Now, someone explain to me why this isn't treason?
Because the actions were committed by a Kennedy, and a Kennedy cannot commit a crime, by definition.
Now, someone explain to me why this isn't treason?
____
Democrats get a pass on everything.
Because it's a Demorat, and we can't question his patriotism?
(Actually, I don't question his patriotism - there's none to question.)
If somone can expalin it, share it with me. I don't understand either...
"Now, someone explain to me why this isn't treason?"
I guess for the same reason Kerry meeting with the communists in Paris in an effort to undermine our war effort wasn't. Isn't admitting to doing so, while still a uniformed Officer, considered treason? Heck Kennedy should be sharing a jail cell with Scot Camil....oh, &*((*&, lol, don't get me started....this deja vu can eatcha alive. Should have taken care of all of these people long ago, instead they're Senators getting paid for being traitors!
Which is exactly the problem, isn't it Mr. Romerstein?
Sen. Kennedy was ready, willing and able to subordinate the interests of the United States to his own. No matter how wrong-headed Peanut Man was, that was no excuse for "collaborating" with the enemy of the USA.
I'll grant that Sen. Kennedy's intentions were not to betray his country...probably. But must we invent a new category of crime specifically for these kinds of liberal actions?:
"Now, someone explain to me why this isn't treason?"
We've got members of congress who are members of thes communist party in the U,S. How's he going to be charged with treason?
Because he's a Democrat.
It is to anyone who isn't named Kennedy.. if you are named Kennedy its called "reaching out to the disaffected".
There is no statute of limitations on treason, so charges could,and should, be brought against the Chappaquiddick swim champ.
Because Communists and Kennedys are on the same team as the Stone Age Press.
Pray for W and Our Troops