Posted on 10/09/2006 7:25:37 PM PDT by Coleus
ST. LOUIS, October 6, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) – For the first time, a Catholic bishop in the US has come out with a strong statement clarifying the Church’s teaching on the practice of donating, or sometimes selling, human ova for medical research. Archbishop Raymond Burke of St. Louis, a strong advocate for life and family, has published a pastoral letter in which he says unequivocally that the removal of ova for artificial reproduction, including cloning, is a grave moral evil.
Referring to an upcoming ballot initiative to amend the state constitution, Archbishop Burke warned that the push to create cloned human beings for medical research not only necessarily takes the lives of innocent human beings, but also exploits women in the process. He wrote, “Human cloning requires the harvesting of eggs from women who are exploited to accomplish the purposes of its proponents. As Christians, we must address the immorality of such exploitation.” “The woman who subjects herself to the harvesting of her eggs for human cloning participates in a grave moral evil, the artificial generation of human life.” Burke said.
That the Catholic Church unequivocally condemns all artificial means of reproduction, as well as abortion and contraception, is one of her best-kept secrets. Pro-life advocates have long struggled to bring to light the fact that the source of much of the so-called “stem cell controversy” is that IVF and its related procedures are themselves violations of human dignity. Burke tells his readers that the ballot measure, called Amendment 2, contains deceptive language and although it is presented as a ban on cloning, it actually protects the practice.
“In fact,” says Burke, “it gives the constitutional right to clone human beings.” “Women will be asked to cooperate in the process without the necessary explanation of the moral implications of their cooperation.” Burke says plainly: “The natural moral law prohibits any woman from cooperating in the act of human cloning.”
He warns that the process involved in creating human clones makes not only the clone but the woman into a “commodity” to be bartered in the scientific world. Calling the process “dehumanizing,” Burke says, “The great gift of fertility in a woman, the natural production of the human egg for reproduction, now becomes an object for manipulation by those who promote human cloning.” "A woman’s cooperation in the twin evils of human cloning and the destruction of human embryos for the sake of the harvesting of stem cells is never justified.”
The Archbishop calls on his readers to consider “the grave moral crisis for our state and nation, which Amendment 2 represents, please give reflection to the moral and physical exploitation of women involved in human cloning for embryonic stem-cell research.”
Read the full text of Archbishop Burke’s letter:
http://www.stlouisreview.com/abpcolumn.php?abpid=11552
Read related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:
Barely Studied Risks of Egg-Donation Come Under Scrutiny
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/aug/06081106.html
I am not Catholic, but I understand and appreciate the consistency of this argument.
Ain't nuthin like the real thing baby
Ain't nuthin like the real thing
Interesting
I'm not either, but I totally agree with the good Bishop.
Every time man invents some new technique or science, we figure out some way to abuse it.
While I'm leery of the cloning, I can't agree with opposing IVF. Without it, I wouldn't have six nieces and nephews.
Living in a cave can't be all that romantic, can it?
It's quite possible you had many more than that, but that they were left to die in a glass dish because they were not needed.
Without out-of-wedlock babies I probably would not have a few nieces and nephews. My love for these kids (and their parents) does not make what their parents did right.
Later pingout.
As is artificial contraceiption.
I am sick of people announcing that they have a right to have a baby. No you don't. You do not have a right to another human being. But it is this mentality that leads to this slippery slope.
That really wasn't my point.
I'm not against progress. It would be nice if progress came without moral dilemmas. It doesn't. And unless we have a bedrock of faith to support our beliefs, we may very well wind up wishing we were still in that cave.
"I am sick of people announcing that they have a right to have a baby. No you don't. "
And you have no right to stop someone from having a baby by any means they can if that is their wish.
It's quite possible you had many more than that, but that they were left to die in a glass dish because they were not needed.
So.... You're volunteering to tell the six nieces and nephews that they shouldn't exist?
So you're giving up technology as a protest of it's abuse? Or are you trying minimize the abuse and maximize the good results?
So... you mean the state can step in and force an abortion if they decide you shouldn't have a baby?
So my little boy shouldn't exist, since we had difficulty conceiving? I hope nobody says that to my face - not if they enjoy the current configuration of their face.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.