Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dem Probers Eye Rush's Medical File Despite Agreement[Fr mentioned]
tp://www.newsmax.com ^ | Thursday Dec. 25, 2003; 2:23 p.m. EST

Posted on 12/25/2003 2:35:19 PM PST by luv2ndamend

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last
To: autoresponder
Get a clue dimbulb


Thanks for the compliment. It speaks so highly of you...

Now was rushie paying 'blackmail' to the Clines as alledged by his Kennedy lawyer? If so, why?
21 posted on 12/25/2003 3:08:45 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
I'm not a regular Rush listener, but it's obvious that the Democrats have set an extremely high priority for knocking him off the airwaves. Just as Drudge was their Public Enemy #1 during the Monica scandal, Rush is their Public Enemy #1 as we approach the 2002 election. With him out of the way they could do a LOT more spinning of the news. Directly or indirectly Rush reaches a lot of people, and makes it much more difficult for the liberal media to peddle their lies unchallenged.

I must admit I've been very surprised at the way many Freepers have reacted to Rush's problems. He is not a deliberate drug addict, he's a guy who got hooked on prescription pain killers. He didn't go out and buy crack cocaine or heroin. What happened to him could happen to anybody. I don't think people understand the dangers of getting addicted to legitimate medicines, and the difficulty of dealing with the problem. I happen to support the policy of keeping addictive drugs like coke, heroine, and (yes) marijuana illegal, but that's quite another matter from using pain killers because you are suffering from terrible pain, and then getting addicted to it. Add to that a criminal housekeeper and a criminal Democrat prosecutor, and my sympathies are entirely with Rush.
22 posted on 12/25/2003 3:13:25 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Really too bad someone could not get ahold of Bill Clinton's medical records. Would have been an immense service to our country.

The Rule of Law surely has built in a respect for the 'other', that Demrats too often, greedily violate.

. . .seems to me, almost a kind of rape mentality; as they viciously tear into the private medical records of Rush. . .they couldn't wait. . .yes, and for sure.

These Demrats are beyond disgusting; but then, we already know that.

23 posted on 12/25/2003 3:14:40 PM PST by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
Rush's drug abuse injured no one but himself. If he was not a popular conservative talk show host this deal would have been settled meekly by now. That, in and of itself, should prove that his prosecution is a witch-hunt launched by the same despicable crowd that thought Clinton's medical records shouldn't be opened to examine evidence of a real assault on someone else's rigths.
The Rats want to lame Rush before the election by touting his hiprocrisy, but in the process are proving their own.
Rush can't be silenced this way. In the unlikely case they did take him out three others would pop up to replace him, (Tony Snow was hit in substitution).
24 posted on 12/25/2003 3:18:05 PM PST by kcar (A gov't big enough to give you everything, doesn't really care about YOU anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport
Allow me to play George Bush, Elder, to your Bill Clinton.

Posts like yours reveal no knowledge whatsoever of opiod addiction not to mention Rush Limbaughs almost single handedly responsibility for 1994 and the 2002 Trifecta.


25 posted on 12/25/2003 3:21:14 PM PST by Helms (Liberalism is a faux compassion that condescends at best and subjugates at worse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Helms
What does that have to do with rushie paying blackmail, assuming he did as alledged by his Kennedy lawyer.

That was then.... this is now... Compassion abounds.... or should don't you think?
26 posted on 12/25/2003 3:24:19 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
It will backfire on the Democrats badly. The choir of democrats who hate Rush and only listen to disrupt, will be gleeful, but the Rush devotees who vote are the ones who will seek to vote their disapproval of the neverending sleaze of the Clintonites. I think a lot of those people are independents, uncommitted voters, moderate democrats, republicans and conservatives.

For the first time this, and listening to a fellow from NY state talk about how poorly Hillary is regarded inher "home state" ,makes me truly see that she is all smoke and mirrors and harshness and really cannot win the nomination or the Presidency, she is through and so is her miserable spouse. She will be lucky to retain her Senate seat and become a female Teddy the Swimmer, Hillary the lightfingered. Rudy may just wipe up the platform with her and she'll be a one term Senator.
27 posted on 12/25/2003 3:24:22 PM PST by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport
(rushie should be given/shown the same compassion he has dealt out to others over the many years)
Benedict Arnold couldn't have put it better deport. Nothing shouts 'I'm the smartest guy in the room' like half baked truths and twisted slander. Although I suppose in the world you live in the people who are on the receiving end of blackmail are the villians, and no one in an elected office would ever have an axe to grind. I mean, everyone knows that prosecutors wouldn't have political agendas
nor would they ever go after high profile cases to bolster their careers. Your bald faced venom will garner little sympathy for your opportunistic attack on a great American, one who, by the way, has not even been accused of a crime, a little detail you might have missed in your scathing condemnation.

28 posted on 12/25/2003 3:25:21 PM PST by HoundsTooth_BP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HoundsTooth_BP
You are 100% correct.... He's not been charged and may well not be.... and shouldn't if he's not done anything wrong. Alledged blackmail ..... so sayth the Kennedy lawyer. Not proven at this stage...

29 posted on 12/25/2003 3:28:58 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
So interesting that one of the biggest shills for Manuel Noriega during the Bush One administration and Clinton during the impeachment, would be crying foul about Democrats now.

Huh? I am not following

30 posted on 12/25/2003 3:29:07 PM PST by TheOtherOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan
a little "bait and switch" perhaps??
31 posted on 12/25/2003 3:30:24 PM PST by cajun-jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
Party politics aside, if ones medical records can be so easily opened one has to really be concerned about the civil rights damage this represents.... and to think that the Demoncrats, those alledged protectors of civil rights, are the one's doing the violating.

Time to write someone about this ...

32 posted on 12/25/2003 3:31:02 PM PST by AgThorn (Go go Bush!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
The taxpayers of Floriduh may be in for an expensive experience. Good thing plenty of em are transplanted rich northern libs. Give em hell Rush.
33 posted on 12/25/2003 3:31:25 PM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
"If Limbaugh had taken a quarter of the drugs he's alleged to have bought he would have died."

This is getting funny - others have said the 2,000 pills we know of in a 5 month period is no big deal ....

At a quick search for pharmacology of the drugs he bought, it appears he got twice as many as the maximum that is normally prescribed, from the single pharmacy we can see the records of.
34 posted on 12/25/2003 3:33:10 PM PST by RS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
I hope Rush sues those responsible.
35 posted on 12/25/2003 3:43:36 PM PST by sweetliberty (Better to keep silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport; CWOJackson
Florida State Attorneys ARE elected officials and the office IS party affiliated. So yes, some counties are represented by prosectors "furnished" by the democRATs while others are "furnished" by the republicans.
36 posted on 12/25/2003 3:45:58 PM PST by NonValueAdded ("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." GWB 9/20/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
I hope Rush sues those responsible.


You reckon he'd do that and then have it all drug out in court proceedings...... all those things he's trying to keep private at this time. I doubt it.

But at some point he may well have a good case and then he's got a decision to make.....
37 posted on 12/25/2003 3:47:10 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
Florida State Attorneys ARE elected officials and the office IS party affiliated.


Yep... like that in most states I'd guess. The State Attorney General is a Republican....
38 posted on 12/25/2003 3:48:53 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
I don't know. I think Davis genuinely believed that Starr's office was doing the same thing to his boss (Clinton). Davis is liberal but would, like Lieberman, fit the role of loyal opposition.
39 posted on 12/25/2003 3:55:45 PM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Waco
"The taxpayers of Floriduh may be in for an expensive experience."


The judge denied the request to quash the Search Warrents on Monday and the prosecuters informed Rush's lawyers and opened the records. Where is the liability ?
40 posted on 12/25/2003 3:59:53 PM PST by RS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson