Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dobson Admits Doubt -- Focus Founder Questioning Early Endorsement of Miers
Rocky Mountain News ^ | M.E. Sprengelmeyer

Posted on 10/07/2005 1:34:08 PM PDT by hinterlander

WASHINGTON - An anguished James Dobson prayed Wednesday for a sign from God, telling his Christian radio listeners he was questioning his early endorsement of Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers.

Dobson, founder of Colorado Springs-based Focus on the Family, is one of the most prominent religious conservatives to back Miers, citing his trust in President Bush and a confidential briefing he received about her from the White House.

But in his regular radio broadcast Wednesday, Dobson prayed he was not making a mistake.

"Lord, you know I don't have the wisdom to make this decision," Dobson said. "You know that what I feel now and what I think is right may be dead wrong."

He added that he worried that his position "could do something to hurt the cause of Christ, and I'd rather sacrifice my life than do that."

Dobson's "agonized heart," as he called it, is a sign of continuing turmoil in the religious conservative movement over the selection of Miers, a longtime confidante of Bush who has never been a judge and therefore has no paper trail detailing her views.

Many evangelicals, including Dobson, see the pick to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor as critical because O'Connor was viewed as a swing vote on contentious issues like abortion.

For more than 30 years, Dobson has waged a crusade to overturn the landmark 1973 Roe vs. Wade decision that legalized abortion. He said he believes Miers is against abortion, based on talks with her longtime friends and other information.

He also confirmed reports that he received a special briefing from Bush's political adviser, Karl Rove, but still will not discuss the talks in detail.

"When you know some of the things I know - that I probably shouldn't know - that take me in this direction, you'll know why I've said with fear and trepidation (that) I believe Harriet Miers will be a good justice," Dobson said in a broadcast with co-host John Fuller.

"And John, if I have made a mistake here, I will never forget it. The blood of those babies who will die will be on my hands to a degree. Lord, if I am right, confirm it, and if I am wrong, chastise me and I will repent of it and come before these microphones."

In a press conference Tuesday, Sen. Ken Salazar, D-Denver, demanded that the White House give senators whatever information it gave Dobson.

He's not the only one who wants to know the secret.

Dobson said his phone has been ringing off the hook from congressional allies and fellow conservatives seeking reassurance heading into Miers' upcoming confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Some are wary because Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, a Nevada Democrat, suggested her name to the president, and because of other hints that have emerged from her record.

Although she contributed funds to President Bush's election, she also has given to Democrats, including Al Gore in 1988.

When she ran for Dallas City Council in 1989, she signed a questionnaire for a gay rights group saying she supported equal civil rights for lesbians and gays. But she also said she was not seeking the group's endorsement and that she opposed a repeal of a law banning sodomy.

On Wednesday, conservative columnist George Will said if 100 capable legal analysts each listed 100 people worthy of being nominated, "Miers' name probably would not have appeared in any of the 10,000 places on those lists."

And the Web site of the Dobson- founded Family Research Council showed a question mark alongside Miers' picture.

Meanwhile, some Republican lawmakers were taking a wait-and-see approach to Miers.

"I just don't know her," Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., said Wednesday. "I'm not going to jump out there and say this is a wonderful choice."

Dobson, who heads one of the largest Christian media empires, said he doesn't want to overestimate his own influence, although countless national media outlets already have quoted him as being in Miers' corner.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; court; dobson; fotf; miers; scotus; supreme
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-214 next last
To: safisoft

Dobson is no less a politician than anyone else and fully capable of political waffling.


41 posted on 10/07/2005 2:04:41 PM PDT by RTINSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: RTINSC

"God may be planning a political wind shift.."

Like in 1994, except this time the Republicans will be blown out of their current leadership positions in Congress. That's what happens when your base loses their zeal.


42 posted on 10/07/2005 2:05:35 PM PDT by Cautor (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sam the Sham
Christians don't need to be seen as pushing crony mediocrity.

That is the first thing that I thought of when I heard Dobson, Falwell, and Robertson endorsing Miers. Believers are to be seen as BEYOND reproach - not a hint of favoritism or a respecter of persons (James 2:1-9)
43 posted on 10/07/2005 2:05:50 PM PDT by safisoft (Give me Torah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Cautor

It is at least theoretically possible that Miers PROVES her conservative bonafides BEFORE November 7, 2006 - and therefore ENERGIZE both bases ; )


44 posted on 10/07/2005 2:08:15 PM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: FreeRep

"What we are learning about Harriet Miers is genuinely encouraging."

There is some suggestion Miers was one of those who urged the administration not to aggressively challenge the University of Michigan’s affirmative action policy when Grutter v. Bollinger came before the Court. Of course almost everything I've heard about Miers is speculation. That's all there is in the absence of facts.


45 posted on 10/07/2005 2:08:38 PM PDT by Cautor (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

"What did Bush know and when did he know it? We're about to find out."

That is all privileged and she will decline to answer. That does not make for any better T.V. than Roberts saying he can't discuss cases that might come before the SCOTUS. Wake me when its over.


46 posted on 10/07/2005 2:09:51 PM PDT by Airborne1986 (Well, you can do what you want to us. But we're not going to sit here while you badmouth the U.S.A.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
Oh one of my favorite songs, Sky Pilot,

He blesses the boys as they stand in line
The smell of gun grease and the bayonets they shine
He's there to help them all that he can
To make them feel wanted he's a good holy man
Sky pilot.....sky pilot
How high can you fly
You'll never, never, never reach the sky

He smiles at the young soldiers
Tells them its all right
He knows of their fear in the forthcoming fight
Soon there'll be blood and many will die
Mothers and fathers back home they will cry
Sky pilot.....sky pilot
How high can you fly
You'll never, never, never reach the sky

He mumbles a prayer and it ends with a smile
The order is given
They move down the line
But he's still behind and he'll meditate
But it won't stop the bleeding or ease the hate
As the young men move out into the battle zone
He feels good, with God you're never alone
He feels tired and he lays on his bed
Hopes the men will find courage in the words that he said
Sky pilot.....sky Pilot
How high can you fly

You'll never, never, never reach the sky
You're soldiers of God you must understand
The fate of your country is in your young hands
May God give you strength
Do your job real well
If it all was worth it
Only time it will tell

In the morning they return
With tears in their eyes
The stench of death drifts up to the skies
A soldier so ill looks at the sky pilot
Remembers the words
"Thou shalt not kill"
Sky pilot.....sky pilot
How high can you fly
You never, never, never reach the sky

Some how it upsets them, never could figure out why.

47 posted on 10/07/2005 2:10:07 PM PDT by dts32041 ( Robin Hood, stealing from the government and giving back to tax payer. Where is he today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hinterlander
He also confirmed reports that he received a special briefing from Bush's political adviser, Karl Rove ...

That was indiscreet on Dobson's part. Sheesh.

48 posted on 10/07/2005 2:10:25 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cautor

I heard she listened to a Barbra Streisand record once. She should immediatly withdraw. We can't have this type of person on the SC..


49 posted on 10/07/2005 2:10:32 PM PDT by RTINSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Airborne1986
Exactly. Barring some scandal, Miers is getting on this Court, so we will find out soon enough if she votes to overturn Roe v. Wade or not.
50 posted on 10/07/2005 2:11:06 PM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
Well, John Dean did it to Nixon.
But that's not the point. The point is that Bush has just walked himself into a full blown inquisition about what private legal counsel that he, Cheney, Rove, Libby, etc may have received regarding Plame, Abu Ghraib, Gitmo, 9/11, war in Iraq, Katrina, etc etc etc...

The Democrats are going to milk this for all the Bush-bashing media attention they can. They'll be demanding the documents and the media will join them.

This is the stupidest move to date from the White House.
51 posted on 10/07/2005 2:11:10 PM PDT by counterpunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Callahan

Gas Prices...actually is what will sink Republicans.


52 posted on 10/07/2005 2:12:53 PM PDT by shield (The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

It was "indiscreet" unless Rove said it was O.K. to use his name on the radio broadcast to soothe unfounded fears ; )


53 posted on 10/07/2005 2:12:59 PM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
"It is at least theoretically possible that Miers PROVES her conservative bonafides BEFORE November 7, 2006 - and therefore ENERGIZE both bases ; )"

Indeed, that is a theoretical possibility. I suppose any horse you bet on at the track could win the race, but most people try to go with proven winners to improve the odds. My firm belief is that the surest way for Bush to energize the base would have been to pick a judge with a proven conservative record, then challenge the Dems and RINOs to "bring it on." Now, we're stuck with theoretical possibilities.
54 posted on 10/07/2005 2:13:27 PM PDT by Cautor (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

I respectfully disagree. Not fighting McCain - Feingold campaign finance reform is the stupidest move to date.


55 posted on 10/07/2005 2:14:25 PM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
No one says 100 are needed - 60 would do just fine.

51 is all it takes under the Constitution. Or has that been subverted while the people were distracted by bread and circuses?

56 posted on 10/07/2005 2:14:45 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Airborne1986

Yeah, and the media headlines the next day will be "MIERS REFUSES TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT BUSH CRIMES"


57 posted on 10/07/2005 2:15:01 PM PDT by counterpunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: hinterlander

Holy shiite, it's spreading! Another sexist barking elitist snob moonbat DU troll!


58 posted on 10/07/2005 2:15:24 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cautor

Most people do indeed go with proven winners to improve the odds - that is unless you know the dark horse is a sure thing ; )


59 posted on 10/07/2005 2:15:49 PM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: RTINSC

You are so wrong.


60 posted on 10/07/2005 2:16:11 PM PDT by Guenevere (God bless our military!...and God bless the President of the United States!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-214 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson