, December 16, 2003 | editorial

Posted on 12/16/2003 9:31:19 AM PST by Willie Green

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:35:27 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

It should come as a shock to no one that three retired military officers, two generals and one admiral, revealed last week that they are gay. What should be surprising is that, despite these and other stellar records, the Pentagon adheres to a policy that prevents known homosexuals from staying in the service.


(Excerpt) Read more at post-gazette.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: dontaskdonttell; homosexualagenda; militaryreadiness; prisoners; ucmj
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 301-314 next last
To: JCEccles
How do you equate a passive characteristic such as skin color, the expression of which is benign and beyond the person's control, with a behavioral characteristic such as homosexuality, the expression of which is within the person's control?

Exactly! Homosexuality is all about behavior (or the apparent inability to control behavior) that is incompatible with military service.

Perhaps we should just give part of our country to the leftists as their own country and let them ruin it however they want. The way they're going, it's very clear their military won't be much of a threat to anyone other than themselves.

81 posted on 12/16/2003 2:52:59 PM PST by FormerLib (Calling someone a "homophobe" is hate speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
De mortuis nil nisi bonum.

Verbum sapienti satis.

82 posted on 12/16/2003 2:54:13 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Thud
My best friend, and my sons' godfather, was for years the highest ranking homosexual...

Are you, by chance, an Episcopalian?

Most other Christians would not permit a man who has embraced what God Himself calls "abomination" to be the one charged with teaching their child about the Lord.

83 posted on 12/16/2003 2:55:32 PM PST by FormerLib (Calling someone a "homophobe" is hate speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
I think male homo's should be allowed to serve in the military, but only if they wear dresses and high heels (kinda like Klinger). Let those bad mofo's serve in the typing pool (ooooooh, cat fight).
84 posted on 12/16/2003 2:57:02 PM PST by searchandrecovery (America - Welcome to Sodom & Gomorrah West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
I was a personnel mgt specialist from 1967 - 1974...even before the draft ended, gays that were drafted, would rather be drafted and go to nam as an infantryman with a very high mortality rate than to simply request a discharge for being gay.

Yes, a few did and some that weren't also requested a discharge saying they were..but this was not the norm in my experience.

Being a booty bandit back then carried a very large stigma attached to it...how would you parents explain your being discharged early?? no physical defects...wouldn't take long for small town America to figure out why jr. was home.

nowadays, being a "goober smoocher" is to be celebrated???
something has gone terribly awry with the moral compass of this great nation. imho
85 posted on 12/16/2003 2:59:30 PM PST by cajun-jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Thud
Let's talk about bigots for a moment. Suppose a soldier keeps Aryan Nation posters up in his room and tells everyone he despises blacks and gays. Suppose further that he has perfect performance reports and has never given his commander, a black, or his roommate, a discreet homosexual, any trouble.

I would nevertheless support his immediate discharge. Would you?

86 posted on 12/16/2003 3:03:19 PM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
So you are saying men and women showering together and bunking together would be A-OK with you? No distractions from task? No unit problems? That's crazy. You want equality some places and not others. No one, whether "something happens" or not, should have to share facilities with the "opposite" sex or its equivalent.

If you like showering with gay guys do it on your own time.

87 posted on 12/16/2003 3:12:51 PM PST by King Black Robe (With freedom of religion and speech now abridged, it is time to go after the press.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
How you feel about it is irrelevant. The fact is, MOST real guys are bothered by showering with gays the same way women would be bothered showering with men (probably not vice versa). You don't speak for all and guys in the military ought to be allowed to retain a little dignity.
88 posted on 12/16/2003 3:17:45 PM PST by King Black Robe (With freedom of religion and speech now abridged, it is time to go after the press.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: King Black Robe
You make a good point. If a male soldier is required to bunk and shower with an openly gay soldier, there is no principled justification for keeping women segregated from sharing rooms and showers with men. If gender and sexual orinetation areirrelevant, if it is truly a unisex military, one body--male or female--should be treated no different from any other body. Assign rooms by lot and leave nature to its course.
89 posted on 12/16/2003 3:17:52 PM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
I believe there is a 6 month stretch of time between HIV infection and a positive test result. That is why gays still can't donate blood or blood products. IV Drug users can't either for the same reason. They're all high risk.
90 posted on 12/16/2003 3:19:35 PM PST by King Black Robe (With freedom of religion and speech now abridged, it is time to go after the press.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles
Exactly. Those who want equality should think about what that really means.
91 posted on 12/16/2003 3:20:48 PM PST by King Black Robe (With freedom of religion and speech now abridged, it is time to go after the press.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles
The statute does not draw such distinctions, and that is what we are talking about. Nice try.

""Orientation" is meaningless unless it is seen as a tendency to act."

92 posted on 12/16/2003 3:21:38 PM PST by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Re: Brig. Gen. Keith H. Kerr and Brig. Gen. Virgil A. Richard, both of the Army, and Rear Adm. Alan M. Steinman of the Coast Guard may be the highest-ranking service members to acknowledge being gay.

As an Old Corps Jarhead, I will keep my thoughts private about those two doggies and a squid...

93 posted on 12/16/2003 3:21:47 PM PST by sonofatpatcher2 (Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; ...
Throughout history, the major civilizations major religions condemned homosexuality.1 Until 1961 homosexual acts were illegal throughout America.

Gays claim that the "prevailing attitude toward homosexuals in the U.S. and many other countries is revulsion and hostility....for acts and desires not harmful to anyone."3 The American Psychological Association and the American Public Health Association assured the U.S. Supreme Court in 1986 that "no significant data show that engaging in...oral and anal sex, results in mental or physical dysfunction."4

What Homosexuals Do

The major surveys on homosexual behavior are summarized below. Two things stand out 1) homosexuals behave similarly world-over, and 2) as Harvard Medical Professor, Dr. William Haseltine,33 noted in 1993, the "changes in sexual behavior that have been reported to have occurred in some groups have proved, for the most part, to be transient. For example, bath houses and sex clubs in many cities have either reopened or were never closed."

Homosexual Activities (in %)

		US16 US13  US    US18 Denmark20 US19  London27  Sydney/London26                                                            Canada25                                                      
		1940s1977 83/84  1983  1984   1983    1985       1991                       
		ever ever  ever in yr in yr  in mo   in mo   last 6mo                                                                                  
oral/penile       83   99  100/99  99    86             67                 
anal/penile       68   91   93/98  95    92     95     100                 
oral/anal         59   83   92/92  63           69      89       55/65       
urine sex         10   23    29/                                              
fisting/toys      22   41/47 34                                       
fecal sex-eating        4     8                                                       
enemas        	       11    11                                               
torture sex       22   37    37                                              
public/orgy sex   61   76    88                                               
sex with minors   37   23    24/                                          

ORAL SEX Homosexuals fellate almost all of their sexual contacts (and ingest semen from about half of these). Semen contains many of the germs carried in the blood. Because of this, gays who practice oral sex verge on consuming raw human blood, with all its medical risks. Since the penis often has tiny lesions (and often will have been in unsanitary places such as a rectum), individuals so involved may become infected with hepatitis A or gonorrhea (and even HIV and hepatitis B). Since many contacts occur between strangers (70% of gays estimated that they had had sex only once with over half of their partners17,27), and gays average somewhere between 106 and 1105 different partners/year, the potential for infection is considerable.

RECTAL SEX Surveys indicate that about 90% of gays have engaged in rectal intercourse, and about two-thirds do it regularly. In a 6-month long study of daily sexual diaries,3 gays averaged 110 sex partners and 68 rectal encounters a year.

Rectal sex is dangerous. During rectal intercourse the rectum becomes a mixing bowl for 1) saliva and its germs and/or an artificial lubricant, 2) the recipient's own feces, 3) whatever germs, infections or substances the penis has on it, and 4) the seminal fluid of the inserter. Since sperm readily penetrate the rectal wall (which is only one cell thick) causing immunologic damage, and tearing or bruising of the anal wall is very common during anal/penile sex, these substances gain almost direct access to the blood stream. Unlike heterosexual intercourse (in which sperm cannot penetrate the multilayered vagina and no feces are present),7 rectal intercourse is probably the most sexually efficient way to spread hepatitis B, HIV syphilis and a host of other blood-borne diseases.

Tearing or ripping of the anal wall is especially likely with "fisting," where the hand and arm is inserted into the rectum. It is also common when "toys" are employed (homosexual lingo for objects which are inserted into the rectum--bottles, carrots, even gerbils8). The risk of contamination and/or having to wear a colostomy bag from such "sport" is very real. Fisting was apparently so rare in Kinsey's time that he didn't think to talk about it. By 1977, well over a third of gays admitted to doing it. The rectum was not designed to accommodate the fist, and those who do so can find themselves consigned to diapers for life.

FECAL SEX About 80% of gays (see Table) admit to licking and/or inserting their tongues into the anus of partners and thus ingesting medically significant amounts of feces. Those who eat or wallow in it are probably at even greater risk. In the diary study,5 70% of the gays had engaged in this activity--half regularly over 6 months. Result? --the "annual incidence of hepatitis A in...homosexual men was 22 percent, whereas no heterosexual men acquired hepatitis A." In 1992,26 it was noted that the proportion of London gays engaging in oral/anal sex had not declined since 1984.

While the body has defenses against fecal germs, exposure to the fecal discharge of dozens of strangers each year is extremely unhealthy. Ingestion of human waste is the major route of contracting hepatitis A and the enteric parasites collectively known as the Gay Bowel Syndrome. Consumption of feces has also been implicated in the transmission of typhoid fever,9 herpes, and cancer.27 About 10% of gays have eaten or played with [e.g., enemas, wallowing in feces]. The San Francisco Department of Public Health saw 75,000 patients per year, of whom 70 to 80 per cent are homosexual men....An average of 10 per cent of all patients and asymptomatic contacts reported...because of positive fecal samples or cultures for amoeba, giardia, and shigella infections were employed as food handlers in public establishments; almost 5 per cent of those with hepatitis A were similarly employed."10 In 1976, a rare airborne scarlet fever broke out among gays and just missed sweeping through San Francisco.10 The U.S. Centers for Disease Control reported that 29% of the hepatitis A cases in Denver, 66% in New York, 50% in San Francisco, 56% in Toronto, 42% in Montreal and 26% in Melbourne in the first six months of 1991 were among gays.11 A 1982 study "suggested that some transmission from the homosexual group to the general population may have occurred."12

URINE SEX About 10% of Kinsey's gays reported having engaged in "golden showers" [drinking or being splashed with urine]. In the largest survey of gays ever conducted,13 23% admitted to urine-sex. In the largest random survey of gays,6 29% reported urine-sex. In a San Francisco study of 655 gays,14 only 24% claimed to have been monogamous in the past year. Of these monogamous gays, 5% drank urine, 7% practiced "fisting," 33% ingested feces via anal/oral contact, 53% swallowed semen, and 59% received semen in their rectum during the previous month.

OTHER GAY SEX PRACTICES

SADOMASOCHISM as the Table indicates, a large minority of gays engage in torture for sexual fun. Sex with minors 25% of white gays17 admitted to sex with boys 16 or younger as adults. In a 9-state study,30 33% of the 181 male, and 22% of the 18 female teachers caught molesting students did so homosexually (though less than 3% of men and 2% of women engage in homosexuality31). Depending on the study, the percent of gays reporting sex in public restrooms ranged from 14%16 to 41%13 to 66%,6 9%16, 60%13 and 67%5 reported sex in gay baths; 64%16 and 90%18 said that they used illegal drugs.

Fear of AIDS may have reduced the volume of gay sex partners, but the numbers are prodigious by any standard. Morin15 reported that 824 gays had lowered their sex-rate from 70 different partners/yr. in 1982 to 50/yr. by 1984. McKusick14 reported declines from 76/yr. to 47/yr. in 1985. In Spain32 the average was 42/yr. in 1989.

Medical Consequences of Homosexual Sex

Death and disease accompany promiscuous and unsanitary sexual activity. 70%25 to 78%x,13 of gays reported having had a sexually transmitted disease. The proportion with intestinal parasites (worms, flukes, amoeba) ranged from 25%18 to 39%19 to 59%.20 As of 1992, 83% of U.S. AIDS in whites had occurred in gays.21 The Seattle sexual diary study3? reported that gays had, on a yearly average:

  1. fellated 108 men and swallowed semen from 48;
  2. exchanged saliva with 96;
  3. experienced 68 penile penetrations of the anus; and
  4. ingested fecal material from 19.

No wonder 10% came down with hepatitis B and 7% contracted hepatitis A during the 6-month study.

Effects on the Lifespan

Smokers and drug addicts don't live as long as non-smokers or non-addicts, so we consider smoking and narcotics abuse harmful. The typical life-span of homosexuals suggests that their activities are more destructive than smoking nd as dangerous as drugs.

Obituaries numbering 6,516 from 16 U.S. homosexual journals over the past 12 years were compared to a large sample of obituaries from regular newspapers.23 The obituaries from the regular newspapers were similar to U.S. averages for longevity; the medium age of death of married men was 75, and 80% of them died old (age 65 or older). For unmarried or divorced men the median age of death was 57, and 32% of them died old. Married women averaged age 79 at death; 85% died old. Unmarried and divorced women averaged age 71, and 60% of them died old.

The median age of death for homosexuals, however, was virtually the same nationwide--and, overall, less than 2% survived to old age. If AIDS was the cause of death, the median age was 39. For the 829 gays who died of something other than AIDS, the median age of death was 42, and 9% died old. The 163 lesbians had a median age of death of 44, and 20% died old.

Two and eight-tenths percent (2.8%) of gays died violently. They were 116 times more apt to be murdered; 24 times more apt to commit suicide; and had a traffic-accident death-rate 18 times the rate of comparably-aged white males. Heart attacks, cancer and liver failure were exceptionally common. Twenty percent of lesbians died of murder, suicide, or accident--a rate 487 times higher than that of white females aged 25-44. The age distribution of samples of homosexuals in the scientific literature from 1989 to 1992 suggests a similarly shortened life-span.

The Gay Legacy

Homosexuals rode into the dawn of sexual freedom and returned with a plague that gives every indication of destroying most of them. Those who treat AIDS patients are at great risk, not only from HIV infection, which as of 1992 involved over 100 health care workers,21 but also from TB and new strains of other diseases.24 Those who are housed with AIDS patients are also at risk.24 Those who are housed with AIDS patients are also at risk.24 Dr. Max Essex, chair of the Harvard AIDS Institute, warned congress in 1992 that "AIDS has already led to other kinds of dangerous epidemics...If AIDS is not eliminated, other new lethal microbes will emerge, and neither safe sex nor drug free practices will prevent them."28 At least 8, and perhaps as many as 30 29 patients had been infected with HIV by health care workers as of 1992.

The Biological Swapmeet

The typical sexual practices of homosexuals are a medical horror story --imagine exchanging saliva, feces, semen and/or blood with dozens of different men each year. Imagine drinking urine, ingesting feces and experiencing rectal trauma on a regular basis. Often these encounters occur while the participants are drunk, high, and/or in an orgy setting. Further, many of them occur in extremely unsanitary places (bathrooms, dirty peep shows), or, because homosexuals travel so frequently, in other parts of the world.

Every year, a quarter or more of homosexuals visit another country.20 Fresh American germs get taken to Europe, Africa and Asia. And fresh pathogens from these continents come here. Foreign homosexuals regularly visit the U.S. and participate in this biological swapmeet.

The Pattern of Infection

Unfortunately the danger of these exchanges does not merely affect homosexuals. Travelers carried so many tropical diseases to New York City that it had to institute a tropical disease center, and gays carried HIV from New York City to the rest of the world.27 Most of the 6,349 Americans who got AIDS from contaminated blood as of 1992, received it from homosexuals and most of the women in California who got AIDS through heterosexual activity got it from men who engaged in homosexual behavior.23 The rare form of airborne scarlet fever that stalked San Francisco in 1976 also started among homosexuals.10

Genuine Compassion

Society is legitimately concerned with health risks-- they impact our taxes and everyone's chances of illness and injury. Because we care about them, smokers are discouraged from smoking by higher insurance premiums, taxes on cigarettes and bans against smoking in public. These social pressures cause many to quit. They likewise encourage non-smokers to stay non-smokers.

Homosexuals are sexually troubled people engaging in dangerous activities. Because we care about them and those tempted to join them, it is important that we neither encourage nor legitimize such a destructive lifestyle.


References

1. Karlen A. SEXUALITY And HOMOSEXUALITY. NY Norton, 1971.

2. Pines B. BACK TO BASICS. NY Morrow, 1982, p. 211.

3. Weinberg G. SOCIETY AND THE HEALTHY HOMOSEXUAL. NY St. Martin's, 1972, preface.

4. Amici curiae brief, in Bowers v. Hardwick, 1986.

5. Corey L. & Holmes, K.K. Sexual transmission of Hepatitis A in homosexual men. "New England Journal of Medicine," 1980302435- 38.

6. Cameron P et al Sexual orientation and sexually transmitted disease. "Nebraska Medical Journal," 198570292-99; Effect of homosexuality upon public health and social order "Psychological Reports," 1989, 64, 1167-79.

7. Manligit, G.W. et al Chronic immune stimulation by sperm alloan- tigens. "Journal of the American Medical Association," 1984251 237-38.

8. Cecil Adams, "The Straight Dope," THE READER (Chicago, 3/28/86) [Adams writes authoritatively on counter-culture material, his column is carried in many alternative newspapers across the U.S. and Canada].

9. Dritz, S. & Braff. Sexually transmitted typhoid fever. "New England Journal of Medicine," 19772961359-60.

10. Dritz, S. Medical aspects of homosexuality. "New England Journal of Medicine," 1980302463-4.

11. CDC Hepatitis A among homosexual men --United States, Canada, and Australia. MMWR 199241155-64.

12. Christenson B. et al. An epidemic outbreak of hepatitis A among homosexual men in Stockholm, "American Journal of Epidemiology," 1982115599-607.

13. Jay, K. & Young, A. THE GAY REPORT. NY Summit, 1979.

14. McKusick, L. et al AIDS and sexual behaviors reported by gay men in San Francisco, "American Journal of Public Health," 1985 75493- 96.

15. USA Today 11/21/84.

16. Gebhard, P. & Johnson, A. THE KINSEY DATA. NY Saunders, 1979.

17. Bell, A. & Weinberg, M. HOMOSEXUALITIES. NY Simon & Schuster, 1978.

18. Jaffee, H. et al. National case-control study of Kaposi's sarcoma. "Annals Of Internal Medicine," 198399145-51.

19. Quinn, T. C. et al. The polymicrobial origin of intestinal infection in homosexual men. "New England Journal of Medicine," 1983309576-82.

20. Biggar, R. J. Low T-lymphocyte ratios in homosexual men. "Journal Of The American Medical Association," 19842511441-46; "Wall Street Journal," 7/18/91, B1.

21. CDC HIV/AIDS SURVEILLANCE, February 1993.

22. Chu, S. et al. AIDS in bisexual men in the U.S. "American Journal Of Public Health," 199282220-24.

23. Cameron, P., Playfair, W. & Wellum, S. The lifespan of homo- sexuals. Paper presented at Eastern Psychological Association Convention, April 17, 1993.

24. Dooley, W.W. et al. Nosocomial transmission of tuberculosis in a hospital unit for HIV-invected patients. "Journal of the American Medical Association," 19922672632-35.

25. Schechter, M.T. et al. Changes in sexual behavior and fear of AIDS. "Lancet," 198411293.

26. Elford, J. et al. Kaposi's sarcoma and insertive rimming. "Lancet," 1992339938.

27. Beral, V. et al. Risk of Kaposi's sarcoma and sexual practices associated with faecal contact in homosexual or bisexual men with AIDS. "Lancet," 1992339632-35.

28. Testimony before House Health & Environment Subcommittee, 2/24/92.

29. Ciesielski, C. et al. Transmission of human immunodeficiency virus in a dental practice. "Annals of Internal Medicine, 1992116 798-80; CDC Announcement Houston Post, 8/7/92.

30. Rubin, S. "Sex Education Teachers Who Sexually Abuse Students." 24th International Congress on Psychology, Sydney, Australia, August 1988.

31. Cameron, P. & Cameron, K. Prevalence of homosexuality. "Psychology Reports," 1993, in press; Melbye, M. & Biggar, R.J. Interactions between persons at risk for AIDS and the general population in Denmark. "American Journal of Epidemiology," 1992135593-602.

32. Rodriguez-Pichardo, A. et al. Sexually transmitted diseases in homosexual males in Seville, Spain, "Geniourin Medicina," 1990 66;423-427.

33. AIDS Prognosis, Washington Times, 2/13/93, C1.

94 posted on 12/16/2003 3:25:08 PM PST by Happy2BMe (2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Sophos verbum.

Autem tunc Marc vescor agnatio?

95 posted on 12/16/2003 3:29:23 PM PST by skeeter (Fac ut vivas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: cajun-jack
Interesting perspective from your draft days. I feel a draft coming back and the gay issue will have to be dealt with. If asking and telling will get you out of the service, then gay will be the Canada of this draft.
96 posted on 12/16/2003 3:30:24 PM PST by Vidi_Vici_Vinnny (An armed man is a Citizen. An unarmed man is a Subject.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Vidi_Vici_Vinnny
You are absolutely correct...if the draft is ever re-instated, anyone that doesn't want to go will only have to say he/she is gay.

It was that way before, but people were ashamed to be that way and would not openly admit to it.

But is so "chic" to be open-minded and double the size of your dating base now......the only truly handsome man i have ever been in love with is the one that smiles at me every morning while i'm shaving. Damn!! he is such a hunk too!!!! roflmao
97 posted on 12/16/2003 3:37:59 PM PST by cajun-jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles
What if someone, through no fault of his own, has a fear orientation, expressing itself in a tendency to run when fired upon? Should he/she/other be discriminated against?

Life is about behavior; why is frequently irrelevant. In the military the ONLY thing that should matter is effectiveness. Save the girly touchy-feely politcal and social issues for the civilians.

98 posted on 12/16/2003 3:44:03 PM PST by King Black Robe (With freedom of religion and speech now abridged, it is time to go after the press.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib
Nope, Brethren, as in German Quaker, and old-line "abolitionist" Quaker at that - conductors & brakemen on the Underground Railroad. So we're quite familiar with the so-called theological basis for discrimination against various groups, and the many fallacies of those. In other theological matters we're so close to straight Baptist that we freely exchange emergency pastors, but there is a world of difference socially.

Probably the major difference between Brethren and our kissing cousins - Amish, Mennonites & German Baptists - is that those who object to war tend to be conscientious objectors rather than pacifists. The latter won't use force period. The former will kill people who need killing, just not under orders. Civil War draft officials in Lancaster County, Pennsylvannia, learned this the hard way.

And there are many Brethren who are neither pacifists nor CO's. See the movies, "Friendly Persuasion", starring Gary Cooper, and the more recent "Glory". One of my ancestors lost an arm in the Crater commanding a company of the 13th Colored Infantry. My uncle Virgil commanded a black MP company in WWII. Both volunteered to lead black troops.

Theologically, there is no difference between justifying slavery based on the Bible, and justifying discrimination against homosexuals based on the Bible. Ask any Brethren minister.

99 posted on 12/16/2003 3:44:07 PM PST by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles
Expression on base is different from expression off base.

The following is from an early draft, stored on my hard drive, of Bob's forthcoming law review article on UCMJ changes. Here he suggests a change to UCMJ section 925, article 125:

Section 925. Art. 125. Sexual Misconduct (a) Any person subject to this chapter who commits an act of consensual sexual intercourse—

(1) on duty

(2) on a Federal installation in any location other than one's own quarters for married personnel, or

(3) on a U.S. military vessel or aircraft

is guilty of sexual impropriety and shall be punished as a court-martial shall direct.

(b) Any person subject to this chapter who—

(1) gestures, writes or speaks unwanted and persistent sexual comments, advances or demands,

(2) commits unwanted, aggressive physical contact of a sexual nature, not amounting to assault under Art. 128, or

(3) who, through action or inaction of official authority, creates, fosters, tolerates or sustains a climate of sexual oppression, intimidation, menace or violence, not amounting to cruelty or maltreatment under Art. 93, or assault under Art. 128, is guilty of sexual harassment, and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(c) Any person subject to this chapter who commits an act of sexual intercourse through misuse of official authority is guilty of sexual abuse of office, and shall be punished by death or as a court-martial may direct, if committed in wartime and in a theater of operations, or otherwise as a court-martial shall direct.


100 posted on 12/16/2003 3:54:02 PM PST by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 301-314 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson