Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MSU Professors Link Hunting With Sexual Violence (As Heard on Rush)
Michigan Times ^ | 11/7/2005 | Page W. H. Brousseau IV

Posted on 11/22/2005 10:46:10 AM PST by Pyro7480

MSU professors link hunting with sexual violence
By Page W. H. Brousseau IV

Three female Michigan State University professors studied the magazine "Traditional Bowhunter," and concluded that hunting is a form of sexual violence with animals substituted for women. They describe hunting as, "erotic heterosexual predation, sadomasochism, restraint for aggressive sexual energy, and allied with the abuse of women." I think I need to take up bowhunting.

The article entitled, "Animals, Women and Weapons: Blurred Sexual Boundaries in the Discourse of Sport Hunting" was published by the Society & Animals Forum. The genesis of the article was the 2003 video "Hunting for Bambi," which reached national attention that year when many news-outlets reported a group in Nevada was selling "hunts" which men paid thousands of dollars to shoot naked women with paintball guns. The producers of the DVD later admitted the hunters and women involved were actors. Like in high-budget porn, the star is only an "actor" and really cannot fix the cable.

Concluding that men turn bows and firearms into phallic symbols, the researchers point to terms and jargon found in the magazine in order to reaffirm their belief of displaced sexual drive. "Climax," "big'uns," and "homely cow" are but a few of the many terms with which they took issue. Two things, first, using terms out of context allows anyone to make them sexual. Second, we are talking about hunting, not sex.

The study fails to see the subject matter as merely hunting. The outrageous links between sexual violence and hunting would cause sensible readers to scoff, but remember, the authors are members of MSU faculty, which makes this paper all the more scary.

Apparently, the woman-is-an-animal argument is only valid until the kill. "When alive and being chased in a sport of hunting, animals are given human characteristics...but when dead and displayed as a trophy, anthropomorphism is no longer necessary...and the animal is simply dead." Why anthropomorphism would be necessary in the first place is not explored. Furthermore, why is it not necessary in the second place?

Indeed, their argument is that men are violent creeps who beat up on poor, cuddly animals because there are no women running around the woods. "Violence against animals and women is linked by a theory of 'overlapping but absent referents' that institutionalizes patriarchal values...animals often are the absent referents in actions and phrases that actually are about women-and women often are the absent referents for animals." Therefore, when men are hunting they do so because there are no women present, conversely, when men are with women they are doing so because there are no animals present.

Absent from this study is where the millions of female hunters fit For that is the only logical conclusion of the animal-is-a-woman and woman-is-an-animal thesis. Not far removed from their illation would be to say women obtain sexual gratification from hunting but actually wish they were sexually abusing women, or maybe themselves.

What would an academic study be these days without a conclusion that points to racism? The study encapsulated that hunting is "cultural messages that validate and exacerbate white male dominance and power." The argument of racial oppression and hunting goes out the window because one can only shoot one Black Duck a day as apposed to five of another species.

When read in its entirety, the syllogistic argument takes on the seriousness of a Mad TV skit.

Maybe it is "Traditional Bowhunter" that is laying the groundwork for world takeover. Once again, the paper's authors come through and leave the reader not disappointed. They warn that, "[T]he underlying messages of the sexualizing of women, animals, and weapons in Traditional Bowhunter cannot be dismissed simply as a hoax. They are resilient popular culture images that celebrate and glorify weapons, killing, and violence, laying the groundwork for the perpetuation of attitudes of domination, power, and control.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: academia; banglist; cantgetlaid; comehereoften; donetodeath; feminazi; feminazis; highereducation; hunting; loonyleft; michigan; misandry; moonbat; peta; psychobabble; radicalfeminists; rushlimbaugh; wacko
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-138 next last
To: pgyanke; knews_hound
IT'S TRUE! I only married my wife because all the good elk sheep were taken! /sarc
51 posted on 11/22/2005 11:13:44 AM PST by clamper1797 (A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

Isn't it obvious? They're repressed homosexuals.

Duh....


52 posted on 11/22/2005 11:14:15 AM PST by Alexander Rubin (Octavius - You make my heart glad building thus, as if Rome is to be eternal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480; All

I can't get the link to work. Does anyone these professor's names?


53 posted on 11/22/2005 11:14:20 AM PST by proudofthesouth (Boycotting movies since 1988)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
Three female Michigan State University professors studied the magazine "Traditional Bowhunter," and concluded that hunting is a form of sexual violence with animals substituted for women.

Because they believe that women are animals???

54 posted on 11/22/2005 11:14:51 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

While bowhunting this year, I passed up three female deer that walked right under my stand. A little while later, a male deer walked by and I shot him. That doesn't, uhm..... that doesn't really mean anything does it?


55 posted on 11/22/2005 11:15:33 AM PST by faq (Read "faq" for "Things you may have forgotten about Iraq".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
I'm going to write my dissertation on "Women and Vegetables - Sublimating Castration and other Murderous Impulses"


56 posted on 11/22/2005 11:16:32 AM PST by Fido969 ("And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free" (John 8:32).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: CSM
OMG - if some came to me and told me this was a premise for an article I would have laughed them out of the county.

What a bunch of rot by a bunch of "who'd want'em anyway" feminists.
57 posted on 11/22/2005 11:16:36 AM PST by RikaStrom (The number one rule of the Kama Sutra is that you both be on the same page.../Exeter 051705)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
They picked "Traditional Bowhunter" ?????? sheeesh! from my bow experience,there tend to be more of the 'liberal' type men involved in the traditional end of bow hunting...there's more artsy fartsy stuff...wish I could post some pictures as a reference.

the guy on this website is obviouly a horny closet womyn beater.... http://groups.msn.com/ferretsarcherywebpage/welcome.msnw

58 posted on 11/22/2005 11:17:13 AM PST by Minnesoootan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
The authors:


Linda Kalof e-mail: LKalofVT@aol.com


Amy Fitzgerald


Lori Baralt

All three are members of the Ecological & Cultural Change Studies Group at Michigan State.

59 posted on 11/22/2005 11:17:54 AM PST by Pyro7480 (Sancte Joseph, terror daemonum, ora pro nobis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

They're nuts. Typical feminist college professors trying desperately to further malign men.


60 posted on 11/22/2005 11:18:00 AM PST by TheSpottedOwl ("President Bush, start building that wall"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proudofthesouth

See post #59.


61 posted on 11/22/2005 11:18:47 AM PST by Pyro7480 (Sancte Joseph, terror daemonum, ora pro nobis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: pollyannaish

LOL!


62 posted on 11/22/2005 11:20:53 AM PST by Tulane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #63 Removed by Moderator

To: Pyro7480

now there's three does I'ld pass on....


64 posted on 11/22/2005 11:22:49 AM PST by Minnesoootan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Let me guess, Linda is Amy and Lori's "mentor".


65 posted on 11/22/2005 11:23:14 AM PST by TheSpottedOwl ("President Bush, start building that wall"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Looks like none of them are at risk of male sexual attention.


66 posted on 11/22/2005 11:25:15 AM PST by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

So, like, all that time Elmer Fudd was really kinda, like, lusting after Bugs Bunny? I never realized just how naive I am.


67 posted on 11/22/2005 11:28:02 AM PST by texas_mrs (The left are the enablers of terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #68 Removed by Moderator

To: TheSpottedOwl
"Linda" looks like a typical academia type with those narrow eyes and that stupid cape. I bet she talks in a condescending sing-song voice.
69 posted on 11/22/2005 11:28:30 AM PST by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

It appears that Kalof is "married" to a colleague of hers, a male professor.


70 posted on 11/22/2005 11:28:45 AM PST by Pyro7480 (Sancte Joseph, terror daemonum, ora pro nobis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan


Ooops - still had the other image stuck on my clipboard.

Here is typical activities taken by these folks:

http://www.direct-action.net/news-03-03-raciststate-tempsuspendionofads.html


71 posted on 11/22/2005 11:31:35 AM PST by Fido969 ("And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free" (John 8:32).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: texas_mrs
Where have you been!? See below for an example: ;-)


72 posted on 11/22/2005 11:32:44 AM PST by Pyro7480 (Sancte Joseph, terror daemonum, ora pro nobis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Perhaps they simply misunderstood the articles in the magazine that talked about "mounting" your prey after you killed it?


73 posted on 11/22/2005 11:33:21 AM PST by The Noodle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
Concluding that men turn bows and firearms into phallic symbols, the researchers point to terms and jargon found in the magazine in order to reaffirm their belief of displaced sexual drive.

The research has a flawed source of data. Magazine writers, of any genre`, are known yarn spinners and predisposed to mangling metaphors. Many of us on FR have worked, or played, in areas were there there are popular magazines written on the subject. How many times have we had to laugh at the pure bunk being written about a subject that we know about by some ignorant moron who has nothing more than a journalism degree. The study reflects more about writers attitudes (and insecurities) than it does about hunters.

74 posted on 11/22/2005 11:34:19 AM PST by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

It's true. You can't make it up. I think I get some of my best comedy here on FR. I don't need to watch comedians on television at all. I can laugh all I want right on here - what a bunch of bozos.


75 posted on 11/22/2005 11:34:56 AM PST by Paved Paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Noodle
Perhaps they simply misunderstood the articles in the magazine that talked about "mounting" your prey after you killed it?

LOL!!

Could be.......

76 posted on 11/22/2005 11:37:08 AM PST by Osage Orange (A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way. -M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

"Looks like none of them are at risk of male sexual attention."

I get the idea they would like to be hunted. And who could blame them? Now, I wonder, if I pass on shooting a doe in the woods, would the doe be offended?


77 posted on 11/22/2005 11:38:35 AM PST by Tenacious 1 (Dems: "It can't be done" Reps. "Move, we'll find a way or make a way. It has to be done!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
"concluded that hunting is a form of sexual violence with animals substituted for women."

Overeating has been often questioned as a substitute for lesbian sex. Researchers have never questioned this theory and there is absolutely no reliable evidence that the theory is correct, but we are calling upon the scientific community to conduct a large scale scientific research program to resolve this important question (sarcasm off)
78 posted on 11/22/2005 11:39:26 AM PST by street_lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Thanks for the article post. It is stupid.
[For some reason I can't cut and paste from it...]

They say:"Bowhunting is manly....revealed the typical characteristics of male sexuality: anticipation, desire, pursuit, excitement, climax and satiation."

That sounds more like women on a shopping trip to me. [Except for the satiation part...some never get enough...like shopping nymphos, perhaps?]

These women are loonies.


79 posted on 11/22/2005 11:40:18 AM PST by Adder (Can we bring back stoning again? Please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Rush is even talking about this today.


80 posted on 11/22/2005 11:40:27 AM PST by OB1kNOb (We're gonna boogie oogie woogie til we just can't boogie no more..............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agrace

And I thought it was just because I like venison.


81 posted on 11/22/2005 11:40:58 AM PST by lightingguy (Sorry, I got distracted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

The men I know who hunt are gentlemen. Are these some of MODO's friends or just lesbians? And NO, you can't make this stuff up.


82 posted on 11/22/2005 11:41:32 AM PST by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Oops. I didn't even read all of your title.
I must get Rush on a one hour delay.


83 posted on 11/22/2005 11:41:40 AM PST by OB1kNOb (We're gonna boogie oogie woogie til we just can't boogie no more..............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Are you hunting beaver or are you hunting beaver?


84 posted on 11/22/2005 11:42:43 AM PST by George Smiley (This tagline deliberately targeted journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: x5452
"I maintain that liberals secretly beleive all this weird crap and are using freudian projection to hide their desires."

Yep. I think what's really going on here is this: Feminist professors desire sex with real men, such as bowhunters, rather than with the girly men that they meet on college campuses. After all, it's these professors who are making the link between sex and hunting.
85 posted on 11/22/2005 11:43:47 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
"So if they're right peak season for whorehouses would be hunting season."

No no no, brother you've got it exactly wrong, during hunting season the whorehouses would be closed since everyone would be getting their jollies in the woods with the animals.

There is a lot of proof that animals are a substitute for women, but mostly where AIDS is most prevalent.
86 posted on 11/22/2005 11:45:17 AM PST by street_lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: street_lawyer
Overeating has been often questioned as a substitute for lesbian sex. Researchers have never questioned this theory and there is absolutely no reliable evidence that the theory is correct, but we are calling upon the scientific community to conduct a large scale scientific research program to resolve this important question (sarcasm off)

LOL!!!!

87 posted on 11/22/2005 11:46:20 AM PST by Pyro7480 (Sancte Joseph, terror daemonum, ora pro nobis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
"a kill wasn't necessary, the hunt was successful". Most hunters know the truth of this.

Well said. Your entire anecdote was the best post of the day.

88 posted on 11/22/2005 11:46:43 AM PST by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480; billhilly; Diana in Wisconsin

Clifton Merrit, publisher of Animal People newspaper, believes this also. I once had a long discussion with him where he told me his research proved all the people who hunted as children become killers as adults.

When I questioned his research he told me I wasn't really a journalist, then he slammed the phone in my ear. He, of course, calls himself a journalist.


89 posted on 11/22/2005 11:47:20 AM PST by girlangler (I'd rather be fishing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

bttt


90 posted on 11/22/2005 11:50:14 AM PST by aberaussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stashiu
Yes, the hunters I know are some of the kindest and geniune people on this planet. They worship the ground their wives walk on. They hunt for sport and meat.

The hunting camp is also a male bonding thing. They eat well, drink well, and hunt well, all together. They don't strip naked and beat tom-toms to find their inner male. They don't need to find it, they never lost it to begin with.

Thanks for the Kind words.

91 posted on 11/22/2005 11:52:30 AM PST by Doomonyou (FR doesn't suffer fools lightly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Just heard it. Just the usual we are men we are evil crappola.


92 posted on 11/22/2005 11:54:19 AM PST by commonasdirt (Reading DU so you won't hafta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Well, that and the fact that hunting is good for finding stuff to eat.


93 posted on 11/22/2005 11:56:35 AM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alexander Rubin
Here's the abstract of my paper in response, adopting it from theirs:

The furor and public outrage surrounding numerous non-fictional outdoors entertainment shows in which female animals are privileged over males for survival in the context of hunting and parallel discourses among hunters about preferences for shooting males inspired this paper. Arguing that distressing representations of hunting as a sexually charged activity are resilient popular culture images, this paper examines the theoretical framework that links hunting with dominant culture gynocratic privileges and the overwhelming empirical evidence of such linkages in the hunting discourse of all hutning related newsstand periodicals. Contemporary feminist theory often connects hunting with sex and women with animals. In the quaint parlance of the observed subjects this is "B.S." This paper details clear evidence of the juxtaposition of hunting and images of dead male animals, correlations to the privileging of female animals, and the psychological connection between hunters and their mothers, showing hunting to be a manifestation of oedipal complexes, a displaced trans-spieces violence transferred from abusive fathers to innocent animals, in the quaint parlance of the observed subjects "critters." This is evindenced in the photographs, narratives, and advertisements of almost all hunting magazines ever known. Particularly prominent in the magazines’ hunting discourses are disproportionate numbers of photos of dead male animals, male human inter-conversations about "points" (belying male functional insecurities), and gynocratic narratives about "good stewardship" with "Mother Earth". This paper concludes that moral outrage at the degradation of men and preference of women, especially when represented with children/fawns/cubs, might be targeted best in the courts on equal rights grounds.

94 posted on 11/22/2005 11:56:53 AM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

After seeing what the researchers look like I tend to agree that animal lovers might well be attracted to them when hunting season ends.


95 posted on 11/22/2005 11:58:52 AM PST by street_lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

By the way, doing my duty as my tagline indicates I just looked thru the DUmmie postings and so no mention at all of this story. Usually they are all over anything Rush reports on. Love how they try to avoid anything that automatically makes them look like fools. But then again, they always seem to comment on things and end up looking foolish anyway. There is time, it may turn up yet


96 posted on 11/22/2005 12:03:38 PM PST by commonasdirt (Reading DU so you won't hafta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Mixing Sigmond Freud and crack cocaine.


97 posted on 11/22/2005 12:03:58 PM PST by Mr. Brightside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

I wonder what would happen to a male professor's tenure if his study claiming compusive shopping was linked to a woman being more bitchy.


98 posted on 11/22/2005 12:09:01 PM PST by Mr. Brightside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

You can't make up for the time Rush wastes discussing sex, mistresses, etc. UGH


99 posted on 11/22/2005 12:10:48 PM PST by OldFriend (The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
I'm sure that these idiots have never touched, much less fired a weapon. I'm equally sure that their research consisted more of idle bull sessions in the faculty lounge than of talking to actual hunters.

With *very* few exceptions, all of the hunters that I know are conservative, well-adjusted people that are far more environmentally in-tune than any enviro-wacko that I've met.

Furthermore, the decision to carry and fire a weapon is a tremendous responsibility. I think that these authors would not be up to the task, and are projecting their own inadequacies onto those that they dislike.

100 posted on 11/22/2005 12:17:48 PM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson