Skip to comments.
Foley's Fall Spotlights Growing 'Velvet Mafia' Influence in GOP
Agape Press ^
| 10/9/6
| Fred Jackson and Bill Fancher
Posted on 10/10/2006 7:34:47 AM PDT by ZGuy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
1
posted on
10/10/2006 7:34:48 AM PDT
by
ZGuy
To: ZGuy
The G.O.P. has feet of clay.
2
posted on
10/10/2006 7:40:06 AM PDT
by
jla
To: ZGuy
So long as the PC-crap continues, afraid of offending the faggots and dykes is ruining the Republican Party, simply through the fear of Judicial Activist judges ruling in favor of the deviates as a 14th Amendment contortion.
Get the queers back behind closed doors, and the fear of discrimination lawsuits and activist rulings will be removed.
The standard "discrimination" claims is old hat; there must be discrimination (in the true sense of the word) to allow common sense folks to choose between right and wrong, and allow for society to establish MORAL principles, without legal intervention to forward deviant wishes....
To: ZGuy
The Republican party should go to school on what the "Lavender Mafia" has done to the Catholic church if it wants to avoid a similar disaster:
http://www.riteofsodomy.com
4
posted on
10/10/2006 7:41:05 AM PDT
by
Ozone34
To: jla
There more I hear about this, the less I like Republicans. I would expect homo's to be running the show if Demo's were in charge, but not Rep's....but that is apparently what is happening. I know it is turning off a lot of social conservatives.
5
posted on
10/10/2006 7:42:38 AM PDT
by
yellowdoghunter
(Vote out the RINO's. Volunteer to help get Conservatives elected!)
To: ZGuy
You never hear Rush or Hannity talk about the homosexual influence in society and especially the schools. Which in my opinion is the greatest threat to America.
6
posted on
10/10/2006 7:44:22 AM PDT
by
stevio
(Red-Blooded Crunchy Con American Male (NRA))
To: stevio
Are you series? You think that gays in schools are the biggest threat to America, not China or terrorists...
7
posted on
10/10/2006 7:48:06 AM PDT
by
Alter Kaker
("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
To: ZGuy
Ah but Nancy Peolsi knew the children were not being protected. (Right now it is difficult to properly identify who exactly their children are.) So how come she is taking a pass on her responsibility?
Nancy in her lust for power did far more to expose their homosexual agenda than Foley and his chatty soliciting sex friends did. Their hope for assault in all their sex talk deluge did not leave unnoticed what must be common in their own party.
To: stevio
The same was true of the Catholic priests'scandal.The Catholic bishops in particular went out of their way to avoid the use of the word homosexual.This was done even though the vast majoity of the priest-predators were documented to be homosexuals.
9
posted on
10/10/2006 7:52:02 AM PDT
by
ardara
To: ZGuy
"There's clearly an effort here to make this somehow a pedophile issue or something that's separate from the homosexual issue," he asserts, "and, of course, this is right up the homosexual alley."Must
not
make
joke...
10
posted on
10/10/2006 7:52:02 AM PDT
by
Disambiguator
(If the Democrats were a stock, I would short them.)
To: ZGuy
Sssshhhh, can't say anything truthful about gays on FR, the homoFRobe police will try to bust you for thought crimes.
How many times have people on FR said "this has nothing to do with Foley being gay"? And denied that he is a sexual predator? And said they'd vote for him again if they could? LOTS of people have already bought into the gay agenda -- oops, ssshhh, there's no such thing!
11
posted on
10/10/2006 7:54:44 AM PDT
by
JohnnyZ
("I respect and will protect a woman's right to choose" -- Mitt Romney, April 2002)
To: yellowdoghunter; All
That is the point of such fluff stories.
This is all about people with their own agenda to depress the turnout.
There are suicidal conservatives who actually want democrats to win so they can reconsolodate their power because they are only one voice in the chorus of a majority. (they rather be a big fish in a little pond)
There are also the MSM pushing the depress the turn out strategy.
The bottom line is that Republicans FIRE homosexuals.
Vote in November,
Get your friends to vote in November.
Piss off the Dinosaur media VOTE!
12
posted on
10/10/2006 7:56:01 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: ZGuy
Meanwhile, one pro-family activist is calling for more openness about another aspect of the scandal. Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth believes the media have taken great pains to avoid using the words "homosexual" or "gay" in coverage of the Foley scandal. "There's clearly an effort here to make this somehow a pedophile issue or something that's separate from the homosexual issue," he asserts, "and, of course, this is right up the homosexual alley."This is what the Old Media did with the Catholic homosexual priests scandal also. You would never know that over 85% of the alleged molestation was by male priests molesting teenage boys.
To: Just mythoughts
HASSERT JUST SAID EVERYONE WILL BE REQUIRED TO TESTIFY UNDER OATH!
This has to include PELOSI!!
If she lawyers up then she has "concerns"!
14
posted on
10/10/2006 7:58:43 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: ardara
"The same was true of the Catholic priests'scandal.The Catholic bishops in particular went out of their way to avoid the use of the word homosexual.This was done even though the vast majoity of the priest-predators were documented to be homosexuals."
The best estimates that I have seen are that roughly 70% of the U.S. bishops are homosexual. The saga goes at least as far back as the turn of 20th Century with Cardinal O'Connell in Boston.
15
posted on
10/10/2006 7:59:56 AM PDT
by
Ozone34
To: jla
Homosexuality is not a political problem, it is a moral problem that represents a general decline in the nation's morality.
The Party is only going to reflect that same morality.
16
posted on
10/10/2006 8:02:30 AM PDT
by
fortheDeclaration
(Am I therefore become your enemy because I tell you the truth? (Gal.4:16))
To: ZGuy
This is the most truthful article I've seen yet on this whole mess. Nail hit head. I also have been disturbed by Rush and others freepers using terms of the left like "gay bashing". Then these same people will say we are inching to liberalism. Well, they are f*cking helping it get there!
To: ZGuy
Sad to say it but..... the facts are that the "Tolerance" that turns persons aside from their gut feeling, is a culprit. I feel fairly sure that the political correctness of "tolerance" may have forced GOOD MEN to ignore their inner conscience.
The British secret service and other agencies were infiltrated by the homosexual. The West almost lost the cold war because of the almost universal treason by homosexuals. The excuse has been used that the Russians were able to blackmail them. That was not the entire excuse by a long shot. Something in many of the homosexuals make up, seems to bring about a flaunting of the rules. A point is in the so-called "gay parades". Could such an individual obscenely flamboyant, be trusted?
Fifty years ago, the conservatives would have known - put a homosexual in a position of trust and power, WITHOUT CLOSE SCRUTINY at one's peril.
Hopefully the Foley affair has a shelf life. The opposition may have "peaked too soon". (I pray).
To: ZGuy
I caught O'Reilly last eve interviewing the guy who outed Foley. I don't recall his name but he said he's going to "out" a number of other Republicans in the next week or so... no Dems though... only 'Pubs because "they are being hypocrites and living a lie."
19
posted on
10/10/2006 8:11:42 AM PDT
by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: ardara
" The same was true of the Catholic priests'scandal.The Catholic bishops in particular went out of their way to avoid the use of the word homosexual.This was done even though the vast majority of the priest-predators were documented to be homosexuals."
You step on a hornet's nest here on FR when you bring up Catholic Church pedophilia, but logic explains perfectly why so many homosexual men entered the priesthood. The church was the ultimate closet. The celibacy requirement fell right into the hands of gays, because in the broad public, it was seen as sex between men and women. Since the Homosexual Priests were not interested in women in the first place, they could practice their sexual preferences in the church, enjoy vast respect, and not have to cover their trails.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson