Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

S.F. Sets Dog Standard of Living
wpvi.com - AP ^ | January 12, 2005 | Staff

Posted on 01/14/2005 11:36:47 AM PST by EveningStar

SAN FRANCISCO-January 12, 2005 — San Francisco dog owners could find themselves in the doghouse if they don't treat Rover right.

The board of supervisors has passed a new ordinance requiring a certain standard of living for man's best friend. Included are specifics on food, water and even doghouses.

Animal control officers say it was difficult to prosecute pet abusers under the old law, because the standards were too vague.

By law in San Francisco, Fido is considered what's termed a companion dog. And a pet owner is actually a pet guardian.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: dog; doggieping; dogs; petguardian; sanfrancisco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
A pet guardian?
1 posted on 01/14/2005 11:36:49 AM PST by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog; mhking

ping


2 posted on 01/14/2005 11:37:22 AM PST by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

More like a minimum wage for dogs.


3 posted on 01/14/2005 11:37:39 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Well, I'm sure these standards don't reach the actual living standards of my pups.


4 posted on 01/14/2005 11:39:48 AM PST by technochick99 (Self defense is a BASIC human right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

well at least now they will have some standard to go by so some of these idiots that own pets but let them starve or such will not go unpunished.....


5 posted on 01/14/2005 11:41:03 AM PST by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; Timesink; dubyaismypresident; Grani; coug97; ...

Just damn.

If you want on the list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...

6 posted on 01/14/2005 11:41:51 AM PST by mhking (Do not mess with dragons, for thou art crunchy & good with ketchup...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

My dog eats very well...he gets at least three cats a day...


7 posted on 01/14/2005 11:43:12 AM PST by Joe 6-pack ("We deal in hard calibers and hot lead." - Roland Deschaines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Can you eat your dog in SF? It seems that such a prohibition would be terribly discriminatory and culturally insensitive. (In Peru, they eat guinea pigs.)


8 posted on 01/14/2005 11:43:26 AM PST by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorCalRepub

I saw the video of this story on one of the cable networks....a poor dog dug a hole under the pavers on a patio ......a hole.....to get out of the rain.


9 posted on 01/14/2005 11:43:33 AM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NorCalRepub

San Fran board of supes has passed law protecting dogs. Hey,it could be someone's SPOUSE there!-[sarc.(maybe)]


10 posted on 01/14/2005 11:45:03 AM PST by Jazzman1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

another day, another reason not to live in San Fancissyco! LMAO


11 posted on 01/14/2005 11:46:08 AM PST by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spok

I don't know about that, but there are some strange goings on in SF that I would hope the law protects dogs from.


12 posted on 01/14/2005 11:46:32 AM PST by BykrBayb (5 minutes of prayer for Terri, every day at 11 am EDT, until she's safe. http://www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
Providing legal standards of living for pets is ridiculous.

But, I still believe there's a special little corner of hell set aside for people who are cruel to animals and children.

13 posted on 01/14/2005 11:47:41 AM PST by TontoKowalski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TontoKowalski

Agree on both counts.


14 posted on 01/14/2005 11:50:01 AM PST by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mhking

Typical liberals, they care more about animals than people.


15 posted on 01/14/2005 11:50:07 AM PST by NeoCaveman (Quote the DUmmie, we got Roved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
another day, another reason not to live in San Fancissyco! LMAO

I guess you can live where you are now and abuse your dog. At least no the City is protecting a class that cannot take care of themselves as opposed to paying to take care of people who can take care of themselves.

16 posted on 01/14/2005 11:50:24 AM PST by IronMan04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

17 posted on 01/14/2005 11:52:42 AM PST by BenLurkin (Big government is still a big problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

TC Rider's dog would require a few other ammenities.

squeeky toys

plush dog bed

leather sofa for naps

regularly scheduled grooming

those tasty liver treats that come in the little milk cartons

Emma - TC Rider's dog


18 posted on 01/14/2005 11:52:52 AM PST by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
Mark my words: the eating of meat will be prohibited in San Francisco within 5 years.


After all, who will speak for the chickens?
19 posted on 01/14/2005 11:54:08 AM PST by beezdotcom (I'm usually either right or wrong...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

Does this mean if the dog is a poor companion you can sue the dog for damages?


20 posted on 01/14/2005 11:54:43 AM PST by PURPLE SHARK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson