Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Predators & Pornography. A disturbing link.
NRO ^ | May 19, 2005, 8:15 a.m. | By Penny Nance

Posted on 05/19/2005 11:05:47 AM PDT by .cnI redruM

On February 2, 2003, when seven-year-old Danielle van Dam disappeared from her family home in the middle of the night, every mother’s nightmare was played out on national television for almost a month while authorities searched for the girl. When Danielle’s body was found at the end of that month, the police and prosecutors discovered a frightening story about a neighbor of Danielle’s who had computer files filled with child pornography and even a sickening cartoon video of the rape of a young girl.

According to a report by Robert Peters, president of Morality in Media, on the link between pornography and violent sex crimes, the prosecutor in the Danielle van Dam case said “The video represented [the defendant’s] sexual fantasies and inspired the abduction, rape, and murder of Danielle.” According to Raymond Pierce, a retired NYPD detective who worked on the sex-crimes squad for many years and is now a criminal-profiling consultant, about 80 percent of rapists and serial killers are heavy pornography users. I was a victim of an attempted rape by a disturbed man who turned out to be involved in pornography.

May is Victims of Pornography Month. Today Senator Sam Brownback (R., Kan.), Rep. Katherine Harris (R., Fla.), Rep. Joe Pitts (R., Pa.), and leaders from the values community will participate in a summit to explore the troubling connection between pornography and violence against women and children.

Florida attorney general Charlie Crist advises parents that “we must never lose sight of the fact that sexual predators make the online world a dangerous place for innocent children. Parents must be ever-vigilant to make sure their children are not exposed to images and messages that would have been unthinkable just a generation ago.” Crist warns that we cannot allow the Internet to be a “pipeline for pornography aimed at children.” But while parents can use available means to protect their children when they are in their own homes, there is a cultural climate surrounding our children that threatens them the way Danielle van Dam was threatened. Because of the availability of pornography online, there is no way of knowing what lurks in the hearts of our neighborhoods.

More needs to be done to evaluate the connection between violent predatory behavior and pornography, and to crack down on these violent predators. Police and law-enforcement officers across the country report brutal instances in which those addicted to pornography utilized its sadistic images on their female and child victims.

Just this past February, the New York Times reported a story about a teenage babysitter who had raped three young children he was watching in their homes. According to the Times, his pattern was to watch pornographic videos with the oldest of the children, a 12-year-old boy, and intimidate them all by torturing them with a knife and threats to their family members. Perhaps one of the most notorious serial killers, Ted Bundy, participated in an interview with Dr. James Dobson shortly before he was executed. In the interview, Bundy explained, “I’ve lived in prison for a long time now. And I’ve met a lot of men who were motivated to commit violence like me. And without exception, every one of them was deeply involved in pornography — without exception, without exception — deeply influenced and consumed by an addiction to pornography.”

Since 1956, the Supreme Court has made clear that the First Amendment does not protect obscene materials. If we know from the perpetrators themselves how obscenity contributes to violence against women and children, what can we do?

We need to fund more studies of the addiction to pornography and its effects on violent behavior. Parents can install filters on any computer used by children and keep the family computer in a central location, not in a child's bedroom or someplace where parents might not regularly see it. We need to demand tougher law enforcement on the state and federal level. The Bush administration is stepping up federal enforcement of obscenity laws. This is a good first step. Contact the U.S. attorney for your district and ask what they are doing to enforce the laws. We need tougher state penalties against both possession and distribution of child porn and passing any kind of pornographic material to kids. Experts indicate that pornography is often used by pedophiles to break down the resistance of child victims. Parents should check out their state’s penalties for child rape and make sure offenders are going to jail and staying there for these offenses. Florida, for example, just passed a tough new law after the tragedy involving Jessica Lunsford, whose killer was a recently released violent offender. We should pass legislation to address the threat to children on the Internet. This includes chat sites, websites, spam, and peer-to-peer networks. Peer-to-Peer networks are of particular concern because they are widely visited by kids and offer porn for free without any age verification.

As Rep. Katherine Harris has pointed out, "Pornography displays human beings as objects, obliterating the wall between an individual's sick fantasies and the compulsion to act upon them. Often, the monsters who hurt women and children start with this malignant desensitizer." We need to all work together to find better ways to protect women and children against this violence.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: amencorner; artorsmut; daniellevandam; mim; needlebutts; porn; violence
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 641-645 next last
To: Publius Valerius

Do not confuse your opposition to the death penalty with Christianity. "An eye for eye" is the biblical prescription.
As far as the death penalty goes, the fight is not between the Christians and non-Christians or the moral vs. the immoral. It's between the coddlers and the justice dispensers.
And DNA has given us powerful new ways of making sure that the guilty can be identified, ending some of the concerns of the past.


221 posted on 05/19/2005 12:57:51 PM PDT by jjmcgo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: cyborg

Or how it eats a hole in your soul!


222 posted on 05/19/2005 12:58:14 PM PDT by TheGunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: jjmcgo
Other than the Internet, U.S. society seems to have found a balance it can live with but the web poses problems never before seen.

I'll add to that cable and satelite TV as well, and you're right, it's causing a lot of people to get their panties in a wad. The reason is access. Historically, you had to either go to the seedy side of town, or maybe deal with mail order companies. Now, with these three methods of delivery (and you could add a forth, with video/dvd porn rentals as well), you can watch porn in the privacy of your own home, and nobody outside of your home knows about it.

And that's what's driving these busybodies nuts! The fact that they can't tell you "No! You can't look at that!"

Mark

223 posted on 05/19/2005 12:58:23 PM PDT by MarkL (I've got a fever, and the only prescription is MORE COWBELL!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Publius Valerius

Actually, regular deep sea fishing is safer than being a cop. It's the very limited Opelio & King crab seasons in AK that are real bad.

BTW, I have never worked on an Alalskan fishing boat of any kind. East coast, yes.


224 posted on 05/19/2005 12:58:26 PM PDT by Fierce Allegiance (This is not your granddaddy's America...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta
You and your fellow theocons are the ones that are stating that pornography causes people to do violent things.

Nice strawman. Where did you get it? I have never said porn causes anything. That's a strawman that the porn pirates erect to beat up so they don't have to respond to the real argument.

225 posted on 05/19/2005 12:58:29 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: TheGunny
I know that all of you God hating "conservatives" or "libertarians" just want to have your fun, but the One in heaven knows whats best for us and that crap aint it.

AMEN TO THAT BROTHA!

226 posted on 05/19/2005 12:58:54 PM PDT by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta

I am not joining the debate, either side. It's too much funn to watch the dogfight.


227 posted on 05/19/2005 12:59:37 PM PDT by Fierce Allegiance (This is not your granddaddy's America...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta

I assume you want your daughter whoring on the tv. At least you're consistent.


228 posted on 05/19/2005 12:59:56 PM PDT by cyborg (Serving fresh, hot Anti-opus since 18 April 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: XR7

I dont get your point???

Its all crap/ not art.


229 posted on 05/19/2005 1:00:14 PM PDT by TheGunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Nice strawman. Where did you get it?

That is the whole point of this thread. If you are not one of the posters that believes that access to pornography encourages people to be sexual predators then I apologize.

230 posted on 05/19/2005 1:00:50 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: jjmcgo
See your hypocrisy? It's okay to publish pictures of women's attributes that make you horny (breasts, pubic hair, butts) but not pictures that might make women horny (erections). With you, it really comes down to my way or the highway, doesn't it?

You're reading too much into what I wrote. I don't look at Playboy. Personally, I think that anyone who needs to look at pictures, videos, etc. to get "horny" is sexually dysfunctional.
231 posted on 05/19/2005 1:00:49 PM PDT by Antoninus (Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini, Hosanna in excelsis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: jjmcgo; MarkL
How does looking at Sharon Stone naked make a person want to do the paperboy?

Actually, research shows that for many men, the more they look at porno, the more problems they have "getting it up" for the real thing.
Something goes haywire in the brain.
This is one of the biggest problems psychologists and family therapists have to deal with.

And if you really think about it, if a guy cannot "get it up" for a real woman, and can only find pleasure in his own hands, he's become homosexual. So, according to much research, the guys defending their use of porno on this thread, if they are "normal," are becoming increasingly impotent and unable to satisfy their wives, as they become more stimulated by a man's hand - their own.

232 posted on 05/19/2005 1:02:07 PM PDT by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: jjmcgo

I'm not going to turn this into a death penalty debate, but it is decidedly un-Christian to take pleasure and glee from the suffering of others, period.

Besides that, I will leave you with a quote from the Sermon on the Mount; you know, pretty much the foundation upon which Christianity rests:

5:38-5:39
Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:
But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.


233 posted on 05/19/2005 1:02:11 PM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: King Prout; ctlpdad
Please: NO profanity, NO personal attacks, NO racism or violence in posts. get it? got it? good.

You might want to tell some of the folks on your side of the argument the same thing...
234 posted on 05/19/2005 1:02:14 PM PDT by Antoninus (Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini, Hosanna in excelsis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

Some folks manage to come to work everyday but ARE addicted to porn. I've seen quite a number of cases where someone's computer keeps crashing and the computer folks find huge amounts of hard-core porn on their work computer. There are others who just have a lot of soft-porn, but it's still what they are into at work.


235 posted on 05/19/2005 1:02:28 PM PDT by Help!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Coke is constantly beaten by Pepsi in blind taste tests. Coke controls it market share through advertising. It presents itself as a hipper product and people in turn want it, even if they actually prefer the taste of Pepsi.


236 posted on 05/19/2005 1:02:56 PM PDT by dpa5923 (Small minds talk about people, normal minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TheGunny

Yeah no kidding.


237 posted on 05/19/2005 1:03:17 PM PDT by cyborg (Serving fresh, hot Anti-opus since 18 April 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
Did I say you had to give up your beloved porn? Don't by all means unless you have an explanation as to how a marriage can be a christian marriage with porn.

Marriage is not the sole province of Christians and imposing christian personal morality is not the province of government.
238 posted on 05/19/2005 1:03:36 PM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
I think that anyone who needs to look at pictures, videos, etc. to get "horny" is sexually dysfunctional.

See #232 above.

239 posted on 05/19/2005 1:03:37 PM PDT by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
I asked if they should be banned.

I gave my response above. I'm in favor of putting the line back to where it was in 1957.
240 posted on 05/19/2005 1:03:54 PM PDT by Antoninus (Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini, Hosanna in excelsis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 641-645 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson