Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hundreds of Chemicals Found in (WI)'s Tap Water
Madison.com via AP Wire ^ | December 20, 2005 | John Helprin

Posted on 12/20/2005 12:28:14 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin

WASHINGTON - Drinking water may have a lot more in it than just H20 and fluoride, according to an environmental group's analysis of records in 42 states, including Wisconsin.

A survey by the Environmental Working Group released today found 141 unregulated chemicals and an additional 119 for which the Environmental Protection Agency has set health-based limits. Most common among the chemicals found were disinfection byproducts, nitrates, chloroform, barium, arsenic and copper.

The research and advocacy organization compiled findings from the states that agreed to provide data they collected from 1998 to 2003. That data comes from nearly 40,000 water utilities, serving 231 million people. The utilities were required by federal law to report that data to consumers.

For the unregulated chemicals, the EPA is still identifying and considering the potential risks for possible future regulations. Nineteen of those chemicals exceeded the EPA's unenforced safety guidelines for tap water systems serving at least 10,000 people, according to the advocacy group.

The EPA gathers its own water monitoring data, reviews the latest research and looks at treatment methods and technology, an agency spokeswoman said. States also are free to set their own safety standards for contaminants that may not be detected in other states.

Benjamin Grumbles, who heads the EPA's Office of Water, said that "for the chemicals the agency regulates, nearly 100 percent of the community water systems that provide drinking water to the majority of Americans are meeting clean drinking water standards. We also have a process to continuously identify new contaminants for which regulation could reduce risks."

Jane Houlihan, the EWG's vice president for research, said the group's findings show that the United States allows millions of people to be exposed to some chemicals for which the EPA either has never considered the risks or if it has, has no enforceable limits.

"So in many communities the water that comes out of the tap could be contaminated with scores of chemicals. People shouldn't be alarmed, but they should be concerned. Our system of public health protections isn't working in this case," Houlihan said.

The top 10 states, listed in order of the most contaminants in their drinking water, were: California, Wisconsin, Arizona, Florida, North Carolina, Texas, New York, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Illinois, according to the EWG, which listed the biggest sources as agriculture, industry and urban and sprawl developments.

Tom Curtis, a deputy director of the Denver-based American Water Works Association, echoed Grumbles' comments. "That's good news, and it's a reflection of water professionals' ongoing commitment to protecting public health," he said.

Curtis said the EPA has "a systematic approach to determining which substances should be regulated. Those regulations take into account occurrence data and health effects research, and should reflect the best available science."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: envirowhacko
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
Can EnviroWacko lawsuits be far behind?
1 posted on 12/20/2005 12:28:15 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

mmmm...disinfection byproducts, nitrates, chloroform, barium, arsenic and copper.
More for your money.


2 posted on 12/20/2005 12:31:15 PM PST by Redcitizen (My tagline can beat up your honor tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

There is no such thing as pure water.


3 posted on 12/20/2005 12:32:37 PM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

This explains alot about Wisconsin.


4 posted on 12/20/2005 12:33:04 PM PST by add925 (The Left = Xenophobes in Denial)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
A survey by the Environmental Working Group released today found 141 unregulated chemicals and an additional 119 for which the Environmental Protection Agency has set health-based limits. Most common among the chemicals found were disinfection byproducts, nitrates, chloroform, barium, arsenic and copper.

The state is giving away all those chemicals and not taxing people for them? Someone better get on the stick.

5 posted on 12/20/2005 12:33:46 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
We also have a process to continuously identify new contaminants for which regulation could reduce risks."

We will continually search for new things to regulate and thereby protect our jobs.

6 posted on 12/20/2005 12:33:50 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

What are the concentrations? The poison is in the dosage.


7 posted on 12/20/2005 12:33:54 PM PST by KarlInOhio (What is the most obscene gesture to a Democrat? An Iraqi voter showing him a stained finger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
Milwaukee still has serious clean water problems due to local government ineptitude. I'm one of the 100's of thousands that was infected by cryptosporidiosis thanks to the city's practice of dumping untreated sewage in Lake Michigan then returning the water to my faucet.
8 posted on 12/20/2005 12:34:42 PM PST by GOP_Party_Animal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin; MamaDearest; Velveeta

BumPing

Heard this on WGN at Noon


9 posted on 12/20/2005 12:34:45 PM PST by JustPiper (what news IS news stays silent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
Chemicals!!! Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

Run for your lives!

10 posted on 12/20/2005 12:34:54 PM PST by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

I wonder what ever became of the case of the woman that was pushed into and drowned in a water treatment tank (I think in Jersey), while she was running a test, a few months ago?


11 posted on 12/20/2005 12:35:32 PM PST by polymuser (Losing, like flooding, brings rats to the surface.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
which listed the biggest sources as agriculture, industry and urban and sprawl developments.

So the only thing which isn't a source for contaminants is free-range spotted owl poop.

12 posted on 12/20/2005 12:35:45 PM PST by KarlInOhio (What is the most obscene gesture to a Democrat? An Iraqi voter showing him a stained finger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Goodbye to everyone up there.


13 posted on 12/20/2005 12:36:13 PM PST by bmwcyle (Evolution is a myth -- Libertarians just won't evolve into Conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
This is more a matter of improvements in the apparent sensitivity of chemical analytical instrumentation than it is any change in the quality of water.

Just because you can detect dimethyl chickenwire at 0.0000000000000000000000001 PPB doesn't mean it is going to hurt you.

14 posted on 12/20/2005 12:36:16 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Wow, I was worried, I thought they said Beer had these problems. Most in WI have beer on tap not water so they are safe.


15 posted on 12/20/2005 12:37:22 PM PST by crosslink (Moderates should play in the middle of a busy street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
What are the concentrations? The poison is in the dosage.

Exactly. Talk to me in ppm or ppb or shut your alarmist pieholes.

16 posted on 12/20/2005 12:38:56 PM PST by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: avg_freeper

Support the Ban on Dihydrogen Monoxide.Contact your local state senator today.


17 posted on 12/20/2005 12:39:50 PM PST by Redcitizen (My tagline can beat up your honor tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

F-ing moronic - look hard enough you will find a lot anywhere. We got Uranium atoms in ourselves, for the love-o-pete


18 posted on 12/20/2005 12:40:17 PM PST by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avg_freeper

We should all be drinking that expensive French water. I'm sure it's much safer.


19 posted on 12/20/2005 12:40:22 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
So the only thing which isn't a source for contaminants is free-range spotted owl poop.

I read that as inner-city urban dwellers, i.e. blue-staters. Imagine that.

20 posted on 12/20/2005 12:40:45 PM PST by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson