Posted on 08/04/2007 12:03:42 PM PDT by Altura Ct.
This is just a partial copy that I was able to get off of another site as Mr Bisbort has removed the original because it "violated the terms and conditions of the blog" not because it was vile or full of bigotry or the fact he is getting slammed in the comments section. He also is not inclined to apologize. Can you imagine a similar thing being said of a non Caucasian or non Christian woman? One other thing to note he rails about taxpayer money for education. The Duggars home school their children.
TOO MANY PEOPLE
Michelle Duggar of Rogers, Arkansas is a bitch in heat. Literally. She just gave birth to her 17th puppy, er, child. The tone of the Associated Press story that accompanied this horrifying news was one of celebration. I mean, my gosh, 17 children! In a world bursting at the seams with more than 6 billion of us! This is nothing to celebrate. This is something to curse. For one, the taxpayers of Rogers, Arkansas must be up in arms. They have to foot the bills for all these kids’ educations, the public services to water them and wash their shit, piss and puke away, the roads to carry their trucks and SUVs, the public welfare to support them when they falter. And just imagine how much the neighbors on either side of them just love the Duggars!
Egads. Idon’t understand the tolerance that we have for this as a society. For God’s sake, will someone tell Mr. Duggar (who is, of course, named Jim Bob) to get fixed and/or Mrs. Duggar to get spayed?
Are you ready for more nausea? Get this: The entire brood of Duggar pups live in a 7,000 square foot home, and every single one of the puppies’ names starts with “J”. Among the "fun facts" listed on Discovery Health's Web page devoted to the Duggars: the Duggars have gone through an estimated 90,000 diapers, and Mrs. Duggar—aka Queen Bitch—has been pregnant for 126 months — or 10.5 years — of her adult life.
Why is this story treated as something other than what it is: grotesque and freakish?
It is amazing how in denial we all are about human overpopulation. Put simply (and we all know it, but won’t say it out loud): There are too many fucking people. There are too many people fucking, and not using contraception.
As my friend Parke says, “Instead of being celebrated, their profligate procreation should be decried and mandatory sterilization imposed immediately upon these crazy people. I propose: a progressive federal tax on children beyond the second one per couple. Or at least eliminating tax deductions for them.The single most important issue of our time is the one no one talks about: overpopulation. You would think it's a four-letter word from the way that politicians of all stripes avoid it.”
17 is very impressive. I’d like to see her have a few more just for the novelty of it. And why not? When you got 17 rugrats, what’s a couple more? I’ve never heard of any woman having more than 15. All I can say is WOW! I’m impressed. Seventeen kids and they are actually all cared for. It’s amazing. I have no kids. I should send them a letter asking them to have one more as a favor to me to make up for me having none.
Just another @$$hole who can’t get over the fact that Paul Erlich was wrong, is wrong, and will continue to be wrong.
It is always a productive strategy to read liberals/leftists with a critical mind, understanding that they idealize "the pee-pul" in the abstract, but in reality hate "the masses." Just one more illustration of how anti-human the left really is.
I think they can support themselves fairly well - if companies want to donate for publicity more power to them. That’s marketing at work.
When they built their house I think they intended to furnish it themselves. I know TLC arranged to give them some furnishings, but I don’t have a problem with that as long as they aren’t accepting government help.
Another liberal celebrates freedom of choice. </sarc>
Once the global warming thing works no longer...this is the next great leftist cause to turn into a demagogic furor.
Just lovely, they'll become millions and millions of little Kervorkians...without even his standards of morality (meaning they'll want to kill everyone who thinks different than they are).
Leftist iconoclasts define themselves with every word that comes from their mouths.
My "unbalanced" response as you call it was in regard to the typical leftist hypocritical positions particularly on all things Christian and white.
I think your view that we need to run a competition between native and nonnative breeders to see who can increase the population most rapidly is a, I believe futile, recipe for disaster.
Competition? Where did I say that? it is an ASSumption on your part.
They keep track of all the kids by actually teaching and demanding all their children learn and accept responsibility.
That's because all of us suckers pay a truckload of taxes to support them.
There was an article on Drudge last week about Russia, oops, the Soviet Union, and their massive summer camps for children where they indoctrinated them into obedience to the state and ENCOURAGED them to have babies for the state. They even had tents set up there, minus condoms, to experiment with “pro-creation”. Sorry, don’t have the source.
The hatred for life is what it is. I wouldn’t expect anything less from those whose religion is infanticide through diabolical procedures resulting in abortion, the tearing apart of a baby in utero, or the murder of the baby while it is only just barely in the birth canal. Evil is as Evil does.
These people are obviously supporting their many children without dependency on the state. If they weren’t, then I’d have a real problem with it.
I propose that anyone that believes there are too many people should start the solution at home. Take out the guy in the mirror. Then there's one less problem in the world.
Sure, my family were all farmers, and needed a lot of extra help. The kids went to work as soon as they could walk. I think that’s one of the problems we have today— kids running around with no jobs. (those pesky child-labor laws) ha ha
Here in California, I see plenty of people with huge families who don’t look like they can afford it, but hey, why worry if you’re getting “assistance”? (my family -like yours I’m sure- never had any assistance. )ha
The older ones help with the younger ones because the parents could not physically do it. I recall my grandmother, who was one of 13, saying the girls would sit behind each other in age-descending order and braid each others' hair. Often in these big families, the older children, especially if they are females, grow up and do not have any kids because they have "been there and done that" with their siblings.
Funny how, all of a sudden, a supposed tax burden is mentioned. I guess that taxes are only supposed to go to libs, victim groups, and illegals.
There is no overpopulation problem. It is a media campaign like so many others that are at root about controlling people like cattle.
“Flown over the country in a jet lately? We are so far from overpopulation it’s laughable.”
They’ve pushed more and more of the population into major cities. The small towns have stagnant economies which forces even more people out. People are easier to control when they are in deed restricted homes/townhomes/condos in major cities.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.