Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scholars: Crucifixion Portrayal Inaccurate
AP News ^ | Feb 19th,2004 | PETER ENAV

Posted on 02/19/2004 3:40:35 PM PST by missyme

"Critics Never Stop"

JERUSALEM (AP) - The dearth of information about Jesus' crucifixion makes it impossible to describe the event in accurate detail, as Mel Gibson attempts to do in his new film, "The Passion of Christ," Bible scholars and anthropologists say.

The crucifixion is the centerpiece of the movie, set to open in U.S. theaters Feb. 25, Ash Wednesday on the Roman Catholic calendar.

People who have seen the movie say it adopts standard Christian imagery in excruciating detail: Jesus being pinioned to a Latin cross - a T-shaped device with a short upper extension - with one nail driven through both feet and one through each palm.

In a December e-mail sent to The Associated Press, Gibson said he did "an immense amount of reading" to supplement the Bible's relatively unadorned account of the crucifixion in the four Gospels.

"I consulted a huge number of theologians, scholars, priests, spiritual writers," Gibson wrote. "The film is faithful to the Gospels but I had to fill in a lot of details - like the way Jesus would have carried His cross, or whether the nails went through the palms of His hands or his wrists ... Since the experts canceled each other out, I was thrown back on my own resources to weigh the different arguments and decide for myself."

Some scholars say even the most widely recognized features of the crucifixion, such as the shape of the cross and the use of nails, are open to debate.

James F. Strange, professor of religious studies at the University of South Florida in Tampa, said 1st century historian Josephus provided only general information, probably because crucifixion was so common that details seemed superfluous.

Crucifixion was first used in the 5th century B.C., and was a widely used form of execution in Asia, Europe and Africa for the ensuing eight centuries, said Israeli anthropologist Joe Zias. Depending on technique, death could be swift or take days.

"If you suspended people by their hands and left their feet free you would kill them within an hour," Zias said. "If you suspended them in a way they couldn't exhale they'd be dead within minutes."

Zias said the question of whether Jesus was nailed to the cross or simply tied to it remains a mystery. "There is no evidence whatsoever he was nailed," he said. "The Gospels say he was crucified and leave it at that."

Zias criticized "The Passion of Christ" for accepting the standard version of three nails being used. He said experiments on cadavers carried out by the Catholic Church in the Middle Ages have shown that people hanging with nails through their hands will fall to the ground within a relatively short time, pulled by gravity.

The Gospels suggest it took Jesus three to six hours to die.

"All this is Crucifixion 101," Zias said. "People who study these things understand them. But Gibson ignored them in his film."

John Dominic Crossan, emeritus professor of religious studies at DePaul University in Chicago, agrees with Zias that little is known about Jesus' execution.

"Early Christians believed that Jesus was nailed to the cross," he said. "But there is absolutely no proof of this. The only skeleton of a crucified person ever recovered indicated that the two arms were tied to a crossbar, and two nails were used in either shinbone. There was no standard procedure in any of this. The only common feature in the different types of crucifixion is intense sadism."

The type of cross in Jesus' execution is also in question, Crossan said. First century Romans are known to have used both a T-shaped device, without an upper extension, and the Latin cross that is standard in Christian iconography.

Each of the four Gospels says an inscription mocking Jesus as the "king of the Jews" was affixed to the cross. Crossan said this would have made sense "because the whole point of crucifixion was to warn people through alluding to a specific crime."

Two of the Gospels say the inscription was mounted above Jesus. This presumably would strengthen the argument for a Latin cross, which would have provided space for writing about the condemned man's head.

However, the other two Gospels don't give a locator. "It (the written warning) could just as easily have hung around his neck," Crossan said.

Crossan is also uncertain whether the cross on which Jesus was crucified was carried to the execution grounds - either by Simon of Cyrene, as three of the Gospels report, or by Jesus himself, according to John's account.

It is possible that the vertical part of the cross was kept at Golgotha, the place of Jesus' death, and that the condemned person carried the crossbar, Crossan said.

"The point is we simply don't know," he said, "not in general cases and not in the case of Jesus either."


TOPICS: Announcements; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: crucifixion; foxmanisascumbag; moviereview; thepassion; toolateabe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-214 next last

1 posted on 02/19/2004 3:40:35 PM PST by missyme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: missyme
...and the significance of this criticism is?
2 posted on 02/19/2004 3:45:06 PM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: missyme

"Early Christians believed that Jesus was nailed to the cross," he said. "But there is absolutely no proof of this."

Excepting the small fact that early Christians believed it ... duh!

3 posted on 02/19/2004 3:46:51 PM PST by JmyBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
Just to let us all know what were up agaisnt...
4 posted on 02/19/2004 3:48:32 PM PST by missyme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: missyme
My reading, 30 years ago, also indicated that there was no basis to conclude that Jesus was nailed to a cross.

He was likely tied, with a small platform for his feet. He died of asphyxiation.

As the scholar says, the weight of a human body pulling on nails in hands, or in wrists, would, within a very short time, tear through the tendons and muscles, and the body would fall.

Besides, tying the arms to the cross-beam would put all the pressure on the lungs, which is what made crucifixion an excruciating death: gradual suffocation.

5 posted on 02/19/2004 3:49:58 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: missyme
Guess one can't even think about it by such foolish criteria.
6 posted on 02/19/2004 3:50:34 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: missyme
"The point is we simply don't know," he said, "not in general cases and not in the case of Jesus either."

So then how do they make the claim that the portrayal is "inacurrate?"

7 posted on 02/19/2004 3:50:34 PM PST by Jagdgewehr (One sword, at least, thy right shall guard, One faithful harp shall praise thee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: missyme
"Experts say....[blah blah blah]"


Well that does it...im going to turn to Islam now... *rolling eyes*
8 posted on 02/19/2004 3:50:44 PM PST by smith288 (http://www.ejsmithweb.com/FR/JohnKerry/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: missyme

Maybe these guys know!

9 posted on 02/19/2004 3:51:28 PM PST by KantianBurke (Principles, not blind loyalty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JmyBryan
There is also a great deal of archaeological evidence to support the use of nails. Yes they were probably put through the wrists, but that is splitting hairs.
10 posted on 02/19/2004 3:52:17 PM PST by TheGunny (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
Zias said the question of whether Jesus was nailed to the cross or simply tied to it remains a mystery. "There is no evidence whatsoever he was nailed," he said. "The Gospels say he was crucified and leave it at that."

Like the Jesus Seminar, so many of these people are too obvious in the laziness. The only record of Y'shua' [Jesus] crucifixion is in Scripture - but then they ignore Scripture when it speaks. Of course He was nailed!

The other disciples therefore said to him, "We have seen the Lord." So he said to them, "Unless I see in His hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the print of the nails, and put my hand into His side, I will not believe." And after eight days His disciples were again inside, and Thomas with them. Jesus came, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst, and said, "Peace to you!" Then He said to Thomas, "Reach your finger here, and look at My hands; and reach your hand here, and put it into My side. Do not be unbelieving, but believing." And Thomas answered and said to Him, "My Lord and my God!"

John 20:25-27


It makes you wonder about both the reporter and the so-called "expert". Hey, if they don't have a Bible, they can check their hotel drawer.
11 posted on 02/19/2004 3:53:55 PM PST by safisoft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: missyme
I couldn't find the story from the link. Just wondering if the "Critics Never Stop" line was in the story or something you provided. Thanks...
12 posted on 02/19/2004 3:55:19 PM PST by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Well the point is that he really did not die anyways, he suffered and lost his human body which was G-d's will and
He lives on every day and for eternity...It is truly not the killing of Jesus's human body that is the central point of faith it is the resurrection that is the focal point of Christianity.
13 posted on 02/19/2004 3:55:32 PM PST by missyme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: missyme
Zias said the question of whether Jesus was nailed to the cross or simply tied to it remains a mystery. "There is no evidence whatsoever he was nailed," he said. "The Gospels say he was crucified and leave it at that."

Kinda hard to show Thomas his scars, you think

John Dominic Crossan, emeritus professor of religious studies at DePaul University in Chicago, agrees with Zias that little is known about Jesus' execution. "Early Christians believed that Jesus was nailed to the cross," he said. "But there is absolutely no proof of this. The only skeleton of a crucified person ever recovered indicated that the two arms were tied to a crossbar, and two nails were used in either shinbone. There was no standard procedure in any of this. The only common feature in the different types of crucifixion is intense sadism."

Crossan is one of the fringe 'theologians' of the Jesus Seminar. There is documented archaeological proof showing the wear on the bones in the wrist that resulted from the nail. How could one tell from bones if the arms were tied? You can't.

14 posted on 02/19/2004 3:55:56 PM PST by Godzilla (Nuke the whales, save the medfly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JmyBryan
Excepting the small fact that early Christians believed it ... duh!

The early Christians also believed Christ was coming back within their lifetimes.

I don't see what difference it makes whether there were nails; the gospels do not mention nails.

Crucifixion could take days. Christ was weakened from the scourging, and had lost blood, so his death came fairly quickly.

To add to the humiliation, it was also fairly common to completely strip the person who was to be crucifed. There's no reason to think Christ was spared this insult.

And the Romans did not take the bodies down after death. If a family member didn't remove the body, it simply hung on the cross, for vultures and other vermin to pick at.

15 posted on 02/19/2004 3:56:21 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: smith288
I wonder when these critics will realize Jesus is not Dead?
16 posted on 02/19/2004 3:56:56 PM PST by missyme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: missyme
"The Gospels say he was crucified and leave it at that."

Then why did the risen Jesus show St. Thomas the nail prints in his hands, and asked him to touch them? Deliver me from scholars! Read your New Testament! If you can read.

17 posted on 02/19/2004 3:57:45 PM PST by swampfox98 (Beyond 2004 - Chaos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheGunny
The liberal press is always quite selective in the 'scholars' and 'experts' they consult.
18 posted on 02/19/2004 3:57:47 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain
Yes twas me :-)
19 posted on 02/19/2004 3:57:54 PM PST by missyme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: missyme
I wonder when these critics will realize Jesus is not Dead?

Judgement Day

20 posted on 02/19/2004 3:58:09 PM PST by So Cal Rocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-214 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson