Bush is the Ring Leader of Plot to Grant Amnesty

American Chronicle ^ | May 26, 2007 | Tony Dolz

[MrsEmmaPeel]

Do you understand what "The Rule of Law" is?

Yeah -- right -- like that disastrous Kelo vs New London decision by the Supremes that effectively overruled a 200+ year law embodied by the Constitution.

What rule of law? We have no rule of law. We have passion of the moment where the loudest voice wins.

[Do Be]

I, for one, an not given to panic or over reacting to the present situation. We are not powerless to address the situation, as some seem to be saying. We need to press Congress to reject any immigration reform until border security is acheived and sustainable. Then let’s discuss each point of immigration reform and see what can be worked out. I can tell you this, the likelyhood of every single illegal alien being booted out of the country isn’t realistic at all. It would be nice to be sure, but the logistics would be a nighmare. Instead, a great way to address the problem is to turn the heat up, way way up, on employers who hire illegals. Once the job marked for these guys dries up a bit, the flow of illegals into the US will slack off considerably Okay, so we pretty much agree.

Secure the borders, enforce the current laws.

. Do what works. What's important is preserving the future for our children

If this is not what you are saying, forgive me for giving you the benefit of the doubt.

And thanks for the answer. You sound like a great guy who has yet to discover that he is being betrayed.

God bless you and yours.

[hedgetrimmer]

Then let’s discuss each point of immigration reform and see what can be worked out.

The only thing that needs 'reforming' is Kennedy's immigration act. It needs to be revoked pronto.

[Do Be]

You sound a little crazy. I understand that, I'm a little crazy these days myself. Actually, I'm a lot crazy.

I can tell that you are intelligent enough to know that I was saying this country was founded upon the rule of law and it is the corruption of this which will lead to its destruction.

Instead you rant about Kelo vs New London as if it were important and everyone knew everything about it down to its finest nuance and, of course, was thus in agreement with you.

Are you black? Blacks reason thus alot.

Or are you just distraught? Consumed by the fire of injustice about that which is dear to your heart.

Send me your picture. If you are beautiful, I want you to have my baby.

If you are one of those homely girls that try to find fulfillment through hatred and discord, please understand that I love you anyway but don't want to spend any more time in your sphere.

I think the subject here was Bush and amnesty and the traitorous things which are becoming the norm. Would you care to join in?

[GLH3IL]

There is a huge diffference between the (R)’s and the (D)’s when it comes to combating terrorism...and while that is one single thread, it is a substantial one that must be given due regard. The Dims (and Ron Paul) would have us tuck tail and run from our enemies. Yes, things could be much worse for us, and for our children with the Dims running things....

[Tennessee Nana]

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

How many calls did you get, Diane, that were FOR Amnesty?

Huh?.......Hmmmmmmm?

[COgamer]

“they could be a plurality here in less than a generation”

Sadly, I have come to believe this is almost an inevitability. I live in Colorado, nowhere near the Mexican border, but at the mall near my house about 50% or more of the shoppers are Latin, and a good chunk of those don’t speak English. Tancredo isn’t so strongly against immigration without reason - if it’s happening here, how much more is it happening elsewhere?

Bush has already demonstrated he’s not going to do anything about this. If he won’t who will? Can we force him? Would maybe a real threat of actual impeachment for failure to enforce his oath of office move him to action? Would a President Cheney enforce our immigration laws?

I have a bad feeling about where this is going. I know a good amount of Spanish, and with many jobs already desiring (aka requiring) bilingual applicants, I think everything we’ve seen up til now (press 1 for English) is but a pale shadow of what’s coming.

[wardaddy]

this administration will do nothing but help the illegals given the chance

Bush has used plenty of mouthpieces in his hire to talk his worldview

I doubt Cheney would be any better

all we can hope for is to stave off the Dems and Bush till 11/08

now that is a helluva place for us to have to be isn’t it?

i will never forgive him or his ilk

i have threads here with pics of me marching for Bush...over and over

i feel like so much used chump

i will be very wary of anyone next time

[sand88]

because from what I read, they aren’t in the shadows, American citizens are complaining that they’re urinating and defecating in broad daylight on public streets and private property from San Diego to NY.

The only thing in the shadow is our Constitution. Congress and the President are violating the Constitution and the precepts that created this once great Republic. I look out my window at work and see 30 illegals stroll by with the babies in strollers. I go to the local Home Depot or Lowes in the morning and there are hundreds of them standing outside. ALL that we loved our the American way of life is literally being destroyed because our leaders betray our Constitution and sell us out for the false notion of cheap labor. I have made my calls and wrote my senators. I guess we can always hope for a 5 mile meteor to reset everything. I have never been this upset and depressed over my governments action.

[sand88]

The only thing that needs 'reforming' is Kennedy's immigration act. It needs to be revoked pronto.

your posts on this thread have been excellent. Bush and Congress are about to set in motion the utter destruction of our way of life. That is not hyperbole, but an almost certain outcome. I am surprised at how many Americans still don't understand or are even aware of the severity of about the treasonous acts our government is about to commit.

Something that would get the nations attention would be for Rush to start off his program by telling the American people that Bush and most of Congress should resign over this immigration fiasco. I doubt the MSM would even give Rush airtime.. They want this "Destroy American Way of Life Bill" passed too.

[MrsEmmaPeel]

Good grief, you sound drunk.

[MrsEmmaPeel]

There is a huge difference between the (R)’s and the (D)’s when it comes to combating terrorism

I grant you military tactics are totally different - but here's where I have a problem -- we go off to Afghanistan, Iraq with an excellent military, but then leave the immigration door wide open for anyone to come in. It makes no sense to me.

[gracesdad]

And to think there are still Freepers claiming Bush will go down as one of the greatest presidents ever. I don’t think he’ll rank even as average.

[FredHunter08]

“He’s doing no such thing. He’s wrong to be sure, but being wrong about something is NOT akin to violating his oath of office. “

Actually, this isn’t true. There are two major oath violations. The first, was signing a bill into law he KNEW to be unconstitutional - CFR. The second was violating the part about “he shall see that the laws are enforced”.

“Shall” is a command. The President gives our money freely around the world, something he is not supposed to have the power to do, but he ignores the REQUIREMENT that he enforce the laws on the books to the BEST OF HIS ABILITY.

[FredHunter08]

“Bush’s performance on the over all War on Terrorism issue since then has been nothing short of brilliant.”

That’s an interesting viewpoint. He’s been fighting it, at best, as a holding action, and at worst, a nation-building exercise he promised he wouldn’t do in 2000.

Oh, and it’s not a “War on Terrorism”, but a war with Islam.

[FredHunter08]

“The Dims (and Ron Paul) would have us tuck tail and run from our enemies”

The White House wants to invite them here and give them visas.

[Guenevere]

A lot of us are feeling like “used chump” nowadays, wardaddy.

[Wolverine]

[GLH3IL]

CFR has passed court review has it not? I’m not saying i like support CFR in anyway, if if it was so glaringly unconstitutional I would have been a no brainer for the courts to shut down. That didn’t happen, so what you have is a difference of opinion, not a violation of the oath of office.

“The President gives our money freely around the world, something he is not supposed to have the power to do...”

The president doesn’t shuffle one penny anywhere unless Congress authorizes the money to be spent...did you just miss the whole debate about funding for our troops?

“...the REQUIREMENT that he enforce the laws on the books to the BEST OF HIS ABILITY.”

Ok. What laws are not being enforced? Why do you think they are not being enforced? How much of the our money do you think should be allocated to enforce, without respite, all the federal laws that are on the books? How is Bush supposed to accomplish this task when it’s well know that the entrenched bureaucracy in all the various executive departments have libs embedded that constantly work againt any conservative agenda. If you feel as you do whay don’t you encourage a vote for impeachment? Reagan made similar mistakes with immigration, shouldn’t, by your standards, he have been subject to impeachment? What about Bush Sr? Isn’t it true that every POTUS in the history of our nation could be accused of not enforcing all of the laws to the best of their ability?

I know you are not happy with Bush’s performance, neither am I based upon recent history. However it is nonsense to suggest that he is violated his oath of office...sheer, unadulterated nonsense. Get your head out of the clouds and focus on reality,this kind of hateful rhetoric is exactly the kind of thing the Dims want to see from us. WE are not liberals....we do not act like a pack of rabid wild dogs...keep your head, keep your common sense, and let’s work FOR something rather than trying to destroy.

[FredHunter08]

“CFR has passed court review has it not?”

That doesn’t mean it isn’t unconstitutional.

“I’m not saying i like support CFR in anyway, if if it was so glaringly unconstitutional I would have been a no brainer for the courts to shut down. “

Have you been paying attention to the USSC for the past 40 years or so?

“That didn’t happen, so what you have is a difference of opinion, not a violation of the oath of office.”

He STATED it was unconstitutional and signed it anyway. All branches are required to protect and defend the Constitution.

“What laws are not being enforced? Why do you think they are not being enforced?”

You’ve really got to be kidding.

” Reagan made similar mistakes with immigration, shouldn’t, by your standards, he have been subject to impeachment?”

Reagan’s mistake at least was called what it was AND required enforcement. What does one call someone who is unable or unwilling to learn from our past mistakes?

“. However it is nonsense to suggest that he is violated his oath of office...sheer, unadulterated nonsense. “

I wish it was. Unfortunately, it isn’t.

“”Get your head out of the clouds and focus on reality,this kind of hateful rhetoric is exactly the kind of thing the Dims want to see from us.””

Hateful rhetoric like that coming from the Administration, you mean.

“WE are not liberals....we do not act like a pack of rabid wild dogs...keep your head, keep your common sense, and let’s work FOR something rather than trying to destroy.”

George W. Bush IS a liberal, therefore working against him on his terrible domestic policy is working FOR something. I will not be silent while this man destroys the country.