Posted on 04/26/2007 7:00:58 AM PDT by NCDragon
Nuts in the Crosshairs by Ann Coulter (More by this author)
Posted: 04/25/2007 For cranky right-wingers who think politicians don't listen to them, this week I give you elected Democrats running like scared schoolgirls from the media's demand that they enact new gun control laws in response to the Virginia Tech shooting.
Instead, Democrats are promoting a mental health exception to the right to bear arms. We've banned mass murder and that hasn't seemed to work. So now we're going to ban mass murderers. Yes, that will do the trick!
This is a feel-good measure that is both wildly under-inclusive (the vast majority of nutcases receive no formal court adjudication of their nuttiness) and wildly over-inclusive (the vast majority of nuts don't kill people.) The worst thing most nuts do is irritate everybody else by driving their electric cars on the highway.
As lovely as it would be, we cannot identify mass murderers before they have broken any law, and mass murder is often the first serious crime they commit. No one can be locked up permanently for being potentially dangerous.
Even stalking laws can put away a person known to be dangerous for only a few years -- at best -- which is generally not worth spending a day sitting in court, facing your stalker, and then waiting a month for the court order.
So on one hand, the mental health exception is a feel-good measure that would be largely pointless. But on the other hand, it's no skin off my back. Liberals go to therapy. Conservatives go to church. And I think we'd all sleep better knowing that David Brock could not buy a gun.
In fact, I think we should expand the mental illness exception to cover First Amendment rights as well as Second Amendment rights.
I note that before mass murder, the only harassment the Virginia Tech killer was guilty of involved speech: creepy e-mails, creepy short stories, creepy phone calls. Stalkers, too, engage in frightening speech -- but that is protected. Revealing a stalking victim's address is "speech" but is little different from being the one to pull the trigger.
This small measure would have taken Dan "What's the Frequency, Kenneth" Rather off the airwaves years ago, preventing him from presenting doctored National Guard documents to the American people to try to throw a presidential election. A mental illness bar would deal a quick blow to Air America and both its remaining listeners. It would also free up about 90% of the Internet.
And it would end the public lunacy of Jim Wallis, the Democrats' Christian. Wallis' first remark on the massacre at Virginia Tech last week was to hail the remarkable "diversity" of the victims. True, Cho murdered 32 people in cold blood. But at least he achieved diversity!
Anyone who thinks a single-minded fixation on diversity must be the ultimate goal of every human endeavor, including mass murder, is not the sort of person who should be able to buy a gun or to publish his daft ruminations in public forums.
But just to get this straight: Democrats are saying we should be able to jail "strange" or "angry" people, but we can't deplane imams who demand extra-length seatbelts after boarding?
Speaking of which, has anyone else noticed the public expressions of shame and contrition from the Korean-American community after the Virginia Tech shooting? Of course, no one blames this exemplary community for the actions of one nut. The Koreans are manifestly law-abiding and decent -- nipping at the heels of Italians as the greatest Americans and tied for second with the Cubans.
Indeed, I believe this marks the first time a Korean has killed anyone in the United States, not involving an automobile. Nonetheless, Korean congregations, community groups and the family members themselves are issuing statements of sorrow. Not "pleas for tolerance." But sorrow. Remorse. Remember those? They were big back in the day.
If the Koreans can do it, why can't the Muslims? What explains the lack of a Muslim guilt impulse -- so normal, as seen in the case of the saddened Koreans -- after dozens of terrorist attacks on Americans?
How about a Muslim exception to the Second Amendment? That would have prevented the Virginia snipers from killing 10 people within three weeks in 2002. But most important: It would help us achieve "diversity" in our gun law prohibitions.
Ann Coulter is Legal Affairs Correspondent for HUMAN EVENTS and author of "High Crimes and Misdemeanors," "Slander," ""How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must)," and most recently, "Godless."
She scares me now.
” No one can be locked up permanently for being potentially dangerous. “
Don’t look for this to be a ‘true statement’ for very long...
There’s a vast clamor (even among putative ‘conservatives’) for crime *prevention*, and the only way to achieve this with any credibility would be to criminalize the *potential* to cause harm.
In other words, we’re all criminals, now.....
I love it. Thanks.
“We’ve banned mass murder and that hasn’t seemed to work. So now we’re going to ban mass murderers. Yes, that will do the trick!”
I can’t wait to use that line in the teachers lounge today!
See “Minority Report” movie...
Bingo! She's hit the nail on the head. Muslims do NOT feel remorse at the death of a non-Muslim. To them, it's simply one less they have to kill tomorrow. We hear about "moderate" Muslims, but we never hear from "moderate" Muslims. Personally, I think that's because there aren't any. They want you and me dead...period.
LOL! I love that woman.
Yep, this could get serious. Molon Labe.
Exactly. All very well to make fun of it, but the last thing in the world we need is a left wing law allowing judges and prosecutors to lock up certified crazies.
Who will do the certifying? As Ann jokingly points out, “Liberals go to therapy. Conservatives go to church.” Which is to say, liberals will make the rules, at their own whims.
There is a precedent for this. During the years of totalitarian rule in the USSR, political prisoners were often put away on grounds that they were mentally ill. In fact, history reveals that this has often been done in the past, by anyone who has the power and the determination to impose their politics by fiat. Which is a pretty good definition of your average leftist.
We already have judges sitting on benches all over the country who are eager to kill babies. These same judges will be just as eager to put away “right wing fanatics.”
” See “Minority Report” movie... “
Don’t need a movie - just need to look around..
DWI laws criminalize the ‘potential’ to cause harm....
(Q: If you take two drinks and drive yourself home - which is now a criminal act - what are the odds of your being involved in an accident? A: Negligible)
Smoking indoors is illegal because of the ‘potential’ (and unprovable) harm ......
Look around, I’m sure you’ll find a plethora of examples on your own.....
“The most dangerous sentence in the English language: ‘There oughtta be a law’ “
OUCH! 8-)
Got to love Ms. Coulter.
Show em what a pair can do for ya!!!!!!!
A woman in Texas catches her husband in bed with another woman. She goes into her closet and grabs her Winchester rifle.
As her husband stands at the foot of the bed, naked and pleading, she raises the rifle and carefully takes aim at her husbands crotch.
"You've betrayed me for the last time Earl. I'm a gonna turn a bull into a steer with one shot!"
"Please Mabel! Gimme one more chance!"
Raising her eye from the gun sight to meet his gaze she says, "Alright then...Set 'em a swingin'!"
I thought this was going to be an article about squirrel hunting.
Generally speaking, I have always had similar concerns as are expressed in this article about the WOT. How do you know which people are terrorists? There are two outcomes from this: 1) the terrorists get the drop every time because we have to wait until they act to take them out. 2) Unfortunately, anyone of any race or creed can become a jihadi muslim, so some innocents will be identified as and treated as terrorists.
yea, I had to think long and hard before I decided to check out this story.......
Why can’t Democrats do it? They have a lot to apologize for allowing their nuts to lead the party and slander our soldiers and our country while providing open defense of the enemy. They are just as complicit as any Muslim.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.