Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS News Concludes It Was Misled on National Guard Memos, Network Officials Say
New York Times ^ | 9/20/04 | Jim Rutenberg

Posted on 09/19/2004 9:40:13 PM PDT by LibWhacker

After days of expressing confidence about the documents used in a "60 Minutes'' report that raised new questions about President Bush's National Guard service, CBS News officials have grave doubts about the authenticity of the material, network officials said last night.

Those officials, who asked not to be identified, said CBS News would most likely make an announcement as early as today that it had been deceived about the documents' origins, and that it was mounting an intensive news investigation of where they came from.

But these people cautioned that CBS News could still pull back from an announcement. Officials were meeting last night with Dan Rather, the anchor who presented the report, to go over the information it has collected about the documents one last time before making a final decision.

People at the network said it was now possible that officials would open a formal internal inquiry into how it moved forward with the report, which officials now say they are beginning to believe was too flawed to have gone on the air.

The report relied in large part on four memorandums purported to be from the personal file of Mr. Bush's squadron commander, Lt. Col. Jerry B. Killian, who died 20 years ago. The memos, dated from the early 1970's, said that Colonel Killian was under pressure to "sugar coat'' the record of the young Lieutenant Bush and that the officer had disobeyed a direct order to take a physical.

Mr. Rather and others at the network are said to still believe that the sentiment in the memos accurately reflected Mr. Killian's feelings, but that the documents' authenticity is now in grave doubt.

The developments last night marked a dramatic turn for CBS News, which for a week stood steadfastly by its Sept. 8 report as various document experts asserted that the typeface of the memos could have been produced only by a modern-day word processor, not Vietnam War-era typewriters.

The seemingly unflappable confidence of Mr. Rather and top news division officials in the documents allayed fears within the network and created doubt among some in the news media at large that those specialists were correct. CBS News officials had said they had reason to be certain that the documents indeed came from the personal file of Colonel Killian.

Sandy Genelius, a network spokeswoman, said last week, "We are confident about the chain of custody; we're confident in how we secured the documents.''

But officials decided yesterday that they would most likely have to declare that they were misled about the records' origin after Mr. Rather and a top network executive, Betsy West, met in Texas with a man who was said to have helped the news division obtain the memos, a former Guard officer named Bill Burkett.

Mr. Rather interviewed Mr. Burkett on camera this weekend, and several people close to the reporting process said his answers to Mr. Rather's questions led officials to conclude that their initial confidence that the memos came from Mr. Killian's own files was not warranted. These people indicated that Mr. Burkett had previously led the producer of the piece, Mary Mapes, to have the utmost confidence in the material.

It was unclear last night whether Mr. Burkett told Mr. Rather that he had been misled about the documents' provenance or that he had been the one who did the misleading.

In an e-mail message yesterday, Mr. Burkett declined to answer any questions about the documents.

Yesterday, Emily J. Will, a document specialist who inspected the records for CBS News and said last week that she had raised concerns about their authenticity with CBS News producers, confirmed a report in Newsweek that a producer had told her that the source of the documents had said they were obtained anonymously and through the mail.

During an interview last night she declined to name the producer who told her this but said that the producer had been in a position to know. CBS News officials have disputed her contention that she warned the network the night before the initial "60 Minutes'' report that it would face questions from documents experts.

In the coming days CBS News officials plan to focus on how the network moved ahead with the report when there were warning signs that the memorandums were not genuine.

Ms. Will is one of two documents experts consulted by the network who said they raised doubts about the material before the segment was broadcast. Another expert, Marcel B. Matley, said in interviews that he had only vouched for Colonel Killian's signatures on the records and not the authenticity of the records themselves. Mr. Matley said he could not rule out that the signatures were cut and pasted from official records pertaining to Colonel Killian.

In examining where the network went wrong, officials at CBS News were turning their attention to Ms. Mapes, one of their most respected producers, who was riding particularly high this year after breaking news about the Abu Ghraib prison scandal for the network.

In a telephone interview this weekend, Josh Howard, the executive producer of the "60 Minutes'' Wednesday edition, said he did not initially know who was Ms. Mapes' primary source for the documents but that he did not see any reason to doubt them. He said he believed Ms. Mapes and her team had appropriately answered all questions about the documents' authenticity and, he noted, no one seemed to be casting doubt upon the essential thrust of the report.

"The editorial story line was still intact, and still is, to this day,'' he said, "and the reporting that was done in it was by a person who has turned in decades of flawless reporting with no challenge to her credibility.''

He added, "We in management had no sense that the producing team wasn't completely comfortable with the results of the document analysis.''

Ms. Mapes has not responded to requests for comment.

Mr. Howard also said in the interview that the White House did not dispute the veracity of the documents when it was presented them on the morning of the report. That reaction, he said, was "the icing on the cake'' of the other reporting the network was conducting on the documents. White House officials have said they saw no reason to challenge documents that had been presented by a credible news organization.

Several people familiar with the situation said that they were girding for a particularly tough week for Mr. Rather and the news division should the network announce its new doubts.

One person close to the situation said the critical question would be, "Where was everybody's judgment on that last day?''


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 60minutes; blatheringidiots; cbs; cbsnews; danblather; dopes; duped; forgery; killian; mapes; mapesthemope; marymapes; memogate; memos; msmapes; napalminthemorning; pajamahadeen; pajamaratti; rather; rathergate; schadenfreude; seebs; seebsnews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 521-530 next last
To: Stonedog
They have already explained what they have planned. They will point to Burkett who will say they were anonymously mailed to him. End of story. They ALL were duped. Give me a break.
181 posted on 09/19/2004 10:24:07 PM PDT by Marak (I am NOT a GOP Lawyer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Cock & Bull Story  
182 posted on 09/19/2004 10:24:14 PM PDT by NewMediaFan (Fake but accurate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Rather thought he had the creditability to pull this hoax off. He knew the documents were fake, he just never believed anyone would ever question them if HE were the one presenting them. He just assumed his reputation would mean that everyone would swallow whatever he presented.

You were wrong Dan, and because you were wrong you not only ruined your own reputation, you ruined the reputation of the entire CBS news department.

Creditability, once lost, can only be regained slowly and painfully over years of flawless work.

183 posted on 09/19/2004 10:24:36 PM PDT by McGavin999 (If Kerry can't deal with the "Republican Attack Machine" how is he going to deal with Al Qaeda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewMediaFan

Perfect.


184 posted on 09/19/2004 10:25:26 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: cabojoe
You don't already have your jammies on??? I'm emailing JimRob right now.
185 posted on 09/19/2004 10:26:04 PM PDT by Marak (I am NOT a GOP Lawyer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: DrDavid

What else would you expect from people with no moral compass?


186 posted on 09/19/2004 10:26:36 PM PDT by MistyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
Their defense is stupidity?

It's plausible. One look at the side-by-side comparison the Wash Post did says they were stupid, blind, biased or all THREE!



187 posted on 09/19/2004 10:26:43 PM PDT by GeorgiaYankee (CBS NEWS, EXPOSED BY THE PAJAMARAZZI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

In examining where the network went wrong, officials at CBS News were turning their attention to Ms. Mapes, one of their most respected producers, who was riding particularly high this year after breaking news about the Abu Ghraib prison scandal for the network.



Ah.... poor Mary......scapegoat found!


188 posted on 09/19/2004 10:27:10 PM PDT by Just Lori (CBS: Turn out the lights. The party's over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tragically Single

of course the clintons pretty much got away with almost everything they covered up, with our media's help.


189 posted on 09/19/2004 10:27:57 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud

They're liars, plain and simple. They've been lying to the American public for 40 years.


190 posted on 09/19/2004 10:28:37 PM PDT by LibWhacker (It is the black heart of Islam, not its black face, to which millions object)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Spanaway Lori

I bet they're going to parade her around with panties on her head...


191 posted on 09/19/2004 10:28:38 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: NavySEAL F-16; BoBToMatoE; Shermy; Howlin; teletech; JohnHuang2
Has Dan Rather ever been to Norway? ;o)

OCTOBER 2003 midmonth : (NORWAY : EUROPEAN SOCIALISTS MEET WITH TOP US DEMOCRATS, INCLUDING HILLARY CLINTON, JOSEPH BIDEN [See Kerry], RON KLAIN [see Wesley Clark] AND STAN GREENBERG, FORMER CLINTON CAMPAIGN STRATEGIST) Norway's Labour Party is joining other European social democrats in linking up with the Democrats in the US. The goal is to be prepared with common strategies if a majority of them on both sides of the Atlantic come back to power. A group of European social democrats, led by former British Foreign Minister Robin Cook, met last week with several top Democratic politicians and party officials. They included US senators Hilary Clinton and Joseph Biden. They also had meetings with Ron Klain of presidential candidate Wesley Clark's campaign, and Stan Greenberg, former US President Bill Clinton's campaign strategist in 1992. On the agenda was European concern over current US foreign policy and the effects of globalization. Espen Barth Eide, who led the Norwegian delegation, said the group met "understanding" that "economic globalization must be accompanied by political globalization." There remain wide differences between the European social democrats and their counterparts in the US, who tend to be far more conservative. Barth Eide called it "natural" however, "to begin with those (in the US) who are closest to us (in ideology), even though the Democrats of course aren't social democrats."--- "Norwegian Labour Party Forges Ties With US Democrats," Norway Aftenposten, October 23, 2003

192 posted on 09/19/2004 10:28:44 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Mr. Rather and others at the network are said to still believe that the sentiment in the memos accurately reflected Mr. Killian's feelings,

These people are UNBELIEVABLE! Sheesh! The guy's been dead for 20 years! If anybody talks about what they believe were MY feelings...20 years after I'm dead, they're gonna get a HUGE ZOT!


193 posted on 09/19/2004 10:29:27 PM PDT by Just Lori (CBS: Turn out the lights. The party's over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJL

Is Petah Arnett working for al-Jazeera? If so, maybe he can help get Dan Rather a job there.


194 posted on 09/19/2004 10:29:33 PM PDT by AF68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
You're right! Mary wanted this huge expose' scoop that might bring down the president. She wanted it so bad, and she knew Dan did too, that she either intentionally overlooked flaws, or was too blinded by hatred for Bush to see them. Either way, Mapes has got to go.
195 posted on 09/19/2004 10:30:05 PM PDT by YaYa123 (@Mary, Mary, Quite Contrary.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

Here is some free advice for Mapes and Rather -- you might want to think about hiring a good lawyer.
___________________________________________

I think they should practice saying "Would you like fries with that?"


196 posted on 09/19/2004 10:30:21 PM PDT by GeorgiaYankee (This document has NOT been authenitcated by SeeBS News, so it could be TRUE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AmericanVictory

Irish song BUMP!!!!!!!


197 posted on 09/19/2004 10:30:25 PM PDT by Christian4Bush (I approve this message: I am a proud member of PCFST --Pajama Clad Freepers Seeking Truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Viet-Boat-Rider
"WHO WAS THE SOURCE?????????"

I heard it was someone who was kicked out of Heaven and thrown down to the Earth, and he whispered into Dan's ear as Dan was taking a bite out of his apple.

198 posted on 09/19/2004 10:30:28 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

CBS is a day late and a dollar short.


199 posted on 09/19/2004 10:31:11 PM PDT by JPJones ("We'll cross all our tee's and dot all our.....lower case j's")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Rats. It was more fun when they denied everything.


200 posted on 09/19/2004 10:31:26 PM PDT by ArcadiaLarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 521-530 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson